Startseite Particle-size and organic matter effects on structure and water retention of soils
Artikel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert Erfordert eine Authentifizierung

Particle-size and organic matter effects on structure and water retention of soils

  • Kálmán Rajkai , Brigitta Tóth , Gyöngyi Barna , Hilda Hernádi , Mihály Kocsis und András Makó EMAIL logo
Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 12. Dezember 2015
Veröffentlichen auch Sie bei De Gruyter Brill
Biologia
Aus der Zeitschrift Biologia Band 70 Heft 11

Abstract

Water storage and flow in soils are highly dependent on soil structure, which strongly determines soil porosity. However pore size distribution can be derived from soil water retention curve (SWRC). Structural characteristics of cultivated arable fields (693 soil profiles, 1773 samples) and soils covered by treated forest stands (137 soil profiles, 405 samples) were selected from the MARTHA Hungarian soil physical database, and evaluated for expressing organic matter effects on soil structure and water retention. For this purpose the normalized pore size distribution curves were determined for the selected soils, plus the modal suction (MS) corresponding to the most frequent pore size class of the soil. Skewness of soils’ pore size distribution curves are found different. The quasi-normal distribution of sandy soils are transformed into distorted in clayey soils. A general growing trend of MS with the ever finer soil texture was shown. Sandy soils have the lowest average MS values, i.e. the highest most frequent equivalent pore diameter. Silty clay and clay soil textures are characterized by the highest MS values. A slight effect of land use and organic matter content is also observable in different MS values of soils under forest vegetation (’forest’) and cultivated arable land (‘plough fields’). MS values of the two land uses were compared statistically. The results of the analyses show that certain soil group’s MS are significantly different under forest vegetation and cultivation. However this difference can be explained only partly and indirectly by the organic matter of different plant coverage in the land use types.

References

Bieganowski A., Ry˙zak M. & Witkowska-Walczak B. 2010. Determination of soil aggregate disintegration dynamics using laser diffraction. Clay Miner. 45: 23-34.10.1180/claymin.2010.045.1.23Suche in Google Scholar

Bouma J. 1989. Using soil survey data for qualitative land evaluation. Adv. Soil Sci. 9: 177-213.10.1007/978-1-4612-3532-3_4Suche in Google Scholar

Bouma J. 1992. Effect of soil structure, tillage, and aggregation upon soil hydraulic properties, pp. 1-36. In: Wagenet R.J., Baveye P. & Stewart B.A. (eds), Interacting Processes in Soil Science. Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton.10.1201/9781003070122-1Suche in Google Scholar

Canarache A., Dumitru E. & Enache R. 1998. Estimation of soil sensitivity to structure degradation. In: Proc. of the 16th World Congress of Soil Science. Montpellier, Symposium 24, 8 (CD-ROM).Suche in Google Scholar

Cresswell H., Mckenzie N. & Paydar Z. 1999. Strategy for determining hydraulic properties of Australian soils using direct measurements and pedotransfer functions, pp. 1143-1160. In: van Genuchten M.T., Leij F. & Wu L. (eds), Proc. Int. Workshop Characterization and Measurement of the Hydraulic Properties of Unsaturated Porous Media. University of California, Riverside, CA.Suche in Google Scholar

Dexter A.R. 2004. Soil physical quality. Part I. Theory, effects of soil texture, density, and organic matter, and effects on root growth. Geoderma 120: 201-214.Suche in Google Scholar

FAO 1980. Metodologia provisional para la evaluacion de la degradacion de los suelos. FAO/UNEP/UNESCO, Rome, 86 pp.Suche in Google Scholar

Gantzer C.J. & Andreson S.H. 2002. Computed tomographic measurement of macroporosity in chisel-disk and no-tillage seedbeds. Soil Till. Res. 64: 101-111.10.1016/S0167-1987(01)00248-3Suche in Google Scholar

Ghezzehei T.A. 2012. Soil structure, pp. 2-1.-2-17. In: Huang P.M., Li Y. & Sumner M.E. (eds), Handbook of soil sciences. Properties and processes. CRC Press, Boca Raton.Suche in Google Scholar

Ghiberto P. J., Imhoff S., Libardi P.L., da Silva A.P., Tormena C.A. & Pilatti M.A. 2015. Soil physical quality of Mollisols quantified by a global index. Sci. Agric. 72: 167-174.10.1590/0103-9016-2013-0414Suche in Google Scholar

Hamblin A. 1985. The influence of soil structure on water movement, crop root growth, and water uptake. Adv. Agron. 38: 95-158.Suche in Google Scholar

Hernádi H. & Mako A. 2014. Preliminary investigation to estimate soil NAPL retention using parametric pedotransfer functions. Int. Agrophysics 28: 435-445.10.2478/intag-2014-0034Suche in Google Scholar

Hillel D. 1998. Environmental Soil Physics. Academic Press. San Diego, 771 pp.Suche in Google Scholar

Kachinsky N.A. 1965. Fizika pochvy. Vysshaya Shkola, Moscow, 323 pp.Suche in Google Scholar

Kemper W.D. & Rosenau R.C. 1986. Aggregate stability and size distribution. In A. Klute (ed.) Methods of Soil Analysis, Part I. (2nd Ed.) Agronomy Monograph 9, pp. 425-442.Suche in Google Scholar

Lamorski K., Bieganowski A., Ryżak M., Sochan A., Sławiński C. & Stelmach W. 2014. Assessment of the usefulness of particle size distribution measured by laser diffraction for soil water retention modelling. J. Plant Nutr. Soil Sci. 177: 803-813.10.1002/jpln.201300594Suche in Google Scholar

