Abstract
This study examines the spillover effects of the PROGRESA program on ineligible children’s participation in economic activities by exploiting the randomized design of the intervention and employing an instrumental variable strategy. We find that the incidence of child work among ineligible children is strongly affected by peer group’s child work decisions. We also find that peer group school attendance has a significant but smaller effect on ineligible children’s participation in economic activities. Our findings are relevant for policy makers as they show that cash transfer programs can have an indirect spillover effect on child work.
References
Andrews, I., J. Stock, and L. Sun. 2019. “Weak Instruments in Instrumental Variables Regression: Theory and Practice.” Annual Review of Economics 11: 727–53. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-economics-080218-025643.Search in Google Scholar
Avitabile, C. 2021. “Spillovers and Social Interaction Effects in the Demand for Preventive Healthcare: Evidence from the Progresa Program.” Journal of Health Economics 79: 102483. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhealeco.2021.102483.Search in Google Scholar
Basu, K. 1999. “Child Labor: Cause, Consequence, and Cure, with Remarks on International Labor Standards.” Journal of Economic Literature 37 (3): 1083–119. https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.37.3.1083.Search in Google Scholar
Bobonis, G., and F. Finan. 2009. “Neighborhood Peer Effects in Secondary School Enrollment Decisions.” The Review of Economics and Statistics 91 (4): 695–716. https://doi.org/10.1162/rest.91.4.695.Search in Google Scholar
Buddelmeyer, H., and E. Skoufias. 2004. “An Evaluation of the Performance of Regression Discontinuity Design on PROGRESA.” IZA Discussion Paper 827 and Policy Research Working Paper 3386. Washington: World Bank, Policy Research Department.10.1596/1813-9450-3386Search in Google Scholar
Cook, Thomas D., William R. Shadish, and Vivian C. Wong. 2008. “Three Conditions under Which Experimental and Observational Studies Produce Comparable Causal Estimates: New Findings from Within-Study Comparisons.” Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 27: 724–50. https://doi.org/10.1002/pam.20375.Search in Google Scholar
Galiani, S., and P. J. McEwan. 2013. “The Heterogeneous Impact of Conditional Cash Transfers.” Journal of Public Economics 103: 85–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2013.04.004.Search in Google Scholar
Lalive, R., and A. Cattaneo. 2009. “Social Interactions and Schooling Decisions.” The Review of Economics and Statistics 91 (3): 457–77. https://doi.org/10.1162/rest.91.3.457.Search in Google Scholar
Skoufias, E., and S. Parker. 2001. “Conditional Cash Transfers and Their Impact on Child Work and Schooling: Evidence from the PROGRESA Program in Mexico.” Economia: 45–96. https://doi.org/10.1353/eco.2001.0016.Search in Google Scholar
Strulik, H. 2013. “School Attendance and Child Labor – A Model of Collective Behavior.” Journal of the European Economic Association 11 (2): 246–77. https://doi.org/10.1111/jeea.12008.Search in Google Scholar
Supplementary Material
This article contains supplementary material (https://doi.org/10.1515/bejeap-2024-0368).
© 2025 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Research Articles
- Fair Choices During COVID-19: Firms’ Altruism and Inequality Aversion in Managing a Large Short-Time Work Scheme
- Inequality in Health Status During the COVID-19 in the UK: Does the Impact of the Second Lockdown Policy Matter?
- The Political Timing of Tax Policy: Evidence from U.S. States
- Is it a Matter of Skills? High School Choices and the Gender Gap in STEM
- Patent Licensing and Litigation
- Class Size, Student Disruption, and Academic Achievement
- Political Orientation and Policy Compliance: Evidence from COVID-19 Mobility Patterns in Korea
- Social Efficiency of Free Entry in a Vertically Related Industry with Cost and Technology Asymmetry
- Carbon Tax with Individuals’ Heterogeneous Environmental Concerns
- Equitable Redistribution and Inefficiency under Credit Rationing
- Letters
- Psychological Well-Being of Only Children: Evidence from the One-Child Policy
- Peer Effects in Child Work Decisions: Evidence from PROGRESA Cash Transfer Program
- Right Time to Focus? Time of Day and Cognitive Performance
- Employee Dissatisfaction and Intentions to Quit: New Evidence and Policy Recommendations
- On the Stability of Common Ownership Arrangements
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Research Articles
- Fair Choices During COVID-19: Firms’ Altruism and Inequality Aversion in Managing a Large Short-Time Work Scheme
- Inequality in Health Status During the COVID-19 in the UK: Does the Impact of the Second Lockdown Policy Matter?
- The Political Timing of Tax Policy: Evidence from U.S. States
- Is it a Matter of Skills? High School Choices and the Gender Gap in STEM
- Patent Licensing and Litigation
- Class Size, Student Disruption, and Academic Achievement
- Political Orientation and Policy Compliance: Evidence from COVID-19 Mobility Patterns in Korea
- Social Efficiency of Free Entry in a Vertically Related Industry with Cost and Technology Asymmetry
- Carbon Tax with Individuals’ Heterogeneous Environmental Concerns
- Equitable Redistribution and Inefficiency under Credit Rationing
- Letters
- Psychological Well-Being of Only Children: Evidence from the One-Child Policy
- Peer Effects in Child Work Decisions: Evidence from PROGRESA Cash Transfer Program
- Right Time to Focus? Time of Day and Cognitive Performance
- Employee Dissatisfaction and Intentions to Quit: New Evidence and Policy Recommendations
- On the Stability of Common Ownership Arrangements