Startseite Assessment of atypical cells in detecting bladder cancer in female patients
Artikel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert Erfordert eine Authentifizierung

Assessment of atypical cells in detecting bladder cancer in female patients

  • Yan Zhao , Enhao Zhang , Yinling Wang , Jun Zheng , Danning Jin und Hong Luan EMAIL logo
Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 18. Juni 2025
Veröffentlichen auch Sie bei De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

Objectives

Atypical or malignant urothelial cells may be identified with a research parameter of atypical cells (Atyp.C) using a fully automated urine particle analyzer in routine urinalysis. This study aimed to determine whether Atyp.C can serve as an effective screening tool for female bladder cancer (BC) and to observe the impact of pyuria and bacteriuria on Atyp.C concentrations.

Methods

Patients were classified into six groups: primary BC, recurrent BC, post-treatment monitoring of BC, other urological tumors, pyuria and bacteriuria, and controls. Atyp.C concentrations were compared across these groups, and its diagnostic performance for BC or pyuria and bacteriuria was analyzed. Logistic regression determined whether Atyp.C was an independent risk factor for BC or pyuria and bacteriuria. Subsequently, key factors contributing to abnormal Atyp.C elevations were investigated.

Results

The median Atyp.C concentrations were significantly elevated in both primary (2.9/µL) and recurrent BC cases (4.0/µL) compared to patients with pyuria and bacteriuria (2.0/µL) and controls (1.7/µL) (p<0.01). Diagnostic performance of Atyp.C to detect primary female BC reached an area under curve of 0.818 when combined with age and urine conductivity. Multivariate analysis confirmed Atyp.C as an independent risk factor for BC in women. Falsely increased Atyp.C concentrations were caused by WBC clumps, clue cells covered by bacteria, and macrophages.

Conclusions

Atyp.C did not reach sufficient specificity for screening of BC in women with existing pyuria or bacteriuria. WBC clumps, macrophages and clue cells contributed to falsely positive Atyp.C counts.


Corresponding author: Hong Luan, Department of Laboratory Medicine, National Clinical Research Center for Laboratory Medicine, The First Hospital of China Medical University, No. 155, Nanjingbei Street, Heping District, Shenyang, Liaoning Province, 110001, P.R. China; and Research Unit of Medical Laboratory, Chinese Academy of Medical Science, Beijing, P.R. China, E-mail:
Yan Zhao and Enhao Zhang contributed equally to this work.

Funding source: CAMS Innovation Fund for Medical Sciences

Award Identifier / Grant number: 2019-I2M-5-027

  1. Research ethics: This study was reviewed and approved by the Ethics Committee of the First Hospital of China Medical University (Reference No. 2024–121).

  2. Informed consent: Not applicable.

  3. Author contributions: All authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this manuscript and approved its submission. Hong Luan and Yan Zhao designed and conceived this manuscript. Hong Luan, Yan Zhao and EnHhao Zhang collected the samples, analyzed the data, and wrote the draft. Yinling Wang, Jun Zheng, and Danning Jin critically revised the manuscript and contributed to the final draft. All authors have read and approved the final manuscript.

  4. Use of Large Language Models, AI and Machine Learning Tools: None declared.

  5. Conflict of interest: The authors state no conflict of interest.

  6. Research funding: This study was supported by grants from CAMS Innovation Fund for Medical Sciences (2019-I2M-5-027).

  7. Data availability: The raw data can be obtained on request from the corresponding author.

References

1. Bray, F, Laversanne, M, Sung, H, Ferlay, J, Siegel, RL, Soerjomataram, I, et al.. Global cancer statistics 2022: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin 2024;74:229–63. https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21834.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

2. Wojcik, EMKD, Rosenthal, DL. The Paris system for reporting urinary cytology, 2nd ed. Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing; 2022:1–4 pp.10.1007/978-3-030-88686-8Suche in Google Scholar

3. Yafi, FA, Brimo, F, Steinberg, J, Aprikian, AG, Tanguay, S, Kassouf, W. Prospective analysis of sensitivity and specificity of urinary cytology and other urinary biomarkers for bladder cancer. Urol Oncol 2015;33:66 e25–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urolonc.2014.06.008.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

4. Karaburun, MC, Ozkaya, MF, Erguder, BI, Suer, E. Investigation of atypical cell parameter in the surveillance of patients with NMIBC; initial outcomes of a single center prospective study. J Med Syst 2023;47:41. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10916-023-01929-0.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

