Home Teaching Chinese Philosophy: From a “Skill-Based” to a “Thinking Through Early Chinese Philosophy” Approach
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Teaching Chinese Philosophy: From a “Skill-Based” to a “Thinking Through Early Chinese Philosophy” Approach

  • Ivana Buljan EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: May 17, 2025

Abstract

This article proposes two different approaches to teaching Classical Chinese philosophy based on the epistemic position of the students. One is a “skill-based approach” and the other is what I call the “thinking through early Chinese philosophy approach.” The first approach is suggested for the students of Sinology, and it requires basic knowledge of Old Chinese. The emphasis is on reading philosophical texts in Old Chinese where a student enters into ancient Chinese thought by access to the medium through which it was written. This approach highlights the relationship between language and thought; the interplay between content and form; and involves the philological (or textual) and philosophical reconstruction of the text. By using the skill-based approach, students can critically analyze and interpret Chinese traditional texts on their own terms and appreciate the aesthetic dimensions of philosophical works. The interplay between content and form is an important aspect of early Chinese texts. The aesthetical dimension of the work is not only the exterior form of the argument shaped to make it more beautiful, but it is also the building part of the argument. The second approach (“thinking through early Chinese philosophy”) is discussion-oriented. In that approach, the focus is on exchanging and developing insights and ideas. This approach is advised to students without prior knowledge of Classical Chinese. Here, a special challenge is represented when a heterogeneous group of students, composed of students of Sinology and students with varying academic backgrounds attend the Chinese philosophy class together. In that case, a balanced approach that combines the two above approaches is suggested. These types of teaching I have used in the Free Study of Sinology at the University of Zagreb.

Literature

Ivan Andrijanić, “Hrvatska i Indija: kulturno-povijesne i gospodarsko-političke veze,” Zbornik sveučilišta Libertas, Vol. 3 No. 3, 2018.Search in Google Scholar

Ivana Buljan, “Od jezika do mišljenja: irealne pogodbe i protučinjenično mišljenje u ranoj Kini,” Filozofska istraživanja, Vol. 37, No 4, 2017, pp. 743–762. 10.21464/fi37408Search in Google Scholar

Ivana Buljan, “Recenzija: Wu Xiaoming: Filozofija i Zhexue,” Filozofska Istraživanja, Vol 28, No 4, 2008, pp. 986–990. Search in Google Scholar

Wing-Tsit Chan, “Basic Problems in the Study of Chinese Philosophy,” Philosophy East and West, Vol. 4, No. 2, 1954, pp. 157–166. 10.2307/1397525Search in Google Scholar

Anne Cheng, “The Problem with “Chinese Philosophy,”” Revue Internationale de Philosophie, Vol. 59, No. 232 (2), pp. 175–180. 10.3917/rip.232.0175Search in Google Scholar

Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi, Flow: The Psychology of Optimal Experience, Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing 2008.Search in Google Scholar

Carine Defoort, “Is There Such a Thing as Chinese Philosophy? Arguments of an Implicit Debate,” Philosophy East and West, Vol. 51, No. 3, 2001, pp. 393–413. 10.1353/pew.2001.0039Search in Google Scholar

Vladimir Filipović, Filozofijski rječnik, Zagreb: Nakladni zavod Matice Hrvatske 1964 [1989]. Search in Google Scholar

Joachim Gentz, and Dirk Meyer, “Introduction: Literary Forms of Argument in Early China,” in: Literary Forms of Argument in Early China, ed. by Joachim Gentz and Dirk Meyer, Leiden: Brill 2015, pp. 1–36.10.1163/9789004299702_002Search in Google Scholar

Julian House, “Text and context in translation,” Journal of Pragmatics, Vol. 38, No 3, 2006, pp. 338–358.10.1016/j.pragma.2005.06.021Search in Google Scholar

Mislav Ježić, “Hrvatska indologija: povijesti sadašnjost, projekti, prinosi i publikacije,” Književna smotra, Vol. 166, No 4, 2012, pp. 5–16.Search in Google Scholar

David N. Keightley, “Early Civilization in China: Reflections on How it Became Chinese,” in: Paul S. Ropp, Heritage of China, Contemporary Perspectives on Chinese Civilization, Oakland: University of California Press 1990.10.1525/9780520908932-004Search in Google Scholar

