Home Residual Wall Thickness Distribution at the Transition and Curve Sections of Water-assisted Injection Molded Tubes
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Residual Wall Thickness Distribution at the Transition and Curve Sections of Water-assisted Injection Molded Tubes

  • S.-J. Liu and M.-H. Hsieh
Published/Copyright: March 26, 2013
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

Water-assisted injection molding technology has been used to manufacture plastic tubes in recent years, due to its light weight, relatively lower resin cost per part and faster cycle time. The residual wall thickness around dimensional transitions and curved sections can significantly affect the strength of molded parts and is of great concern. This research investigated the uniformity of the residual wall thickness distribution in water-assisted injection molded circular tubes with dimensional variations and curved sections. Experiments were carried out on an 80-ton injection-molding machine equipped with a lab scale water injection system, which included a water pump, a pressure accumulator, a water injection pin, a water tank equipped with a temperature regulator, and a control circuit. The material used was semi-crystalline polypropylene. It was found that the wall thickness was not uniform near transitions. With the addition of fillets with proper angles around transitions, the uniformity of residual wall could be greatly improved. The residual wall thickness in curved sections was thick around the outer wall and thin around the inner wall. In addition, the experimental results suggest that water-assisted molded parts exhibit a more uniform thickness distribution at transition and curved sections than in gas-assisted molded parts.


Mail address: S.-J. Liu, Polymer Rheology and Processing Lab., Department of Mechanical Engineering, Chang Gung University, 259, Wen-Hwa 1st Road, Kwei-San, Tao-Yuan 333, Taiwan. E-mail:

References

1Knights, M.: Plast. Technol., April, p. 42 (2002)Search in Google Scholar

2Michaeli, W., Juntgen, T., Brunswick, A.: Kunststoffe Plast Europe91, p. 37 (2001)Search in Google Scholar

3Liu, S. J., Chen, Y. S.: Polym. Eng. Sci. 43, p. 1806 (2003)10.1002/pen.10153Search in Google Scholar

4Liu, S. J., Chen, Y. S.: Plast. Rubber Comp. 33, p. 260 (2004)10.1179/174328904X4882Search in Google Scholar

5Liu, S. J., Lin, S. P.: Comp. Part A: Appl. Sci. Manuf., 36, p. 1507 (2005)10.1016/j.compositesa.2005.02.011Search in Google Scholar

6Johnson, L., Olley, P., Coates, P. D.: Plast. Rubber Comp. 29, p. 31 (2000)10.1179/146580100101540671Search in Google Scholar

7Potente, H., Moritzer, E., Oberman, C. H.: Polym. Eng. Sci. 36, p. 2163 (1996)10.1002/pen.10613Search in Google Scholar

8Yang, S. Y., Chou, H. L.: Polym. Eng. Sci. 42, p. 111 (2002)10.1002/pen.10932Search in Google Scholar

9White, J. L.: Principles of Polymer Engineering Rheology. Wiley, New York (1990)Search in Google Scholar

10Liu, S. J., Chang, J. H., Ho, C. Y., Hung, S. W.: Int. Polym. Process. 14, p. 191 (1999)10.3139/217.1534Search in Google Scholar

11Liu, S. J., Chang, J. H.: Polym. Comp. 21, p. 322 (2000)10.1002/pc.10189Search in Google Scholar

12Liu, S. J., Wu, Y. C.: Int. Polym. Process. 15, p. 297 (2000)Search in Google Scholar

13Liu, S. J., Yang, C. Y.: Plast. Rubber Comp. 31, p. 36 (2002)10.1179/146580101125000466Search in Google Scholar

14Liu, S. J., Lin, I. H.: Plast. Rubber Comp. 31, p. 28 (2002)10.1179/146580102225001364Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2005-11-29
Accepted: 2006-11-4
Published Online: 2013-03-26
Published in Print: 2007-03-01

© 2007, Carl Hanser Verlag, Munich

Downloaded on 22.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.3139/217.0130/pdf
Scroll to top button