Home The Influence of Combining Computer-Assisted Language Learning With Instruction on Chinese College Students’ L2 Pragmatic Ability
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

The Influence of Combining Computer-Assisted Language Learning With Instruction on Chinese College Students’ L2 Pragmatic Ability

  • Ying Zhang

    Ying ZHANG received her master’s degree in Teaching English to Speakers of Other Languages (TESOL) at the University of Southern California, in the United States. Her research efforts have been focused on computer-assisted language learning, second language acquisition, and second language pedagogy.

Published/Copyright: May 18, 2022
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

In the area of computer-assisted language learning (CALL), although a number of studies have adopted various CALL-based devices (e. g., blogs, gaming, and synthetic environments) to foster second language (L2) acquisition, the vital component of instruction has received little attention. The present study explored the usefulness of CALL-based communication in conjunction with instruction on EFL learners’ L2 pragmatic development. Sixty-two EFL students from a university in China were recruited for the current research. The experimental group communicated with a native English speaker through synchronous messaging via Skype and had two instructional sessions pertinent to compliment responses, while the control group interacted with a native English speaker via Skype without having the teaching intervention. Findings from an independent samples t-test demonstrated that the experimental group produced significantly more proper compliment responses in the immediate posttest than the control group (p < . 001). Moreover, a significant difference (p < . 001) was found for the experimental group between the pre-intervention and delayed post-intervention mean scores, suggesting that CALL coupled with teaching intervention had a long-term impact on learners’ L2 pragmatic development. These findings enrich our understanding of the beneficial and lasting influence of combining CALL with instruction on EFL students’ pragmatic development. In addition, pedagogical implications for deploying CALL paired with L2 pragmatics instruction are provided.

About the author

Ying Zhang

Ying ZHANG received her master’s degree in Teaching English to Speakers of Other Languages (TESOL) at the University of Southern California, in the United States. Her research efforts have been focused on computer-assisted language learning, second language acquisition, and second language pedagogy.

Acknowledgments

I would like to express my deep and sincere gratitude to the reviewers for their valuable suggestions and feedback.

References

Abrams, Z. (2013). Say what?! L2 Sociopragmatic competence in CMC: Skill transfer and development. CALICO Journal, 30, 423-445.10.11139/cj.30.3.423-445Search in Google Scholar

Bardovi-Harlig, K. (2001). Evaluating the empirical evidence: Grounds for instruction in pragmatics? In K. Rose & G. Kasper (Eds.), Pragmatics in language teaching (pp.13-32). Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139524797.005Search in Google Scholar

Belz, J. (2007). The role of computer mediation in the instruction and development of L2 pragmatic competence. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 27, 45-75.10.1017/S0267190508070037Search in Google Scholar

Belz, J., & Vyatkina, N. (2005). Learner corpus analysis and the development of L2 pragmatic competence in networked intercultural language study: The case of German modal particles. The Canadian Modern Language Review, 62(1), 17-48.10.3138/cmlr.62.1.17Search in Google Scholar

Belz, J., & Vyatkina, N. (2008). The pedagogical mediation of a developmental learner corpus for classroom-based language instruction. Language Learning & Technology, 12(3), 33–52.Search in Google Scholar

Cai, Y. (2012). A study on compliment response strategies by Chinese college students. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 3, 3.10.4304/jltr.3.3.543-549Search in Google Scholar

Chen, R. (1993). Responding to compliments: A contrastive study of politeness strategies between American English and Chinese speakers. Journal of Pragmatics, 20, 49-75.10.1016/0378-2166(93)90106-YSearch in Google Scholar

Chen, R., & Yang, D. (2010). Responding to compliments in Chinese: Has it changed? Journal of Pragmatics, 42, 1951-1963.10.1016/j.pragma.2009.12.006Search in Google Scholar

Cheng, D. (2011). New insights on compliment responses: A comparison between native English speakers and Chinese L2 speakers. Journal of Pragmatics, 43, 2204-2214.10.1016/j.pragma.2011.02.003Search in Google Scholar

Cunningham, J. (2016). Request modification in synchronous computer-mediated communication: The role of focused instruction. The Modern Language Journal, 100, 1-24.10.1111/modl.12332Search in Google Scholar

Cunningham, J., & Vyatkina, N. (2012). Telecollaboration for professional purposes: Towards developing a formal register in the foreign language classroom. The Canadian Modern Language Review, 68, 422-450.10.3138/cmlr.1279Search in Google Scholar

Ellis, R. (1994). The study of second language acquisition. Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Gonzáles, A. (2013). Development of politeness strategies in participatory online environments: A case study. In N. Taguchi & J. Sykes (Eds.), Language learning & language teaching (pp. 101-120). John Benjamins.10.1075/lllt.36.06gonSearch in Google Scholar

