Home Chapter 7. Similative, equative, and comparative constructions in Beja (North-Cushitic)
Chapter
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Chapter 7. Similative, equative, and comparative constructions in Beja (North-Cushitic)

  • Martine Vanhove
View more publications by John Benjamins Publishing Company
Similative and Equative Constructions
This chapter is in the book Similative and Equative Constructions

Abstract

This paper presents an overview of the morphosyntax of comparative, equative and similative constructions in Beja, a Cushitic language spoken in Sudan. It also discusses their relevance for current typological models and the extent to which they are at variance with the existing literature (Stassen 1985;Haspelmath & Buchholz 1998;Henkelmann 2006). The paper also proposes hypotheses regarding the origin of Beja comparative and similative morphemes, an issue which is problematic. A section is dedicated to the study of the extensions of the morphemes concerned to other functional domains, such as functives, pretence clauses, similes and accord clauses, causal and adverbial clauses, within the background ofCreissels’s (2014)approach to the polysemy and multifunctionality of these markers. Comparisons with other Cushitic languages are also provided when necessary.

Abstract

This paper presents an overview of the morphosyntax of comparative, equative and similative constructions in Beja, a Cushitic language spoken in Sudan. It also discusses their relevance for current typological models and the extent to which they are at variance with the existing literature (Stassen 1985;Haspelmath & Buchholz 1998;Henkelmann 2006). The paper also proposes hypotheses regarding the origin of Beja comparative and similative morphemes, an issue which is problematic. A section is dedicated to the study of the extensions of the morphemes concerned to other functional domains, such as functives, pretence clauses, similes and accord clauses, causal and adverbial clauses, within the background ofCreissels’s (2014)approach to the polysemy and multifunctionality of these markers. Comparisons with other Cushitic languages are also provided when necessary.

Downloaded on 14.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1075/tsl.117.08van/pdf
Scroll to top button