Home Classical, Ancient Near Eastern & Egyptian Studies Riccardo Bartolinis Austrias (1516) oder: Wie ein Herrscher zum Feldherrn gegen die Türken wird
Chapter
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Riccardo Bartolinis Austrias (1516) oder: Wie ein Herrscher zum Feldherrn gegen die Türken wird

  • Florian Schaffenrath
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill
Portraying the Prince in the Renaissance
This chapter is in the book Portraying the Prince in the Renaissance

Abstract

The portrayal of princes was central to the numerous Neo-Latin historical epics composed for powerful patrons in the early modern period. One example is Riccardo Bartolini’s (ca. 1470-1528/1529) Austrias (Strasbourg, 1516), which deals with the War of the Succession of Landshut and the part played in the conflict by Maximilian I. The manner in which Bartolini portrays his hero Maximilian depends largely on his reliance on two main models: Virgil’s Aeneid, in which the focus is on the hero Aeneas, and Lucan’s Pharsalia, which pays greater attention to historical events and has no single dominant protagonist. Bartolini successfully combines these two models in the service of Maximilian and the House of Habsburg. The emphasis Bartolini places on Maximilian as the leader of a pan-European campaign against the Turks is important for the understanding of later texts in which Bartolini pleads for German and European princes to take a united stand against the enemy. Bartolini’s portrayal of Maximilian as the ideal head of such a campaign in his description of the Augsburg Reichstag of 1518 and in the oration he held there is very heavily indebted to his depiction of Maximilian in the Austrias.

Abstract

The portrayal of princes was central to the numerous Neo-Latin historical epics composed for powerful patrons in the early modern period. One example is Riccardo Bartolini’s (ca. 1470-1528/1529) Austrias (Strasbourg, 1516), which deals with the War of the Succession of Landshut and the part played in the conflict by Maximilian I. The manner in which Bartolini portrays his hero Maximilian depends largely on his reliance on two main models: Virgil’s Aeneid, in which the focus is on the hero Aeneas, and Lucan’s Pharsalia, which pays greater attention to historical events and has no single dominant protagonist. Bartolini successfully combines these two models in the service of Maximilian and the House of Habsburg. The emphasis Bartolini places on Maximilian as the leader of a pan-European campaign against the Turks is important for the understanding of later texts in which Bartolini pleads for German and European princes to take a united stand against the enemy. Bartolini’s portrayal of Maximilian as the ideal head of such a campaign in his description of the Augsburg Reichstag of 1518 and in the oration he held there is very heavily indebted to his depiction of Maximilian in the Austrias.

Chapters in this book

  1. Frontmatter I
  2. Contents VII
  3. Introduction 1
  4. I. Virtues
  5. Der Herrscher und die gute Ordnung. Das Bild Karls VII. in der französischen Historiographie am Übergang von der tradierten zur humanistisch geprägten Historiographie 17
  6. Charlemagne am Renaissancehof. Die Darstellung Karls des Großen in Paolo Emilios De rebus gestis Francorum 39
  7. Guter König, schlechter König? Die Darstellung Heinrichs V. und Heinrichs VI. von England in Polydor Vergils Anglica historia 65
  8. Alfonso ›the Magnanimous‹ of Naples as Portrayed by Facio and Panormita: Four Versions of Emulation, Representation, and Virtue 95
  9. II. Cultural and Political Pretensions
  10. Illyrian Trojans in a Turkish Storm: Croatian Renaissance Lords and the Politics of Dynastic Origin Myths 121
  11. Personelle Serialität und nationale Geschichte. Überlegungen zu den Herrschergestalten in Franciscus Irenicus’ Germaniae Exegesis 157
  12. Riccardo Bartolinis Austrias (1516) oder: Wie ein Herrscher zum Feldherrn gegen die Türken wird 193
  13. III. Models Ancient, Medieval, and Modern
  14. Der Herrscher als zweiter Salomo. Zum Bild König Roberts von Anjou in der Renaissance 217
  15. Pier Candido Decembrio and the Suetonian Path to Princely Biography 237
  16. Die Cosmias des Giovanni Mario Filelfo (1426–1480) 271
  17. Einhard reloaded. Francesco Tedeschini Piccolomini, Hilarion aus Verona, Donato Acciaiuoli und die Karlsbiographik im italienischen Renaissance-Humanismus 287
  18. Auf den Spuren Paolo Giovios? Herrscherdarstellung in Jacobus Sluperius’ Elogia virorum bellica laude illustrium 307
  19. IV. Method
  20. Princes between Lorenzo Valla and Bartolomeo Facio 337
  21. Juan Páez de Castro, Charles V, and a Method for Royal Historiography 363
  22. Picturing the Perfect Patron? Francesco Filelfo’s Image of Francesco Sforza 391
  23. Verbis phucare tyrannos? Selbstanspruch und Leistungsspektren von zeithistorischer Epik als panegyrischem Medium im 15. Jahrhundert 415
  24. V. Critical Summary
  25. The Description Makes the Prince: Princely Portrayal from the Perspective of Transformation Theory 445
  26. Indices
  27. Index of Names 463
  28. Index of Places 485
  29. List of Contributors 491
Downloaded on 17.1.2026 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/9783110473377-008/html
Scroll to top button