Home Measurement uncertainty of β-lactam antibiotics results: estimation and clinical impact on therapeutic drug monitoring
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Measurement uncertainty of β-lactam antibiotics results: estimation and clinical impact on therapeutic drug monitoring

  • Raúl Rigo-Bonnin EMAIL logo , Francesca Canalias , Cristina El Haj , María Cristina González-Hernando , Noelia Díaz-Troyano , Laura Soldevila , Eva Benavent and Oscar Murillo
Published/Copyright: August 30, 2019

Abstract

Background

Despite that measurement uncertainty data should facilitate an appropriate interpretation of measured values, there are actually few reported by clinical laboratories. We aimed to estimate the measurement uncertainty of some β-lactam antibiotics (β-LA), and to evaluate the impact of reporting the measurement uncertainty on clinicians’ decisions while guiding antibiotic therapy.

Methods

Measurement uncertainty of β-LA (aztreonam [ATM], cefepime [FEP], ceftazidime [CAZ], and piperacillin [PIP]) values, obtained by an UHPLC-MS/MS based-method, was estimated using the top-down approach called the single laboratory validation approach (EUROLAB guidelines). Main uncertainty sources considered were related to calibrators’ assigned values, the intermediate precision, and the bias. As part of an institutional program, patients with osteoarticular infections are treated with β-LA in continuous infusion and monitored to assure values at least 4 times over the minimal inhibitory concentration (4×MIC). We retrospectively evaluated the impact of two scenarios of laboratory reports on clinicians’ expected decisions while monitoring the treatment: reports containing only the β-LA values, or including the β-LA coverage intervals (β-LA values and their expanded measurement uncertainties).

Results

The relative expanded uncertainties for ATM, FEP, CAZ and PIP were lower than 26.7%, 26.4%, 28.8%, and 25.5%, respectively. Reporting the measurement uncertainty, we identified that clinicians may modify their decision especially in cases where 4×MIC values were within the β-LA coverage intervals.

Conclusions

This study provides a simple method to estimate the measurement uncertainty of β-LA values that can be easily applied in clinical laboratories. Further studies should confirm the potential impact of reporting measurement uncertainty on clinicians’ decision-making while guiding antibiotic therapy.

  1. Author contribution: All the authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this submitted manuscript and approved submission.

  2. Research funding: None declared.

  3. Employment or leadership: None declared.

  4. Honorarium: None declared.

  5. Competing interests: The funding organization(s) played no role in the study design; in the collection, analysis, and interpretation of data; in the writing of the report; or in the decision to submit the report for publication.

References

1. Milinković N, Ignjatović S, Šumarac Z, Majkić-Singh N. Uncertainty of measurement in laboratory medicine. J Med Biochem 2018;37:1–10.10.2478/jomb-2018-0002Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

2. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. Expression of measurement uncertainty in laboratory medicine; approved guideline. Document EP29-A. Wayne, PA: CLSI, 2012.Search in Google Scholar

3. Joint Committee for Guides in Metrology. Evaluation of measurement data. Guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement (GUM). Guide JCGM 100:2008. Sèvres, France: JCGM, 2008. https://www.bipm.org/utils/common/documents/jcgm/JCGM_100_2008_E.pdf. Accessed May 2019.Search in Google Scholar

4. Eurachem. Co-operation on international traceability in analytical chemistry. Quantifying uncertainty in analytical measurement. 3rd ed. Eurochem/CITAC Guide CG4. Torino, Italy: Eurachem, 2012. https://www.eurachem.org/images/stories/Guides/pdf/QUAM2012_P1.pdf. Accessed May 2019.Search in Google Scholar

5. Kallner A. Estimation of uncertainty in measurements in the clinical laboratory. Clin Chem Lab Med 2013;51:2249–51.10.1515/cclm-2013-0749Search in Google Scholar PubMed

6. European Federation of National Associations of Measurement, Testing and Analytical Laboratories. Measurement uncertainty revisited: alternative approaches to uncertainty evaluation. Technical report No. 1/2007. Brussels, Belgium: EUROLAB, 2007. Available at: http://www.eurolab.org/documents/1-2007.pdf. Accessed May 2019.Search in Google Scholar

7. European Federation of National Associations of Measurement, Testing and Analytical Laboratories. Guide to the evaluation of measurement uncertainty for quantitative test results. Technical report No. 1/2006. Brussels, Belgium: EUROLAB, 2006. Available at: http://www.eurolab.org/documents/EL_11_01_06_387%20Technical%20report%20-%20Guide_Measurement_uncertainty.pdf. Accessed May 2019.Search in Google Scholar

8. Plebani P, Sciacovelli L, Bernardi D, Aita A, Antonelli G, Padoan A. What information on measurement uncertainty should be communicated to clinicians, and how? Clin Biochem 2018;57:18–22.10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2018.01.017Search in Google Scholar PubMed

