Home Technology Effects of fixture rotation on coating uniformity for high-performance optical filter fabrication
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Effects of fixture rotation on coating uniformity for high-performance optical filter fabrication

  • Binyamin Rubin

    Binyamin Rubin obtained his PhD in Aerospace Engineering from Technion – Israel Institute of Technology and MSc and BSc from Moscow Institute of Physics and Technology. He has 10 years of experience developing ion thrusters for space propulsion and 6 years of experience developing ion beam deposition equipment for optical coatings.

    EMAIL logo
    , Jason George

    Jason George obtained his BS in Chemistry from the University of Florida and his MS in Mechanical Engineering from Colorado State University. Jason has over 17 years of optical coating and vacuum technology experience and has worked for Veeco for 16 years in various roles and responsibilities.

    and Riju Singhal

    Riju Singhal obtained his PhD in Materials Science and Engineering from Drexel University in 2012, and a B-Tech in Chemical Engineering from the Indian Institute of Technology, Kanpur in 2007. He has 5 years of experience in coating technologies including chemical vapor deposition and ion beam sputtering. He has been working with Veeco Instruments for the past 2.5 years in a technical product marketing role for the development of ion beam deposition equipment for optical coatings.

Published/Copyright: March 15, 2018
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

Coating uniformity is critical in fabricating high-performance optical filters by various vacuum deposition methods. Simple and planetary rotation systems with shadow masks are used to achieve the required uniformity [J. B. Oliver and D. Talbot, Appl. Optics 45, 13, 3097 (2006); O. Lyngnes, K. Kraus, A. Ode and T. Erguder, in ‘Method for Designing Coating Thickness Uniformity Shadow Masks for Deposition Systems with a Planetary Fixture’, 2014 Technical Conference Proceedings, Optical Coatings, August 13, 2014, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.14332/svc14.proc.1817.]. In this work, we discuss the effect of rotation pattern and speed on thickness uniformity in an ion beam sputter deposition system. Numerical modeling is used to determine statistical distribution of random thickness errors in coating layers. The relationship between thickness tolerance and production yield are simulated theoretically and demonstrated experimentally. Production yields for different optical filters produced in an ion beam deposition system with planetary rotation are presented. Single-wavelength and broadband optical monitoring systems were used for endpoint monitoring during filter deposition. Limitations of thickness tolerances that can be achieved in systems with planetary rotation are shown. Paths for improving production yield in an ion beam deposition system are described.

About the authors

Binyamin Rubin

Binyamin Rubin obtained his PhD in Aerospace Engineering from Technion – Israel Institute of Technology and MSc and BSc from Moscow Institute of Physics and Technology. He has 10 years of experience developing ion thrusters for space propulsion and 6 years of experience developing ion beam deposition equipment for optical coatings.

Jason George

Jason George obtained his BS in Chemistry from the University of Florida and his MS in Mechanical Engineering from Colorado State University. Jason has over 17 years of optical coating and vacuum technology experience and has worked for Veeco for 16 years in various roles and responsibilities.

Riju Singhal

Riju Singhal obtained his PhD in Materials Science and Engineering from Drexel University in 2012, and a B-Tech in Chemical Engineering from the Indian Institute of Technology, Kanpur in 2007. He has 5 years of experience in coating technologies including chemical vapor deposition and ion beam sputtering. He has been working with Veeco Instruments for the past 2.5 years in a technical product marketing role for the development of ion beam deposition equipment for optical coatings.

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Hector Castillo (Veeco Instruments, Inc.) for the help with the fabrication of the large-area single rotational axis fixture OGP measurements of the grids were not used in this work.

  1. Author contributions: Binyamin Rubin performed all the simulations and experiments. Riju Singhal and Binyamin Rubin drafted the manuscript. Jason George supervised the entire work.

  2. Competing interest: The authors declare no competing interest.

References

[1] D. Deakins, T. Ramin, B. Rubin and S. Chakmakjian, in ‘Evaluation of Broadband Optical Monitoring for Optical Interference Coatings’, 2014 Technical Conference Proceedings, Optical Coatings, August 21, 2014, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.14332/svc14.proc.1837?10.14332/svc14.proc.1837Search in Google Scholar

[2] J. B. Oliver and D. Talbot, Appl. Optics 45, 13, 3097 (2006).10.1364/AO.45.003097Search in Google Scholar

[3] O. Lyngnes, K. Kraus, A. Ode and T. Erguder, in ‘Method for Designing Coating Thickness Uniformity Shadow Masks for Deposition Systems with a Planetary Fixture’, 2014 Technical Conference Proceedings, Optical Coatings, August 13, 2014, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.14332/svc14.proc.1817?10.14332/svc14.proc.1817Search in Google Scholar

[4] J. Oliver, Appl. Optics 55, 30, 8550 (2016).10.1364/AO.55.008550Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[5] B. Rubin, J. Topper, C. Farnell and A. Yalin, Rev. Sci. Instrum. 80, 103506 (2009).10.1063/1.3249560Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[6] B. Rubin, J. Topper and A. Yalin, J. Appl. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 42, 205205 (2009).10.1088/0022-3727/42/20/205205Search in Google Scholar

[7] C. Bundesmann, T. Lautenschläger, D. Spemanna, A. Finzel, E. Thelander, et al., App. Surf. Sci. 421, Part B, 331 (2017).10.1016/j.apsusc.2016.08.056Search in Google Scholar

[8] T. Lautenschläger, R. Feder, H. Neumann, C. Rice, M. Schubert, et al., Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. B 385, 39 (2016).10.1016/j.nimb.2016.08.017Search in Google Scholar

[9] D. Wei, Appl. Optics 28, 14, 2813 (1989).10.1364/AO.28.002813Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[10] J. R. Sites, P. Gilstrap and R. Rujkorakarn, Opt. Eng. 22, 4, 224447 (1983).10.1117/12.7973141Search in Google Scholar

[11] R. Thielsch, A. Gatto and N. Kaiser, Appl. Optics 41, 16, 3211, (2002).10.1364/AO.41.003211Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[12] J. Kraus, J. Davis, B. Rubin, O. Lyngnes and A. Ode, in ‘Improving Throughput of Ion Beam Sputtered Optical Films’, 2013 Technical Conference Proceedings, Optical Coatings, September 19, 2013, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.14332/svc13.proc.1086?10.14332/svc13.proc.1086Search in Google Scholar

[13] O. Lyngnes, U. Brauneck, J. Wang, R. Erz, S. Kohli, et al., in ‘Proc. SPIE 9627, Optical Systems Design 2015: Advances in Optical Thin Films V’, 962715 (23 September 2015); doi: 10.1117/12.2194090.10.1117/12.2194090Search in Google Scholar

[14] C. Farnell, ‘Performance and lifetime simulation of ion thruster optics’, Dissertation Thesis, 2007.Search in Google Scholar

[15] J. B. Oliver, Appl. Opt. 56, 5, 1460 (2017).10.1364/AO.56.001460Search in Google Scholar

[16] M. Gross, S. Dligatch and A. Chtanov, Appl. Opt. 50, 9, C316 (2011).10.1364/AO.50.00C316Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Received: 2017-11-30
Accepted: 2018-2-15
Published Online: 2018-3-15
Published in Print: 2018-4-25

©2018 THOSS Media & De Gruyter, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 6.2.2026 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/aot-2017-0085/html
Scroll to top button