Home Parameter-based patient-specific restoration of physiological knee morphology for optimized implant design and matching
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Parameter-based patient-specific restoration of physiological knee morphology for optimized implant design and matching

  • Sonja Grothues ORCID logo EMAIL logo , Ann-Kristin Becker , Benjamin Hohlmann and Klaus Radermacher
Published/Copyright: April 28, 2023

Abstract

Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) patients may present with genetic deformities, such as trochlear dysplasia, or deformities related to osteoarthritis. This pathologic morphology should be corrected by TKA to compensate for related functional deficiencies. Hence, a reconstruction of an equivalent physiological knee morphology would be favorable for detailed preoperative planning and the patient-specific implant selection or design process. A parametric database of 673 knees, each described by 36 femoral parameter values, was used. Each knee was classified as pathological or physiological based on cut-off values from literature. A clinical and a mathematical classification approach were developed to distinguish between affected and unaffected parameters. Three different prediction methods were used for the restoration of physiological parameter values: regression, nearest neighbor search and artificial neural networks. Several variants of the respective prediction model were considered, such as different network architectures. Regarding all methods, the model variant chosen resulted in a prediction error below the parameters’ standard deviation, while the regression yielded the lowest errors. Future analyses should consider other deformities, also of tibia and patella. Furthermore, the functional consequences of the parameter changes should be analyzed.


Corresponding author: Sonja Grothues, Chair of Medical Engineering, Helmholtz-Institute for Biomedical Engineering, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany, E-mail:

Acknowledgments

For the study we used a database derived from surface models provided by Conformis, Inc. (Billerica, MA, USA).

  1. Research funding: “Not applicable”.

  2. Author contributions: All authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this manuscript and approved its submission.

  3. Competing interests: Authors state no conflict of interest.

  4. Informed consent: “Not applicable”.

  5. Ethical approval: Ethical approval was not required since the anonymized patient data and surface models analyzed were acquired in the past for surgery and not for the purpose of this retrospective study. The cadaver data and surface models were acquired in the past for training. No donor identifying information was accessed for the conduct of the study.

References

1. Dejour, H, Walch, G, Nove-Josserand, L, Guier, C. Factors of patellar instability: an anatomic radiographic study. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 1994;2:19–26. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01552649.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

2. Jungmann, PM, Tham, SC, Liebl, H, Nevitt, MC, McCulloch, CE, Lynch, J, et al.. Association of trochlear dysplasia with degenerative abnormalities in the knee: data from the Osteoarthritis Initiative. Skeletal Radiol 2013;42:1383–92. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-013-1664-x.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

3. van Diek, FM, Wolf, MR, Murawski, CD, van Eck, CF, Fu, FH. Knee morphology and risk factors for developing an anterior cruciate ligament rupture: an MRI comparison between ACL-ruptured and non-injured knees. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2014;22:987–94. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-013-2588-7.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

4. van Kuijk, KSR, Reijman, M, Bierma-Zeinstra, SMA, Waarsing, JH, Meuffels, DE. Posterior cruciate ligament injury is influenced by intercondylar shape and size of tibial eminence. Bone Joint Lett J 2019;101-B:1058–62. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620x.101b9.bjj-2018-1567.r1.Search in Google Scholar

5. Kellgren, JH, Lawrence, JS. Radiological assessment of osteo-arthrosis. Ann Rheum Dis 1957;16:494–502. https://doi.org/10.1136/ard.16.4.494.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

6. Dejour, D, Ntagiopoulos, PG, Saffarini, M. Evidence of trochlear dysplasia in femoral component designs. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2014;22:2599–607. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-012-2268-z.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

7. Slamin, J, Parsley, B. Evolution of customization design for total knee arthroplasty. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med 2012;5:290–5. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12178-012-9141-z.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

8. Zingde, SM, Slamin, J. Biomechanics of the knee joint, as they relate to arthroplasty. Orthop Traumatol 2017;31:1–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mporth.2016.10.001.Search in Google Scholar

9. Bonnin, MP, Schmidt, A, Basiglini, L, Bossard, N, Dantony, E. Mediolateral oversizing influences pain, function, and flexion after TKA. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2013;21:2314–24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-013-2443-x.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

10. Mahoney, OM, Kinsey, T. Overhang of the femoral component in total knee arthroplasty: risk factors and clinical consequences. J Bone Jt Surg Am 2010;92:1115–21. https://doi.org/10.2106/jbjs.h.00434.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

11. Leichtle, UG, Lange, B, Herzog, Y, Schnauffer, P, Leichtle, CI, Wülker, N, et al.. Influence of different patellofemoral design variations based on genesis II total knee endoprosthesis on patellofemoral pressure and kinematics. Appl Bionics Biomech 2017;2017:5492383. https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/5492383.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

