Abstract
Insurance coverage increases health care consumption, but less is known whether moderate copayments affect adults’ primary care utilization in a system characterized by gatekeeping. We analyze whether abolishing a 14-euro copayment for visits to general practitioners (GP) in Helsinki, the capital of Finland, increased the number of GP visits among adults and especially among low-income individuals. Using a difference-in-differences (DD) design and combining several administrative registers from 2011 to 2014, we find that the abolition is associated with only a small increase in GP visits (+0.04 visits annually, or +4.4 %, for all adults). The increase is driven by low-income adults (+0.06 visits, or +4.5 %, at the bottom 40 %). Although the point estimates are rather robustly positive, the conclusions regarding the statistical significance are sensitive to how we account for clustering in a setting characterized by only one treated cluster and a finite number of comparison clusters.
Funding source: Sosiaali-ja Terveysministeriö
Funding source: Yrjö Jahnssonin Säätiö
Award Identifier / Grant number: 20197209
Acknowledgment
We thank Mikko Peltola, Heikki Kauppi, and THL for support and Liisa T. Laine, Tuomas Markkula, Mikko Nurminen, Jukka Pirttilä, Lauri Sääksvuori, Jussi Tervola, and Maria Vaalavuo for comments and suggestions. We also thank all seminar participants who have provided comments to this study and our other related projects. This work is supported by Yrjö Jahnsson Foundation (research grant No. 20197209) and by the Finnish Ministry of Social Affairs and Health. Replication codes: https://github.com/tapiohaa/ASMA2. Working paper versions: https://osf.io/8q5b2/.
References
Abadie, A., S. Athey, G. Imbens, and J. Wooldridge. 2023. “When Should You Adjust Standard Errors for Clustering?” The Quarterly Journal of Economics 138 (1): 1–35. https://doi.org/10.1093/qje/qjac038.Suche in Google Scholar
Beck Olsen, C., and H. O. Melberg. 2018. “Did Adolescents in Norway Respond to the Elimination of Copayments for General Practitioner Services?” Health Economics 27 (7): 1120–30. https://doi.org/10.1002/hec.3660.Suche in Google Scholar
Bertrand, M., E. Duflo, and S. Mullainathan. 2004. “How Much Should We Trust Differences-In-Differences Estimates?” The Quarterly Journal of Economics 119 (1): 249–75. https://doi.org/10.1162/003355304772839588.Suche in Google Scholar
Bhuller, M., T. Havnes, E. Leuven, and M. Mogstad. 2013. “Broadband Internet: An Information Superhighway to Sex Crime?” The Review of Economic Studies 80 (4): 1237–66. https://doi.org/10.1093/restud/rdt013.Suche in Google Scholar
Bilinski, A., and L. A. Hatfield. 2020. “Nothing to See Here? Non-Inferiority Approaches to Parallel Trends and Other Model Assumptions.” arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1805.03273.Suche in Google Scholar
Brot-Goldberg, Z. C., A. Chandra, B. R. Handel, and J. T. Kolstad. 2017. “What Does a Deductible Do? The Impact of Cost-Sharing on Health Care Prices, Quantities, and Spending Dynamics.” The Quarterly Journal of Economics 132 (3): 1261–318. https://doi.org/10.1093/qje/qjx013.Suche in Google Scholar
Einav, L., and A. Finkelstein. 2018. “Moral Hazard in Health Insurance: What We Know and How we Know it.” Journal of the European Economic Association 16 (4): 957–82. https://doi.org/10.1093/jeea/jvy017.Suche in Google Scholar
Ferman, B., and C. Pinto. 2021. “Synthetic Controls with Imperfect Pretreatment Fit.” Quantitative Economics 12: 1197–221. https://doi.org/10.3982/qe1596.Suche in Google Scholar
Ferman, B., C. Pinto, and V. Possebom. 2020. “Cherry Picking with Synthetic Controls.” Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 39 (2): 510–32. https://doi.org/10.1002/pam.22206.Suche in Google Scholar
Goodman-Bacon, A. 2021. “Difference-in-Differences with Variation in Treatment Timing.” Journal of Econometrics 225 (2): 254–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconom.2021.03.014.Suche in Google Scholar
Haaga, T., P. Böckerman, M. Kortelainen, and J. Tukiainen. 2023a. “Do Adolescents from Low-Income Families Respond More to Cost-Sharing in Primary Care?”. https://osf.io/r83sq.Suche in Google Scholar
Haaga, T., P. Böckerman, M. Kortelainen, and J. Tukiainen. 2023b. “Effects of Nurse Visit Copayment on Primary Care Use: Do Low-Income Households Pay the Price?”. https://osf.io/xqbt3.10.1016/j.jhealeco.2024.102866Suche in Google Scholar
Hagemann, A. 2020. “Inference with a Single Treated Cluster.” (working paper). https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2010.04076.Suche in Google Scholar
