Home Smart management of sample dilution using an artificial neural network to achieve streamlined processes and saving resources: the automated nephelometric testing of serum free light chain as case study
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Smart management of sample dilution using an artificial neural network to achieve streamlined processes and saving resources: the automated nephelometric testing of serum free light chain as case study

  • Cristiano Ialongo EMAIL logo , Massimo Pieri and Sergio Bernardini
Published/Copyright: July 12, 2016

Abstract

Background:

Saving resources is a paramount issue for the modern laboratory, and new trainable as well as smart technologies can be used to allow the automated instrumentation to manage samples more efficiently in order to achieve streamlined processes. In this regard the serum free light chain (sFLC) testing represents an interesting challenge, as it usually causes using a number of assays before achieving an acceptable result within the analytical range.

Methods:

An artificial neural network based on the multi-layer perceptron (MLP-ANN) was used to infer the starting dilution status of sFLC samples based on the information available through the laboratory information system (LIS). After the learning phase, the MLP-ANN simulation was applied to the nephelometric testing routinely performed in our laboratory on a BN ProSpec® System analyzer (Siemens Helathcare) using the N Latex FLC kit.

Results:

The MLP-ANN reduced the serum kappa free light chain (κ-FLC) and serum lambda free light chain (λ-FLC) wasted tests by 69.4% and 70.8% with respect to the naïve stepwise dilution scheme used by the automated analyzer, and by 64.9% and 66.9% compared to a “rational” dilution scheme based on a 4-step dilution.

Conclusions:

Although it was restricted to follow-up samples, the MLP-ANN showed good predictive performance, which alongside the possibility to implement it in any automated system, made it a suitable solution for achieving streamlined laboratory processes and saving resources.


Corresponding author: Dr. med. Cristiano Ialongo, Department of Physiology and Pharmacology, Sapienza University of Rome, Viale Oxford 81, 00135 Rome (RM), Italy, Phone: +3906-2090-2151, Fax: +3906-2090-2357
aCristiano Ialongo and Massimo Pieri contributed equally to this work.
  1. Author contributions: All the authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this submitted manuscript and approved submission.

  2. Research funding: None declared.

  3. Employment or leadership: None declared.

  4. Honorarium: None declared.

  5. Competing interests: The funding organization(s) played no role in the study design; in the collection, analysis, and interpretation of data; in the writing of the report; or in the decision to submit the report for publication.

References

1. Mussap M. An alternative perspective on how laboratory medicine can contribute to solve the health care crisis: a model to save costs by acquiring excellence in diagnostic systems. Clin Chim Acta 2014;427:202–4.10.1016/j.cca.2013.09.034Search in Google Scholar

2. Plebani M. Clinical laboratories: production industry or medical services? Clin Chem Lab Med 2015;53:995–1004.10.1515/cclm-2014-1007Search in Google Scholar

3. Streitberg GS, Angel L, Sikaris KA, Bwititi PT. Automation in clinical biochemistry: core, peripheral, STAT, and specialist laboratories in Australia. J Lab Autom 2012;17:387–94.10.1177/2211068212448865Search in Google Scholar

4. Zaninotto M, Plebani M. The “hospital central laboratory”: automation, integration and clinical usefulness. Clin Chem Lab Med 2010;48:911–7.10.1515/CCLM.2010.192Search in Google Scholar

5. Sarkozi L, Simson E, Ramanathan L. The effects of total laboratory automation on the management of a clinical chemistry laboratory. Retrospective analysis of 36 years. Clin Chim Acta 2003;329:89–94.10.1016/S0009-8981(03)00020-2Search in Google Scholar

6. Plebani M. Errors in laboratory medicine and patient safety: the road ahead. Clin Chem Lab Med 2007;45:700–7.10.1515/CCLM.2007.170Search in Google Scholar PubMed

7. Bhole MV, Sadler R, Ramasamy K. Serum-free light-chain assay: clinical utility and limitations. Ann Clin Biochem 2014;51:528–42.10.1177/0004563213518758Search in Google Scholar PubMed

8. Jenner E. Serum free light chains in clinical laboratory diagnostics. Clin Chim Acta 2014;427:15–20.10.1016/j.cca.2013.08.018Search in Google Scholar PubMed

9. Pretorius CJ, Klingberg S, Tate J, Wilgen U, Ungerer JP. Evaluation of the N Latex FLC free light chain assay on the Siemens BN analyser: precision, agreement, linearity and variation between reagent lots. Ann Clin Biochem 2012;49:450–5.10.1258/acb.2012.011264Search in Google Scholar PubMed

10. IBM. SPSS MLP Algorithms. Available at: http://www-01.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/SSLVMB_21.0.0/com.ibm.spss.statistics.help/alg_mlp.htm. Search in Google Scholar