Stipe Kutleša (Ed.), Filozofski leksikon, Zagreb: Leksikografski zavod “Miroslav Krleža” 2012.Search in Google Scholar

Andrew Lambert, “The Challenge of Teaching Chinese Philosophy: Some Thoughts on Method,” ASIANetwork Exchange, Vol. 23, No 2, 2016, pp. 107–123.10.16995/ane.168Search in Google Scholar

D. C. Lau, Ho Che Wah and Chen Fong Ching (Ed.), 何志華, 劉殿爵, 陳方正《荀子逐字索引》,(香港:商務印書館,1996)A Concordance to the Xunzi (荀子逐字索引), ICS series, Hong Kong: Commercial Press 1996.Search in Google Scholar

Michael Puett, and Christine Gross-Loh, The Path: What Chinese Philosophers Can Teach Us About the Good Life, Zagreb: Simon and Schuster 2017.Search in Google Scholar

Rein Raud, “Philosophies versus Philosophy: In Defense of a Flexible Definition,” Philosophy East and West, Vol. 56, No. 4, 2006, pp. 618–625. 10.1353/pew.2006.0059Search in Google Scholar

Heiner Roetz, Confucian Ethics of the Axial Age. A Reconstruction under the Aspect of the Breakthrough toward Postconventional Thinking, Albany: SUNY 1993, pp. 15–17.Search in Google Scholar

Tea Sernelj, “Xu Fuguan’s Concept of Anxiety and Its Connection to Religious Studies,” Asian Studies, Vol. 17, Issue 2, 2013, pp. 71–87.10.4312/as.2013.1.2.71-87Search in Google Scholar

Bryan W. Van Norden, Introduction to Classical Chinese Philosophy, Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing 2011. Search in Google Scholar

Wu Xiaoming, Filozofija i Zhexue: put k drugome i natrag, transl. by Zorana Baković, Mario Rebac, Zagreb: Bibliotheca Orientalica 2006.Search in Google Scholar

Internet sources:

http://www.japanorama.rs/2021/01/01/osnivac-sinologije-i-japanologije-u-srbiji-dejan-razic/ Search in Google Scholar

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10640830/ Search in Google Scholar

https://sinologija.ffzg.unizg.hr Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2025-05-17
Published in Print: 2025-05-09

© 2025 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Frontmatter
  2. Frontmatter
  3. Editorial Preface
  4. Preface
  5. I. Teaching Daoist Philosophy
  6. Experiences of Learning, Teaching, and Investigating Chinese Philosophy in Europe
  7. Zhuangzi as Educator: Spectatorial Engagement and Transcultural Understanding for Global Citizenship
  8. Teaching Chinese Philosophy Outside the Philosophy Classroom: Reflections on Contents, Methods, and Prospects
  9. From “Being and Time” to “Dao and Time”
  10. II. Teaching Confucian Philosophy
  11. How to Interpret Chinese Philosophy to the West—My Experience of Teaching Chinese Philosophy at Freie Universität Berlin
  12. Teaching through Sublation: Political and Philosophical Confucianism
  13. Engaging with Li 禮 in the European Philosophy Classroom
  14. A Few Reflections from Central Europe on Teaching Chinese Philosophy
  15. Teaching Chinese Philosophy: From a “Skill-Based” to a “Thinking Through Early Chinese Philosophy” Approach
  16. The Teaching of “Chinese Philosophy” in Sinology Studies
  17. Look Back in Anger? Chinese Philosophy at Ruhr University Bochum
  18. III. Teaching Chinese Buddhist Philosophy
  19. Buddhism as Philosophy: Exercise in Observing Observation: The Nonduality of Paradoxical and Representational Thinking in Chinese Buddhism
  20. Ideas, Labels, and Boxes – The Three Teachings in Cheng Xuanying’s Early Tang Commentary to the Laozi and Some Reflections on our Scholarly Explorations of the Three Teachings
  21. IV. Miscellaneous
  22. Die Bildung abstrakter Begriffe in archaischen chinesischen Schriften: Humboldt’sche Perspektiven
  23. Chinesische Sprache und Schrift in philosophischer und kulturübergreifender Sicht—ein Vorlesungsplan
  24. Bio-Bibliography
  25. Name Index
Downloaded on 6.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/yewph-2025-0011/html
Scroll to top button