Hayen, A. P., T. J. Klein, and M. Salm. 2021. “Does the Framing of Patient Cost-Sharing Incentives Matter? The Effects of Deductibles vs. No-Claim Refunds.” Journal of Health Economics 80: 102520. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhealeco.2021.102520.Suche in Google Scholar
Iizuka, T., and H. Shigeoka. 2023. “Asymmetric Demand Response when Prices Increase and Decrease: The Case of Child Healthcare.” The Review of Economics and Statistics 105 (5): 1325–33. https://doi.org/10.1162/rest_a_01110.Suche in Google Scholar
Jakobsson, N., and M. Svensson. 2016. “The Effect of Copayments on Primary Care Utilization: Results from a Quasi-Experiment.” Applied Economics 48 (39): 3752–62. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2016.1145346.Suche in Google Scholar
Johansson, N., N. Jakobsson, and M. Svensson. 2019. “Effects of Primary Care Cost-Sharing Among Young Adults: Varying Impact Across Income Groups and Gender.” The European Journal of Health Economics 20 (8): 1271–80. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10198-019-01095-6.Suche in Google Scholar
Magnussen Landsem, M., and J. Magnussen. 2018. “The Effect of Copayments on the Utilization of the GP Service in Norway.” Social Science & Medicine 205: 99–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2018.03.034.Suche in Google Scholar
Mäklin, S., and P. Kokko. 2020. “Terveyden- ja sosiaalihuollon yksikkökustannukset Suomessa vuonna 2017.” THL Työpaperi 2020 (21): 1–55.Suche in Google Scholar
Nilsson, A., and A. Paul. 2018. “Patient Cost-Sharing, Socioeconomic Status, and Children’s Health Care Utilization.” Journal of Health Economics 59: 109–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhealeco.2018.03.006.Suche in Google Scholar
Olden, A., and J. Møen. 2022. “The Triple Difference Estimator.” The Econometrics Journal 25 (3): 531–53. https://doi.org/10.1093/ectj/utac010.Suche in Google Scholar
Rambachan, A., and J. Roth. 2023. “A More Credible Approach to Parallel Trends.” The Review of Economic Studies 90 (5): 2555–91. https://doi.org/10.1093/restud/rdad018.Suche in Google Scholar
Remmerswaal, M., J. Boone, M. Bijlsma, and R. Douven. 2019. “Cost-Sharing Design Matters: A Comparison of the Rebate and Deductible in Healthcare.” Journal of Public Economics 170: 83–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2019.01.008.Suche in Google Scholar
Roodman, D., M. Ø. Nielsen, J. G. MacKinnon, and M. D. Webb. 2019. “Fast and Wild: Bootstrap Inference in Stata Using Boottest.” The Stata Journal 19 (1): 4–60. https://doi.org/10.1177/1536867x19830877.Suche in Google Scholar
Roth, J., P. H. C. Sant’Anna, A. Bilinski, and J. Poe. 2023. “What’s Trending in Difference-In-Differences? A Synthesis of the Recent Econometrics Literature.” Journal of Econometrics 235 (2): 2218–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconom.2023.03.008.Suche in Google Scholar
Supplementary Material
This article contains supplementary material (https://doi.org/10.1515/bejeap-2023-0056).
© 2023 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
Artikel in diesem Heft
- Frontmatter
- Research Articles
- Gender Differences and Firm Performance: Evidence from India
- The Effect of Soft Skills on Academic Outcomes
- Search and Matching in Political Corruption
- The New Form Agency Problem: Cooperation and Circular Agency
- Lobbying for Tariff Protection, International Technology Licensing and Consumer Surplus
- Active Labour Market Policies: What Works for the Long-Term Unemployed?
- Does Abolishing a Copayment Increase Doctor Visits? A Comparative Case Study
- An Experimental Analysis of Patient Dumping Under Different Payment Systems
- Does Excellence Pay Off? Evidence from the Italian Wine Market
- Letters
- Estimating the Socio-Economic Status of the U.S. Capitol Insurrectionists
- The Effect of Elevating the Supplemental Poverty Measure on Government Program Eligibility and Spending
- Data-Driven Health Innovation and Privacy Regulation
Artikel in diesem Heft
- Frontmatter
- Research Articles
- Gender Differences and Firm Performance: Evidence from India
- The Effect of Soft Skills on Academic Outcomes
- Search and Matching in Political Corruption
- The New Form Agency Problem: Cooperation and Circular Agency
- Lobbying for Tariff Protection, International Technology Licensing and Consumer Surplus
- Active Labour Market Policies: What Works for the Long-Term Unemployed?
- Does Abolishing a Copayment Increase Doctor Visits? A Comparative Case Study
- An Experimental Analysis of Patient Dumping Under Different Payment Systems
- Does Excellence Pay Off? Evidence from the Italian Wine Market
- Letters
- Estimating the Socio-Economic Status of the U.S. Capitol Insurrectionists
- The Effect of Elevating the Supplemental Poverty Measure on Government Program Eligibility and Spending
- Data-Driven Health Innovation and Privacy Regulation