Home Modeling of imaging fiber bundles and adapted signal processing for fringe projection
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Modeling of imaging fiber bundles and adapted signal processing for fringe projection

  • Steffen Matthias

    Steffen Matthias is a research associate at the Institute of Measurement and Automatic Control at Leibniz Universität Hannover.

    ORCID logo EMAIL logo
    , Markus Kästner

    Markus Kästner is the head of the department for production metrology at the Institute of Measurement and Automatic Control at Leibniz Universität Hannover.

    and Eduard Reithmeier

    Eduard Reithmeier is the head of the Institute of Measurement and Automatic Control at Leibniz Universität Hannover.

Published/Copyright: November 9, 2016
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

Fringe projection profilometry is an established technique for capturing three-dimensional (3-D)-geometry data with high-point densities in short time. By combining fringe projection with endoscopy techniques, it is possible to perform inline inspection of industrial manufacturing processes. A new fringe projection system is presented, which uses flexible image fiber bundles to achieve versatile positioning of a compact sensor head. When measuring specimens with highly varying reflectivity, such as technical surfaces on tool geometries, measurement errors increase especially due to the crosstalk between individual fibers in the bundle. A detailed analysis of the transmission properties of the utilized fiber bundles is presented. It is shown that aliasing is avoided due to the non-regular grid structure of a bundle. Different techniques are demonstrated to reduce the effect of crosstalk on the phase evaluation. Measurements of highly reflective technical surfaces with different geometrical properties are shown.

Award Identifier / Grant number: SFB/TR 73

Funding statement: Funding: Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, (Grant/Award Number: ‘SFB/TR 73’).

About the authors

Steffen Matthias

Steffen Matthias is a research associate at the Institute of Measurement and Automatic Control at Leibniz Universität Hannover.

Markus Kästner

Markus Kästner is the head of the department for production metrology at the Institute of Measurement and Automatic Control at Leibniz Universität Hannover.

Eduard Reithmeier

Eduard Reithmeier is the head of the Institute of Measurement and Automatic Control at Leibniz Universität Hannover.

Acknowledgment

The authors would like to thank the German Research Foundation (DFG) for funding the project B6 “Endoscopic geometry inspection” within the Collaborative Research Center (CRC)/TR 73. Thanks to Dominic Stangier from TU Dortmund for providing the coated specimens used for the measurements in this article.

References

[1] H. Schwenke, U. Neuschaefer-Rube, T. Pfeifer and H. Kunzmann, CIRP Ann. Manuf. Techn. 51, 685 (2002).10.1016/S0007-8506(07)61707-7Search in Google Scholar

[2] E. Savio, L. de Chiffre and R. Schmitt, CIRP Ann. Manuf. Techn. 56, 810 (2007).10.1016/j.cirp.2007.10.008Search in Google Scholar

[3] S. Matthias, A. Loderer, S. Koch, M. Gröne, M. Kästner, et al, Prod. Engineer. 10, 51 (2016).10.1007/s11740-015-0647-2Search in Google Scholar

[4] J. Gamo, O. Demuynck, Ó. Esteban, J. L. Lázaro and A. Cubillo, Proc. IADAT (IADAT, Bilbao, Spain, 2005).Search in Google Scholar

[5] C. Winter, S. Rupp, M. Elter, C. Munzenmayer, H. Gerhauser and T. Wittenberg, IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 53, 2035 (2006).10.1109/TBME.2006.877110Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[6] M. A. Z. Dippé and E. H. Wold, ACM Siggraph Computer Graphics 19, 69 (1985).10.1145/325165.325182Search in Google Scholar

[7] R. Drougard, J. Opt. Soc. Am. 54, 907 (1964).10.1364/JOSA.54.000907Search in Google Scholar

[8] X. Chen, K. L. Reichenbach and C. Xu, Opt. Express 16, 21598 (2008).10.1364/OE.16.021598Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[9] K. L. Reichenbach and C. Xu, Opt. Express 15, 2151 (2007).10.1364/OE.15.002151Search in Google Scholar

[10] O. Coquoz, Opt. Eng. 34, 2092 (1995).10.1117/12.204737Search in Google Scholar

[11] S. K. Park, R. Schowengerdt and M.-A. Kaczynski, Appl. Opt. 23, 2572 (1984).10.1364/AO.23.002572Search in Google Scholar

[12] J. H. McClellan, in ‘Proc. 7th Annu. Princeton Conf. Information Sciences and Systems’ (1973) pp. 247–251.Search in Google Scholar

[13] S. Matthias, M. Kästner and E. Reithmeier, in ‘SPIE Photonics Europe, SPIE Proceedings’, Ed. By F. Berghmans and A. G. Mignani (SPIE, 2016) p. 989905.10.1117/12.2225601Search in Google Scholar

[14] S. S. Gorthi and P. Rastogi, Opt. Lasers Eng. 48(IMAC-REVIEW-2009-001), 133–140 (2010).10.1016/j.optlaseng.2009.09.001Search in Google Scholar

[15] W. H. Richardson, J. Opt. Soc. Am. 62, 55 (1972).10.1364/JOSA.62.000055Search in Google Scholar

[16] S. Prasad, J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 19, 1286 (2002).10.1364/JOSAA.19.001286Search in Google Scholar

[17] J.-H. Han, J. Lee and J. U. Kang, Opt. Express 18, 7427 (2010).10.1364/OE.18.007427Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[18] S. Rupp, C. Winter and M. Elter, in ‘Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society’, (2009) pp. 3677–3680.Search in Google Scholar

[19] J. M. Huntley and H. Saldner, Appl. Opt. 32, 3047 (1993).10.1364/AO.32.003047Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[20] H. P. Stahl, in ‘San Diego – DL Tentative, SPIE Proceedings’, Ed. By C. P. Grover (SPIE, 1990) p. 704.10.1117/12.51121Search in Google Scholar

[21] W. Tillmann, D. Stangier and P. Schröder, Surf. Coat. Technol. (2016). DOI: 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2016.07.110 (in press).10.1016/j.surfcoat.2016.07.110Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2016-9-7
Accepted: 2016-10-4
Published Online: 2016-11-9
Published in Print: 2016-12-1

©2016 THOSS Media & De Gruyter

Downloaded on 7.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/aot-2016-0050/html
Scroll to top button