The Effects of Technology-Mediated TBLT on Enhancing the Speaking Abilities of University Students in a Collaborative EFL Learning Environment

References

AbuSeileek, A. F. 2012. The effect of computer-assisted cooperative learning methods and group size on the EFL learners’ achievement in communication skills. Computers & Education 58(1). 231–239. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.07.011.Search in Google Scholar

Allam, C. 2006. Using filmmaking to teach students about Shakespeare, urban regeneration and other stuff! Proceedings of the 6th International Diverse Conference, 5-7 July 2006, Glasgow, UK: Glasgow Caledonian University. 163–170.Search in Google Scholar

Ashton-Hay, S. & H. K. Pillay. 2010. Case study of collaborative learning in two contexts: what do English language learners gain? In E. Luzzatto & G. DiMarco (eds.), Collaborative learning: Methodology, types of interactions and techniques. education in a competitive and globalizing world. New York.: Nova Publishers.Search in Google Scholar

Brooke, S. 2003. Video production in the foreign language classroom: Some practical ideas’. The Internet TESL Journal 9(10). Available at http://iteslj.org/Techniques/Brooke-Video.html Accessed: 29 October 2018.Search in Google Scholar

Brown, F. A. 2008. Collaborative learning in the EAP classroom: Students’ perceptions. ESP World 17(1). 1–18.Search in Google Scholar

Brown, H. D. 2001. Teaching by principles: An interactive approach to language pedagogy. 2nd ed. White Plain, NY: Addison Wesley Longman Longman.Search in Google Scholar

Brown, J. D. & T. S. Rodgers. 2002. Doing second language research: An introduction to the theory and practice of second language research for graduate/master’s students in TESOL and applied linguistics, and others. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Carter, N., D. Bryant-Lukosius, A. DiCenso, J. Blythe & A. J. Neville. 2014. The use of triangulation in qualitative research. Oncol Nurs Forum 41(5). 545–547. doi:10.1188/14.ONF.545-547.Search in Google Scholar

Chapelle, C. A. 2001. Computer applications in second language acquisition: Foundations for teaching, testing, and research. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139524681Search in Google Scholar

Cohen, E.G. 1994. Restructuring the classroom: Conditions for productive small groups. Review of Educational Research 64(1). 1–35. doi:10.3102/00346543064001001.Search in Google Scholar

Dillenbourg, P. 1999. What do yuo mean by collaborative leraning? In P. Dillenbourg (ed.), Collaborative-learning: Cognitive and computational approaches, 1–19. Oxford: Elsevier.Search in Google Scholar

Dooly, M. 2011. Divergent perceptions of telecollaborative language learning tasks: Tasks-as-workplan vs. task-as-process. Language Learning & Technology 15(2). 69–91.Search in Google Scholar

González-Lloret, M. 2003. Designing task-based CALL to promote interaction: En busca de Esmeraldas. Language Learning & Technology 7(1). 86–104.Search in Google Scholar

González-Lloret, M. & L. Ortega. 2014. Technology-mediated TBLT: Researching technology and tasks. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.10.1075/tblt.6Search in Google Scholar

Gromik, N. A. 2012. Cell phone video recording feature as a language learning tool: A case study. Computers & Education 58(1). 223–230. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.06.013.Search in Google Scholar

Hafner, C. A. & L. Miller. 2011. Fostering learner autonomy in English for science: A collaborative digital video project in a technological learning environment. Language Learning & Technology 15(3). 68–86.Search in Google Scholar

Hampel, R. 2006. Rethinking task design for the digital age: A framework for language teaching and learning in a synchronous online environment. ReCALL 18(1). 105–121. doi:10.1017/S0958344006000711.Search in Google Scholar

Hauck, M. & B. L. Youngs. 2008. Telecollaboration in multimodal environments: The impact on task design and learner interaction. Computer Assisted Language Learning 21(2). 87–124. doi:10.1080/09588220801943510.Search in Google Scholar

Kern, R. 2006. Perspectives on technology in learning and teaching languages. TESOL Quarterly 40(1). 183–210. doi:10.2307/40264516.Search in Google Scholar

Kukulska-Hulme, A. & L. Shield. 2008. An overview of mobile assisted language learning: From content delivery to supported collaboration and interaction. ReCALL 20(3). 271–289. doi:10.1017/S0958344008000335.Search in Google Scholar

Lai, C. & G. Li. 2011. Technology and task-based language teaching: A critical review. CALICO Journal 28(2). 498–521.10.11139/cj.28.2.498-521Search in Google Scholar

Levy, M. & G. Stockwell. 2006. CALL dimensions: Options and issues in computer-assisted language learning. Mahwah, NJ: L. Erbaum Associates.Search in Google Scholar

Limbu, L. & L. Markauskaite. 2015. How do learners experience joint writing: University students’ conceptions of online collaborative writing tasks and environments. Computers & Education 82. 393–408. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.11.024.Search in Google Scholar

Matthews, R. S. 1996. Collaborative learning: Creating knowledge with students. In M. W. R. J. Menges & Associates (eds.), Teaching on solid ground: Using scholarship to improve practice, 101–124. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Search in Google Scholar

