Startseite Philosophie Heuristics as a Source of Cognitive Vulnerability in Philosophy
Kapitel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert Erfordert eine Authentifizierung

Heuristics as a Source of Cognitive Vulnerability in Philosophy

  • Timothy Williamson
Veröffentlichen auch Sie bei De Gruyter Brill
Cognitive Vulnerability
Ein Kapitel aus dem Buch Cognitive Vulnerability

Abstract

The chapter discusses human unreflective reliance on heuristics as a source of error in philosophy, especially in verdicts on examples. Heuristics are efficient but imperfectly reliable cognitive methods. Some are built into our perceptual systems and are hardly noticed except when they produce perceptual illusions. More general cognitive heuristics produce philosophical paradoxes. We are often unaware of using such heuristics and may even treat their outputs as analytic. Two examples are discussed in detail. The persistence heuristic has us ignore small differences by default in updating. It is unavoidable in practice, even for AI databases. It applies to precise terms as well as vague ones, but it produces sorites paradoxes for the latter because inhibitors of the default are lacking. The suppositional heuristic is humans’ primary way of assessing conditionals, but is implicitly inconsistent, and so cannot be fully reliable. Ways of mitigating the resulting unreliability are discussed.

Abstract

The chapter discusses human unreflective reliance on heuristics as a source of error in philosophy, especially in verdicts on examples. Heuristics are efficient but imperfectly reliable cognitive methods. Some are built into our perceptual systems and are hardly noticed except when they produce perceptual illusions. More general cognitive heuristics produce philosophical paradoxes. We are often unaware of using such heuristics and may even treat their outputs as analytic. Two examples are discussed in detail. The persistence heuristic has us ignore small differences by default in updating. It is unavoidable in practice, even for AI databases. It applies to precise terms as well as vague ones, but it produces sorites paradoxes for the latter because inhibitors of the default are lacking. The suppositional heuristic is humans’ primary way of assessing conditionals, but is implicitly inconsistent, and so cannot be fully reliable. Ways of mitigating the resulting unreliability are discussed.

Heruntergeladen am 20.9.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/9783110799163-006/html
Button zum nach oben scrollen