Startseite Water repellent effects of manure amended soils on organic matter decomposition, C retention, and respired CO2-C
Artikel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert Erfordert eine Authentifizierung

Water repellent effects of manure amended soils on organic matter decomposition, C retention, and respired CO2-C

  • Dewpura A. L. Leelamanie EMAIL logo und Tanuja D. P. Liyanage
Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 17. September 2016
Veröffentlichen auch Sie bei De Gruyter Brill
Biologia
Aus der Zeitschrift Biologia Band 71 Heft 9

Abstract

One option that can be used to mitigate the changes in global climate caused by the elevated levels of atmospheric CO2 is to improve the capacity of soil to act as a carbon (C) sink. Water repellency is known to reduce the mineralization of C, which is considered as a result of the reduced water film thickness and discontinuous water films. The objective of this study was to examine effects of water repellent conditions caused by different manure amendments to an Ultisol on organic matter decomposition, C retention, and respired CO2-C through NaOH trapping. The soils used in the laboratory and field experiments are Rhodudults under USDA soil classification. Cattle manure (CM), goat manure (GM), Gliricidia maculata (GL), and Casuarina equisetifolia (CE) were used as the organic amendments. Soil (0–5 cm) collected for the laboratory experiment were air-dried, passed through a 2 mm sieve, and mixed with ground organic amendments in different ratios (5% CM, 5% GM, 5% GL, 5% CE, with and without intermixed 2% CE). Soil-water contact angle, soil organic matter (SOM) content, retained C (field), and respired CO2 were measured. Laboratory measurements were conducted for a period of 30 d, while field experiments for 9 weeks. Samples with 5% CE showed the highest repellency. Samples with GL, CM, and GM showed slightly higher contact angles when intermixed with 2% CE. The control (mineral soil) showed the lowest contact angle (56.2 ± 3.8°). The SOM contents decreased with time over the 30 d laboratory as well as in the 9-week field experiment. The % depletion of SOM showed a significant difference between the samples with and without intermixed 2% CE only in samples amended with 5% GM. Percentage depletion of SOM content of the samples showed a moderate negative linear correlation with initial soil-water contact angle (R2 = 0.53). The retained C% (as a percentage of added C) in the field was highest in the soil with 5% CE (highest repellent). Samples with 5% GL, CM, and GM intermixed with 2% CE showed significantly higher retained C% than those with no intermixed CE. Samples with 5% CE with the highest initial repellency showed the lowest while those with 5% GL with lowest initial repellency showed the highest respired CO2–C. Both respired CO2–C g in 1 kg of soil and respired CO2–C mg per kg of SOC showed a moderate negative linear correlations (significant at 0.05 probability level) with soil-water contact angle (R2 = 0.58 and 0.48, respectively). The results clearly showed that the C retention capacity of different organic manure amended soils was positively related with the original hydrophobicity of added manures under the field conditions as well.

Acknowledgements

We gratefully acknowledge the Faculty of Graduate Studies, University of Ruhuna for providing financial support through a research grant for post graduate studies (MPhil Research Grant 2015/2016).

References

Bachmann J., Ellies A. & Hartge K.H. 2000. Development and application of a new sessile drop contact angle method to assess soil water repellency. J. Hydrol. 231–232: 66–75.10.1016/S0022-1694(00)00184-0Suche in Google Scholar

Bachmann J., Guggenburger G., Baumgartl T., Ellerbrock R.H., Urbanek E., Goebel M.O., Kaiser K., Horn R. & Fischer W.R. 2008. Physical carbon−sequestration mechanisms under special consideration of soil wettability. J. Plant Nutr. Soil Sci. 171: 14−26.10.1002/jpln.200700054Suche in Google Scholar

Ball B.C., Scott A. & Parker J.P. 1999. Field N2O, CO2 and CH4 fluxes in relation to tillage, compaction and soil quality in Scotland. Soil Till. Res. 53: 29–39.10.1016/S0167-1987(99)00074-4Suche in Google Scholar

Davidson E. A. & Janssens I. A. 2006. Temperature sensitivity of soil carbon decomposition and feedbacks to climate change. Nature 440: 165−173.10.1038/nature04514Suche in Google Scholar

Doran G. & Zander A. 2012. An improved method for measuring soil microbial activity by gas phase flow injection analysis. Braz. J. Soil Sci. 36: 349−357.10.1590/S0100-06832012000200004Suche in Google Scholar

