Startseite Linguistik & Semiotik Meaning-to-form mismatches in Functional Discourse Grammar and Systemic Functional Grammar: A case study of the English discourse connective however
Kapitel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert Erfordert eine Authentifizierung

Meaning-to-form mismatches in Functional Discourse Grammar and Systemic Functional Grammar: A case study of the English discourse connective however

Veröffentlichen auch Sie bei De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

This chapter investigates quantitative meaning-to-form mismatches with regard to the use of the English discourse connective however within the theoretical frameworks of Functional Discourse Grammar (FDG) and Systemic Functional Grammar (SFG). Rather than being fully transparent, languages usually display varying degrees of opacity between the different levels of linguistic organization. Given that inter-level mismatches can be said to be more difficult to process than transparent relations, this paper aims to answer the question as to why mismatches in language are allowed at all, and how they can be accounted for in the models of FDG and SFG. Based on data from the British National Corpus, the present study shows that however exhibits particular formal (i.e. syntactic) and functional (i.e. discourse-pragmatic) properties which give rise to quantitative mismatches between the levels of function and form. Even though mismatches contribute to a higher degree of opacity in language, it will be argued that in the case of however in English, they are indeed motivated by the speaker’s communicative goals and are therefore allowed and accounted for by the rules of grammar. The present paper eventually proposes an alternative categorization of however in an FDG analysis based on the classification provided in SFG.

Abstract

This chapter investigates quantitative meaning-to-form mismatches with regard to the use of the English discourse connective however within the theoretical frameworks of Functional Discourse Grammar (FDG) and Systemic Functional Grammar (SFG). Rather than being fully transparent, languages usually display varying degrees of opacity between the different levels of linguistic organization. Given that inter-level mismatches can be said to be more difficult to process than transparent relations, this paper aims to answer the question as to why mismatches in language are allowed at all, and how they can be accounted for in the models of FDG and SFG. Based on data from the British National Corpus, the present study shows that however exhibits particular formal (i.e. syntactic) and functional (i.e. discourse-pragmatic) properties which give rise to quantitative mismatches between the levels of function and form. Even though mismatches contribute to a higher degree of opacity in language, it will be argued that in the case of however in English, they are indeed motivated by the speaker’s communicative goals and are therefore allowed and accounted for by the rules of grammar. The present paper eventually proposes an alternative categorization of however in an FDG analysis based on the classification provided in SFG.

Heruntergeladen am 18.3.2026 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/9783110711592-012/html
Button zum nach oben scrollen