Startseite Analytical and clinical performance of the new Fujirebio 25-OH vitamin D assay, a comparison with liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) and three other automated assays
Artikel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert Erfordert eine Authentifizierung

Analytical and clinical performance of the new Fujirebio 25-OH vitamin D assay, a comparison with liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) and three other automated assays

  • Lanja Saleh EMAIL logo , Daniel Mueller und Arnold von Eckardstein
Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 10. Oktober 2015
Veröffentlichen auch Sie bei De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

Background: We evaluated the analytical and clinical performance of the new Lumipulse®G 25-OH vitamin D assay from Fujirebio, and compared it to a liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) method and three other commercial automated assays.

Methods: Total 25 hydroxy vitamin D (25(OH)D) levels were measured in 100 selected serum samples from our routine analysis with Fujirebio 25(OH)D assay. The results were compared with those obtained with LC-MS/MS and three other automated 25(OH)D assays (Abbott, Beckman, and Roche). The accuracy of each assay tested was evaluated against a Labquality reference serum panel for 25(OH)D (Ref!25OHD; University of Ghent).

Results: Intra- and inter-day imprecision of the Fujirebio 25(OH)D assay was <5%. Fujirebio 25(OH)D assay showed the highest correlation among the assays tested with the LC-MS/MS method (R=0.986). The mean relative bias obtained was –15.6% (Fujirebio), –12.7% (Beckman), –2.1% (Abbott) and 9.7% (Roche) as compared to LC-MS/MS. Comparison with the Labquality certified reference serum panel yielded a mean bias of –11.8% (Fujirebio), –14.1% (Beckman), 4.4% (Abbott) and 3.2% (Roche), respectively. Compared to LC-MS/MS, the sensitivity of different methods in detecting vitamin D insufficiency (<50 nmol/L) varied from 100% for the Fujirebio assay to 72.7% for Roche, and specificity ranged from 94.4% for Roche to 87.6% for Beckman.

Conclusions: The Lumipulse G 25-OH vitamin D assay from Fujirebio demonstrated a good correlation with LC-MS/MS and some immunoassays. The performance of the assay is well-suited for routine 25(OH)D measurement in clinical serum samples. A correction for the observed negative bias vs. LC-MS/MS could be considered.


Corresponding author: Dr. Lanja Saleh, Institute of Clinical Chemistry, University Hospital of Zurich and University of Zurich, Raemistr. 100, 8091 Zurich, Switzerland, Phone: +41-(0)44-255 2293, Fax: +41-(0)44-255 4590, E-mail:

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to Abbott, Beckman Coulter, Fujirebio and Roche for having provided their reagents for this study free of charge. We thank Tanja Wiedemann, Anuschka Beccato, Ursula Gutteck, and Beate Jaworek from Institute of clinical chemistry for their excellent technical assistance.

Author contributions: All the authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this submitted manuscript and approved submission.

Research funding: We thank Fujirebio Europe N.V for financial sponsorship of this study. 25-Hydroxy vitamin D assay kits from Roche, Beckmann, and Abbott were provided by the respective companies without cost and the involvement of the companies in the study design, analysis and interpretation of data and writing of the manuscript.

Employment or leadership: None declared.

Honorarium: None declared.

Competing interests: The funding organization(s) played no role in the study design; in the collection, analysis, and interpretation of data; in the writing of the report; or in the decision to submit the report for publication.

References

1. Holick MF. Vitamin D deficiency: a worldwide problem with health consequences. Am J Clin Nutr 2008;87:10805–65.10.1093/ajcn/87.4.1080SSuche in Google Scholar PubMed

2. Holick MF. Vitamin D status: measurement, interpretation and clinical application. Ann Epidemiol 2009;19:73–8.10.1016/j.annepidem.2007.12.001Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

3. Ross AC, Manson JE, Abrams SA, Aloia JF, Brannon PM, Clinton SK, et al. The 2011 report on dietary reference intakes for calcium and vitamin D from the Institute of Medicine: what clinicians need to know. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2011;96:53–8.10.1210/jc.2010-2704Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

4. Dawson-Hughes B, Mithal A, Bonjour JP, Boonen S, Burckhardt P, Fuleihan GE, et al. IOF position statement: vitamin D recommendations for older adults. Osteoporos Int 2010;21:1151–4.10.1007/s00198-010-1285-3Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

5. Holick MF, Binkley NC, Bischoff-Ferrari HA, Gordon CM, Hanley DA, Heaney RP, et al. Evaluation, treatment, and prevention of vitamin D deficiency: an Endocrine Society clinical practice guideline. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2011;96:1911–30.10.1210/jc.2011-0385Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

6. Bischoff-Ferrari HA, Dawson-Hughes B, Stöcklin E, Sidelnikov E, Willett WC, Edel JO, et al. Oral supplementation with 25(OH)D3 versus vitamin D3: effects on 25(OH)D levels, lower extremity function, blood pressure, and markers of innate immunity. J Bone Miner Res 2012;27:160–9.10.1002/jbmr.551Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

