Home Sustainability of ameliorative potentials of urea spiked poultry manure biochar types in simulated sodic soils
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Sustainability of ameliorative potentials of urea spiked poultry manure biochar types in simulated sodic soils

  • Yetunde Bunmi Oyeyiola EMAIL logo and Christianah Iyanuoluwa Adeosun
Published/Copyright: April 8, 2022
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

Alkaline soil conditions are serious challenges to optimal crop production on irrigated farmlands in arid and semi-arid regions of the world. Unique characteristics of biochar had been utilized in the amelioration of many problematic soils but its use in sodic soil management is not popular in Nigeria. Ameliorative effects of biochar types prepared from poultry manure co-pyrolyzed with or without urea fertilizer were evaluated on soil organic carbon and selected soil chemical characteristics of a simulated sodic soil. The results from the six weeks incubation trial revealed the ability of the biochar types to reduce soil pH from the initial 10.38 to 7.91–10.29 in high sodic (HS) and from initial 9.70 to a range of 7.51–8.39 in low sodic (LS) soil situations compared to 9.88 (HS) and 6.82 (LS) in sole urea treated soil. This accounted for up to 51 and 57% reduction in exchangeable sodium content and percentage (ESP), respectively and 28% increases in exchangeable Ca in the sodic soils. Poultry manure biochar co-pyrolyzed with urea was most effective in reducing exchangeable sodium and ESP in the soils while poultry manure biochar not co-pyrolyzed with urea was highest in reducing soil pH. Poultry manure biochar not spiked with urea was most superior in increasing soil organic carbon in low sodic situation.


Corresponding author: Yetunde Bunmi Oyeyiola, Department of Crop Production and Soil Science, Ladoke Akintola University of Technology, Ogbomoso, Nigeria, E-mail:

  1. Author contributions: All the authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this submitted manuscript and approved submission.

  2. Research funding: None declared.

  3. Conflict of interest statement: The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding this article.

References

1. Alkharabsheh, HM, Seleiman, MF, Battaglia, ML, Shai, A, Jalal, RS, Alhammad, BA, et al.. Biochar and its broad impacts in soil quality and fertility, nutrient leaching and crop productivity: a review. Agronomy 2021;11:993. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy11050993.Search in Google Scholar

2. Nzamouhe, M, Omar, G. Effect of irrigation on some chemical properties of fluvisols in Sudan Savanna Zone of Nigeria. J Res For Wildl Environ 2020;12:105–17.Search in Google Scholar

3. Xiao, Q, Zhu, LX, Zhang, HP, Li, XY, Shen, YF, Li, SQ. Soil amendment with biochar increases maize yield in a semi-arid region by improving soil quality and root growth. Crop Pasture Sci 2016;67:495–507. https://doi.org/10.1071/cp15351.Search in Google Scholar

4. Tekwa, J, Garjila, YA, Bashir, AA. An assessment of physico-chemical properties and fertility potentials of fallow and cultivated vertisols in Numan Area, Adamawa State, Nigeria. Sch J Agric Sci 2013;3:104–9.Search in Google Scholar

5. Dedeke, OA, Akomolafe, GF. Influence of salinity on soil chemical properties and surrounding vegetation of Awe salt mining site, Nasarawa State, Nigeria. Afr J Environ Sci Technol 2013;7:1070–5. https://doi.org/10.5897/AJEST2013.1600.Search in Google Scholar

6. Gong, H, Li, S. Effects of the interaction between biochar and nutrients on soil organic carbon sequestration in soda saline-alkali grassland: a review. Global Ecol Conserv 2021;26. https://doi.org/10.1016/gecco.2020.e01449.Search in Google Scholar

7. Lin, XW, Xie, ZB, Zhang, JY, Liu, Q, Bei, QC, Zhu, JG. Effects of biochar application on greenhouse gas emissions, sequestration and crop growth in coastal saline soil. Eur J Soil Sci 2015;66:329–38. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejss.12225.Search in Google Scholar

8. Ezeaku, PI, Ene, J, Shehu, JA. Application of different reclamation methods on salt affected soils for crop production. Am J Exp Agric 2015;9:1–11. https://doi.org/10.9734/ajea/2015/17187.Search in Google Scholar

9. Amini, S, Ghadiri, H, Chen, C, Marschner, P. Salt-affected soils, reclamation, carbon dynamics and biochar: a review. J Soils Sediments 2016;16:939–53. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11368-015-1293-1.Search in Google Scholar

10. Najad, ZD, Jung, MC. The effects of biochar and inorganic amendments on soil remediation in the presence of hyper-accumulator plant. Int J Energy Environ Eng 2017;8:317–29.10.1007/s40095-017-0250-8Search in Google Scholar

11. Sun, H, LU, H, Chu, L, Shao, H, Shi, W. Biochar applied with appropriate rates can reduce N leaching, keep N retention and not increase NH3 volatilization in a coastal saline soil. Sci Total Environ 2017;575:820–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.09.137.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

12. Cantrell, KB, Hunt, PG, Uchimiya, M, Novak, JM, Ro, KS. Impact of pyrolysis temperature and manure source on physicochemical characteristics of biochar. Bioresour Technol 2012;107:419–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2011.11.084.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

