Home Serum or plasma? An old question looking for new answers
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Serum or plasma? An old question looking for new answers

  • Mario Plebani ORCID logo EMAIL logo , Giuseppe Banfi , Sergio Bernardini , Francesco Bondanini , Laura Conti , Romolo Dorizzi , Fulvio Enrico Ferrara , Rita Mancini and Tommaso Trenti
Published/Copyright: September 17, 2019

Abstract

Serum or plasma? An old question looking for new answers. There is a continual debate on what type of sample a clinical laboratory should use. While serum is still considered the gold standard and remains the required sample for some assays, laboratories must consider turn-around time, which is an important metric for laboratory performance and, more importantly, plays a critical role in patient care. In addition, a body of evidence emphasise the choice of plasma in order to prevent modifications of some analytes due to the coagulation process and related interferences. Advantages and disadvantages of serum and plasma are discussed on the basis of current literature and evidence. In addition, data are provided on the current utilisation of the samples (serum or plasma) in Italy and in other countries. Finally, a rationale for a possible switch from serum to plasma is provided.


Corresponding author: Prof. Mario Plebani, Dipartimento Strutturale Medicina di Laboratorio, Azienda Ospedale Università di Padova, Via Giustiniani, 2, 35128 Padova, Italy, Phone: 0498212792

Acknowledgments

Thanks to EDRA SpA for the editorial support for the manuscript.

  1. Author contributions: All the authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this submitted manuscript and approved submission.

  2. Research funding: None declared.

  3. Employment or leadership: None declared.

  4. Honorarium: None declared.

  5. Potential conflicts of interest: This document was produced with the non-conditional contribution of Becton Dickinson Italia SpA.

  6. Competing interests: The funding organisation(s) played no role in the study design; in the collection, analysis, and interpretation of data; in the writing of the report; or in the decision to submit the report for publication.

References

1. Lum G, Gambino SR. A comparison of serum versus heparinized plasma for routine chemistry tests. Am J Clin Pathol 1974;61:108–13.10.1093/ajcp/61.1.108Search in Google Scholar

2. Ladenson JH, Tsai LM, Michael JM, Kessler G, Joist JH. Serum versus heparinized plasma for eighteen common chemistry tests. Am J Clin Pathol 1974;62:545–52.10.1093/ajcp/62.4.545Search in Google Scholar

3. Doumas BT, Hause LL, Simuncak DM, Breitenfeld D. Differences between values for plasma and serum in tests performed in the Ektachem 700 XR Analyzer, and evaluation of “plasma separator tubes (PST)”. Clin Chem 1989;35:151–3.10.1093/clinchem/35.1.151Search in Google Scholar

4. Ebert SC, Leroy M, Darcey B. Comparison of aminoglycoside concentrations measured in plasma versus serum. Ther Drug Monit 1989;11:44–6.10.1097/00007691-198901000-00009Search in Google Scholar

5. Racine JF, Caya S, Delvin EE. Suitability of lithium heparinate plasma for the measurement of selected analytes on Beckman Synchron CX analyzers. Clin Biochem 1996;29:493–5.10.1016/0009-9120(96)00065-3Search in Google Scholar

6. Donnelly JG, Soldin SJ, Nealon DA, Hicks JM. Is heparinized plasma suitable for use in routine biochemistry? Pediatr Pathol Lab Med 1995;15:555–9.10.3109/15513819509026991Search in Google Scholar PubMed

7. Soffiati G, Giavarina D. Stat laboratory testing: integration or autonomy? Clin Chem Lab Med 2010;48:927–30.10.1515/CCLM.2010.187Search in Google Scholar PubMed

8. Dolci A, Giavarina D, Pasqualetti S, Panteghini M. Total laboratory automation: do stat tests still matter? Clin Biochem 2017;50:605–11.10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2017.04.002Search in Google Scholar PubMed

9. Tate J, Ward G. Interferences in immunoassay. Clin Biochem Rev 2004;25:105–20.Search in Google Scholar

10. Kazmierczak SC, Sekhon H, Richards C. False-positive troponin I measured with the Abbott AxSYM attributed to fibrin interference. Int J Cardiol 2005;101:27–31.10.1016/j.ijcard.2004.03.008Search in Google Scholar PubMed

11. Lippi G, Giavarina D, Gelati M, Salvagno GL. Reference range of hemolysis index in serum and lithium heparin plasma measured with two analytical platforms in a population of unselected outpatients. Clin Chim Acta 2014;429:143–6.10.1016/j.cca.2013.12.010Search in Google Scholar PubMed

12. Pasqualetti S, Szőke D, Panteghini M. Heparinate but not serum tubes are susceptible to hemolysis by pneumatic tube transportation. Clin Chem Lab Med 2016;54:785–9.10.1515/cclm-2015-0751Search in Google Scholar PubMed

13. Mohamadkhani A, Poustchi H. Repository of human blood derivative biospecimens in biobank: technical implications. Middle East J Dig Dis 2015;7:61–8.Search in Google Scholar

