Startseite Philosophie Mathematik in den Wissenschaften
Kapitel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert Erfordert eine Authentifizierung

Mathematik in den Wissenschaften

  • Georg Schiemer
Veröffentlichen auch Sie bei De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

Mathematics in the sciences. Mathematics is known to play a central role in the modern sciences. Its theorems and methods often function as necessary conditions for the formulation of scientific laws as well as for the scientific explanation of investigated phenomena. This is true specifically in the context of the natural and the social sciences where the use of mathematical models and simulations has led to a steady development and rigorization of as diverse fields as particle physics, evolutionary biology, and macroeconomics. The present article aims to give a general discussion of the different roles that mathematical models or representations play in scientific reasoning. Moreover, it addresses Wigner’s famous claim of the “unreasonable effectiveness” of mathematics in physics. Based on recent discussions of Wigner’s puzzle in work by Steiner, Bueno, and Pincock, we compare two structuralist accounts of mathematical representation in the sciences, namely a “mapping-based” and an “inferentialist” approach.

Abstract

Mathematics in the sciences. Mathematics is known to play a central role in the modern sciences. Its theorems and methods often function as necessary conditions for the formulation of scientific laws as well as for the scientific explanation of investigated phenomena. This is true specifically in the context of the natural and the social sciences where the use of mathematical models and simulations has led to a steady development and rigorization of as diverse fields as particle physics, evolutionary biology, and macroeconomics. The present article aims to give a general discussion of the different roles that mathematical models or representations play in scientific reasoning. Moreover, it addresses Wigner’s famous claim of the “unreasonable effectiveness” of mathematics in physics. Based on recent discussions of Wigner’s puzzle in work by Steiner, Bueno, and Pincock, we compare two structuralist accounts of mathematical representation in the sciences, namely a “mapping-based” and an “inferentialist” approach.

Heruntergeladen am 9.10.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/9783110614831-003/html
Button zum nach oben scrollen