Startseite Philosophie Kant’s Value Prescriptivism
Kapitel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert Erfordert eine Authentifizierung

Kant’s Value Prescriptivism

  • Oliver Sensen
Veröffentlichen auch Sie bei De Gruyter Brill
Kant’s Theory of Value
Ein Kapitel aus dem Buch Kant’s Theory of Value

Abstract

In this paper, I defend the view that Kant is a prescriptivist about value. I first argue that, according to Kant, expressions with the grammatical form that something ‘has value’ or ‘is good’ are not meant to describe this something, but to express an imperative command of what reason deems to be necessary. This includes the absolute command to respect all human beings. I then briefly describe the two kinds of imperatives Kant puts forth and relate his account of value to them. I argue that Kant’s distinction between dignity and price fits this interpretation, and I add a new discussion in which sense one can say that dignity is a value. Finally, I will meet the objection that - in the third Section of Groundwork - Kant does conceive of ‘value’ as the description of an ontological property all human beings possess in virtue of being part of an intelligible world. I argue that Kant reduces even this claim to what reason deems necessary. I conclude that Kant’s primary focus is on the imperatives that reason commands, and ‘has value’ is a secondary construction that expresses these imperatives of reason.

Abstract

In this paper, I defend the view that Kant is a prescriptivist about value. I first argue that, according to Kant, expressions with the grammatical form that something ‘has value’ or ‘is good’ are not meant to describe this something, but to express an imperative command of what reason deems to be necessary. This includes the absolute command to respect all human beings. I then briefly describe the two kinds of imperatives Kant puts forth and relate his account of value to them. I argue that Kant’s distinction between dignity and price fits this interpretation, and I add a new discussion in which sense one can say that dignity is a value. Finally, I will meet the objection that - in the third Section of Groundwork - Kant does conceive of ‘value’ as the description of an ontological property all human beings possess in virtue of being part of an intelligible world. I argue that Kant reduces even this claim to what reason deems necessary. I conclude that Kant’s primary focus is on the imperatives that reason commands, and ‘has value’ is a secondary construction that expresses these imperatives of reason.

Heruntergeladen am 5.11.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/9783110796056-004/html
Button zum nach oben scrollen