Home De- and recellularized urethral reconstruction with autologous buccal mucosal cells implanted in an ovine animal model
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

De- and recellularized urethral reconstruction with autologous buccal mucosal cells implanted in an ovine animal model

  • Joakim Håkansson ORCID logo , Lachmi Jenndahl , Stina Simonsson , Martin E. Johansson , Karin Larsson , Raimund Strehl and Teresa Olsen Ekerhult EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: April 3, 2023

Abstract

Objectives

Patients with urethral stricture due to any type of trauma, hypospadias or gender dysphoria suffer immensely from impaired capacity to urinate and are in need of a new functional urethra. Tissue engineering with decellularization of a donated organ recellularized with cells from the recipient patient has emerged as a promising alternative of advanced therapy medicinal products. The aim of this pilot study was to develop an ovine model of urethral transplantation and to produce an individualized urethra graft to show proof of function in vivo.

Methods

Donated urethras from ram abattoir waste were decellularized and further recellularized with autologous buccal mucosa epithelial cells excised from the recipient ram and expanded in vitro. The individualized urethral grafts were implanted by reconstructive surgery in rams replacing 2.5 ± 0.5 cm of the native penile urethra.

Results

After surgery optimization, three ram had the tissue engineered urethra implanted for one month and two out of three showed a partially regenerated epithelium.

Conclusions

Further adjustments of the model are needed to achieve a satisfactory proof-of-concept; however, we interpret these findings as a proof of principle and a possible path to develop a functional tissue engineered urethral graft with de- and recellularization and regeneration in vivo after transplantation.


Corresponding author: Teresa Olsen Ekerhult, Department of Urology, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden; and Department of Urology, Västra Götaland Region, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden, Phone: +46-31-3429019, E-mail:

Funding source: VINNOVA

Award Identifier / Grant number: 2017-02130

Acknowledgments

We want to acknowledge the staff at the Department of Experimental Biomedicine at Gothenburg University.

  1. Research funding: This study was supported by VINNOVA project CAMP (Contract no. 2017–02130). This study was partly performed by funding from all partners involved with required co-financing.

  2. Author contributions: All authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this manuscript and approved its submission.

  3. Competing interests: The authors report no conflicts of interest. The authors alone are responsible for the content and writing of the paper. The authors Lachmi Jenndahl and Raimund Strehl are fully employed by the company VERIGRAFT AB.

  4. Informed consent: Not applicable

  5. Ethical approval: The in vivo experiments were performed after prior approval from the local ethics committee for animal studies at the administrative court of appeals in Gothenburg, Sweden.

References

1. Anger, JT, Buckley, JC, Santucci, RA, Elliott, SP, Saigal, CS, Urologic Diseases in America P. Trends in stricture management among male Medicare beneficiaries: underuse of urethroplasty? Urology 2011;77:481–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2010.05.055.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

2. Santucci, RA, Joyce, GF, Wise, M. Male urethral stricture disease. J Urol 2007;177:1667–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2007.01.041.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

3. Payne, SR, Fowler, S, Mundy, AR. Analysis of a 7-year national online audit of the management of open reconstructive urethral surgery in men. BJU Int 2020;125:304–13. https://doi.org/10.1111/bju.14897.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

4. Hampson, LA, McAninch, JW, Breyer, BN. Male urethral strictures and their management. Nat Rev Urol 2014;11:43–50. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrurol.2013.275.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

5. Bergman, JE, Loane, M, Vrijheid, M, Pierini, A, Nijman, RJ, Addor, MC, et al.. Epidemiology of hypospadias in Europe: a registry-based study. World J Urol 2015;33:2159–67. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-015-1507-6.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

6. Springer, A, van den Heijkant, M, Baumann, S. Worldwide prevalence of hypospadias. J Pediatr Urol 2016;12:152.e1–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpurol.2015.12.002.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

7. Long, CJ, Canning, DA. Hypospadias: are we as good as we think when we correct proximal hypospadias? J Pediatr Urol 2016;12:196.e1–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpurol.2016.05.002.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

8. Zucker, KJ. Epidemiology of gender dysphoria and transgender identity. Sex Health 2017;14:404–11. https://doi.org/10.1071/sh17067.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