5. Zhang, T, Zhu, J, Li, Z, Zhao, Y, Li, Y, Li, J, et al.. The UF-5000 Atyp.C parameter is an independent risk factor for bladder cancer. Sci Rep 2024;14:12659. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-63572-0.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

6. Ren, C, Wang, X, Yang, C, Li, S, Liu, S, Cao, H. Investigation of Atyp.C using UF-5000 flow cytometer in patients with a suspected diagnosis of urothelial carcinoma: a single-center study. Diagn Pathol 2020;15:77. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13000-020-00993-1.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

7. Wang, Y, Zheng, J, Liu, Y, Li, D, Jin, D, Luan, H. Atypical cells in urine sediment: a novel biomarker for early detection of bladder cancer. Clin Chem Lab Med 2025;63:399–409. https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm-2024-0650.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

8. Doshi, B, Athans, SR, Woloszynska, A. Biological differences underlying sex and gender disparities in bladder cancer: current synopsis and future directions. Oncogenesis 2023;12:44. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41389-023-00489-9.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

9. Cohn, JA, Vekhter, B, Lyttle, C, Steinberg, GD, Large, MC. Sex disparities in diagnosis of bladder cancer after initial presentation with hematuria: a nationwide claims-based investigation. Cancer 2014;120:555–61. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.28416.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

10. Pignot, G, Barthelemy, P, Borchiellini, D. Sex disparities in bladder cancer diagnosis and treatment. Cancers (Basel) 2024;16. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers16234100.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

11. Bonkat, G, Bartoletti, R, Bruyère, F, Cai, T, Geerlings, SE, Köves, B, et al.. EAU guidelines on urological infections [online]. Available from: https://uroweb.org/guidelines/urological-infections [limited update Apr 2024]Suche in Google Scholar

12. Foxman, B, Barlow, R, D’Arcy, H, Gillespie, B, Sobel, JD. Urinary tract infection: self reported incidence and associated costs. Ann Epidemiol 2000;10:509–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1047-2797(00)00072-7.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

13. Foxman, B. Urinary tract infection syndromes: occurrence, recurrence, bacteriology, risk factors, and disease burden. Infect Dis Clin North Am 2014;28:1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.idc.2013.09.003.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

14. Isberg, HK, Hedin, K, Melander, E, Mölstad, S, Beckman, A. Increased adherence to treatment guidelines in patients with urinary tract infection in primary care: a retrospective study. PLoS One 2019;14. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0214572.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

15. Fernández-García, S, Moreno, AM, Giner-Soriano, M, Morros, R, Ouchi, D, García-Sangenís, A, et al.. Urinary tract infections in men in primary care in catalonia, Spain. Antibiotics (Basel) 2023;12. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics12111611.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

16. Shukuya, K, Morita, Y, Hisasue, T, Ono, Y, Tomiyasu, S, Kurano, M, et al.. Comparison of the clinical performance of the Atyp.C parameter of the UF-5000 fully automated urine particle analyzer with that of microscopic urine sediment analysis. Pract Lab Med 2023;36:e00328. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plabm.2023.e00328.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

17. Aydin, O. Atypical cells parameter in Sysmex UN automated urine analyzer: feedback from the field. Diagn Pathol 2021;16:9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13000-021-01068-5.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

18. Llor, C, Moragas, A, Aguilar-Sanchez, M, Garcia-Sangenis, A, Monfa, R, Morros, R. Best methods for urine sample collection for diagnostic accuracy in women with urinary tract infection symptoms: a systematic review. Fam Pract 2023;40:176–82. https://doi.org/10.1093/fampra/cmac058.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

19. Barkan, GA, Wojcik, EM, Nayar, R, Savic-Prince, S, Quek, ML, Kurtycz, DF, et al.. The Paris System for reporting urinary cytology: the quest to develop a standardized terminology. Acta Cytol 2016;60:185–97. https://doi.org/10.1159/000446270.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

20. Mukaka, MM. Statistics corner: a guide to appropriate use of correlation coefficient in medical research. Malawi Med J 2012;24:69–71.Suche in Google Scholar

21. Zare, M, Vehreschild, M, Wagenlehner, F. Management of uncomplicated recurrent urinary tract infections. BJU Int 2022;129:668–78. https://doi.org/10.1111/bju.15630.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

