Home A plea for intra-laboratory reference limits. Part 1. General considerations and concepts for determination
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

A plea for intra-laboratory reference limits. Part 1. General considerations and concepts for determination

  • Rainer Haeckel , Werner Wosniok and Farhad Arzideh
Published/Copyright: August 1, 2007
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill
Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM)
From the journal Volume 45 Issue 8

Abstract

Accurate results for quantitative procedures can be useless if the reference limits for the interpretation of laboratory results are unreliable. Recent concepts for quality management systems require that laboratories pay more attention to identification and verification of reference limits. Scientific recommendations often claim that each laboratory should determine intra-laboratory reference limits, which should be reviewed periodically. This recommendation is currently neglected by most laboratories; instead they use reference limits from external sources, despite various problems of transference. Prospective and retrospective methods either using or neglecting disease prevalences (polymodal or unimodal concepts, respectively) and applying different statistical approaches for determining reference limits have been described. The various procedures are reviewed with regard to their diagnostic sensitivity, specificity and (non-)efficiency. The present gold standard is the reference limit concept according to IFCC recommendations (a unimodal prospective approach). This concept, together with trueness-based standardization, is the most useful basis for harmonization of the decision-making process with laboratory results, despite complex problems of traceability and transference. This harmonization is at present only achieved for a limited number of analytes for which SI units and traceability can be technically realized. For the majority of measurands in laboratory medicine, much research is still required and results cannot be expected in the near future. For these measurands, a need remains for internal, efficient and simple identification of population-based reference limits. Therefore, newer retrospective concepts were developed that use large data sets from laboratory information systems to derive intra-laboratory reference limits. These approaches appear promising and should be further developed.

Clin Chem Lab Med 2007;45:1033–42.


Corresponding author: Prof. Dr. Rainer Haeckel, Diagnostisches Zentrum Wagner Stibbe, Werner-von-Siemens-Str. 10, 37077 Göttingen, Germany Phone: +49-421-273446,

Received: 2007-1-2
Accepted: 2007-4-11
Published Online: 2007-08-01
Published in Print: 2007-08-01

©2007 by Walter de Gruyter Berlin New York

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Congress of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine, Joint Annual Congress of The Austrian Society for Laboratory Medicine and Clinical Chemistry (OEGLMKC) and the The German United Society of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (DGKL), Vienna, Austria, September 19-22, 2007
  2. Interpretation of laboratory results: the Reference Intervals, a necessary evil?
  3. Implementation of haemoglobin A1c results traceable to the IFCC reference system: the way forward
  4. Exhaled breath condensate: a new method for lung disease diagnosis
  5. Biochemical markers of alcoholism
  6. Polymorphisms of the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-γ coactivator-1α gene are associated with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy and not with hypertension hypertrophy
  7. Association of interleukin-1 genetic polymorphisms with the risk of rheumatoid arthritis in Chinese population
  8. Highest accuracy of combined consensus clinical criteria and SNRPN gene molecular markers in diagnosis of Prader-Willi syndrome in Thai patients
  9. Use of maternal plasma for non-invasive prenatal diagnosis of fetal ABO genotypes
  10. Relationship of the CAG repeat polymorphism of the MEF2A gene and coronary artery disease in a Chinese population
  11. Specific real-time PCR vs. fluorescent dyes for serum free DNA quantification
  12. Increased glycation of hemoglobin and plasma proteins in normotensive, non-diabetic obese Indian subjects: putative role of lipid peroxides
  13. The relationship between red blood cell and reticulocyte indices and serum markers of iron status in the cord blood of newborns
  14. Association of amino-terminal propeptide of type III procollagen and acute myocardial rejection in male patients receiving heart transplantation
  15. Changes in platelet count and indices in pulmonary tuberculosis
  16. Activity or mass concentration of bone-specific alkaline phosphatase as a marker of bone formation
  17. A simple isocratic HPLC assay to determine linezolid concentrations in different biomatrices for in vivo and in vitro studies
  18. Pitfalls in measuring the endocannabinoid 2-arachidonoyl glycerol in biological samples
  19. Partitioning reference values for several subpopulations using cluster analysis
  20. A plea for intra-laboratory reference limits. Part 1. General considerations and concepts for determination
  21. A plea for intra-laboratory reference limits. Part 2. A bimodal retrospective concept for determining reference limits from intra-laboratory databases demonstrated by catalytic activity concentrations of enzymes
  22. Biological variation of thyroid autoantibodies and thyroglobulin
  23. Monitoring glycaemic control: is there evidence for appropriate use of routine measurement of glycated haemoglobin?
  24. Performance and utility of a cost-effective collagen-binding assay for the laboratory diagnosis of Von Willebrand disease
  25. Hook effect in calcitonin immunoradiometric assay
  26. Rapid genotyping of the Ser447Stop variant of the lipoprotein lipase gene using real-time fluorescent PCR
  27. Global standardization of glycated hemoglobin measurement: the position of the IFCC Working Group
  28. Recommendation for term and measurement unit for “HbA1c”
  29. Desirable performance standards for HbA1c analysis – precision, accuracy and standardisation Consensus statement of the Australasian Association of Clinical Biochemists (AACB), the Australian Diabetes Society (ADS), the Royal College of Pathologists of Australasia (RCPA), Endocrine Society of Australia (ESA), and the Australian Diabetes Educators Association (ADEA)
  30. IFCC Position Paper: Report of the IFCC Taskforce on Ethics: Introduction and framework
  31. IFCC Awards: Call for Nominations
  32. Call for papers, ideas and initiatives
Downloaded on 3.12.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/CCLM.2007.249/html
Scroll to top button