Home Linguistics & Semiotics A Contribution to a Better Understanding of Silent Pause
Chapter
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

A Contribution to a Better Understanding of Silent Pause

  • Bárbara Teixeira , Plínio A. Barbosa and Tommaso Raso
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill
Prosodic Interfaces
This chapter is in the book Prosodic Interfaces

Abstract

This paper presents a study about silent pause, which is part of a greater project aimed at building an automatic tool for spontaneous speech prosodic segmentation. The main goal of the paper is to define an ideal minimal duration of silence that can be perceived as pause in Brazilian Portuguese, without capturing the occlusion phase of stop consonants, and could be appropriate as an input for an automatic tool. The study uses data from spontaneous speech corpora, and is based on a perception test with 15 annotators. Besides silence duration, several features that may correlate with pause perception are taken into consideration: (i) the function of the boundary (whether terminal, non-terminal or due to disfluencies); (ii) the articulation rate; (iii) the presence of an f0 reset or shift; (iv) and the phonetic context, in which are analyzed the absolute duration of the vowel before the silence, the absolute duration of rhyme and coda before the silence, the presence of different possible codas before the silence, the absolute duration of consonant after the silence, and the nature of the phone after the silence. The results show that the boundary function clearly affects the cues correlated with pause perception. Our conclusion is that the ideal minimal duration of silence that can be perceived as a pause is 100 ms.

Abstract

This paper presents a study about silent pause, which is part of a greater project aimed at building an automatic tool for spontaneous speech prosodic segmentation. The main goal of the paper is to define an ideal minimal duration of silence that can be perceived as pause in Brazilian Portuguese, without capturing the occlusion phase of stop consonants, and could be appropriate as an input for an automatic tool. The study uses data from spontaneous speech corpora, and is based on a perception test with 15 annotators. Besides silence duration, several features that may correlate with pause perception are taken into consideration: (i) the function of the boundary (whether terminal, non-terminal or due to disfluencies); (ii) the articulation rate; (iii) the presence of an f0 reset or shift; (iv) and the phonetic context, in which are analyzed the absolute duration of the vowel before the silence, the absolute duration of rhyme and coda before the silence, the presence of different possible codas before the silence, the absolute duration of consonant after the silence, and the nature of the phone after the silence. The results show that the boundary function clearly affects the cues correlated with pause perception. Our conclusion is that the ideal minimal duration of silence that can be perceived as a pause is 100 ms.

Downloaded on 10.12.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/9783111060309-004/html
Scroll to top button