Home A new method for estimating soil water repellency index
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

A new method for estimating soil water repellency index

  • Pavla Pekárová EMAIL logo , Ján Pekár and Ľubomír Lichner
Published/Copyright: December 12, 2015
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

The soil water repellency index, R, is calculated from the ethanol sorptivity, Se, and water sorptivity, Sw, using an equation: R = 1.95 Se/Sw. In the older method, Se and Sw were measured in pairwise arrangements to reduce the influence of spatial heterogeneity of soil properties, and one value of R only was calculated from one pair of Se and Sw measurements. The new method to estimate R takes into account all the measured values of water and ethanol sorptivity, i.e., m × n values of R are to be calculated from m values of Sw and n values of Se. The results of the t-test revealed that there is not a statistically significant difference between the means of both samples at the 95.0% confidence level for all four studied soils. It was found using the F-test that there is not a statistically significant difference between the variances of samples estimated by the older and new methods at the 95.0% confidence level for all but one (grassland soil) studied soils. Comparison of R values taken in sandy soil under different vegetation cover in Sekule, southwest Slovakia, revealed that the average values of R estimated using the new method increased with vegetation succession, i.e., Pure sand < Glade soil < Grassland soil < Pine-forest soil, while the me|an values of R, estimated using the older method changed in the order: Pure sand < Grassland soil < Glade soil < Pine-forest soil. It seems that an increase in the number of R values processed can result in the more reliable mean values of R at the sites with high spatial heterogeneity of soil properties.

References

Bachmann J., Goebel M.-O. & Woche S.K. 2013. Small-scale contact angle mapping on undisturbed soil surfaces. J. Hydrol. Hydromech. 61: 3-8.10.2478/johh-2013-0002Search in Google Scholar

Beatty S.M. & Smith J.E. 2013. Dynamic soil water repellency and infiltration in post-wildfire soils. Geoderma 192: 160-172.10.1016/j.geoderma.2012.08.012Search in Google Scholar

Beatty S.M. & Smith J.E. 2014. Infiltration of water and ethanol solutions in water repellent post wildfire soils. J. Hydrol. 514: 233-248.10.1016/j.jhydrol.2014.04.024Search in Google Scholar

Dekker L.W., Doerr S.H., Oostindie K., Ziogas A.K. & Ritsema C.J. 2001. Water repellency and critical soil water content in a dune sand. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 65: 1667-1674.10.2136/sssaj2001.1667Search in Google Scholar

Diehl D. 2013. Soil water repellency: Dynamics of heterogeneous surfaces. Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects 432: 8-18.10.1016/j.colsurfa.2013.05.011Search in Google Scholar

Doerr S.H. 1998. On standardizing the “Water Drop Penetration Time” and the “Molarity of an Ethanol Droplet” techniques to classify soil hydrophobicity: a case study using medium textured soils. Earth Surf. Proc. Landforms 23: 663-668.10.1002/(SICI)1096-9837(199807)23:7<663::AID-ESP909>3.0.CO;2-6Search in Google Scholar

Doerr S.H., Shakesby R.A. & Walsh R.P.D. 2000. Soil water repellency: its causes, characteristics and hydro-geomorphological significance. Earth-Sci. Rev. 51: 33-65.Search in Google Scholar

Faško P., Lapin M. & Pecho J. 2008. 20-year extraordinary climatic period in Slovakia. Meteorol. Časopis 11: 99-105.Search in Google Scholar

Gordon D.C. & Hallett P.D. 2014. An automated microinfiltrometer to measure small-scale soil water infiltration properties. J. Hydrol. Hydromech. 62: 248-252.10.2478/johh-2014-0023Search in Google Scholar

Hallett P.D. 2007. An introduction to soil water repellency, 13 p. In: Gaskin R.E. (ed.), Proc. 8th Int. Symp. Adjuvants for Agrochemicals. Hand Multimedia, Christchurch, New Zealand. ISBN 978-0-473-12388-8.Search in Google Scholar

Hallett P.D., Nunan N., Douglas J.T. & Young I.M. 2004. Millimeter-scale spatial variability in soil water sorptivity. Soil Sci. Soc. Amer. J. 68: 352-358.10.2136/sssaj2004.3520Search in Google Scholar

Hunter A.E., Chau H.W. & Si B.C. 2011. Impact of tension infiltrometer disc size on measured soil water repellency index. Can. J. Soil Sci. 91: 77-81.10.4141/cjss10033Search in Google Scholar

Kalivodova E., Kubiček F., Bedrna Z., Kalivoda H., Gavlas V., Kollar J., Gajdoš P. & Štepanovičova O. 2002. Sand Dunes of Slovakia. Luka-Press, Bratislava, 60 pp. (In Slovak.) Klipa V., Sněhota M. & Dohnal M. 2015. New automatic minidisk infiltrometer: design and testing. J. Hydrol. Hydromech. 63: 110-116.Search in Google Scholar

Kořenkova L., Šimkovic I., Dlapa P., Jurani B. & Matuš P. 2015. Identifying the origin of soil water repellency at regional level using multiple soil characteristics: The White Carpathians and Myjavska Pahorkatina Upland case study. Soil & Water Res. 10 (2): 78-89.10.17221/28/2014-SWRSearch in Google Scholar