9. Zucker, KJ. Adolescents with gender dysphoria: reflections on some contemporary clinical and research issues. Arch Sex Behav 2019;48:1983–92. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-019-01518-8.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

10. Nerli, RB, Neelagund, SE, Guntaka, A, Patil, S, Hiremath, SC, Jali, SM, et al.. Staged buccal mucosa urethroplasty in reoperative hypospadias. Indian J Urol 2011;27:196–9. https://doi.org/10.4103/0970-1591.82837.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

11. Lumen, N, Oosterlinck, W, Hoebeke, P. Urethral reconstruction using buccal mucosa or penile skin grafts: systematic review and meta-analysis. Urol Int 2012;89:387–94. https://doi.org/10.1159/000341138.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

12. Venn, SN, Mundy, AR. Early experience with the use of buccal mucosa for substitution urethroplasty. Br J Urol 1998;81:738–40. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1464-410x.1998.00617.x.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

13. Salgado, CJ, Fein, LA, Chim, J, Medina, CA, Demaso, S, Gomez, C. Prelamination of neourethra with uterine mucosa in radial forearm osteocutaneous free flap phalloplasty in the female-to-male transgender patient. Case Rep Urol 2016;2016:8742531. https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/8742531.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

14. Elmer-DeWitt, MA, Wood, HM, Hull, T, Unger, CA. Rectoneovaginal fistula in a transgender woman successfully repaired using a buccal mucosa graft. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg 2019;25:e43–4. https://doi.org/10.1097/spv.0000000000000490.Search in Google Scholar

15. Tolstunov, L, Pogrel, MA, McAninch, JW. Intraoral morbidity following free buccal mucosal graft harvesting for urethroplasty. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1997;84:480–2. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1079-2104(97)90261-4.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

16. Neuhaus, RW, Baylis, HI, Shorr, N. Complications at mucous membrane donor sites. Am J Ophthalmol 1982;93:643–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0002-9394(14)77381-7.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

17. Markiewicz, MR, DeSantis, JL, Margarone, JE3rd, Pogrel, MA, Chuang, SK. Morbidity associated with oral mucosa harvest for urological reconstruction: an overview. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2008;66:739–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2007.11.023.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

18. Brasher, WJ, Rees, TD, Boyce, WA. Complications of free grafts of masticatory mucosa. J Periodontol 1975;46:133–8. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.1975.46.3.133.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

19. Håkansson, J, Simsa, R, Bogestål, Y, Jenndahl, L, Gustafsson-Hedberg, T, Petronis, S, et al.. Individualized tissue-engineered veins as vascular grafts: a proof of concept study in pig. J Tissue Eng Regen Med 2021;15:818–30. https://doi.org/10.1002/term.3233.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

20. Jenndahl, L, Österberg, K, Bogestål, Y, Simsa, R, Gustafsson-Hedberg, T, Stenlund, P, et al.. Personalized tissue-engineered arteries as vascular graft transplants: a safety study in sheep. Regen Ther 2022;21:331–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.reth.2022.08.005.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

21. Song, L, Murphy, SV, Yang, B, Xu, Y, Zhang, Y, Atala, A. Bladder acellular matrix and its application in bladder augmentation. Tissue Eng Part B Rev 2014;20:163–72. https://doi.org/10.1089/ten.teb.2013.0103.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

22. Chen, F, Yoo, JJ, Atala, A. Acellular collagen matrix as a possible "off the shelf" biomaterial for urethral repair. Urology 1999;54:407–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0090-4295(99)00179-x.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

23. Sutherland, RS, Baskin, LS, Hayward, SW, Cunha, GR. Regeneration of bladder urothelium, smooth muscle, blood vessels and nerves into an acellular tissue matrix. J Urol 1996;156:571–7. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005392-199608001-00002.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

24. Yang, B, Zhang, Y, Zhou, L, Sun, Z, Zheng, J, Chen, Y, et al.. Development of a porcine bladder acellular matrix with well-preserved extracellular bioactive factors for tissue engineering. Tissue Eng Part C Methods 2010;16:1201–11. https://doi.org/10.1089/ten.tec.2009.0311.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

