Startseite Optimization and validation of moving average quality control procedures using bias detection curves and moving average validation charts
Artikel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert Erfordert eine Authentifizierung

Optimization and validation of moving average quality control procedures using bias detection curves and moving average validation charts

  • Huub H. van Rossum EMAIL logo und Hans Kemperman
Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 15. August 2016
Veröffentlichen auch Sie bei De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

Background:

To date, no practical tools are available to obtain optimal settings for moving average (MA) as a continuous analytical quality control instrument. Also, there is no knowledge of the true bias detection properties of applied MA. We describe the use of bias detection curves for MA optimization and MA validation charts for validation of MA.

Methods:

MA optimization was performed on a data set of previously obtained consecutive assay results. Bias introduction and MA bias detection were simulated for multiple MA procedures (combination of truncation limits, calculation algorithms and control limits) and performed for various biases. Bias detection curves were generated by plotting the median number of test results needed for bias detection against the simulated introduced bias. In MA validation charts the minimum, median, and maximum numbers of assay results required for MA bias detection are shown for various bias. Their use was demonstrated for sodium, potassium, and albumin.

Results:

Bias detection curves allowed optimization of MA settings by graphical comparison of bias detection properties of multiple MA. The optimal MA was selected based on the bias detection characteristics obtained. MA validation charts were generated for selected optimal MA and provided insight into the range of results required for MA bias detection.

Conclusions:

Bias detection curves and MA validation charts are useful tools for optimization and validation of MA procedures.

  1. Author contributions: All the authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this submitted manuscript and approved submission.

  2. Research funding: None declared.

  3. Employment or leadership: H.H. van Rossum is registered as inventor on a filed patent describing the content of the manuscript. H.H. van Rossum is owner and director of Huvaros BV company that holds an exclusive license of the intellectual property described.

  4. Honorarium: None declared.

  5. Competing interests: The funding organization(s) played no role in the study design; in the collection, analysis, and interpretation of data; in the writing of the report; or in the decision to submit the report for publication.

References

1. Hoffmann RG, Waid ME. The “Average of Normals” method of quality control. Am J Clin Pathol 1965;43:134–41.10.1093/ajcp/43.2.134Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

2. Bull BS, Elashoff RM, Heilbron DC, Couperus J. A study of various estimators for the derivation of quality control procedures from patient erythrocyte indices. Am J Clin Pathol 1974;61:473–81.10.1093/ajcp/61.4.473Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

3. Cembrowski GS, Chandler EP, Westgard JO. Assessment of “Average of Normals” quality control procedures and guidelines for implementation. Am J Clin Pathol 1984;81:492–9.10.1093/ajcp/81.4.492Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

4. Ye JJ, Ingels SC, Parvin CA. Performance evaluation and planning for patient-based quality control procedures. Am J Clin Pathol 2000;113:240–8.10.1309/V5BT-BAWP-1WBF-14W6Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

5. Hinge M, Lund ED, Brandslund I, Plesner T, Madsen JS. Patient pools and the use of “patient means” are valuable tools in quality control illustrated by a bone-specific alkaline phosphatase assay. Clin Chem Lab Med 2016;54:403–6.10.1515/cclm-2015-0308Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

6. Fleming JK, Katayev A. Changing the paradigm of laboratory quality control through implementation of real-time test results monitoring: for patients by patients. Clin Biochem 2015;48:508–13.10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2014.12.016Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

7. van Rossum HH, Kemperman H. A method for optimization and validation of moving average as continuous analytical quality control instrument demonstrated for creatinine. Clin Chim Acta 2016;457:1–7.10.1016/j.cca.2016.03.008Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

8. Kazmierczak SC. Laboratory quality control: using patient data to assess analytical performance. Clin Chem Lab Med 2003;41: 617–27.10.1515/CCLM.2003.093Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

9. Carey RN. Patient population controls. Clin Lab Med 2013;33: 139–46.10.1016/j.cll.2012.11.002Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

10. Cembrowski GS. Thoughts on quality-control systems: a laboratorian’s perspective. Clin Chem 1997;43:886–92.10.1093/clinchem/43.5.886Suche in Google Scholar