Le Bissonnais Y. 1996. Aggregate stability and assessment of soil crustability and erodibility. I. Theory and methodology. Eur. J. Soil Sci. 47: 425-437.10.1111/j.1365-2389.1996.tb01843.xSuche in Google Scholar

Lin H.S., McInnes K.J., Wilding I.P. & Hallmark C.T. 1999. Effect of soil morphology on hydraulic properties: II. Hydraulic pedotransfer functions. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 63: 955-961.10.2136/sssaj1999.634955xSuche in Google Scholar

Loveland P. & Webb J. 2003. Is there a critical level of organic matter in the agricultural soils of temperate regions: a review. Soil Till. Res. 70: 1-18.10.1016/S0167-1987(02)00139-3Suche in Google Scholar

Makό A., Elek B., Dunai A. & Hernadi H. 2009. Comparison of the NAPL conductivity and air permeability of different soils. Commun. Soil Sci. Plant. 40: 787-799.10.1080/00103620802694993Suche in Google Scholar

Makό A., Toth B., Hernadi H., Farkas C. & Marth P. 2010. Introduction of the Hungarian Detailed Soil Hydrophysical Database (MARTHA) and its use to test external pedotransfer functions. Agrokem. Talajtan 59: 29-39.10.1556/agrokem.59.2010.1.4Suche in Google Scholar

Makό, A. & Toth, B. 2013. Soil data from Hungary, pp. 50-55. In: Weynants M (ed.), European Hydropedological Data Inventory (EU-HYDI). Publications Office of the European Union, 2013. JRC Technical Reports, Brussels.Suche in Google Scholar

Marshall T.J. & Holmes J.W. 1979. Soil Physics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 345 pp.Suche in Google Scholar

MSZ-08. 0205-78. 1979. A talaj fizikai es vizgazdalkodasi tulajdonsagainak vizsgalata. Hungarian Standard. Budapest.Suche in Google Scholar

Norton L.D.,Mamedov A. I., Huang C. & Levy G.J. 2006. Soil aggregate stability as affected by long-term tillage and clay mineralogy. Adv. Geoecol. 38: 422-429.Suche in Google Scholar

Rawls W.J., Pachepsky Y.A., Ritchie J.C., Sobecki T.M. & Bloodworth H. 2003. Effect of soil organic carbon on soil water retention. Geoderma 116: 61-76.10.1016/S0016-7061(03)00094-6Suche in Google Scholar

Reynolds W.D., Drury C.F., Tan C.S., Fox C.A. & Yang X.M. 2009. Use of indicators and pore volume-function characteristics to quantify soil physical quality. Geoderma 152: 252-263.10.1016/j.geoderma.2009.06.009Suche in Google Scholar

SSSA 1997. Glossary of Soil Science Terms. Soil Science Society of America, Madison.Suche in Google Scholar

Tόth B., Mako A., Guadagnini A. & Toth G. 2012. Water retention of salt affected soils: quantitative estimation using soil survey information. Arid Land Res. Manag. 26: 103-121. 10.1080/15324982.2012.657025Suche in Google Scholar

van Genuchten M.T. 1980. A closed form equation for predicting the hydraulic conductivity of unsaturated soils. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 44: 892-898. 10.2136/sssaj1980.03615995004400050002xSuche in Google Scholar

Received: 2015-6-15
Accepted: 2015-8-14
Published Online: 2015-12-12
Published in Print: 2015-11-1

© Institute of Molecular Biology, Slovak Academy of Sciences

Artikel in diesem Heft

  1. Hardpan in skeletal soils: Statistical approach to determine its depth in a cherry orchard plot
  2. Using dye tracer for visualizing roots impact on soil structure and soil porous system
  3. Alterations in soil aggregate stability of a tropical Ultisol as mediated by changes in land use
  4. A new method for estimating soil water repellency index
  5. Particle-size and organic matter effects on structure and water retention of soils
  6. Depth-dependent heterogeneity of water flow in sandy soil under grass
  7. Spatial variability of hydrophysical properties of fallow sandy soils
  8. Effects of vegetation at different succession stages on soil properties and water flow in sandy soil
  9. Impact of crop residue retention and tillage on water infiltration into a water-repellent soil
  10. Night-time leaf wetting process and its effect on the morning humidity gradient as a driving force of transpirational water loss in a semi-arid cornfield
  11. Hoplophthiracarus species (Acari: Oribatida: Phthiracaridae) from China with descriptions of two new species
  12. A new species of Trhypochthoniellus (Acari: Oribatida: Trhypochthoniidae) from Chile, with remarks on diagnosis of the genus
  13. New species of oribatid mites (Acari: Oribatida) of the genera Austrachipteria (Achipteriidae), Cultroribula (Astegistidae) and Microlamellarea (Lamellareidae) from New Zealand
  14. The genus Apterogyna in Saudi Arabia, with description of a new species and a new record (Hymenoptera: Bradynobaenidae: Apterogyninae)
  15. The effects of tree age and tree species composition on bird species richness in a Central European montane forest
  16. Me11b receptor mediated action of melatonin in regulation of lung associated immune system (LAIS) of Perdicula asiatica: An in vitro study
  17. Importance of urban trees and buildings as daytime roosts for bats
Heruntergeladen am 9.9.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/biolog-2015-0176/pdf
Button zum nach oben scrollen