Startseite Medizin Effective deep learning classification for kidney stone using axial computed tomography (CT) images
Artikel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert Erfordert eine Authentifizierung

Effective deep learning classification for kidney stone using axial computed tomography (CT) images

  • Özlem Sabuncu ORCID logo EMAIL logo , Bülent Bilgehan ORCID logo , Enver Kneebone und Omid Mirzaei
Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 3. Mai 2023

Abstract

Introduction

Stone formation in the kidneys is a common disease, and the high rate of recurrence and morbidity of the disease worries all patients with kidney stones. There are many imaging options for diagnosing and managing kidney stone disease, and CT imaging is the preferred method.

Objectives

Radiologists need to manually analyse large numbers of CT slices to diagnose kidney stones, and this process is laborious and time-consuming. This study used deep automated learning (DL) algorithms to analyse kidney stones. The primary purpose of this study is to classify kidney stones accurately from CT scans using deep learning algorithms.

Methods

The Inception-V3 model was selected as a reference in this study. Pre-trained with other CNN architectures were applied to a recorded dataset of abdominal CT scans of patients with kidney stones labelled by a radiologist. The minibatch size has been modified to 7, and the initial learning rate was 0.0085.

Results

The performance of the eight models has been analysed with 8209 CT images recorded at the hospital for the first time. The training and test phases were processed with limited authentic recorded CT images. The outcome result of the test shows that the Inception-V3 model has a test accuracy of 98.52 % using CT images in detecting kidney stones.

Conclusions

The observation is that the Inception-V3 model is successful in detecting kidney stones of small size. The performance of the Inception-V3 Model is at a high level and can be used for clinical applications. The research helps the radiologist identify kidney stones with less computational cost and disregards the need for many experts for such applications.


Corresponding author: Özlem Sabuncu, Department of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Near East University, Nicosia, Mersin, Türkiye, E-mail:

  1. Research funding: Not applicable.

  2. Author contributions: All authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this manuscript and approved its submission.

  3. Competing interests: Authors state no conflict of interest.

  4. Informed consent: Informed consent was obtained from all individuals included in this study.

  5. Ethical approval: The local Institutional Review Board approved the study.

References

1. Meyers, AM, Naicker, S. Nephrolithiasis (part 1): epidemiology, causes and pathogenesis of recurrent nephrolithiasis. South Afr Med J 2021;111:930–3. https://doi.org/10.7196/samj.2021.v111i10.15988.Suche in Google Scholar

2. Wigner, P, Grębowski, R, Bijak, M, Szemraj, J, Saluk-Bijak, J. The molecular aspect of nephrolithiasis development. Cells 2021;10:1926. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells10081926.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

3. Asoudeh, F, Talebi, S, Jayedi, A, Marx, W, Najafi, MT, Mohammadi, H. Associations of total protein or animal protein intake and animal protein sources with risk of kidney stones: a systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis. Adv Nutr 2022;13:821–32. https://doi.org/10.1093/advances/nmac013.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

4. Geraghty, R, Abdi, A, Somani, B, Cook, P, Roderick, P. Does chronic hyperglycaemia increase the risk of kidney stone disease? Results from a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ Open 2020;10:e032094. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-032094.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

5. Lovegrove, CE, Geraghty, RM, Yang, B, Brain, E, Howles, S, Turney, B, et al.. Natural history of small asymptomatic kidney and residual stones over a long-term follow-up: systematic review over 25 years. BJU Int 2021;129:442–56. https://doi.org/10.1111/bju.15522.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

6. Caroli, A, Remuzzi, A, Lerman, LO. Basic principles and new advances in kidney imaging. Kidney Int 2021;100:1001–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.kint.2021.04.032.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

7. Chang, HC, Raskolnikov, D, Dai, JC, Holt, SK, Sorensen, MD, Sternberg, K, et al.. National imaging trends in nephrolithiasis—does renal ultrasound in the emergency department pave the way for computerised tomography? Urol Pract 2021;8:82–7. https://doi.org/10.1097/upj.0000000000000148.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

8. Palko, J. Developing prediction models for kidney stone disease. New York: Union College; 2021.Suche in Google Scholar

9. Ali, A, Suria, B, Sohu, S, Chandio, MA, Dilawar, S, Memon, MA. To determine the outcome of extracorporporeal shock waves lithotripsy for high density renal stone on non-contrast computed tomography. Prof Med J 2020;27:403–6. https://doi.org/10.29309/tpmj/2020.27.02.4265.Suche in Google Scholar

