Home Linguistics & Semiotics Benefactive and malefactive applicativization in Mapudungun
Chapter
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Benefactive and malefactive applicativization in Mapudungun

  • Fernando Zúñiga
View more publications by John Benjamins Publishing Company
Benefactives and Malefactives
This chapter is in the book Benefactives and Malefactives

Abstract

This paper argues that two productive applicatives in Mapudungun, viz. -(l)el and -ñma, can be labeled benefactive and malefactive respectively, but only in a superficially impressionistic way. Based on a detailed survey of the literature on the language, as well as on synchronic evidence and some tentative internal reconstruction, I suggest that the yield of -ñma was originally probably neutral with respect to benefaction, and that it still is in some uses of this suffix. According to this account, the appearance of (l)el-applicatives (probably from elu- ‘give’ or el- ‘set’) gave rise to a privative opposition between the meaning of both morphemes with many bivalent predicates.

Abstract

This paper argues that two productive applicatives in Mapudungun, viz. -(l)el and -ñma, can be labeled benefactive and malefactive respectively, but only in a superficially impressionistic way. Based on a detailed survey of the literature on the language, as well as on synchronic evidence and some tentative internal reconstruction, I suggest that the yield of -ñma was originally probably neutral with respect to benefaction, and that it still is in some uses of this suffix. According to this account, the appearance of (l)el-applicatives (probably from elu- ‘give’ or el- ‘set’) gave rise to a privative opposition between the meaning of both morphemes with many bivalent predicates.

Downloaded on 6.3.2026 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1075/tsl.92.08zun/html
Scroll to top button