13. Tomczyk, A, Sokolowska, Z, Boguta, P. Biochar physicochemical properties: pyrolysis temperature and feedstock kind effects. Rev Environ Sci Biotechnol 2020;19:191–215. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11157-020-09523-3.Search in Google Scholar

14. Cabeza, I, Waterhouse, T, Sohi, S, Rooke, JA. Effect of biochar produced from different biomass sources and at different temperatures on methane production and ammonia concentrations in vitro. Anim Feed Sci Technol 2018;237:1–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2018.01.003.Search in Google Scholar

15. Fungo, B, Lehmann, J, Kalbitz, K, Thiongo, M, Okeyo, I, Tenywa, M, et al.. Aggregate size distribution in biochar-amended tropical Ultisol under conventional hand-hoe tillage. Soil Tillage Res 2017;165:190–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2016.08.012.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

16. Hadroug, S, Jellali, S, Leahy, JJ, Kwapinska, M, Jaguirim, M, Hamdi, H, et al.. Pyrolysis process as a sustainable management option of poultry manure: characterization of the derived biochars and assessment of their nutrient release capacities. Water 2019;11:2271. https://doi.org/10.3390/w11112271.Search in Google Scholar

17. Jindo, K, Mizumoto, H, Sawada, Y, Sanchez-Monedero, MA, Sonoki, T. Physical and chemical characterization of biochars derived from different agricultural residues. Biogeosciences 2014;11:6613–21. https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-11-6613-2014.Search in Google Scholar

18. Kimetu, JM, Lehmann, J. Stability and stabilization od biochar and green manure in soil with different organic carbon contents. Aust J Soil Res 2010;48:577–85. https://doi.org/10.1071/sr10036.Search in Google Scholar

19. Li, Y, Cheng, J, Lee, X, Chen, Y, Gao, W, Pan, W, et al.. Effects of biochar-based fertilizers on nutrient leaching in a tobacco-planting soil. Acta Geochim 2019;38:1–7.10.1007/s11631-018-0307-2Search in Google Scholar

20. Yao, Y, Gao, B, Zhang, M, Inyang, M, Zimmerman, AR. Efects of biochar amendment on sorption and leaching of nitrate, ammonium and phosphate in a sandy soil. Chemosphere 2012;89:1467–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2012.06.002.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

21. Akhtar, SS, Anderson, MN, Liu, F. Biochar mitigates salinity stress in potato. J Agron Crop Sci 2015;201:368–78. https://doi.org/10.1111/jac.12132.Search in Google Scholar

22. Usman, ARA, Al-Wabel, MI, Abdulaziz, AH, Mahmoud, WA, El-Nagga, AH, Ahmad, M, et al.. Conocarpus biochar induces changes in soil nutrient availability and tomato growth under saline irrigation. Pedosphere 2016;26:27–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1002-0160(15)60019-4.Search in Google Scholar

23. Xu, M, Zhang, X, Sun, N, Zhang, W. Advances in research of synergistic effects of soil carbon sequestration on crop yield improvement in cropland. J Plant Nutr Fertil 2017;23:1441–9.Search in Google Scholar

24. Taha, RS, Seleimann, MF, Alotaibi, M, Alhammad, BA, Rady, MM, Mahdi, AHA. Exogenous potassium treatments elevate salt tolerance and performance of Glycine max L. by boosting antioxidant defense system under actual saline field condition. Agronomy 2020;10:1741. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy10111741.Search in Google Scholar

25. Bremner, JM. Nitrogen-urea. In: Page, AL, Miller, RH, editors. Methods of soil analysis, 2nd ed. Madison: American Society of Agronomy, Soil Science Society of America; 1982:699–709 pp.10.2134/agronmonogr9.2.2ed.c34Search in Google Scholar

26. Olatunji, OO. Forms and distribution of sesquioxides and effects on phosphate sorption in some soil on basesment complex of south-western Nigeria Ph.D. Thesis. Ogbomoso, Nigeria: LAUTECH; 2011. p. 192.Search in Google Scholar

27. Smyth, AJ, Montgomery, RF. Soils and land use in central western Nigeria. Ibadan: Government Printer; 1962. p. 214–50.Search in Google Scholar

28. IITA- International Institute of Tropical Agriculture. Selected methods for soil and plant analysis, 2nd ed.; 1978, vol 1. p. 1–24. Manual series.Search in Google Scholar

29. Qadir, M, Schubert, S, Chafoor, A, Murtaza, G. Amelioration strategies for sodic soils: a review. Land Degrad Dev 2001;12:357–86. https://doi.org/10.1002/ldr.458.Search in Google Scholar

30. Leogrande, R, Vitti, C. Use of organic amendments to reclaim saline and sodic soils: a review. Arid Land Res Manag 2019;33. https://doi.org/10.1080/15324982.2018.1498038.Search in Google Scholar

31. Oyeyiola, YB, Omueti, JAI. Sorption characteristics of phosphorus forms of some alfisols in Osun state. Nigeria. Afr J Phys Sci 2010;3:54–60.Search in Google Scholar