10. Sung, JM, Jefferson, FA, Tapiero, S, Patel, RM, Owyong, M, Xie, L, et al.. Evaluation of a diuresis enhanced non-contrast computed tomography for kidney stones protocol to maximise collecting system distention. J Endourol 2020;34:255–61. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2019.0719.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

11. Yan, DD, Zhao, LL, Song, XW, Zang, XH, Yang, LC. Automated detection of clinical depression based on convolution neural network model. Biomed Eng Biomedizinische Technik 2022;67:131–42. https://doi.org/10.1515/bmt-2021-0232.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

12. Saba, L, Biswas, M, Kuppili, V, Godia, EC, Suri, HS, Edla, DR, et al.. The present and future of deep learning in radiology. Eur J Radiol 2019;114:14–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2019.02.038.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

13. Pacal, I, Karaboga, D, Basturk, A, Akay, B, Nalbantoglu, U. A comprehensive review of deep learning in colon cancer. Comput Biol Med 2020;126:104003. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compbiomed.2020.104003.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

14. Ozdemir, MA, Degirmenci, M, Izci, E, Akan, A. EEG-based emotion recognition with deep convolutional neural networks. Biomed Eng Biomedizinische Technik 2021;66:43–57. https://doi.org/10.1515/bmt-2019-0306.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

15. Mazurowski, MA, Buda, M, Saha, A, Bashir, MR. Deep learning in radiology: an overview of the concepts and a survey of the state of the art with a focus on MRI. J Magn Reson Imag 2019;49:939–54. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.26534.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

16. Keles, A, Keles, MB, Keles, A. COV19-CNNet and COV19-ResNet: diagnostic inference Engines for early detection of COVID-19. Cogn Comput 2021:1–11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12559-020-09795-5.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

17. Zhang, YD, Satapathy, SC, Zhang, X, Wang, SH. Covid-19 diagnosis via DenseNet and optimisation of transfer learning setting. Cognitive Computation 2021:1–17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12559-020-09776-8.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

18. Nalini, MK, Radhika, KR. Comparative analysis of deep network models through transfer learning. In: 2020 fourth international conference on I-SMAC (IoT in social, mobile, analytics and cloud) (I-SMAC). IEEE; 2020:1007–12 pp.10.1109/I-SMAC49090.2020.9243469Suche in Google Scholar

19. Al-Timemy, AH, Ghaeb, NH, Mosa, ZM, Escudero, J. Deep transfer learning for improved detection of keratoconus using corneal topographic maps. Cogn Comput 2021;14:1627–42. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12559-021-09880-3.Suche in Google Scholar

20. Geng, L, Shan, H, Xiao, Z, Wang, W, Wei, M. Voice pathology detection and classification from speech signals and EGG signals based on a multimodal fusion method. Biomed Eng Biomedizinische Technik 2021;66:613–25. https://doi.org/10.1515/bmt-2021-0112.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

21. Szegedy, C, Vanhoucke, V, Ioffe, S, Shlens, J, Wojna, Z. Rethinking the inception architecture for computer vision. In: Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition; 2016:2818–26 pp.10.1109/CVPR.2016.308Suche in Google Scholar

22. Szegedy, C, Ioffe, S, Vanhoucke, V, Alemi, AA. Inception-v4, inception-resnet and the impact of residual connections on learning. In: Thirty-first AAAI conference on artificial intelligence; 2017.10.1609/aaai.v31i1.11231Suche in Google Scholar

23. Chollet, F. Xception: deep learning with depthwise separable convolutions. In: Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition; 2017:1251–8 pp.10.1109/CVPR.2017.195Suche in Google Scholar

24. Zoph, B, Vasudevan, V, Shlens, J, Le, QV. Learning transferable architectures for scalable image recognition. In: Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition; 2018: 8697–710 pp.10.1109/CVPR.2018.00907Suche in Google Scholar

25. Huang, G, Liu, Z, Van Der Maaten, L, Weinberger, KQ. Densely connected convolutional networks. In: Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition; 2017:4700–8 pp.10.1109/CVPR.2017.243Suche in Google Scholar

26. Chollet, F, et al.. Keras [Internet]. GitHub; 2015. Available from: https://keras.io/api/applications/.Suche in Google Scholar

27. Lu, WY, Ming, Y. Face detection based on Viola-Jones algorithm applying composite features. In: 2019 International conference on robots & intelligent system (ICRIS). IEEE; 2019:82–5 pp.10.1109/ICRIS.2019.00029Suche in Google Scholar

