Home Linguistics & Semiotics Textsegmentierung in Handschrift und Frühdruck
Chapter
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Textsegmentierung in Handschrift und Frühdruck

  • Marko Neumann and Anja Voeste
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill
Explore this Subject How to publish with us
Vergleichende Interpunktion – Comparative Punctuation
This chapter is in the book Vergleichende Interpunktion – Comparative Punctuation

Abstract

In the 15th and early 16th centuries, punctuation was one of several components of text segmentation, carried out by the different craftsmen involved. Drawing on two case studies from the period of early printing (1430-1530), this article explores the operatingmethods of those contributors (scribes, typesetters, rubricators) at different stages of their work (first processing, secondary editing, transposition of a text). Common feature is the loose connection between form and content: the protagonists did not adhere to the text template, but edited the texts according to individual, idioscriptal concepts, using awide range of variants. Punctuationwas not independent of other segmentation units; it rather interacted with them, e. g.with the caesura at the end of the line. In addition to these similarities, our investigation has revealed differences in the waymanuscripts and prints were processed. This becomes clear, for example, in the secondary editing done by rubricators: the uniform letter forms in prints brought about a more superficial way of rubrication.

Abstract

In the 15th and early 16th centuries, punctuation was one of several components of text segmentation, carried out by the different craftsmen involved. Drawing on two case studies from the period of early printing (1430-1530), this article explores the operatingmethods of those contributors (scribes, typesetters, rubricators) at different stages of their work (first processing, secondary editing, transposition of a text). Common feature is the loose connection between form and content: the protagonists did not adhere to the text template, but edited the texts according to individual, idioscriptal concepts, using awide range of variants. Punctuationwas not independent of other segmentation units; it rather interacted with them, e. g.with the caesura at the end of the line. In addition to these similarities, our investigation has revealed differences in the waymanuscripts and prints were processed. This becomes clear, for example, in the secondary editing done by rubricators: the uniform letter forms in prints brought about a more superficial way of rubrication.

Chapters in this book

  1. Frontmatter I
  2. Vorwort V
  3. Preface VII
  4. Inhaltsverzeichnis/Contents IX
  5. Einleitung XIII
  6. Introduction XXIII
  7. System
  8. Zur Kommasetzung im Deutschen 3
  9. ‹/›, ‹,› und ‹,› – Variation und Wandel in der Entwicklung der Kommas im 17. und 18. Jh. aus graph(emat)ischer Perspektive 25
  10. Das Komma in kontrastiver Perspektive Italienisch–Deutsch 57
  11. Punctuation Principles in the Glagolitic and Cyrillic Printed Works of the Croatian Protestant Printing Press in Urach (1561–1564) 73
  12. Norm
  13. Isolating the Syntactic Factor in Non-Standard Punctuation 91
  14. Vom genormten Satzbau zur genormten Interpunktion 109
  15. Gebrauch/Use
  16. Textsegmentierung in Handschrift und Frühdruck 137
  17. Interpunktion in historischen Patientenbriefen 163
  18. Japanische Interpunktion im Wandel der Zeit 187
  19. An Investigation of the Factors Influencing Chinese Readers’ Perception of Sentence Boundaries in Mandarin 215
  20. The Colon in English, German and Swedish: A Contrastive Corpus-Based Study 237
  21. Comparing Word Marks 263
  22. The Ellipsis and the Dash in Italian and English: A Contrastive Perspective 289
  23. Erwerb/Acquisition
  24. Interpunktion – (K)ein Thema für Deutsch als Fremdsprache? 317
  25. Deutsch und Dänisch im Vergleich: Die Verwendung des Ausrufezeichens 343
  26. Zur Kommasetzung italienischer DaF-Lernender 369
  27. Sachregister/Index 397
  28. Interpunktionszeichenregister/Index of Punctuation Marks 407
  29. Adressen/Addresses 413
https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110756319-007

Chapters in this book

  1. Frontmatter I
  2. Vorwort V
  3. Preface VII
  4. Inhaltsverzeichnis/Contents IX
  5. Einleitung XIII
  6. Introduction XXIII
  7. System
  8. Zur Kommasetzung im Deutschen 3
  9. ‹/›, ‹,› und ‹,› – Variation und Wandel in der Entwicklung der Kommas im 17. und 18. Jh. aus graph(emat)ischer Perspektive 25
  10. Das Komma in kontrastiver Perspektive Italienisch–Deutsch 57
  11. Punctuation Principles in the Glagolitic and Cyrillic Printed Works of the Croatian Protestant Printing Press in Urach (1561–1564) 73
  12. Norm
  13. Isolating the Syntactic Factor in Non-Standard Punctuation 91
  14. Vom genormten Satzbau zur genormten Interpunktion 109
  15. Gebrauch/Use
  16. Textsegmentierung in Handschrift und Frühdruck 137
  17. Interpunktion in historischen Patientenbriefen 163
  18. Japanische Interpunktion im Wandel der Zeit 187
  19. An Investigation of the Factors Influencing Chinese Readers’ Perception of Sentence Boundaries in Mandarin 215
  20. The Colon in English, German and Swedish: A Contrastive Corpus-Based Study 237
  21. Comparing Word Marks 263
  22. The Ellipsis and the Dash in Italian and English: A Contrastive Perspective 289
  23. Erwerb/Acquisition
  24. Interpunktion – (K)ein Thema für Deutsch als Fremdsprache? 317
  25. Deutsch und Dänisch im Vergleich: Die Verwendung des Ausrufezeichens 343
  26. Zur Kommasetzung italienischer DaF-Lernender 369
  27. Sachregister/Index 397
  28. Interpunktionszeichenregister/Index of Punctuation Marks 407
  29. Adressen/Addresses 413
Sign up now to receive a 20% welcome discount
Institutional Access
How does access work?
Have an idea on how to improve our website?
Please write us.
© 2026 De Gruyter Brill
Downloaded on 3.2.2026 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/9783110756319-007/html
Scroll to top button