González-Lloret, M. (2019). Technology and L2 pragmatics learning. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 39, 113-127. https://doi.org/10.1017/S026719051900004710.1017/S0267190519000047Search in Google Scholar

Holmes, J. (1988). Compliments and compliment responses in New Zealand English. Anthropological Linguistics, 28, 485-508.Search in Google Scholar

Holmes, J., & Brown, D. F. (1987). Teachers and students learning about compliments. TESOL Quarterly, 21(3), 523-546.10.2307/3586501Search in Google Scholar

Kakegawa, T. (2009). Development of the use of Japanese sentence-final particles through email correspondence. In N. Taguchi (Ed.), Pragmatic ability (pp. 301-333). Mouton De Gruyter.10.1515/9783110218558.301Search in Google Scholar

Leech, G. N. (1983). Principles of pragmatics. Longman.Search in Google Scholar

LoCastro, V. (2003). An introduction to pragmatics: Social action for language teachers. The University of Michigan Press.Search in Google Scholar

Plonsky, L., & Zhuang, J. (2019). A meta-analysis of second language pragmatics instruction. In N. Taguchi (Ed.), Routledge handbook of SLA and pragmatics (pp. 287-307). Routledge.10.4324/9781351164085-19Search in Google Scholar

Plonsky, L., & Ziegler, N. (2016). The CALL-SLA interface: Insights from a second-order synthesis. Language Learning & Technology, 20(2), 17–37.Search in Google Scholar

Sardegna, V. G., & Molle, D. (2010). Videoconferencing with strangers: Teaching Japanese EFL students verbal backchannel signals and reactive expressions. Intercultural Pragmatics, 7(2), 279–310.10.1515/iprg.2010.013Search in Google Scholar

Schmidt, R. (1993). Consciousness, learning and interlanguage pragmatics. In G. Kasper & S. Blum-Kulka (Eds.), Interlanguage pragmatics (pp. 43-57). Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780195066029.003.0002Search in Google Scholar

Sykes, J. (2005). Synchronous CALL and pragmatic development: Effects of oral and written chat. CALICO Journal, 22, 399-431.10.1558/cj.v22i3.399-431Search in Google Scholar

Sykes, J. (2013). Multiuser virtual environments: Learner apologies in Spanish. In N. Taguchi & J. Sykes (Eds.), Technology in interlanguage pragmatics research and teaching (pp. 71-100). John Benjamins.10.1075/lllt.36.05sykSearch in Google Scholar

Taguchi, N. (2015). Instructed pragmatics at a glance: Where instructional studies were, are, and should be going. Language Teaching, 48, 1-50.10.1017/S0261444814000263Search in Google Scholar

Vyatkina, N., & Belz, J. (2006). A corpus-driven intervention for the development of L2 pragmatic competence. In K. Bardovi-Harlig, J. C. Felix-Brasdefer, & A. Omar (Eds.), Pragmatics and language learning (pp. 315-357). National Foreign Language Resource Center, University of Hawaii.Search in Google Scholar

Yu, M. (2003). On the universality of face: Evidence from Chinese compliment response behavior. Journal of Pragmatics, 35, 1679-1710.10.1016/S0378-2166(03)00074-2Search in Google Scholar

Zhang, Y. (2020). The effect of combining computer-mediated communication with instruction on EFL learners’ pragmatic competence. International Journal of TESOL Studies, 2(4), 50-63.Search in Google Scholar

Appendix

Handout: How to Respond to Compliments in English

Acceptance

1 Showing gratitude

“Thanks!”

2 Expressing agreement

“Me, too.”

3 Expressing gladness

“I’m glad that you enjoyed watching my movie.”

4 Returning a compliment

“You are a congenial person, too.”

5 Giving encouragement

“Your essay will be wonderful, too.”

6 Providing an explanation

“I bought this sweater three years ago.”

Evasion

7 Offering

“Do you want one?”

8 Joking

“I am a rock star. Don’t you think so?”

9 Showing doubt

“Me?”

10 Evading followed by an explanation

“This is not a new hat. I purchased it at Goodwill.”

Refusal

11 Expressing disagreement

“I may disagree.”

12 Denigrating

“Not really. The kayak has a lot of issues.”

13 Rejecting followed by an explanation

“I don’t know about that. I am not into the material.”

Published Online: 2022-05-18
Published in Print: 2022-05-25

© 2022 BFSU, FLTRP, Walter de Gruyter, Cultural and Education Section British Embassy

Downloaded on 15.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/CJAL-2022-0206/html
Scroll to top button