Krol A., Lipiec J. & Frac M. 2015. The effect of dairy sewage sludge amendment on repellency and hydraulic conductivity of soil aggregates from two depths of Eutric Cambisol. J. Plant Nutr. Soil Sci. 178: 270-277.10.1002/jpln.201400231Search in Google Scholar

Lichner Ľ., Hallett P.D., Feeney D.S., Ďugova O., Šir M. & Tesař M. 2007. Field measurement of soil water repellency and its impact on water flow under different vegetation. Biologia 62: 537-541.10.2478/s11756-007-0106-4Search in Google Scholar

Lichner L., Eldridge D.J., Schacht K., Zhukova N., Holko L., Šir M. & Pecho J. 2011. Grass cover influences hydrophysical parameters and heterogeneity of water flow in a sandy soil. Pedosphere 21: 719-729.10.1016/S1002-0160(11)60175-6Search in Google Scholar

Lichner Ľ., Holko L., Zhukova N., Schacht K., Rajkai K., Fodor N. & Sandor R. 2012. Plants and biological soil crust influence the hydrophysical parameters and water flow in an aeolian sandy soil. J. Hydrol. Hydromech.60: 309-318.10.2478/v10098-012-0027-ySearch in Google Scholar

Lichner L., Hallett P.D., Drongova Z., Czachor H., Kovacik L., Mataix-Solera J. & Homolak M. 2013a. Algae influence hydrophysical parameters of a sandy soil. Catena 108: 58-68.10.1016/j.catena.2012.02.016Search in Google Scholar

Lichner Ľ., Capuliak J., Zhukova N., Holko L., Czachor H. & Kollar J. 2013b. Pines influence hydrophysical parameters and water flow in a sandy soil. Biologia 68: 1104-1108.10.2478/s11756-013-0254-7Search in Google Scholar

Moody D.R. & Schlossberg M.J. 2010. Soil water repellency index prediction using the molarity of ethanol droplet test. Vadose Zone J. 9: 1046-1051.10.2136/vzj2009.0119Search in Google Scholar

Prochazka, M., Deyl, M., Novicky, O. 2001. Technology for detecting trends and changes in time series of hydrological and meteorological variables - Change and Trend Problem Analysis (CTPA). User’s Guide. CHMI, Prague, 25 pp.Search in Google Scholar

Schacht K., Chen Y., Tarchitzky J., Lichner L. & Marschner B. 2014. Impact of treated wastewater irrigation on water repellency of Mediterranean soils. Irrig. Sci. 32: 369-378.10.1007/s00271-014-0435-3Search in Google Scholar

Schaumann G.E., Braun B., Kirchner D., Rotard W., Szewzyk U. & Grohmann E. 2007. Influence of biofilms on the water repellency of urban soil samples. Hydrol. Process. 21: 2276-2284.10.1002/hyp.6746Search in Google Scholar

Soil Survey Division Staff 1993. Soil survey manual. Soil Conservation Service. U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 18, 437 pp.Search in Google Scholar

Tillman R.W., Scotter D.R., Wallis M.G. & Clothier B.E. 1989. Water repellency and its measurement by using intrinsic sorptivity. Austr. J. Soil Res. 27: 637-644.10.1071/SR9890637Search in Google Scholar

WRB 2006. World Reference Base for Soil Resources 2006. 2nd edition. World Soil Resources Reports No. 103. FAO, Rome.Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2015-6-21
Accepted: 2015-8-31
Published Online: 2015-12-12
Published in Print: 2015-11-1

© Institute of Molecular Biology, Slovak Academy of Sciences

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Hardpan in skeletal soils: Statistical approach to determine its depth in a cherry orchard plot
  2. Using dye tracer for visualizing roots impact on soil structure and soil porous system
  3. Alterations in soil aggregate stability of a tropical Ultisol as mediated by changes in land use
  4. A new method for estimating soil water repellency index
  5. Particle-size and organic matter effects on structure and water retention of soils
  6. Depth-dependent heterogeneity of water flow in sandy soil under grass
  7. Spatial variability of hydrophysical properties of fallow sandy soils
  8. Effects of vegetation at different succession stages on soil properties and water flow in sandy soil
  9. Impact of crop residue retention and tillage on water infiltration into a water-repellent soil
  10. Night-time leaf wetting process and its effect on the morning humidity gradient as a driving force of transpirational water loss in a semi-arid cornfield
  11. Hoplophthiracarus species (Acari: Oribatida: Phthiracaridae) from China with descriptions of two new species
  12. A new species of Trhypochthoniellus (Acari: Oribatida: Trhypochthoniidae) from Chile, with remarks on diagnosis of the genus
  13. New species of oribatid mites (Acari: Oribatida) of the genera Austrachipteria (Achipteriidae), Cultroribula (Astegistidae) and Microlamellarea (Lamellareidae) from New Zealand
  14. The genus Apterogyna in Saudi Arabia, with description of a new species and a new record (Hymenoptera: Bradynobaenidae: Apterogyninae)
  15. The effects of tree age and tree species composition on bird species richness in a Central European montane forest
  16. Me11b receptor mediated action of melatonin in regulation of lung associated immune system (LAIS) of Perdicula asiatica: An in vitro study
  17. Importance of urban trees and buildings as daytime roosts for bats
Downloaded on 8.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/biolog-2015-0178/html
Scroll to top button