Fontaine S., Mariotti A. & Abbadie L. 2003. The priming effect of organic matter: a question of microbial competition? Soil Bio. Biochem. 35: 837−843.10.1016/S0038-0717(03)00123-8Suche in Google Scholar

Goebel M.O., Bachmann J., Woche S.K. & Fischer W.R. 2005. Soil wettability, aggregate stability, and the decomposition of soil organic matter. Geoderma 128: 80−93.10.1016/j.geoderma.2004.12.016Suche in Google Scholar

Goebel M.O., Woche S.K., Bachmann J., Lamparter A. & Fischer W.R. 2007. Significance of wettability−induced changes in microscopic water distribution for soil organic matter decomposition. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 71: 1593−1599.10.2136/sssaj2006.0192Suche in Google Scholar

Goebel M., Bachmann J., Reichsrein M., Janssens I. A. & Guggenberger G. 2011. Soil water repellency and its implications for organic matter decomposition−is there a link to extreme climatic events? Global Change Biol. 17: 2640−2656.10.1111/j.1365-2486.2011.02414.xSuche in Google Scholar

Haney R.L., Brinton W.F. & Evans E. 2008. Soil CO2 respiration: Comparison of chemical titration, CO2 IRGA analysis and the Solvita gel system. Renew. Agric. Food Syst. 23: 171– 176.10.1017/S174217050800224XSuche in Google Scholar

Janzen H.H. & Kucey R.M.N. 1988. C, N and S mineralization of crop residue as influenced by crop species and nutrient regime. Plant and Soil 100: 35–41.10.1007/BF02371192Suche in Google Scholar

Kaboneka S., Sabbe W.E. & Mauromoustakos A. 1997. Carbon decomposition kinetics and nitrogen mineralization from corn, soybean, and wheat residues. Comm. Soil Sci. Plant Anal. 28: 1359–1373.10.1080/00103629709369880Suche in Google Scholar

Kořenková L. & Matúš P. 2015. Role of water repellency in aggregate stability of cultivated soils under simulated raindrop impact. Eur. Soil Sci. 48: 754–758.10.1134/S1064229315070054Suche in Google Scholar

Lal R. 2004. Soil carbon sequestration impacts on global climate change and food security, Science 304: 1623−1627.10.1126/science.1097396Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

Lal R., Follett F., Stewart B.A. & Kimble J.M. 2007. Soil carbon sequestration to mitigate climate change and advance food security. Soil Sci. 172: 943–956.10.1097/ss.0b013e31815cc498Suche in Google Scholar

Lamparter A., Bachmann J., Goebel M.O. & Woche S. K. 2009. Carbon mineralization in soil: Impact of wetting–drying, aggregation and water repellency. Geoderma 150: 324−333.10.1016/j.geoderma.2009.02.014Suche in Google Scholar

Leelamanie D. A. L. 2014. Initial water repellency affected organic matter depletion rates of manure amended soils in Sri Lanka. J. Hydrol. Hydromech. 62: 309−315.10.2478/johh-2014-0040Suche in Google Scholar

Leelamanie D.A.L. 2016. Occurrence and distribution of water repellency in size fractionated coastal dune sand in Sri Lanka under Casuarina shelterbelt. Catanea 142: 206-212.10.1016/j.catena.2016.03.026Suche in Google Scholar

Leelamanie D.A.L. & Mapa R.B. 2015. Alterations in soil aggregate stability of a tropical Ultisol as mediated by changes in land use. Biologia 70: 1444–1449.10.1515/biolog-2015-0168Suche in Google Scholar

Leelamanie D.A.L., Karube J. & Samarawickrama U. I. 2013. Stability analysis of aggregates in relation to the hydrophobicity of organic manure for Sri Lankan Red Yellow Podzolic soils. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr. 59: 683−69110.1080/00380768.2013.826568Suche in Google Scholar

Li W., Pan K.W., Wu N., Wang J.C., Wang Y.J. & Zhang L. 2014. Effect of litter type on soil microbial parameters and dissolved organic carbon in a laboratory microcosm experiment. Plant Soil Environ. 60: 170–176.10.17221/39/2014-PSESuche in Google Scholar

Lichner Ľ., Holko L., Zhukova N., Schacht K., Rajkai K., Fodor N. & Sándor R. 2012. Plants and biological soil crust influence the hydrophysical parameters and water flow in an aeolian sandy soil. J. Hydrol. Hydromech. 60: 309–318.10.2478/v10098-012-0027-ySuche in Google Scholar