25. Horst, M, Madduri, S, Gobet, R, Sulser, T, Milleret, V, Hall, H, et al.. Engineering functional bladder tissues. J Tissue Eng Regen Med 2013;7:515–22. https://doi.org/10.1002/term.547.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

26. Simsa, R, Vila, XM, Salzer, E, Teuschl, A, Jenndahl, L, Bergh, N, et al.. Effect of fluid dynamics on decellularization efficacy and mechanical properties of blood vessels. PLoS One 2019;14:e0220743. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0220743.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

27. Simsa, R, Padma, AM, Heher, P, Hellström, M, Teuschl, A, Jenndahl, L, et al.. Systematic in vitro comparison of decellularization protocols for blood vessels. PLoS One 2018;13:e0209269. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0209269.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

28. Kaufman, G, Skrtic, D. Morphological and kinetic study of oral keratinocytes assembly on reconstituted basement membrane: effect of TEGDMA. Arch Oral Biol 2019;104:103–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.archoralbio.2019.05.019.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

29. de Kemp, V, de Graaf, P, Fledderus, JO, Ruud Bosch, JL, de Kort, LM. Tissue engineering for human urethral reconstruction: systematic review of recent literature. PLoS One 2015;10:e0118653. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0118653.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

30. Saad, S, Osman, NI, Chapple, CR. Tissue engineering: recent advances and review of clinical outcome for urethral strictures. Curr Opin Urol 2021;31:498–503. https://doi.org/10.1097/mou.0000000000000921.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

31. Ortac, M, Olsen Ekerhult, T, Zhao, W, Atala, A. Tissue engineering graft for urethral reconstruction: is it ready for clinical application? Urol Res Pract 2023;49:11–8.10.5152/tud.2023.22226Search in Google Scholar

32. Wood, MW, Hart, LA. Selecting appropriate animal models and strains: making the best use of research, information and outreach. AATEX 2007;14:303–6.Search in Google Scholar

33. Amend, B, Harland, N, Knoll, J, Stenzl, A, Aicher, WK. Large animal models for investigating cell therapies of stress urinary incontinence. Int J Mol Sci 2021;22:1–13. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22116092.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

34. Sievert, KD, Daum, L, Maurer, S, Toomey, P, Vaegler, M, Aufderklamm, S, et al.. Urethroplasty performed with an autologous urothelium-vegetated collagen fleece to treat urethral stricture in the minipig model. World J Urol 2020;38:2123–31. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-019-02888-3.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

35. Crapo, PM, Gilbert, TW, Badylak, SF. An overview of tissue and whole organ decellularization processes. Biomaterials 2011;32:3233–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.01.057.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

36. Rashidbenam, Z, Jasman, MH, Hafez, P, Tan, GH, Goh, EH, Fam, XI, et al.. Overview of urethral reconstruction by tissue engineering: current strategies, clinical status and future direction. Tissue Eng Regen Med 2019;16:365–84. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13770-019-00193-z.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

37. Olive, PL, Vikse, C, Trotter, MJ. Measurement of oxygen diffusion distance in tumor cubes using a fluorescent hypoxia probe. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1992;22:397–402. https://doi.org/10.1016/0360-3016(92)90840-e.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

38. Tannock, IF. Oxygen diffusion and the distribution of cellular radiosensitivity in tumours. Br J Radiol 1972;45:515–24. https://doi.org/10.1259/0007-1285-45-535-515.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

39. Thomlinson, RH, Gray, LH. The histological structure of some human lung cancers and the possible implications for radiotherapy. Br J Cancer 1955;9:539–49. https://doi.org/10.1038/bjc.1955.55.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

40. Walles, T, Herden, T, Haverich, A, Mertsching, H. Influence of scaffold thickness and scaffold composition on bioartificial graft survival. Biomaterials 2003;24:1233–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0142-9612(02)00490-8.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

41. Hansen, NU, Genovese, F, Leeming, DJ, Karsdal, MA. The importance of extracellular matrix for cell function and in vivo likeness. Exp Mol Pathol 2015;98:286–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yexmp.2015.01.006.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Received: 2022-09-28
Accepted: 2023-03-13
Published Online: 2023-04-03
Published in Print: 2023-10-26

© 2023 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 13.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/bmt-2022-0386/html
Scroll to top button