9. Padoan A, Sciacovelli L, Aita A, Antonellia G, Plebani M. Measurement uncertainty in laboratory reports: a tool for improving the interpretation of test results. Clin Biochem 2018;57:41–7.10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2018.03.009Search in Google Scholar PubMed

10. International Organization for Standardization. Medical laboratories. Requirements for quality and competence. Document ISO 15189. Geneva, Switzerland: ISO, 2012.Search in Google Scholar

11. Scott-Wittenborn N, Schneider JS. Assumptions of quality medicine: the role of uncertainty. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2017;143:753–4.10.1001/jamaoto.2017.0257Search in Google Scholar PubMed

12. Joint Committee for Guides in Metrology. International vocabulary of metrology. Basic and general concepts and associated terms (VIM). 3rd ed. Guide JCGM 200. Sèvres, France: JCGM, 2012. Available at: https://www.bipm.org/utils/common/documents/jcgm/JCGM_200_2012.pdf. Accessed May 2019.Search in Google Scholar

13. Roberts JA, Norris R, Paterson DL, Martin JH. Therapeutic drug monitoring of antimicrobials. Br J Clin Pharmacol 2012;73:27–36.10.1111/j.1365-2125.2011.04080.xSearch in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

14. Korbila IP, Tansarli GS, Karageorgopoulos DE, Vardakas KZ, Falagas ME. Extended or continuous versus short-term intravenous infusion of cephalosporins: a meta-analysis. Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther 2013;11:585–95.10.1586/eri.13.44Search in Google Scholar PubMed

15. MacVane SH, Kuti JL, Nicolau DP. Prolonging β-lactam infusion: a review of the rationale and evidence, and guidance for implementation. Int J Antimicrob Agents 2014;43:105–13.10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2013.10.021Search in Google Scholar PubMed

16. Huttner A, Harbarth S, Hope WW, Lipman J, Roberts JA. Therapeutic drug monitoring of the β-lactam antibiotics: what is the evidence and which patients should we be using it for? J Antimicrob Chemother 2015;70:3178–83.10.1093/jac/dkv201Search in Google Scholar PubMed

17. Grupper M, Kuti JL, Nicolau DP. Continuous and prolonged intravenous β-lactam dosing: implications for the clinical laboratory. Clin Microbiol Rev 2016;29:759–72.10.1128/CMR.00022-16Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

18. Ribera A, Soldevila L, Rigo-Bonnin R, Tubau F, Padullés A, Gómez-Junyent J, et al. Beta-lactams in continuous infusion for Gram-negative bacilli osteoarticular infections: an easy method for clinical use. Infection 2018;46:239–44.10.1007/s15010-018-1116-6Search in Google Scholar PubMed

19. Gaudiano MC, Di Maggio A, Antoniella E, Valvo L, Bertocchi P, Manna L, et al. An LC method for the simultaneous screening of some common counterfeit and sub-standard antibiotics validation and uncertainty estimation. J Pharm Biomed Anal 2008;48:303–9.10.1016/j.jpba.2007.12.032Search in Google Scholar PubMed

20. Lourenço FR. Simple estimation of uncertainty in the quantification of cefazolin by HPLC and bioassay. J Chromatogr Sep Tech 2012;3:1000153.10.4172/2157-7064.1000153Search in Google Scholar

21. Rigo-Bonnin R, Gomez-Junyent J, García-Tejada L, Benavent E, Soldevila L, Tubau F, et al. Measurement of ceftolozane and tazobactam concentrations in plasma by UHPLC-MS/MS. Clinical application in the management of difficult-to-treat osteoarticular infections. Clin Chim Acta 2019;488:50–60.10.1016/j.cca.2018.10.034Search in Google Scholar PubMed

22. Rigo-Bonnin R, Ribera A, Arbiol-Roca A, Cobo-Sacristán S, Padullés A, Murillo Ò, et al. Development and validation of a measurement procedure based on ultra-high performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry for simultaneous measurement of β-lactam antibiotic concentration in human plasma. Clin Chim Acta 2017;468:215–24.10.1016/j.cca.2017.03.009Search in Google Scholar PubMed

23. International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry, International Federation of Clinical Chemistry. Properties and units in the laboratory sciences. Part X. Properties and units in general clinical chemistry. Pure Appl Chem 2000;72:747–972.10.1351/pac200072050747Search in Google Scholar

24. Fuentes-Arderiu X. Clinical sample stability and measurement uncertainty. Clin Chem Lab Med 2014;52:e37–8.10.1515/cclm-2013-0721Search in Google Scholar PubMed

25. European Medicines Agency. Guideline on bioanalytical method validation. Guide EMEA/CHMP/EWP/192217/2009. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: EMA, 2011. Available at: http://www.ema.europa.eu/docs/en_GB/document_library/Scientific_guideline/2011/08/WC500109686.pdf. Accessed May 2019.Search in Google Scholar

