Startseite Student Engagement With Peer Feedback in L2 Writing: A Multiple Case Study of Chinese Secondary School Students
Artikel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert Erfordert eine Authentifizierung

Student Engagement With Peer Feedback in L2 Writing: A Multiple Case Study of Chinese Secondary School Students

  • Qiuyan Yan

    Qiuyan YAN is a professor of applied linguistics at the School of Foreign Languages and Literature, Shandong University. Her research interests include second language reading and writing, foreign language testing and assessment.

    und Chen Tang

    Chen TANG is a graduate student at the School of Foreign Languages and Literature, Shandong University. Her research interests focus on second language writing.

Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 17. März 2023
Veröffentlichen auch Sie bei De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

While the past few decades have witnessed a growing body of research on peer feedback and student engagement, little attention has been paid to student engagement with peer feedback in the secondary school classrooms. Based on multiple qualitative data including semi-structured interviews, stimulated recall, original, revised and final writing drafts as well as peer discussion recordings, this case study investigated how secondary school students engaged with peer feedback in behavior, cognition, and affect from both the feedback giver’s and receiver’s perspectives and what factors may influence their engagement with peer feedback. Data analysis showed that 1) student engagement with both giving and receiving peer feedback demonstrated dynamic and complex interactions among three dimensions; 2) students were engaged with peer feedback in different ways while playing the roles of feedback givers and receivers, showing deep engagement as a giver and superficial engagement as a receiver, and vice versa; 3) factors such as language proficiency, self-efficacy, personality and teachers’ guidance were found to influence student engagement with peer feedback. By shedding light on the multi-dimensional characteristics of students’ engagement from bidirectional perspectives, the study offers suggestions for educational practitioners to improve English learners’ engagement with peer feedback in L2 writing classes.

About the authors

Qiuyan Yan

Qiuyan YAN is a professor of applied linguistics at the School of Foreign Languages and Literature, Shandong University. Her research interests include second language reading and writing, foreign language testing and assessment.

Chen Tang

Chen TANG is a graduate student at the School of Foreign Languages and Literature, Shandong University. Her research interests focus on second language writing.

Acknowledgments

This paper was supported by Shandong Social Science Planning Fund under the foreign language research project “The effect of reading-writing connection on English majors’ writing performance” (Grant No. 15CWZJ05).

References

Alqassab, M., Strijbos, J. W., & Ufer, S. (2019). Preservice mathematics teachers’ beliefs about peer feedback, perceptions of their peer feedback message, and emotions as predictors of peer feedback accuracy and comprehension of the learning task. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 44 (1), 139-154.10.1080/02602938.2018.1485012Suche in Google Scholar

Cao, Z., Yu, S., & Huang, J. (2019). A qualitative inquiry into undergraduates’ learning from giving and receiving peer feedback in L2 writing: Insights from a case study. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 63, 102-112.10.1016/j.stueduc.2019.08.001Suche in Google Scholar

Carless, D., & Boud, D. (2018). The development of student feedback literacy: Enabling uptake of feedback. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 43(8), 1315-1325.10.1080/02602938.2018.1463354Suche in Google Scholar

Chang, C. Y. (2016). Two decades of research in L2 peer review. Journal of Writing Research, 8(1), 81-117.10.17239/jowr-2016.08.01.03Suche in Google Scholar

Diab, N. M. (2011). Assessing the relationship between different types of student feedback and the quality of revised writing. Assessing Writing, 16(4), 274-292.10.1016/j.asw.2011.08.001Suche in Google Scholar

Ellis, R. (2010). A framework for investigating oral and written corrective feedback. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 32, 335-349.10.1017/S0272263109990544Suche in Google Scholar

Fan, Y., & Xu, J. (2020). Exploring student engagement with peer feedback on L2 writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 50, 100775.10.1016/j.jslw.2020.100775Suche in Google Scholar