32. Dugdug, AAS. Biochar for saline-sodic soil reclamation, phosphorus retention and crop growth improvement PhD Thesis. University of Alberta; 2017. p. 151.Search in Google Scholar

33. Mia, S, Dijkstra, FA, Singn, B. Aging induced changes in biochar’s functionality and adsorption behavior for phosphate and ammonium. Environ Sci Technol 2017;51:8359–67. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.7b00647.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

34. Lungu, OI, Dynoodt, RF. Acidification from long term use of urea and its effects on selected soil properties. Afr J Food Nutr Sci 2008;8:63–76. https://doi.org/10.4314/ajfand.v8i1.19180.Search in Google Scholar

35. Oyeyiola, YB. Phospho-compost amelioration of acid soil for Vigna unguiculata (L.) production. Ph.D. Thesis. University of Ibadan; 2017. p. 182.Search in Google Scholar

36. Esfandbod, M, Philip, IR, Miller, B, Rashti, MR, Lan, ZM, Srivastava, P, et al.. Aged acidic biochar increases nitrogen retention and decreases ammonia volatilization in alkaline bauxite residue sand. Ecol Eng 2017;98:157–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2016.10.077.Search in Google Scholar

37. Che, Q, Li, M, Zhang, Z. Effects of biochar application on soil organic carbon in degraded saline-sodic wetlands of Songnen plain, Northeast China. Chin Geogr Sci 2021;31:877–87. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11769-021-1232-6.Search in Google Scholar

38. Nehela, Y, Mazrou, VSA, Rady, AMS, El-Sherif, AMA, Omar, AC, El-Monem, AM, et al.. The integrated amendment of sodic – saline soils using biochar and plant growth –promoting rhizobacteria enhances maize (Zea mays L.) resilience to water salinity. Plants 2021;10:1960. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants10091960.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

Published Online: 2022-04-08

© 2022 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Frontmatter
  2. Reviews
  3. Recent endeavors in microbial remediation of micro- and nanoplastics
  4. Metal nanoparticles and its application on phenolic and heavy metal pollutants
  5. The story of nitrogen
  6. Recent development of imidazole derivatives as potential anticancer agents
  7. Indole based prostate cancer agents
  8. Lawsone (2-hydroxy-1,4-naphthaquinone) derived anticancer agents
  9. Small modular nuclear reactors are mostly bad policy
  10. A holistic environmental investigation of complementary energy in Alberta
  11. Green synthesis of various saturated S-heterocyclic scaffolds: an update
  12. Recent advances of heterocycle based anticancer hybrids
  13. Molecular docking and MD: mimicking the real biological process
  14. Synthesis of quinazolinone and quinazoline derivatives using green chemistry approach
  15. Nuclear fusion: the promise of endless energy
  16. Finance for Green Chemistry through Currency Mix
  17. Synthesis of bioactive scaffolds catalyzed by agro-waste-based solvent medium
  18. Recent developments in the green synthesis of biologically relevant cinnolines and phthalazines
  19. Detection of Rapid Eye Movement Behaviour Sleep Disorder using Time and Frequency Analysis of EEG Signal Applied on C4-A1 Channels
  20. Recent developments in C–C bond formation catalyzed by solid supported palladium: a greener perspective
  21. Visible-light-mediated metal-free C–Si bond formation reactions
  22. An overview of quinoxaline synthesis by green methods: recent reports
  23. Naturally occurring, natural product inspired and synthetic heterocyclic anti-cancer drugs
  24. Synthesis of bioactive natural products and their analogs at room temperature – an update
  25. One-pot multi-component synthesis of diverse bioactive heterocyclic scaffolds involving 6-aminouracil or its N-methyl derivatives as a versatile reagent
  26. Synthesis of new horizons in benzothiazole scaffold and used in anticancer drug development
  27. Triazine based chemical entities for anticancer activity
  28. Modification of kaolinite/muscovite clay for the removal of Pb(II) ions from aqueous media
  29. In silico design of ACE2 mutants for competitive binding of SARS-CoV-2 receptor binding domain with hACE2
  30. Computational study of Cu n AgAu (n = 1–4) clusters invoking DFT based descriptors
  31. Development of an online assessment system to evaluate knowledge on chemical safety and security
  32. Developing a questionnaire for diabetes mellitus type 2 risk effects and precondition factors – multivariate statistical paths
  33. Antioxidant and antibacterial activities of two xanthones derivatives isolated from the leaves extract of Anthocleista schweinfurthii Gilg (Loganiaceae)
  34. The stability increase of α-amylase enzyme from Aspergillus fumigatus using dimethyladipimidate
  35. Sustainability of ameliorative potentials of urea spiked poultry manure biochar types in simulated sodic soils
  36. Cytotoxicity test and antibacterial assay on the compound produced by the isolation and modification of artonin E from Artocarpus kemando Miq.
  37. Effects of alum, soda ash, and carbon dioxide on 40–50 year old concrete wastewater tanks
Downloaded on 14.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/psr-2021-0137/html
Scroll to top button