Home 13 Electoral Democracy
Chapter
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

13 Electoral Democracy

  • Claire McGing
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

Despite the central role of gender relations in shaping electoral politics, electoral geography has largely overlooked gender and feminist perspectives, as well as related methodological approaches. When gender is considered, it is typically treated as a binary variable rather than as a dynamic process influencing all aspects of electoral democracy. The concept of intersectionality and its relevance to election contests is even more neglected in the field. This gap stands in contrast to political science, where a substantial body of literature on ‘women in politics’ has emerged, and to other areas of political and human geography, where feminist perspectives have gained significant traction.

This chapter traces electoral geography’s ‘gender problem’ to three main areas: who (the scholarly community), what (thematic focus), and how (methodological approaches). It highlights the significant epistemological and methodological differences between electoral geography and feminist political geography in their approaches to gender analysis. Drawing on these insights, the chapter weaves together key strands of feminist electoral studies, specifically gender and voting behavior, and women’s political representation, to outline pathways for future research in feminist electoral geography.

Abstract

Despite the central role of gender relations in shaping electoral politics, electoral geography has largely overlooked gender and feminist perspectives, as well as related methodological approaches. When gender is considered, it is typically treated as a binary variable rather than as a dynamic process influencing all aspects of electoral democracy. The concept of intersectionality and its relevance to election contests is even more neglected in the field. This gap stands in contrast to political science, where a substantial body of literature on ‘women in politics’ has emerged, and to other areas of political and human geography, where feminist perspectives have gained significant traction.

This chapter traces electoral geography’s ‘gender problem’ to three main areas: who (the scholarly community), what (thematic focus), and how (methodological approaches). It highlights the significant epistemological and methodological differences between electoral geography and feminist political geography in their approaches to gender analysis. Drawing on these insights, the chapter weaves together key strands of feminist electoral studies, specifically gender and voting behavior, and women’s political representation, to outline pathways for future research in feminist electoral geography.

Downloaded on 11.11.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/9783111289274-014/html
Scroll to top button