26. Magnusson B, Ellison SR. Treatment of uncorrected measurement bias in uncertainty estimation for chemical measurements. Anal Bioanal Chem 2008;390:201–13.10.1007/s00216-007-1693-1Search in Google Scholar PubMed

27. Joint Committee for Guides in Metrology. JCTLM database: laboratory medicine and in vitro diagnostics. Available at: https://www.bipm.org/jctlm/. Accessed May 2019.Search in Google Scholar

28. Craig W. Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic parameters: rationale for antibacterial dosing of mice and men. Clin Infect Dis 1998;26:1–10.10.1086/516284Search in Google Scholar PubMed

29. Mouton JW, Vinks AA. Continuous infusion of beta-lactams. Curr Opin Crit Care 2007;13:598–606.10.1097/MCC.0b013e3282e2a98fSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

30. Nordic Innovation Center. Handbook for calculation of measurement uncertainty in environmental laboratories, NORDTEST Technical report 537–Edition 3.1, 2012. Available at: http://www.nordtest.info/index.php/technical-reports/item/handbook-for-calculation-of-measurement-uncertainty-in-environmental-laboratories-nt-tr-537-edition-3.html. Accessed May 2019.Search in Google Scholar

31. Padoan A, Antonelli G, Aita A, Sciacovelli L, Plebani M. An approach for estimating measurement uncertainty in medical laboratories using data from long-term quality control and external quality assessment schemes. Clin Chem Lab Med 2017;55:1696–701.10.1515/cclm-2016-0896Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Received: 2019-06-18
Accepted: 2019-08-01
Published Online: 2019-08-30
Published in Print: 2020-01-28

©2019 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Frontmatter
  2. Editorial
  3. Towards a personalized assessment of vitamin D status
  4. Reviews
  5. Circulating tumor DNA and their added value in molecular oncology
  6. Telomere length determinants in childhood
  7. Opinion Papers
  8. Serum or plasma? An old question looking for new answers
  9. Evaluating sample stability in the clinical laboratory with the help of linear and non-linear regression analysis
  10. General Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine
  11. Simultaneous measurement of 25(OH)-vitamin D and 24,25(OH)2-vitamin D to define cut-offs for CYP24A1 mutation and vitamin D deficiency in a population of 1200 young subjects
  12. How well do Croatian laboratories adhere to national recommendations for laboratory diagnostics of chronic kidney disease (CKD)?
  13. Underfilling of vacuum blood collection tubes leads to increased lactate dehydrogenase activity in serum and heparin plasma samples
  14. Calcium state estimation by total calcium: the evidence to end the never-ending story
  15. The use of faecal immunochemical testing in the decision-making process for the endoscopic investigation of iron deficiency anaemia
  16. Measurement uncertainty of β-lactam antibiotics results: estimation and clinical impact on therapeutic drug monitoring
  17. Practical approach to method verification in plasma and validation in cerebrospinal fluid under accreditation using a flexible scope in molecular virology: setting up the HIV, HBV and HCV Aptima™ Quant Dx assays
  18. Plasma neurofilament light chain is associated with mortality after spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage
  19. Comparison of the diagnostic performance of two automated urine sediment analyzers with manual phase-contrast microscopy
  20. Development and validation of LC-MS/MS methods to measure tobramycin and lincomycin in plasma, microdialysis fluid and urine: application to a pilot pharmacokinetic research study
  21. Reference Values and Biological Variations
  22. Cord blood S100B: reference ranges and interest for early identification of newborns with brain injury
  23. Hematology and Coagulation
  24. Validation and standardization of the ETP-based activated protein C resistance test for the clinical investigation of steroid contraceptives in women: an unmet clinical and regulatory need
  25. Cancer Diagnostics
  26. Next-generation sequencing for tumor mutation quantification using liquid biopsies
  27. Cardiovascular Diseases
  28. Evolution of the slopes of ST2 and galectin-3 during marathon and ultratrail running compared to a control group
  29. Letters to the Editor
  30. Biological variation of two serum markers for preeclampsia prediction
  31. Daily monitoring of a control material with a concentration near the limit of detection improves the measurement accuracy of highly sensitive troponin assays
  32. Are patients adequately informed about procedures for 24-h urine collection?
  33. Interferences in free thyroxine concentration using the Roche analytical platform: improvement of the third generation?
  34. Procedures for the diagnosis of macro-follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) in a patient with high serum FSH concentrations
  35. False-positive result of immunochromatographic (IC) strip test for the diagnosis of α-thalassemia in samples with autoantibodies
  36. Sample dilution for soluble interleukin-2 receptor α measurement: comparison of two different matrices
  37. The growing problem of predatory publishing: a case report
  38. Cerebrospinal fluid lactate levels according to the site of puncture
Downloaded on 1.11.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/cclm-2019-0621/html
Scroll to top button