Home Linguistics & Semiotics A comparative study of the pragmatic marker like in Irish English and in south-eastern varieties of British English
Chapter
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

A comparative study of the pragmatic marker like in Irish English and in south-eastern varieties of British English

  • Martin Schweinberger
View more publications by John Benjamins Publishing Company
Pragmatic Markers in Irish English
This chapter is in the book Pragmatic Markers in Irish English

Abstract

This study compares the use of like in Irish English (IrE) to its use in southeastern British English (SE-BrE). There are significant differences between the use of like in IrE and SE-BrE in terms of overall frequency, social meaning and positioning. This paper argues that the differences in the use of like require a functional explanation on two levels, namely on a language-external social level and on a language-internal discourse-pragmatic level. On the extra-linguistic level, the differences in like’s social profile indicate distinct social meanings while, on a language-internal level, differences in positioning suggest that either like is used to perform distinct pragmatic functions or that uses of like in clause-medial and clause-final positions compete to perform similar functions, e.g. focusing elements. The substantial differences revealed by the analysis are accounted for by historical and identity-related factors.

Abstract

This study compares the use of like in Irish English (IrE) to its use in southeastern British English (SE-BrE). There are significant differences between the use of like in IrE and SE-BrE in terms of overall frequency, social meaning and positioning. This paper argues that the differences in the use of like require a functional explanation on two levels, namely on a language-external social level and on a language-internal discourse-pragmatic level. On the extra-linguistic level, the differences in like’s social profile indicate distinct social meanings while, on a language-internal level, differences in positioning suggest that either like is used to perform distinct pragmatic functions or that uses of like in clause-medial and clause-final positions compete to perform similar functions, e.g. focusing elements. The substantial differences revealed by the analysis are accounted for by historical and identity-related factors.

Downloaded on 18.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1075/pbns.258.05sch/html
Scroll to top button