Home Linguistics & Semiotics The myth of the mixed languages
Chapter
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

The myth of the mixed languages

  • Kees Versteegh
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill
Advances in Maltese Linguistics
This chapter is in the book Advances in Maltese Linguistics

Abstract

This paper focuses on the usefulness of the label ‘mixed languages’ as an analytical tool. Section 1 sketches the emergence of the biological paradigm in linguistics and its effect on the contemporary debate about mixed languages. Sections 2 and 3 discuss two processes that have been held responsible for the emergence of mixed languages, code-switching and extreme borrowing. Section 4 compares these two mechanisms with the categories of change in Thomason & Kaufman (1988), while Section 5 offers some conclusions about the status of mixed languages as a special category.

Abstract

This paper focuses on the usefulness of the label ‘mixed languages’ as an analytical tool. Section 1 sketches the emergence of the biological paradigm in linguistics and its effect on the contemporary debate about mixed languages. Sections 2 and 3 discuss two processes that have been held responsible for the emergence of mixed languages, code-switching and extreme borrowing. Section 4 compares these two mechanisms with the categories of change in Thomason & Kaufman (1988), while Section 5 offers some conclusions about the status of mixed languages as a special category.

Downloaded on 19.10.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/9783110565744-011/html
Scroll to top button