11. Ricos C, Alvarez V, Cava F, Garcia-Lario JV, Hernandez A, Jimenez CV, et al. Current databases on biological variation: pros, cons and progress. Scand J Clin Lab Inv 1999;59:491–500.10.1080/00365519950185229Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

12. Schoenmakers CH, Naus AJ, Vermeer HJ, van Loon D, Steen G. Practical application of sigma metrics QC procedures in clinical chemistry. Clin Chem Lab Med 2011;49:1837–43.10.1515/cclm.2011.249Suche in Google Scholar

13. Westgard JO, Groth T. Power functions for statistical control rules. Clin Chem 1979;25:863–9.10.1093/clinchem/25.6.863Suche in Google Scholar

Received: 2016-4-4
Accepted: 2016-7-1
Published Online: 2016-8-15
Published in Print: 2017-2-1

©2017 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Artikel in diesem Heft

  1. Frontmatter
  2. Editorial
  3. Commutable samples with assigned target concentrations may help us harmonise general chemistry results
  4. Reviews
  5. Performance of point-of-care HbA1c test devices: implications for use in clinical practice – a systematic review and meta-analysis
  6. Cardiac troponins and mortality in type 1 and 2 myocardial infarction
  7. Opinion Paper
  8. Criteria for assigning laboratory measurands to models for analytical performance specifications defined in the 1st EFLM Strategic Conference
  9. Genetics and Molecular Diagnostics
  10. External quality assessment for human papillomavirus 16/18 DNA detection and genotyping in Shanghai, China
  11. General Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine
  12. Analytical performance of 17 general chemistry analytes across countries and across manufacturers in the INPUtS project of EQA organizers in Italy, the Netherlands, Portugal, United Kingdom and Spain
  13. Commutability of proficiency testing material containing tobramycin: a study within the framework of the Dutch Calibration 2.000 project
  14. Optimization and validation of moving average quality control procedures using bias detection curves and moving average validation charts
  15. Extending laboratory automation to the wards: effect of an innovative pneumatic tube system on diagnostic samples and transport time
  16. Smart management of sample dilution using an artificial neural network to achieve streamlined processes and saving resources: the automated nephelometric testing of serum free light chain as case study
  17. An integrated proteomic and peptidomic assessment of the normal human urinome
  18. An alternative inhibition method for determining cross-reactive allergens
  19. Validation of a new assay for α-synuclein detection in cerebrospinal fluid
  20. Reference Values and Biological Variations
  21. Intra-individual variation of plasma trimethylamine-N-oxide (TMAO), betaine and choline over 1 year
  22. Cancer Diagnostics
  23. Predictive performance of TPA testing for recurrent disease during follow-up after curative intent surgery for colorectal carcinoma
  24. Cardiovascular Diseases
  25. Mid-regional pro-adrenomedullin (MR-proADM) and mid-regional pro-atrial natriuretic peptide (MR-proANP) in severe aortic valve stenosis: association with outcome after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI)
  26. Association between apolipoprotein E polymorphisms and premature coronary artery disease: a meta-analysis
  27. Urinary orosomucoid: a novel, early biomarker of sepsis with promising diagnostic performance
  28. Letters to the Editor
  29. CT or MRI
  30. Reply to: CT or MRI in the diagnosis of right lower quadrant abdominal pain?
  31. Quantification of daratumumab in the serum protein electrophoresis
  32. Response to: Interference of daratumumab on the serum protein electrophoresis
  33. Glycated albumin: correlation to HbA1c and preliminary reference interval evaluation
  34. Using “big data” to describe the effect of seasonal variation in thyroid-stimulating hormone
  35. IgE multiple myeloma: a new case report
  36. Therapeutic decision-making process in the intensive care unit: role of biological point-of-care testing
  37. How can we evaluate differences between serial measurements on the same sample? A new approach based on within-subject biological variation
Heruntergeladen am 30.9.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/cclm-2016-0270/html
Button zum nach oben scrollen