11. Garson GD. Interpreting neural network connection weights. Artif Intell Exp 1991;6:46–51.Search in Google Scholar

12. MacMillan D. Calculating cost savings in utilization management. Clin Chim Acta 2014;427:123–6.10.1016/j.cca.2013.09.024Search in Google Scholar PubMed

13. Ialongo C, Pieri M, Bernardini S. Artificial neural network for total laboratory automation to improve the management of sample dilution: smart automation for clinical laboratory timeliness. J Lab Autom 2016. pii: 2211068216636635.10.1177/2211068216636635Search in Google Scholar

14. Tate J, Bazeley S, Sykes S, Mollee P. Quantitative serum free light chain assay – analytical issues. Clin Biochem Rev 2009;30:131–40.Search in Google Scholar

15. Abadie JM, van Hoeven KH, Wells JM. Are renal reference intervals required when screening for plasma cell disorders with serum free light chains and serum protein electrophoresis? Am J Clin Pathol 2009;131:166–71.10.1309/AJCPR2M4EUYNHLGMSearch in Google Scholar

16. Kotsiantis SB, Zaharakis ID, Pintelas PE. Machine learning: a review of classification and combining techniques. Artif Intell Rev 2006;26:156–90.10.1007/s10462-007-9052-3Search in Google Scholar

17. Widrow B, Kamenetsky M. Statistical efficiency of adaptive algorithms. Neural Netw 2003;16:735–44.10.1016/S0893-6080(03)00126-6Search in Google Scholar


Supplemental Material:

The online version of this article (DOI: 10.1515/cclm-2016-0263) offers supplementary material, available to authorized users.


Received: 2016-4-1
Accepted: 2016-6-17
Published Online: 2016-7-12
Published in Print: 2017-2-1

©2017 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Frontmatter
  2. Editorial
  3. Commutable samples with assigned target concentrations may help us harmonise general chemistry results
  4. Reviews
  5. Performance of point-of-care HbA1c test devices: implications for use in clinical practice – a systematic review and meta-analysis
  6. Cardiac troponins and mortality in type 1 and 2 myocardial infarction
  7. Opinion Paper
  8. Criteria for assigning laboratory measurands to models for analytical performance specifications defined in the 1st EFLM Strategic Conference
  9. Genetics and Molecular Diagnostics
  10. External quality assessment for human papillomavirus 16/18 DNA detection and genotyping in Shanghai, China
  11. General Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine
  12. Analytical performance of 17 general chemistry analytes across countries and across manufacturers in the INPUtS project of EQA organizers in Italy, the Netherlands, Portugal, United Kingdom and Spain
  13. Commutability of proficiency testing material containing tobramycin: a study within the framework of the Dutch Calibration 2.000 project
  14. Optimization and validation of moving average quality control procedures using bias detection curves and moving average validation charts
  15. Extending laboratory automation to the wards: effect of an innovative pneumatic tube system on diagnostic samples and transport time
  16. Smart management of sample dilution using an artificial neural network to achieve streamlined processes and saving resources: the automated nephelometric testing of serum free light chain as case study
  17. An integrated proteomic and peptidomic assessment of the normal human urinome
  18. An alternative inhibition method for determining cross-reactive allergens
  19. Validation of a new assay for α-synuclein detection in cerebrospinal fluid
  20. Reference Values and Biological Variations
  21. Intra-individual variation of plasma trimethylamine-N-oxide (TMAO), betaine and choline over 1 year
  22. Cancer Diagnostics
  23. Predictive performance of TPA testing for recurrent disease during follow-up after curative intent surgery for colorectal carcinoma
  24. Cardiovascular Diseases
  25. Mid-regional pro-adrenomedullin (MR-proADM) and mid-regional pro-atrial natriuretic peptide (MR-proANP) in severe aortic valve stenosis: association with outcome after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI)
  26. Association between apolipoprotein E polymorphisms and premature coronary artery disease: a meta-analysis
  27. Urinary orosomucoid: a novel, early biomarker of sepsis with promising diagnostic performance
  28. Letters to the Editor
  29. CT or MRI
  30. Reply to: CT or MRI in the diagnosis of right lower quadrant abdominal pain?
  31. Quantification of daratumumab in the serum protein electrophoresis
  32. Response to: Interference of daratumumab on the serum protein electrophoresis
  33. Glycated albumin: correlation to HbA1c and preliminary reference interval evaluation
  34. Using “big data” to describe the effect of seasonal variation in thyroid-stimulating hormone
  35. IgE multiple myeloma: a new case report
  36. Therapeutic decision-making process in the intensive care unit: role of biological point-of-care testing
  37. How can we evaluate differences between serial measurements on the same sample? A new approach based on within-subject biological variation
Downloaded on 17.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/cclm-2016-0263/html
Scroll to top button