Home Exploring Mutual Learning of Four Chinese Senior High School EFL Teachers in a Collaborative Action Research Community
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Exploring Mutual Learning of Four Chinese Senior High School EFL Teachers in a Collaborative Action Research Community

  • Hongying Zheng

    Hongying ZHENG is a professor and doctoral supervisor of English Education at Sichuan Normal University. She obtained her Ph.D. from Cambridge University. Her research interests include L2 teacher professional development, English language teaching, and learning.

    and Tingting Huan

    Tingting HUAN is now a Ph.D. candidate in Curriculum and Teaching Methodology at Sichuan Normal University.

Published/Copyright: September 28, 2023
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

English as a Foreign Language (EFL) teachers’ professional development has been attached much importance with the advent of the National English Curriculum Standards (NECS in short) for Senior High Schools as it initiates the shift from knowledge-skill-oriented education to competence-oriented education. As an effective way for teachers’ professional development, collaborative action research community is introduced in this study to provide teachers with opportunities for mutual engagement, meaning negotiation, and a shared repertoire. Four senior high school EFL teachers from four different schools were studied in a collaborative action research community to explore how teachers from diversified backgrounds achieve mutual learning for their professional development. With data collected from observation, interviews, and journals, the study reveals that diversity and partiality help maintain mutual engagement in the community of practice. Meaning negotiation and mutual accountability in a joint enterprise contribute to the coherence of the community. Moreover, the participative activity of online and offline group discussion and the common topic of thinking visualization were treated as sources of a shared repertoire, an essential indication of a harmonious community. In this case, this study extrapolates how the collaborative action research community achieves harmony to support teachers’ professional development in action research.

About the authors

Hongying Zheng

Hongying ZHENG is a professor and doctoral supervisor of English Education at Sichuan Normal University. She obtained her Ph.D. from Cambridge University. Her research interests include L2 teacher professional development, English language teaching, and learning.

Tingting Huan

Tingting HUAN is now a Ph.D. candidate in Curriculum and Teaching Methodology at Sichuan Normal University.

References

Adams, P., & Townsend, D. (2014). From action research to collaborative inquiry: A framework for researchers and practitioners. Education Canada, 54(5), 12-15Search in Google Scholar

Ampartzaki, M., Kypriotaki, M., Voreadou, C., Dardioti, A., & Stathi, I. (2013). Communities of practice and participatory action research: The formation of a synergy for the development of museum programmes for early childhood. Educational Action Research, 21(1), 4-2710.1080/09650792.2013.761920Search in Google Scholar

Balach, C. A., & Szymanski, G. J. (2003). The growth of a professional learning community through collaborative action research (ERIC Document Reproduction ED 477527)Search in Google Scholar

Beveridge, L., Mockler, N., & Gore, J. (2017). An Australian view of the academic partner role in Schools. Educational Action Research, 26(1), 25-4110.1080/09650792.2017.1290538Search in Google Scholar

Bleicher, R. E. (2013). A collaborative action research approach to professional learning. Professional Development in Education, 40(5), 802-82110.1080/19415257.2013.842183Search in Google Scholar

Bruce, B. C., & Easley, J. A. (2000). Emerging communities of practice: Collaboration and communication in action research. Educational Action Research, 8(2), 243-25910.1080/09650790000200118Search in Google Scholar

Burn, K. (2007). Professional knowledge and identity in a contested discipline: Challenges for student teachers and teacher educators. Oxford Review of Education, 33(4), 445-46710.1080/03054980701450886Search in Google Scholar

Burns, A. (2011a). Action Research in the Field of Second Language Teaching and Learning. In E. Hinkel (Eds.) Handbook of Research in Second Language Teaching and Learning (pp. 237-253). RoutledgeSearch in Google Scholar

Burns, A. (2011b). Doing action research in English Language Teaching. RoutledgeSearch in Google Scholar

Button, B. L., Cook, C., & Goertzen, J. (2022). Impact of a professional development session based on learner evaluations within a preceptor community of practice. Medical Teacher, 45(7), 732-739. https: //doi.org/10.1080/0142159x.2022.215512110.1080/0142159X.2022.2155121Search in Google Scholar

Castro-Garces, A. Y., & Martinez-Granada, L. (2016). The Role of Collaborative Action Research in Teachers’ Professional Development. PROFILE Issues in Teachers’ Professional Development, 18(1), 39-54. https://doi.org/10.15446/profile.v18n1.4914810.15446/profile.v18n1.49148Search in Google Scholar

Caudle, L., Moran, M. J., & Hobbs, M. (2014). The potential of communities of practice as contexts for the development of agentic teacher leaders: A three-year narrative of one early childhood teacher’s journey. Action in teacher education, 36, 45-6010.1080/01626620.2013.850124Search in Google Scholar

Chen, L. (2020). English book. Foreign Language Teaching and Research PressSearch in Google Scholar

Chen, X. M. (2019). 中小学教师为什么要做研究 [Why Do School Teachers Need to Do Research?]. Research in Educational Development,39(08), 67-72Search in Google Scholar

Chen, Z. H., Lin, Y. M., & Shao, H. B. (2023). 高中英语教材中的思辨能力培养模式探究:以阅读教学为例 [Exploration to Cultivating Students’ Critical Thinking Ability Based on English Textbooks: An Example from Reading Class]. English Language Learning, 745(03), 4-9Search in Google Scholar

Ding, H. Y. (2009). “ 问题为本的学习” 与“ 行动研究” 的整合 [An Integration of PBL and Action Research].Foreign Languages and Their Teaching, (03),40-44Search in Google Scholar