14. Ishikawa M, Maekawa K, Saito K, Senoo Y, Urata M, Murayama M, et al. Plasma and serum lipidomics of healthy white adults shows characteristic profiles by subjects’ gender and age. PLoS One 2014;9:e91806.10.1371/journal.pone.0091806Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

15. Lippi G, Salvagno GL, Danese E, Lima-Oliveira G, Brocco G, Guidi GC. Inversion of lithium heparin gel tubes after centrifugation is a significant source of bias in clinical chemistry testing. Clin Chim Acta 2014;436:183–7.10.1016/j.cca.2014.05.028Search in Google Scholar PubMed

16. Padoan A, Zaninotto M, Piva E, Sciacovelli L, Aita A, TasinatoA, et al. Quality of plasma samples and BD Vacutainer Barricor tubes: effects of centrifugation. Clin Chim Acta 2018;483:271–4.10.1016/j.cca.2018.05.018Search in Google Scholar PubMed

17. Grzych G, Pekar JD, Maboudou P. Better glucose stability in serum than in plasma samples after 12-h stay at room temperature. Diabetes Technol Ther 2019;21:413–4.10.1089/dia.2019.0061Search in Google Scholar PubMed

18. Balboni F, Burbui S, Lippi G. Glucose variation in centrifuged serum and lithium-heparin gel tubes stored for up to 96hours at room temperature or 4°C. Scand J Clin Lab Invest 2018;78: 546–50.10.1080/00365513.2018.1517221Search in Google Scholar PubMed

19. Grzych G, Pekar JD, Maboudou P, Lippi G. Leucocytosis-induced plasma hyperkalaemia in samples conveyed by a pneumatic transport system: tips and tricks. Br J Haematol 2019;186:e71–3.10.1111/bjh.15908Search in Google Scholar PubMed

20. Bowen RA, Remaley AT. Interferences from blood collection tube components on clinical chemistry assays. Biochem Med (Zagreb) 2014;24:31–44.10.11613/BM.2014.006Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

21. Demonte D, Pucci M, Salvagno GL, Lippi G. Can citrate plasma be used in exceptional circumstances for some clinical chemistry and immunochemistry tests? Diagnosis (Berl) 2019 May 4. doi: 10.1515/dx-2019-0027 [Epub ahead of print].10.1515/dx-2019-0027Search in Google Scholar PubMed

22. Daves M, Lippi G, Cosio G, Raffagnini A, Peer E, Dangella A, et al. An unusual case of a primary blood collection tube with floating separator gel. J Clin Lab Anal 2012;26:246–7.10.1002/jcla.21512Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

23. Cervellin G, Aloe R, Lippi G. A case of factitious hyponatremia and hypokalemia due to the presence of fibrin gel in serum. Diagnosis 2015;2:73–4.10.1515/dx-2014-0067Search in Google Scholar PubMed

24. Lippi G, Giavarina D, Montagnana M. National survey on the pre-analytical variability in a representative cohort of Italian laboratories. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2006;44:1491–4.10.1515/CCLM.2006.274Search in Google Scholar PubMed

25. Lippi G, Giavarina D. Indagine conoscitiva su matrice biologica e gestione della fase preanalitica nei laboratoriclinici. Biochim Clin 2017;41:142–7.Search in Google Scholar

26. Woltering EA, Hilton RS, Zolfoghary CM, Thomson J, Zietz S, Go VL, et al. Validation of serum versus plasma measurements of chromogranin A levels in patients with carcinoid tumours: lack of correlation between absolute chromogranin A levels and symptom frequency. Pancreas 2006;33:250–4.10.1097/01.mpa.0000235302.73615.d4Search in Google Scholar PubMed

27. Giavarina D, Fortunato A, Barzon E, Church S, Bérubé J, Green S, et al. Evaluation of BD Vacutainer PST II tubes for a wide range of immunoassays. Clin Chem Lab Med 2009;47:237–41.10.1515/CCLM.2009.034Search in Google Scholar PubMed

28. Denery JR, Nunes AA, Dickerson TJ. Characterization of differences between blood sample matrices in untargeted metabolomics. Anal Chem 2011;83:1040–7.10.1021/ac102806pSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

29. Gonzalez-Covarrubias V, Dane A, Hankemeier T, Vreeken RJ. The influence of citrate, EDTA, and heparin anticoagulants to human plasma LC–MS lipidomic profiling. Metabolomics 2013;9:337–48.10.1007/s11306-012-0450-4Search in Google Scholar

30. Khadka M, Todor A, Maner-Smith KM, Colucci JK, Tran V, Gaul DA, et al. The effect of anticoagulants, temperature, and time on the human plasma metabolome and lipidome from healthy donors as determined by liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry. Biomolecules 2019;9. pii: E200.10.3390/biom9050200Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