Liyanage T.D.P. & Leelamanie D.A.L. 2016. Influence of organic manure amendments on water repellency, water entry value, and water retention of soil samples from a tropical Ultisol. J. Hydrol. Hydromech. 64: 160–166.10.1515/johh-2016-0025Suche in Google Scholar

Lozano E., García-Orenes F., Bárcenas-Moreno G., Jiménez-Pinilla P., Mataix-Solera J., Arcenegui V., Morugán-Coronado A. & Mataix-Beneyto J. 2014. Relationships between soil water repellency and microbial community composition under different plant species in a Mediterranean semiarid forest. J. Hydrol. Hydromech. 62: 101–107.10.2478/johh-2014-0017Suche in Google Scholar

Lozano E., Grayston S.J., Mataix-Solera J., Arcenegui V., Jimenez-Pinilla P. & Mataix-Beneyto J. 2015. Effects of soil water repellency on microbial community structure and functions in Mediterranean pine forests. Geophysical Research Abstracts, Volume 17. EGU General Assembly 2015, Held 12−17 April, 2015 in Vienna, Austria. id.10430.Suche in Google Scholar

Lützow M.V., Kögel-Knabner I., Ekschmitt K., Matzner E., Guggenberger G., Marschner B. & Flessa H. 2006. Stabilization of organic matter in temperate soils: mechanisms and their relevance under different soil conditions–a review. Eur. J. Soil Sci. 57: 426–445.10.1111/j.1365-2389.2006.00809.xSuche in Google Scholar

Mary B., Fresneau C., Morel J.L. & Mariotti A. 1993. C and N cycling during decomposition of root mucilage, roots and glucose in soil. Soil Biol. Biochem. 25: 1005–1014.10.1016/0038-0717(93)90147-4Suche in Google Scholar

Paul E.A. & F.E. Clark. 1996. Soil Microbiology and Biochemistry. 2nd ed. Academic Press. San Diego, California, pp. 62– 63.Suche in Google Scholar

Piccolo A. & Mbagwu J.S.C. 1999. Role of hydrophobic components of soil organic matter in soil aggregate stability. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 63: 1801−1810.10.2136/sssaj1999.6361801xSuche in Google Scholar

Piccolo A., Spaccini R., Haberhauer G. & Gerzabek M.H. 1999. Increased sequestration of organic carbon in soil by hydrophobic protection. Natur. Wissensch. 86: 496−499.10.1007/s001140050662Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

Roger S. 2001. Sequestration of carbon by soil. Soil Sci. 166: 858−871.10.1097/00010694-200111000-00010Suche in Google Scholar

Rosenzweig C. & Parry M.L. 1994. Potential impact of climate change on world food supply. Nature 367: 133−138.10.1201/9781315136967-5Suche in Google Scholar

Šimon T. 2007. Characterization of soil organic matter in long-term fallow experiment with respect to the soil hydrophobicity and wettability. Soil Water Res. 2: 96−103.10.17221/2105-SWRSuche in Google Scholar

Six J., Conant R.T., Paul E.A. & Paustian K. 2002. Stabilization mechanisms of soil organic matter: Implications for C-saturation of soils. Plant Soil 241: 155−176.10.1023/A:1016125726789Suche in Google Scholar

Sorensen L.H. 1974. Rate of decomposition of organic matter in soil as influenced by repeated air drying-rewetting and repeated additions of organic material. Soil Bio. Biochem. 6: 287−292.10.1016/0038-0717(74)90032-7Suche in Google Scholar

Šurda P., Lichner Ľ., Nagy V., Kollár J., Iovino M. & Horel Á. 2015. Effects of vegetation at different succession stages on soil properties and water flow in sandy soil. Biologia 70: 1474– 1479.10.1515/biolog-2015-0172Suche in Google Scholar

Ward P.R., Roper M.M., Jongepier R. & Micin S.F. 2015. Impact of crop residue retention and tillage on water infiltration into a water-repellent soil. Biologia 70: 1480–1484.10.1515/biolog-2015-0170Suche in Google Scholar

Weerasinghe K.D.N. 1989. The rainfall probability analysis of Mapalana and its application to agricultural production of the area. J. National Sci. Coun. Sri Lanka 17: 173−186.10.4038/jnsfsr.v17i2.8219Suche in Google Scholar

Received: 2016-4-30
Accepted: 2016-6-14
Published Online: 2016-9-17
Published in Print: 2016-9-1

©2016 Institute of Botany, Slovak Academy of Sciences

Heruntergeladen am 12.10.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/biolog-2016-0127/html
Button zum nach oben scrollen