Home Linguistics & Semiotics Taking a Closer Look at Romance VN Compounds
Chapter
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Taking a Closer Look at Romance VN Compounds

  • Reineke Bok-Bennema and Brigitte Kampers-Manhe
View more publications by John Benjamins Publishing Company
New Perspectives on Romance Linguistics
This chapter is in the book New Perspectives on Romance Linguistics

Abstract

Romance compounds of the type essuie-glace (“windshield wiper”) have been analyzed in the past as nominalizations of VPs (DiSciullo&Williams,1987, Lieber,1992 a.o.). We take this analysis as our point of departure. Given the actual insights into the architecture of VP it is natural to wonder whether the nominalization involves the whole VP, i.e. vP, or only its internal shell (VP). We present a number of arguments in favor of the former option. We also show that the vP hypothesis allows for a fine-grained analysis that does justice to the complete semantics of the compounds. Within this analysis the element responsible for the nominalization fulfils a role very similar to the complementizer of relatives in the Vergnaud/Kayne approach to the latter. One further issue we address concerns the relation between Romance VN-compounds and English forms such as screensaver. At the end of our paper we evaluate the insights the proposed analysis offers into the relationship between morphology and syntax.

Abstract

Romance compounds of the type essuie-glace (“windshield wiper”) have been analyzed in the past as nominalizations of VPs (DiSciullo&Williams,1987, Lieber,1992 a.o.). We take this analysis as our point of departure. Given the actual insights into the architecture of VP it is natural to wonder whether the nominalization involves the whole VP, i.e. vP, or only its internal shell (VP). We present a number of arguments in favor of the former option. We also show that the vP hypothesis allows for a fine-grained analysis that does justice to the complete semantics of the compounds. Within this analysis the element responsible for the nominalization fulfils a role very similar to the complementizer of relatives in the Vergnaud/Kayne approach to the latter. One further issue we address concerns the relation between Romance VN-compounds and English forms such as screensaver. At the end of our paper we evaluate the insights the proposed analysis offers into the relationship between morphology and syntax.

Downloaded on 29.12.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1075/cilt.275.04bok/html
Scroll to top button