Startseite 20 Austerity
Kapitel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert Erfordert eine Authentifizierung

20 Austerity

  • Ed Kiely
Veröffentlichen auch Sie bei De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

Geographers have often defined austerity in economic terms, neglecting the lived and felt dimensions of fiscal policies. In response, feminist researchers have begun to theorize austerity as an everyday phenomenon, highlighting its relational constitution and its impacts upon intimate geographies. This literature has interrogated the gendering of austerity, and its reproduction of intersecting social inequalities. It therefore takes up key themes from within feminist political geography, by grounding political institutions and power relations within everyday practices. Focusing predominantly on the UK, feminist geographers have interrogated the materialization of austerity within four interrelated, interpersonal domains: psychosocial; affective; discursive; and temporal. This work has mainly addressed the aftermath of the 2008 Global Financial Crisis. Future research should more precisely define distinct periods of austerity, to reflect the ebbs and flows of fiscal policy across time. This would broaden the geographical and historical reach of this literature, by highlighting relations with earlier deployments of austerity within structural adjustment programs in the Global South. In turn, this would foster engagements with theories of austerity developed by work of African, Latin American, and Caribbean feminists, whose work remains neglected. Mainstream feminist geographies must go further in foregrounding the scholarship of Black feminists, who have offered crucial accounts of the relationships between austerity, racialization, and colonialism. As austerity threatens to further corrode labor conditions within universities, this demands feminist interventions to tackle academic precarity, which disproportionately affects Black women.

Abstract

Geographers have often defined austerity in economic terms, neglecting the lived and felt dimensions of fiscal policies. In response, feminist researchers have begun to theorize austerity as an everyday phenomenon, highlighting its relational constitution and its impacts upon intimate geographies. This literature has interrogated the gendering of austerity, and its reproduction of intersecting social inequalities. It therefore takes up key themes from within feminist political geography, by grounding political institutions and power relations within everyday practices. Focusing predominantly on the UK, feminist geographers have interrogated the materialization of austerity within four interrelated, interpersonal domains: psychosocial; affective; discursive; and temporal. This work has mainly addressed the aftermath of the 2008 Global Financial Crisis. Future research should more precisely define distinct periods of austerity, to reflect the ebbs and flows of fiscal policy across time. This would broaden the geographical and historical reach of this literature, by highlighting relations with earlier deployments of austerity within structural adjustment programs in the Global South. In turn, this would foster engagements with theories of austerity developed by work of African, Latin American, and Caribbean feminists, whose work remains neglected. Mainstream feminist geographies must go further in foregrounding the scholarship of Black feminists, who have offered crucial accounts of the relationships between austerity, racialization, and colonialism. As austerity threatens to further corrode labor conditions within universities, this demands feminist interventions to tackle academic precarity, which disproportionately affects Black women.

Heruntergeladen am 11.11.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/9783111289274-021/html?lang=de
Button zum nach oben scrollen