Flyvbjerg, B. (2006). Five misunderstandings about case study research. Qualitative Inquiry 12(2), 219-4510.1177/1077800405284363Search in Google Scholar

Hildreth, P. M., & Kimble, C. (2004). Knowledge networks: Innovation through communities of practice. Idea Group Pub10.4018/978-1-59140-200-8Search in Google Scholar

Kemmis, S., & McTaggart, R. (1988). The action research planner. Deakin University PressSearch in Google Scholar

Kimble, C., Hildreth, P. M., & Bourdon, I. (2008). Communities of Practice: Creating Learning Environments for Educators. Information Age PubSearch in Google Scholar

Leshem, S. (2007). Thinking about conceptual frameworks in a research community of practice: A case of a doctoral programme. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 44(3), 287-9910.1080/14703290701486696Search in Google Scholar

Locke, T., & Riley, D. (2009). What happened to educational criticism? Engaging with a paradigm for observation. Educational Action Research, 17(4), 489-50410.1080/09650790903309342Search in Google Scholar

Mehdizadeh, M., Pourhaji, M., & Derakhshan, A. (2023). Evolution of communities of practice, realignment of possible selves, and Repositionings in EFL teacher professional identity development: A longitudinal case study. The Language Learning Journal, 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1080/09571736.2022.216368510.1080/09571736.2022.2163685Search in Google Scholar

Ministry of Education, People’s Republic of China. (2020). 普通高中英语课程标准 2020 年版 [English curriculum standards for general senior high school (2020)]. People’s Education PressSearch in Google Scholar

Mitchell, S. N., Reilly, R. C., & Logue, M. E. (2009). Benefits of collaborative action research for the beginning teacher. Teaching and Teacher Education, 25(2), 344-34910.1016/j.tate.2008.06.008Search in Google Scholar

Osborn, J. (2017). Librarians as teachers: Forming a learning and teaching community of practice. Journal of the Australian Library and Information Association, 66(2), 162-16910.1080/24750158.2017.1328633Search in Google Scholar

O’Siochru, C., Norton, L., Pilkington, R., Parr, E., Anderson, B., & Maslen, J. (2020). Action learning: How can it contribute to a collaborative process of pedagogical action research? Educational Action Research, 29(2), 191-20510.1080/09650792.2020.1850495Search in Google Scholar

Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative evaluation and research methods (3rd ed.). SageSearch in Google Scholar

Peterson, S. S., Swartz, L., Bodnar, S., McCaigg, G., Ritchie, S., Dawson, R., & Glassford, J. (2010). Collaborative action research supporting teachers’ professional development as exemplified by one teacher team’s action research on a study of silent reading. Ontario Action Researcher, 11(1), 1-8. http://oar.nipissingu.ca/PDFS/V1113.pdfSearch in Google Scholar

Rainey, E. C., & Storm, S. (2021). English teacher interpretive communities: an exploratory case study of teachers’ literacy practices and pedagogical reasoning. Literacy Research and Instruction, (1), 1-2010.1080/19388071.2020.1867264Search in Google Scholar

Ruan, C. W. (2010). 教师行动研究的专业伦理及其建构 [Professional Morality and Construction in Teachers’ Action Research].Journal of Anhui Normal University, 38(01),13-18Search in Google Scholar

Scott, S. (2010). The theory and practice divide in relation to teacher professional development. In J. O. Lindberg and A. D. Olofsson (Eds). Online Learning Communities and Teacher Professional Development (pp. 20-40). Information Science Reference10.4018/978-1-60566-780-5.ch002Search in Google Scholar

Stake, R. E. (2005). Qualitative case studies. In N. K. Denzin and Y. S. Lincoln (Eds). The SAGE Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 443-466). SageSearch in Google Scholar

Strauss, A. L., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and Techniques. SageSearch in Google Scholar

Tasker, T., Johnson, K. E., & Davis, T. S. (2010). A sociocultural analysis of teacher talk in inquiry-based Professional Development. Language Teaching Research, 14(2), 129-14010.1177/1362168809353871Search in Google Scholar

Väätäjä, J. O. (2023). A community of Practice Approach to the co-development of digital pedagogy: A case study of primary school teacher education practicum. European Journal of Teacher Education, 118. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2023.219810210.1080/02619768.2023.2198102Search in Google Scholar

vanOostveen, R. (2017). Purposeful action research: Reconsidering science and technology teacher professional development. College Quarterly, 20(2), n2Search in Google Scholar

Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning and Identity. CUP10.1017/CBO9780511803932Search in Google Scholar

Wenger, E. (2010). Communities of Practice and social learning systems: The career of a concept. Social Learning Systems and Communities of Practice, 179-198. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84996-133-2_1110.1007/978-1-84996-133-2_11Search in Google Scholar

Wenger, E., Mcdermott, R. A., & Snyder, W. M. (2002). Cultivating Communities of Practice: A Guide to Managing Knowledge. Harvard Business School PressSearch in Google Scholar

Yin, R. K. (2009). Case Study Research: Design and Methods. SageSearch in Google Scholar

Zheng, H. Y. (2020). 基于复杂系统理论的思维发展:中学英语课堂对话教学策略探究[Developing Thinking based on Complexity Theory: Exploration of Dialogic Education Strategies in Senior High School English Classroom]. Journal of Sichuan Normal University (Social Sciences Edition), 47(01), 108-114Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2023-09-28
Published in Print: 2023-09-26

© 2023 FLTRP, Walter de Gruyter, Cultural and Education Section British Embassy

Downloaded on 24.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/CJAL-2023-0301/html?lang=en
Scroll to top button