31. Lee J-E, Kim SY, Shin S-Y. Effect of repeated freezing and thawing on biomarker stability in plasma and serum samples. Osong Public Health Res Perspect 2015;6:357–62.10.1016/j.phrp.2015.11.005Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

32. Zhou Z, Chen Y, He J, Xu J, Zhang R, Mao Y, et al. Systematic evaluation of serum and plasma collection on the endogenous metabolome. Bioanalysis 2017;9:239–50.10.4155/bio-2016-0078Search in Google Scholar PubMed

33. ISO 15189:2012 Medical laboratories: particular requirements for quality and competence. Geneva: International Organisation for Standardisation, 2012.Search in Google Scholar

34. Da Rin G. Technological solutions in favour or using plasma in routines. 47th National Congress SIBioC, Firenze, 2015.Search in Google Scholar

35. Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI). Measurement procedure comparison and bias estimates using patient samples, approved guideline, 3rd ed. CLSI guideline EP09c. Wayne, PA: CLSI, 2018.Search in Google Scholar

36. Plebani M. Harmonization in laboratory medicine: more than clinical chemistry? Clin Chem Lab Med 2018;56:1579–86.10.1515/cclm-2017-0865Search in Google Scholar PubMed

37. Plebani M, Sciacovelli L, Aita A. Quality indicators for the total testing process. Clin Lab Med 2017;37:187–205.10.1016/j.cll.2016.09.015Search in Google Scholar PubMed


Article note

This paper is a translation, slightly modified, of the paper published in Biochimica Clinica: Plebani M, Banfi G, Bernardini S, Bondanini F, Conti L. Dorizzi R. et al. Siero o plasma? Un quesito non nuovo che attende risposte nuove. Biochim Clin 2019;43:178–86.


Received: 2019-07-15
Accepted: 2019-08-22
Published Online: 2019-09-17
Published in Print: 2020-01-28

©2019 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Frontmatter
  2. Editorial
  3. Towards a personalized assessment of vitamin D status
  4. Reviews
  5. Circulating tumor DNA and their added value in molecular oncology
  6. Telomere length determinants in childhood
  7. Opinion Papers
  8. Serum or plasma? An old question looking for new answers
  9. Evaluating sample stability in the clinical laboratory with the help of linear and non-linear regression analysis
  10. General Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine
  11. Simultaneous measurement of 25(OH)-vitamin D and 24,25(OH)2-vitamin D to define cut-offs for CYP24A1 mutation and vitamin D deficiency in a population of 1200 young subjects
  12. How well do Croatian laboratories adhere to national recommendations for laboratory diagnostics of chronic kidney disease (CKD)?
  13. Underfilling of vacuum blood collection tubes leads to increased lactate dehydrogenase activity in serum and heparin plasma samples
  14. Calcium state estimation by total calcium: the evidence to end the never-ending story
  15. The use of faecal immunochemical testing in the decision-making process for the endoscopic investigation of iron deficiency anaemia
  16. Measurement uncertainty of β-lactam antibiotics results: estimation and clinical impact on therapeutic drug monitoring
  17. Practical approach to method verification in plasma and validation in cerebrospinal fluid under accreditation using a flexible scope in molecular virology: setting up the HIV, HBV and HCV Aptima™ Quant Dx assays
  18. Plasma neurofilament light chain is associated with mortality after spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage
  19. Comparison of the diagnostic performance of two automated urine sediment analyzers with manual phase-contrast microscopy
  20. Development and validation of LC-MS/MS methods to measure tobramycin and lincomycin in plasma, microdialysis fluid and urine: application to a pilot pharmacokinetic research study
  21. Reference Values and Biological Variations
  22. Cord blood S100B: reference ranges and interest for early identification of newborns with brain injury
  23. Hematology and Coagulation
  24. Validation and standardization of the ETP-based activated protein C resistance test for the clinical investigation of steroid contraceptives in women: an unmet clinical and regulatory need
  25. Cancer Diagnostics
  26. Next-generation sequencing for tumor mutation quantification using liquid biopsies
  27. Cardiovascular Diseases
  28. Evolution of the slopes of ST2 and galectin-3 during marathon and ultratrail running compared to a control group
  29. Letters to the Editor
  30. Biological variation of two serum markers for preeclampsia prediction
  31. Daily monitoring of a control material with a concentration near the limit of detection improves the measurement accuracy of highly sensitive troponin assays
  32. Are patients adequately informed about procedures for 24-h urine collection?
  33. Interferences in free thyroxine concentration using the Roche analytical platform: improvement of the third generation?
  34. Procedures for the diagnosis of macro-follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) in a patient with high serum FSH concentrations
  35. False-positive result of immunochromatographic (IC) strip test for the diagnosis of α-thalassemia in samples with autoantibodies
  36. Sample dilution for soluble interleukin-2 receptor α measurement: comparison of two different matrices
  37. The growing problem of predatory publishing: a case report
  38. Cerebrospinal fluid lactate levels according to the site of puncture
Downloaded on 1.11.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/cclm-2019-0719/html
Scroll to top button