12. van den Heever, D, Scheffer, C, Erasmus, P, Dillon, E. Method for selection of femoral component in total knee arthroplasty (tka). Australas Phys Eng Sci Med 2011;34:23–30. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13246-011-0053-9.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

13. Badillo, S, Banfai, B, Birzele, F, Davydov, II, Hutchinson, L, Kam-Thong, T, et al.. An introduction to machine learning. Clin Pharmacol Ther 2020;107:871–85. https://doi.org/10.1002/cpt.1796.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

14. Greener, JG, Kandathil, SM, Moffat, L, Jones, DT. A guide to machine learning for biologists. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2022;23:40–55. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41580-021-00407-0.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

15. Asseln, M, Hänisch, C, Schick, F, Radermacher, K. Gender differences in knee morphology and the prospects for implant design in total knee replacement. Knee 2018;25:545–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knee.2018.04.005.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

16. Diederichs, G, Scheffler, S. MRT nach Patellaluxation: quantifizierung der Risikofaktoren und Beschreibung der Folgeschäden (MRI after patellar dislocation: assessment of risk factors and injury to the joint). Röfo 2013;185:611–20. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0032-1330690.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

17. Pfirrmann, CW, Zanetti, M, Romero, J, Hodler, J. Femoral trochlear dysplasia: MR findings. Radiology 2000;216:858–64. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.216.3.r00se38858.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

18. Kızılgöz, V, Sivrioğlu, AK, Ulusoy, GR, Aydın, H, Karayol, SS, Menderes, U. Analysis of the risk factors for anterior cruciate ligament injury: an investigation of structural tendencies. Clin Imag 2018;50:20–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinimag.2017.12.004.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

19. Dejour, D, Saggin, P. The sulcus deepening trochleoplasty-the Lyon’s procedure. Int Orthop 2010;34:311–6. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-009-0933-8.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

20. Chomboon, K, Chujai, P, Teerarassammee, P, Kerdprasop, K, Kerdprasop, N. An empirical study of distance metrics for k-nearest neighbor algorithm. In: Proceedings of the 3rd international conference on industrial application engineering. Kitakyushu, Japan; 2015.10.12792/iciae2015.051Search in Google Scholar

21. Zou, H, Hastie, T. Regularization and variable selection via the elastic net. J Roy Stat Soc B 2005;67:301–20. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9868.2005.00503.x.Search in Google Scholar

22. Hoerl, AE, Kennard, RW. Ridge regression: biased estimation for nonorthogonal problems. Technometrics 1970;12:55. https://doi.org/10.1080/00401706.1970.10488634.Search in Google Scholar

23. Tibshirani, R. Regression shrinkage and selection via the lasso. J Roy Stat Soc B 1996;58:267–88. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2517-6161.1996.tb02080.x.Search in Google Scholar

24. Uzair, M, Jamil, N. Effects of hidden layers on the efficiency of neural networks. In: 2020 IEEE 23rd international multitopic conference (INMIC). Bahawalpur, Pakistan; 2020.10.1109/INMIC50486.2020.9318195Search in Google Scholar

25. Dogan, E, Sengorur, B, Koklu, R. Modeling biological oxygen demand of the Melen River in Turkey using an artificial neural network technique. J Environ Manag 2009;90:1229–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2008.06.004.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

26. Hohlmann, B, Asseln, M, Xu, J, Radermacher, K. Investigation of morphotypes of the knee using cluster analysis. Knee 2022;35:157–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knee.2022.03.006.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

27. Asseln, M, Grothues, SAGA, Radermacher, K. Relationship between the form and function of implant design in total knee replacement. J Biomech 2021;119:110296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2021.110296.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

28. Favre, J, Erhart-Hledik, JC, Blazek, K, Fasel, B, Gold, GE, Andriacchi, TP. Anatomically standardized maps reveal distinct patterns of cartilage thickness with increasing severity of medial compartment knee osteoarthritis. J Orthop Res 2017;35:2442–51. https://doi.org/10.1002/jor.23548.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

29. Lösch, A, Eckstein, F, Haubner, M, Englmeier, KH. A non-invasive technique for 3-dimensional assessment of articular cartilage thickness based on MRI. Part 1: development of a computational method. Magn Reson Imaging 1997;15:795–804. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0730-725x(97)00012-x.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

30. Carballido-Gamio, J, Bauer, JS, Stahl, R, Lee, KY, Krause, S, Link, TM, et al.. Inter-subject comparison of MRI knee cartilage thickness. Med Image Anal 2008;12:120–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.media.2007.08.002.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

Received: 2023-01-12
Accepted: 2023-04-03
Published Online: 2023-04-28
Published in Print: 2023-10-26

© 2023 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 11.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/bmt-2023-0017/html
Scroll to top button