28. Hu, J, Shen, L, Sun, G. Squeeze-and-excitation networks. In: Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition; 2018:7132–41 pp.10.1109/CVPR.2018.00745Suche in Google Scholar

29. Hu, Y, Wen, G, Luo, M, Dai, D, Ma, J, Yu, Z. Competitive inner-imaging squeeze and excitation for residual network; 2018. arXiv preprint arXiv:1807.08920.Suche in Google Scholar

30. Rasool, M, Ismail, NA, Boulila, W, Ammar, A, Samma, H, Yafooz, WM, et al.. A hybrid deep learning model for brain tumour classification. Entropy 2022;24:799. https://doi.org/10.3390/e24060799.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

31. Mao, YJ, Lim, HJ, Ni, M, Yan, WH, Wong, DWC, Cheung, JCW. Breast tumour classification using ultrasound elastography with machine learning: a systematic scoping review. Cancers 2022;14:367. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers14020367.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

32. Khan, E, Rehman, MZU, Ahmed, F, Alfouzan, FA, Alzahrani, NM, Ahmad, J. Chest X-ray classification for the detection of COVID-19 using deep learning techniques. Sensors 2022;22:1211. https://doi.org/10.3390/s22031211.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

33. Baygin, M, Yaman, O, Barua, PD, Dogan, S, Tuncer, T, Acharya, UR. Exemplar Darknet19 feature generation technique for automated kidney stone detection with coronal CT images. Artif Intell Med 2022;127:102274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artmed.2022.102274.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

34. Elton, DC, Turkbey, EB, Pickhardt, PJ, Summers, RM. A deep learning system for automated kidney stone detection and volumetric segmentation on noncontrast CT scans. Med Phys 2022;49:2545–54. https://doi.org/10.1002/mp.15518.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

35. Manoj, B, Mohan, N, Kumar, S. Automated detection of kidney stone using deep learning models. In: 2022 2nd International conference on intelligent technologies (CONIT). IEEE; 2022:1–5 pp.Suche in Google Scholar

36. Caglayan, A, Horsanali, MO, Kocadurdu, K, Ismailoglu, E, Guneyli, S. Deep learning model-assisted detection of kidney stones on computed tomography. Int Braz J Urol 2022;48:830–9. https://doi.org/10.1590/s1677-5538.ibju.2022.0132.Suche in Google Scholar

37. Lakshmi, MJ, Nagaraja Rao, S. Brain tumor magnetic resonance image classification: a deep learning approach. Soft Comput 2022;26:6245–53. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-022-07163-z.Suche in Google Scholar

38. Zhang, X, Lee, VC, Rong, J, Lee, JC, Liu, F. Deep convolutional neural networks in thyroid disease detection: a multi-classification comparison by ultrasonography and computed tomography. Comput Methods Progr Biomed 2022;220:106823. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmpb.2022.106823.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

39. He, G, Ping, A, Wang, X, Zhu, Y. Alzheimer’s disease diagnosis model based on three-dimensional full convolutional DenseNet. In: 2019 10th International conference on information technology in medicine and education (ITME). IEEE; 2019:13–7 pp.10.1109/ITME.2019.00014Suche in Google Scholar

40. Polat, Ö. Detection of covid-19 from chest CT images using xception architecture: a deep transfer learning based approach. Sakarya Univ J Sci 2021;25:800–10. https://doi.org/10.16984/saufenbilder.903886.Suche in Google Scholar

41. Zhang, G, Lin, L, Wang, J. Lung nodule classification in CT images using 3D DenseNet. J Phys: Conf Ser 2021;1827:012155.10.1088/1742-6596/1827/1/012155Suche in Google Scholar

42. Dong, N, Zhao, L, Wu, CH, Chang, JF. Inception v3 based cervical cell classification combined with artificially extracted features. Appl Soft Comput 2020;93:106311. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2020.106311.Suche in Google Scholar

43. Deng, J, Dong, W, Socher, R, Li, LJ, Li, K, Fei-Fei, L. Imagenet: a large-scale hierarchical image database. In: 2009 IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition. IEEE; 2009:248–55 pp.10.1109/CVPR.2009.5206848Suche in Google Scholar

Received: 2022-04-08
Accepted: 2023-04-11
Published Online: 2023-05-03
Published in Print: 2023-10-26

© 2023 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Heruntergeladen am 31.12.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/bmt-2022-0142/html
Button zum nach oben scrollen