22. Lazarus, JE, Gupta, K. Recurrent UTI in women-risk factors and management. Infect Dis Clin North Am 2024;38:325–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.idc.2024.03.010.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

23. Aydin, O. Atypical cells parameter in an automated urine analyzer: does it have a future? Anal Biochem 2020;600:113763. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ab.2020.113763.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

24. Oyaert, M, Speeckaert, M, Boelens, J, Delanghe, JR. Renal tubular epithelial cells add value in the diagnosis of upper urinary tract pathology. Clin Chem Lab Med 2020;58:597–604. https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm-2019-1068.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

25. Poloni, JAT, Rotta, LN. Urine sediment findings and the immune response to pathologies in fungal urinary tract infections caused by Candida spp. J Fungi (Basel) 2020;6. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof6040245.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central


Supplementary Material

This article contains supplementary material (https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm-2025-0268).


Received: 2025-03-06
Accepted: 2025-06-01
Published Online: 2025-06-18
Published in Print: 2025-09-25

© 2025 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Artikel in diesem Heft

  1. Frontmatter
  2. Editorial
  3. Quality indicators: an evolving target for laboratory medicine
  4. Reviews
  5. Regulating the future of laboratory medicine: European regulatory landscape of AI-driven medical device software in laboratory medicine
  6. The spectrum of nuclear patterns with stained metaphase chromosome plate: morphology nuances, immunological associations, and clinical relevance
  7. Opinion Papers
  8. Comprehensive assessment of medical laboratory performance: a 4D model of quality, economics, velocity, and productivity indicators
  9. Detecting cardiac injury: the next generation of high-sensitivity cardiac troponins improving diagnostic outcomes
  10. Perspectives
  11. Can Theranos resurrect from its ashes?
  12. Guidelines and Recommendations
  13. Australasian guideline for the performance of sweat chloride testing 3rd edition: to support cystic fibrosis screening, diagnosis and monitoring
  14. General Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine
  15. Recommendations for the integration of standardized quality indicators for glucose point-of-care testing
  16. A cost-effective assessment for the combination of indirect immunofluorescence and solid-phase assay in ANA-screening
  17. Assessment of measurement uncertainty of immunoassays and LC-MS/MS methods for serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D
  18. A novel immunoprecipitation-based targeted liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry analysis for accurate determination for copeptin in human serum
  19. Histamine metabolite to basal serum tryptase ratios in systemic mastocytosis and hereditary alpha tryptasemia using a validated LC-MS/MS approach
  20. Machine learning algorithms with body fluid parameters: an interpretable framework for malignant cell screening in cerebrospinal fluid
  21. Impact of analytical bias on machine learning models for sepsis prediction using laboratory data
  22. Immunochemical measurement of urinary free light chains and Bence Jones proteinuria
  23. Serum biomarkers as early indicators of outcomes in spontaneous subarachnoid hemorrhage
  24. High myoglobin plasma samples risk being reported as falsely low due to antigen excess – follow up after a 2-year period of using a mitigating procedure
  25. Candidate Reference Measurement Procedures and Materials
  26. Commutability evaluation of glycated albumin candidate EQA materials
  27. Reference Values and Biological Variations
  28. Health-related reference intervals for heavy metals in non-exposed young adults
  29. Hematology and Coagulation
  30. Practical handling of hemolytic, icteric and lipemic samples for coagulation testing in European laboratories. A collaborative survey from the European Organisation for External Quality Assurance Providers in Laboratory Medicine (EQALM)
  31. Cancer Diagnostics
  32. Assessment of atypical cells in detecting bladder cancer in female patients
  33. Cardiovascular Diseases
  34. False-positive cardiac troponin I values due to macrotroponin in healthy athletes after COVID-19
  35. Diabetes
  36. A comparison of current methods to measure antibodies in type 1 diabetes
  37. Letters to the Editor
  38. The neglected issue of pyridoxal- 5′ phosphate
  39. Error in prostate-specific antigen levels after prostate cancer treatment with radical prostatectomy
  40. Arivale is dead ‒ Hooke is alive
  41. A single dose of 20-mg of ostarine is detectable in hair
  42. Growing importance of vocabularies in medical laboratories
  43. Congress Abstracts
  44. 62nd National Congress of the Hungarian Society of Laboratory Medicine Szeged, Hungary, August 28–30, 2025
Heruntergeladen am 10.11.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/cclm-2025-0268/html?lang=de
Button zum nach oben scrollen