Ferris, D. R. (2006). Does error feedback help student writers? New evidence on the short- and long-term effects of written error correction. In K. H. F. Hyland (Eds.), Feedback in second language writing: Contexts and issues (pp. 81-104). Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139524742.007Suche in Google Scholar

Finn, J. D., & Zimmer, K. S. (2012). Student engagement: What is it? Why does it matter? In S. L. Christenson, A. Reschly, & C. Wylie (Eds.), Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 97-131). Springer.10.1007/978-1-4614-2018-7_5Suche in Google Scholar

Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59-109.10.3102/00346543074001059Suche in Google Scholar

Ge, L. (2011). 英语写作中教师评阅及同伴互评的反馈效果研究 [On the effects of feedback from teacher assessment and peer assessment in English writing]. Shandong Foreign Language Teaching Journal, 32(3), 54-57.Suche in Google Scholar

Goh, C. F., Tan, O. K., Rasli, A., & Choi, S. L. (2019). Engagement in peer review, learner-content interaction and learning outcomes. International Journal of Information and Learning Technology, 36 (5), 423-433.10.1108/IJILT-04-2018-0038Suche in Google Scholar

Hadjar, A., Grecu, A., Scharf, J., Moll, F. D., Morinaj, J., & Hascher, T. (2021). Changes in school alienation profiles among secondary school students and the role of teaching style: Results from a longitudinal study in Luxembourg and Switzerland. International Journal of Educational Research, 15, 13-38.10.1016/j.ijer.2020.101697Suche in Google Scholar

Han, Y., & Hyland, F. (2015). Exploring learner engagement with written corrective feedback in a Chinese tertiary EFL classroom. Journal of Second Language Writing, 30, 31-44.10.1016/j.jslw.2015.08.002Suche in Google Scholar

Handley, K., Price, M., & Millar, J. (2011). Beyond “doing time”: Investigating the concept of student engagement with feedback. Oxford Review of Education, 37(4), 543-560.10.1080/03054985.2011.604951Suche in Google Scholar

Hyland, F. (1998). The impact of teacher written feedback on individual writers. Journal of Second Language Writing, 7(3), 255-286.10.1016/S1060-3743(98)90017-0Suche in Google Scholar

Hyland, F. (2003). Focusing on form: Student engagement with teacher feedback. System, 31(2), 217-230.10.1016/S0346-251X(03)00021-6Suche in Google Scholar

Hyland, K., & Hyland, F. (2006). Feedback on second language students’ writing. Language Teaching, 39, 83-10110.1017/S0261444806003399Suche in Google Scholar

Kahu, E. R. (2013). Framing student engagement in higher education. Studies in Higher Education, 38(5), 758-773.10.1080/03075079.2011.598505Suche in Google Scholar

Lee, M., & Evans, M. (2019). Investigating the operating mechanisms of the sources of L2 writing self-efficacy at the stages of giving and receiving peer feedback. Modern Language Journal, 103 (4), 831-847.10.1111/modl.12598Suche in Google Scholar

Li, R. (2007). 初中学生英语写作的元认知训练研究 [Metacognitive training in English writing of junior middle school students]. Journal of Educational Development, (6), 30-32.Suche in Google Scholar

Martin, I. A., & Sippel, L. (2021). Providing vs. receiving peer feedback: Learners’ beliefs and experiences. Language Teaching Research, https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168821102436510.1177/13621688211024365Suche in Google Scholar

Mercader, C., Ion, G., & Díaz-Vicario, A. (2020). Factors influencing students’ peer feedback uptake: Instructional design matters. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 45(8), 1169-1180.10.1080/02602938.2020.1726283Suche in Google Scholar

Mo, J. H. (2005). An exploratory study of conducting peer review among Chinese college students. Chinese Journal of Applied Linguistics, 28(6), 43-48.Suche in Google Scholar