7. Souberbielle JC, Body JJ, Lappe JM, Plebani M, Shoenfeld Y, Wang TJ, et al. Vitamin D and musculoskeletal health, cardiovascular disease, autoimmunity and cancer: recommendations for clinical practice. Autoimmun Rev 2010;9:709–15.10.1016/j.autrev.2010.06.009Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

8. Pittas AG, Sun Q, Manson JE, Dawson-Hughes B, Hu FB. Plasma 25-hydroxy vitamin D concentration and risk of incident type 2 diabetes in women. Diabetes Care 2010;33:2021–3.10.2337/dc10-0790Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

9. Holmes EW, Garbincius J, McKenna KM. Analytical variability among methods for the measurement of 25-hydroxyvitamin D: still adding to the noise. Am J Clin Pathol 2013;140:550–60.10.1309/AJCPU2SKW1TFKSWYSuche in Google Scholar PubMed

10. Fraser WD, Milan AM. Vitamin D assays: past and present debates, difficulties, and developments. Calcif Tissue Int 2013;92:118–27.10.1007/s00223-012-9693-3Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

11. Farrell CJ, Martin S, McWhinney B, Straub I, Williams P, Herrmann M. State-of-the-art vitamin D assays: a comparison of automated immunoassays with liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry methods. Clin Chem 2012;58:531–42.10.1373/clinchem.2011.172155Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

12. Farrell CJ, Soldo J, Williams P, Herrmann M. 25-Hydroxyvitmain D testing: challenging the performance of current automated immunoassays. Clin Chem Lab Med 2012;50:1953–63.10.1515/cclm-2012-0522Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

13. Schöttker B, Jansen EH, Haug U, Schomburg L, Köhrle J, Brenner H. Standardization of misleading immunoassay based 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels with liquid chromatography tandem-mass spectrometry in a large cohort study. PLoS One 2012;7:e48774.10.1371/journal.pone.0048774Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

14. Janssen MJ, Wielders JP, Bekker CC, Boesten LS, Buijs MM, Heijboer AC, et al. Multicenter comparison study of current methods to measure 25-hydroxyvitamin D in serum. Steroids 2012;77:1366–72.10.1016/j.steroids.2012.07.013Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

15. Moon HW, Cho JH, Hur M, Song J, Oh GY, Park CM, et al. Comparison of four current 25-hydroxyvitamin D assays. Clin Biochem 2012;45:326–30.10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2011.12.025Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

16. Depreter B, Heijboer AC, Langlois MR. Accuracy of three automated 25-hydroxyvitamin D assays in hemodialysis patients. Clin Chim Acta 2013;415:255–60.10.1016/j.cca.2012.10.056Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

17. Cavalier E, Lukas P, Crine Y, Peeters S, Carlisi A, Le Goff C, et al. Evaluation of automated immunoassays for 25(OH)-vitamin D determination in different critical populations before and after standardization of the assays. Clin Chim Acta 2014;431:60–5.10.1016/j.cca.2014.01.026Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

18. Omi K, Ando T, Sakyu T, Shirakawa T, Uchida Y, Oka A, et al. Noncompetitive immunoassay detection system for haptens on the basis of antimetatype antibodies. Clin Chem 2015;61:627–35.10.1373/clinchem.2014.232728Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

19. Passing H, Bablok. A new biometrical procedure for testing the equality of measurements from two different analytical methods. Application of linear regression procedures for method comparison studies in clinical chemistry, Part I. J Clin Chem Clin Biochem 1983;21:709–20.Suche in Google Scholar

20. Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986;1:307–10.Suche in Google Scholar

21. Stöckl D, Sluss PM, Linda M. Thienpont. Specifications for trueness and precision of a reference measurement system for serum/plasma 25-hydroxyvitamin D analysis. Clinica Chimica Acta 2009;408:8–13.10.1016/j.cca.2009.06.027Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

22. Heijboer AC, Blankenstein MA, Kema IP, Buijs MM. Accuracy of 6 routine 25-hydroxyvitamin D assays: influence of vitamin D binding protein concentration. Clin Chem 2012;58:543–8.10.1373/clinchem.2011.176545Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

23. Cavalier E, Carlisi A, Bekaert AC, Rousselle O, Chapelle JP, Souberbielle JC. Analytical evaluation of the new Abbott Architect 25-OH vitamin D assay. Clin Biochem 2012;45: 505–8.10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2012.01.021Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

24. Kobold U. Approaches to measurement of vitamin D concentrations – mass spectrometry. Scand J Clin Lab Invest Suppl 2012;243:54–9.Suche in Google Scholar

25. Van Den Ouweland JM, Beijers AM, Van Daal H, Elisen MG, Steen G, Wielders PM. Evaluation of 3-epi-25-hydroxyvitamin D3 cross-reactivity in the Roche Elecsys Vitamin D Total protein binding assay. Clin Chem Lab Med 2013;52:373–80.10.1515/cclm-2013-0702Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

26. Bailey D, Veljkoviic K, Yazdanpanah M, Adeli K. Analytical measurement and clinical relevance of vitamin D3 C3-epimer. Clin Biochem 2013;46;190–6.10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2012.10.037Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

