Home Linguistics & Semiotics Korean benefactive particles and their meanings
Chapter
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Korean benefactive particles and their meanings

  • Jae Jung Song
View more publications by John Benjamins Publishing Company
Benefactives and Malefactives
This chapter is in the book Benefactives and Malefactives

Abstract

This article investigates the grammar of Korean benefactive constructions with particular reference to the benefactive particles, eykey, (l)ulwihay(se) and taysin. The meaning contribution of these particles is shown to be so specific that their use can be explained by direct reference to their individual meanings. In particular, the particle eykey, unlike the other two particles, is subject to certain restrictions. The existence of these restrictions can be better understood once the meaning of the particle is properly recognized (i.e. the goal engaging with the theme to its benefit, rather than the goal exercising possessive control over the theme). This recognition is argued to render avoidable or unnecessary a certain special constraint previously proposed for the constructions. Also discussed briefly in the guise of a conclusion are the implications of the findings of the article for Construction Grammar, in which constructional meaning reigns over the meanings of individual items.

Abstract

This article investigates the grammar of Korean benefactive constructions with particular reference to the benefactive particles, eykey, (l)ulwihay(se) and taysin. The meaning contribution of these particles is shown to be so specific that their use can be explained by direct reference to their individual meanings. In particular, the particle eykey, unlike the other two particles, is subject to certain restrictions. The existence of these restrictions can be better understood once the meaning of the particle is properly recognized (i.e. the goal engaging with the theme to its benefit, rather than the goal exercising possessive control over the theme). This recognition is argued to render avoidable or unnecessary a certain special constraint previously proposed for the constructions. Also discussed briefly in the guise of a conclusion are the implications of the findings of the article for Construction Grammar, in which constructional meaning reigns over the meanings of individual items.

Downloaded on 13.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1075/tsl.92.17son/html
Scroll to top button