Nystrand, M., & Gamoran, A. (1991). Instructional discourse, student engagement, and literature achievement. Research in the Teaching of English, 25(3), 261-290.10.58680/rte199115462Suche in Google Scholar

Pang, H., & Zhang, J. (2021). 中学生心理弹性状况的差异分析及教育对策—— 以浙江省为例 [Analyzing the differences of psychological resilience among middle school students and the educational countermeasures: A case study in Zhejiang Province]. Journal of Shanghai Educational Research, (9), 64-69.Suche in Google Scholar

Rouhi, A., & Azizian, E. (2013). Peer review: Is giving corrective feedback better than receiving it in L2 writing? In H. F. Odabasi (Ed.), Procedia social and behavioral sciences (pp. 1349-1354). Elsevier Science.10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.10.042Suche in Google Scholar

Tian, L., & Li, L. (2018). Chinese EFL learners’ perception of peer oral and written feedback as providers, receivers and observers. Language Awareness, 27(4), 312-330.10.1080/09658416.2018.1535602Suche in Google Scholar

Tian, L., & Zhou, Y. (2020). Learner engagement with automated feedback, peer feedback and teacher feedback in an online EFL writing context. System, 91, 10224710.1016/j.system.2020.102247Suche in Google Scholar

Uitto, A. (2014). Interest, attitudes and self-efficacy beliefs explaining upper-secondary school students’ orientation towards biology-related careers. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 12(6), 1425-1444.10.1007/s10763-014-9516-2Suche in Google Scholar

Wang, K., & Lin, C. (2008). 中学生写作文本形成能力的发展特点 [The development of middle school students’ ability of forming text]. Psychological Research, (1), 11-16.Suche in Google Scholar

Wu, D. (2005). 中学政治课教学中学生注意力的调控 [The regulation of students’ attention in middle school political teaching]. Education Review, (6), 114-115.Suche in Google Scholar

Xie, J. J., & Mu, F. Y. (2015). A study into students’ views on guided peer feedback in group work. Chinese Journal of Applied Linguistics, 38(2), 188-203.10.1515/cjal-2015-0011Suche in Google Scholar

Yu, S. (2019). Learning from giving peer feedback on postgraduate theses: Voices from master’s students in the Macau EFL context. Assessing Writing, 40, 42-52.10.1016/j.asw.2019.03.004Suche in Google Scholar

Yu, S. (2021). Giving genre-based peer feedback in academic writing: sources of knowledge and skills, difficulties and challenges. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 46(1), 36-53.10.1080/02602938.2020.1742872Suche in Google Scholar

Yu, S., & Jiang, L. (2020). Doctoral students’ engagement with journal reviewers’ feedback on academic writing. Studies in Continuing Education, 44, 87-10410.1080/0158037X.2020.1781610Suche in Google Scholar

Yu, S., & Lee, I. (2016). Peer feedback in second language writing (2005-2014). Language Teaching, 49(4), 461-493.10.1017/S0261444816000161Suche in Google Scholar

Yu, S., Zhang, Y., Zheng, Y., Yuan, K., & Zhang, L. (2018). Understanding student engagement with peer feedback on master’s theses: A Macau study. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 44(1), 50-65.10.1080/02602938.2018.1467879Suche in Google Scholar

Zhang, Z. V., & Hyland, K. (2018). Student engagement with teacher and automated feedback on L2 writing. Assessing Writing, 36, 90-102.10.1016/j.asw.2018.02.004Suche in Google Scholar

Zheng, Y., & Yu, S. (2018). Student engagement with teacher written corrective feedback in EFL writing: A case study of Chinese lower-proficiency students. Assessing Writing, 37, 13-24.10.1016/j.asw.2018.03.001Suche in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2023-03-17
Published in Print: 2023-02-23

© 2023 FLTRP, Walter de Gruyter, Cultural and Education Section British Embassy

Heruntergeladen am 20.11.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/CJAL-2023-0108/html
Button zum nach oben scrollen