27. Bedner M, Lippa KA, Tai SS. An assessment of 25-hydroxyvitamin D measurements in comparability studies conducted by the Vitamin D Metabolites Quality Assurance Program. Clin Chim Acta 2013;15:426:6–11.10.1016/j.cca.2013.08.012Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

28. Stepman HC, Vanderroost A, Van Uytfanghe K, Thienpont LM. Candidate reference measurement procedures for serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D3and 25-hydroxyvitamin D2 by using isotope dilution liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrophotometry. Clin Chem 2011;57:441–8.10.1373/clinchem.2010.152553Suche in Google Scholar PubMed


Supplemental Material:

The online version of this article (DOI: 10.1515/cclm-2015-0427) offers supplementary material, available to authorized users.


Received: 2015-5-6
Accepted: 2015-8-26
Published Online: 2015-10-10
Published in Print: 2016-4-1

©2016 by De Gruyter

Artikel in diesem Heft

  1. Frontmatter
  2. Editorial
  3. Macroprolactin: searching for a needle in a haystack?
  4. Review
  5. Laboratory medicine in the new healthcare environment
  6. Opinion Paper
  7. Developing GRADE outcome-based recommendations about diagnostic tests: a key role in laboratory medicine policies
  8. EFLM Survey
  9. Accreditation process in European countries – an EFLM survey
  10. Genetics and Molecular Diagnostics
  11. HB Puerta del Sol [HBA1:c.148A>C], HB Valdecilla [HBA2:c.3G>T], HB Gran Vía [HBA2:c.98T>G], HB Macarena [HBA2:c.358C>T] and HB El Retiro [HBA2:c.364_366dupGTG]: description of five new hemoglobinopathies
  12. General Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine
  13. A candidate reference method using ICP-MS for sweat chloride quantification
  14. Quantification of hemoglobin A1c by off-line HPLC separation and liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry: a modification of the IFCC reference measurement procedure
  15. Comparison between B·R·A·H·M·S PCT direct, a new sensitive point-of-care testing device for rapid quantification of procalcitonin in emergency department patients and established reference methods – a prospective multinational trial
  16. Evaluation of a hand-held blood gas analyzer for rapid determination of blood gases, electrolytes and metabolites in intensive care setting
  17. Use of a faecal immunochemical test for haemoglobin can aid in the investigation of patients with lower abdominal symptoms
  18. A possible cause of the variable detectability of macroprolactin by different immunoassay systems
  19. A multicenter comparison of whole blood vitamin B6 assays
  20. Analytical and clinical performance of the new Fujirebio 25-OH vitamin D assay, a comparison with liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) and three other automated assays
  21. Development and validation of a 2nd tier test for identification of purine nucleoside phosphorylase deficiency patients during expanded newborn screening by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry
  22. A cross-sectional study of biomarkers of exposure and effect in smokers and moist snuff consumers
  23. Reference Values and Biological Variations
  24. Pediatric reference value distributions and covariate-stratified reference intervals for 29 endocrine and special chemistry biomarkers on the Beckman Coulter Immunoassay Systems: a CALIPER study of healthy community children
  25. Development of reference intervals for serum alkaline phosphatase among adults in Southern China traced to the new IFCC reference measurement procedure
  26. Birth season predicts the values of red blood cell distribution width (RDW) in adulthood
  27. Cardiovascular Diseases
  28. Cardiovascular risk stratification in hemodialysis patients in the era of highly sensitive troponins: should we choose between hs-troponin I and hs-troponin T?
  29. A standardised FACS assay based on native, receptor transfected cells for the clinical diagnosis and monitoring of β1-adrenergic receptor autoantibodies in human heart disease
  30. Infectious Diseases
  31. The diagnostic value of serum fucosylated fetuin A in hepatitis B virus-related liver diseases
  32. Letters to the Editor
  33. Discriminant indices for distinguishing thalassemia and iron deficiency in patients with microcytic anemia
  34. Discriminant indices for distinguishing thalassemia and iron deficiency in patients with microcytic anemia: a reply
  35. STORE (Sample Tracking: Organization, Refrigeration and Expansion): a project in a clinical laboratory perspective
  36. Control materials for immunochromatographic strip used for α-thalassemia screening
  37. Comparison of a 10- vs. 15-min centrifugation time for chemical and immunochemical assays and impact on turnaround time in a hospital laboratory
  38. Pre-analytical phase in cryoglobulin (CRG) detection: an alternative method for sample transport
  39. The efficacy of an internet-based e-learning system using the CellaVision Competency Software for continuing professional development
  40. Clinical examinations after the Fukushima disaster: a case report of Soma General Hospital
  41. Non-fasting plasma glucose concentration in blood donors
  42. Analytical evaluation of a second generation assay for chromogranin A; a dual-site study
  43. UBE3A, c.1347_1348delGA: a mutation in question
Heruntergeladen am 9.9.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/cclm-2015-0427/pdf
Button zum nach oben scrollen