Memari Hanjani, A. 2016. Collaborative revision in L2 writing: learners’ reflections. ELT Journal 70(3). 296–307. doi:10.1093/elt/ccv053.Search in Google Scholar

Miles, M. B. & A. M. Huberman. 1994. Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. London: SAGE Publications.Search in Google Scholar

Motteram, G. & M. Thomas. 2010. Afterword: Future eirections for technology-mediated tasks. In M. Thomas & H. Reinders (eds.), Task-based language learning and teaching with technology, 218–237. London: Continuum.Search in Google Scholar

Nikitina, L. 2010. Video-making in the foreign language classroom: Applying principles of constructivist pedagogy. Electronic Journal of Foreign Language Teaching 7(1). 21–31.Search in Google Scholar

Nunan, D. 1992. Collaborative language learning and teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Nunan, D. & K. M. Bailey. 2009. Exploring second language classroom research: A comprehensive guide. Boston, MA: Heinle, Cengage Learning.Search in Google Scholar

O’Donoghue, T. A. & K. Punch. 2003. Qualitative educational research in cction: Doing and reflecting. London: RoutledgeFalmer.10.4324/9780203506301Search in Google Scholar

Oskoz, A. & I. Elola. 2014. Promoting FL collaborative writing through the use of Web 2.0 tools. In M. L. L. Ortega (ed.), Technology and tasks: Exploring technologymediated TBLT, 115–147. Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.10.1075/tblt.6.05oskSearch in Google Scholar

Oxford, R. 1990. Language learning strategies: What every teacher should know. New York: Newbury House Publisher.Search in Google Scholar

Oxford, R. 1997. Cooperative learning, collaborative learning, and interaction: Three communicative strands in the language classroom. The Modern Language Journal 81(4). 443–456. doi:10.2307/328888.Search in Google Scholar

Payne, J. S. & P. J. Whitney. 2002. Developing L2 oral proficiency through synchronous CMC: Output, working memory, and interlanguage development. CALICO Journal 20. 7–32.10.1558/cj.v20i1.7-32Search in Google Scholar

Pearson, J. 1990. Putting pupils in the picture. Language Learning Journal 2. 71–72.10.1080/09571739085200541Search in Google Scholar

Reinders, H. & C. White. 2010. The theory and practice of technology in materials development and task design. In N. Harwood (ed.), Materials in ELT: Theory and practice, 58–80. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Salaberry, M. R. 2000. Pedagogical design of computer mediated communication tasks: Learning objectives and technological capabilities. The Modern Language Journal 84(1). 28–37. doi:10.1111/0026-7902.00050.Search in Google Scholar

Skehan, P. 2003. Focus on form, tasks, and technolog. Computer Assisted Language Learning 16(5). 391–411. doi:10.1076/call.16.5.391.29489.Search in Google Scholar

Smith, B. 2015. Technology in language learning: An overview. New York: Taylor & Francis.10.4324/9781315673721Search in Google Scholar

Solares, M. E. 2014. Textbooks, tasks and technology: An action research study in a textbook-bound EFL context’. In M. G.-L. L. Ortega (ed.), Technology mediated TBLT: Researching technology and tasks, 79–114. Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.10.1075/tblt.6.04solSearch in Google Scholar

Spada, N. & M. Fröhlich. 1995. COLT – Communicative orientation of language teaching observation scheme: Coding conventions and applications. Sydney: National Centre for English Language Teaching and Research.Search in Google Scholar

Thomas, M. & H. Reinders. 2013. Task-based language learning and teaching with technology. New York: Bloomsbury Publishing.Search in Google Scholar

Uzunboylu, H., N. Cavus & E. Ercag. 2009. Using mobile learning to increase environmental awareness. Computers & Education 52(2). 381–389. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2008.09.008.Search in Google Scholar

Van Parijs, P. 2000. The ground floor of the world: On the socio-economic consequences of linguistic globalization. International Political Science Review 21(2). 217–233. doi:10.1177/0192512100212006.Search in Google Scholar

Wang, M. J. 2009. Web based projects enhancing English language and generic skills development for Asian hospitality industry students. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology & Society 25(5). 611–626.10.14742/ajet.1111Search in Google Scholar

Wang, S. & M. Higgins. 2006. Limitations of mobile phone learning. The JALT CALL Journal 2(1). 3–14.10.29140/jaltcall.v2n1.18Search in Google Scholar

Wiener, H. S. 1986. Collaborative learning in the classroom: A guide to evaluation. College English 48(1). 52–61. doi:10.2307/376586.Search in Google Scholar

Willmot, P., M. Bramhall & K. Radley. 2012. Using digital video reporting to inspire and engage students. Available at: http://www.raeng.org.uk/education/hestem/heip/pdf/Using_digital_video_reporting.pdf Accessed 29 October 2018.Search in Google Scholar

Xerri, D. 2018. Feature films in English language teaching. ELT Journal, ccy041. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccy04110.1093/elt/ccy041Search in Google Scholar

Zhang, D., Y. Fan & W. Du. 2013. Sociocultural theory applied to second language learning: collaborative learning with reference to the Chinese context. International Education Studies 6(9). 165–174.10.5539/ies.v6n9p165Search in Google Scholar