Home Effect of light and oxygen on repetitive bacterial inactivation on uniform, adhesive, robust and stable Cu-polyester surfaces
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Effect of light and oxygen on repetitive bacterial inactivation on uniform, adhesive, robust and stable Cu-polyester surfaces

  • Sami Rtimi EMAIL logo , Rosendo Sanjines , Cesar Pulgarin and John Kiwi
Published/Copyright: January 19, 2017
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

This study reports new findings on the sputtered Cu-polyester (Cu-PES) bacterial inactivation under low intensity visible light (λ >400 nm). Cu-PES samples sputtered for 160 s led to the complete inactivation of E. coli in anaerobic and aerobic media within 45 min. The (Cu-PES) oxidative radicals generated in aerobic media were not the only intermediates leading to bacterial inactivation. Bacterial inactivation also proceeds in the dark under anaerobic conditions. For this reason, the oxidative radicals were leading to bacterial reduction were unambiguously identified by appropriate scavengers. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) provided evidence for redox catalysis going within the time required by Cu-PES to induce bacterial reduction. Furthermore, the Cu-ions in the ppb range leached from the Cu-PES during bacterial reduction were monitored by inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS) and the Cu found were below the limit allowed for mammalian cells. By infrared spectroscopy (ATR-FTIR) the bacteria stretching shifts of the predominant lipo-polysaccharide (LPS) associated-(CH2) groups were monitored. The overstretching of these groups determined the time necessary for bond scission/bacterial inactivation.

Funding statement: We acknowledge the EPFL and Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF) Project (200021-143283/1) for the funding of this study.

References

1. Klevens RM, Edwards RJ, Richards LC, Horan CT, Gaynes PR, Pollock AD,et al. Public Health Rep. 2007;122:160–166.10.1177/003335490712200205Search in Google Scholar

2. Pittet D, Tarara D, Wenzel P. JAMA. 1994;271:1598–1601.10.1001/jama.1994.03510440058033Search in Google Scholar

3. Allegranzi B, Najed N, Combescure C, Graafmans W, Attar H, Donaldson L,et al. Lancet. 2011;377:228–241.10.1016/S0140-6736(10)61458-4Search in Google Scholar

4. Otter AJ, Yezli S, French LG. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2011;32:687–699.10.1086/660363Search in Google Scholar PubMed

5. Kramer A, Schwebke I, Kampf G. BMC Infect Dis. 2006;6:130–139.10.1186/1471-2334-6-130Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

6. Talon D. J Hosp Infect. 1999;43:13–17.10.1053/jhin.1999.0613Search in Google Scholar PubMed

7. Espirito-Santo C, Lam W, Elowsky G, Quaranta D, Domaille W, Chang J,et al. Appl Eenviron Microb. 2011;77:794–802.10.1128/AEM.01599-10Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

8. Casey L, Adams D, Karpanen J, Lambert A, Cookson D, Nightingale P,et al. J Hosp Infect. 2010;74:72–77.10.1016/j.jhin.2009.08.018Search in Google Scholar PubMed

9. Rio L, Kusiak-Nejman E, Kiwi J, Betrisey B, Pulgarin C, Trampuz A,et al. Appl Environ Microb. 2012;78:8176–8182.10.1128/AEM.02266-12Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

10. Borkow G, Gabbay J. Curr Chem Biol. 2009;3:272–278.Search in Google Scholar

11. Rtimi S, Baghriche O, Pulgarin C, Lavanchy J-C. Surf Coat Technol. 2013;232:804–813.10.1016/j.surfcoat.2013.06.102Search in Google Scholar

12. Dancer J. J Hosp Infect. 2009;73:378–385.10.1016/j.jhin.2009.03.030Search in Google Scholar PubMed

13. Kiwi J, Nadtochenko V. J Phys Chem B. 2004;108:17675–17684.10.1021/jp048281aSearch in Google Scholar

14. Nadtochenko V, Rincon A, Stanka S, Kiwi J. J Photochem Photobiol A. 2005;169:131–137.10.1016/j.jphotochem.2004.06.011Search in Google Scholar

15. Wagner CD, Riggs M, Davis EL, Müllenberg GE. Handbook of X-Ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy. Minnesota: PerkinElmer Corporation, Physical Electronics Division; 1979.Search in Google Scholar

16. Hardee K, Bard J. J Electrochem Soc. 1977;124:215–224.10.1149/1.2133269Search in Google Scholar

17. Méndez-Vilas A. Chapter 13 Cu, Cu/TiO2 thin films sputtered by up to date methods on non-thermal thin resistant substrates leading to bacterial inactivation. In:Kiwi J, Rtimi S, Pulgarin C, editors. Microbial pathogens and strategies for combating them: Science, technology and educationFormatex Research Center; 2013:74–82.Search in Google Scholar

18. Rtimi S, Sanjines R, Pulgarin C, Kiwi J. Biointerphases. 2014;9:029012.10.1116/1.4870596Search in Google Scholar PubMed

19. Bandara J, Guasaquillo I, Bowen P, Soare L, Jardim W, Kiwi J. Langmuir. 2005;21:8554–8559.10.1021/la0504661Search in Google Scholar PubMed

20. Sunada K, Watanabe T, Hashimoto K. Environ Sci Technol. 2003;37:4785–4789.10.1021/es034106gSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

21. Ishiguro H, Yao Y, Nakano Y, Hara M, Sunada K, Hashimoto H,et al. Appl Cat B. 2013;129:56–61.10.1016/j.apcatb.2012.09.012Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

22. Irie H, Miura S, Kamiya K, Hashimoto K. Chem Phys Lett. 2008;457:202–205.10.1016/j.cplett.2008.04.006Search in Google Scholar

23. Qiu X, Miyauchi M, Sunada K, Minoshima M, Liu M, Lu Y,et al. ACS Nano. 2012;6:1609–1618.10.1021/nn2045888Search in Google Scholar PubMed

24. Li J, Dennehy J. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2011;77:6878–6883.10.1128/AEM.05661-11Search in Google Scholar

25. Ditta B, Steele A, Liptrot C, Tobin J, Tyler H, Yates HM,et al. Appl Microbiol Cell Physiol. 2008;79:127–133.Search in Google Scholar

26. Walters G, Parkin IP. J Mater Chem. 2009;19:574–590.10.1039/B809646ESearch in Google Scholar

27. Daoud W. Self-cleaning Materials and Surfaces Beijing, China John Wiley and Sons Ltd.; 2013 .10.1002/9781118652336Search in Google Scholar

28. Fujishima A, Zhang X, Tryk D. Surf Sci Repts. 2008;63:515–582.10.1016/j.surfrep.2008.10.001Search in Google Scholar

29. Bondarenko O, Katre J. Arch Toxicol. 2013;87:1181–1200.10.1007/s00204-013-1079-4Search in Google Scholar

30. Brewer GJ. Clin Neurophysiol. 2010;121:459–460.10.1016/j.clinph.2009.12.015Search in Google Scholar

31. Nikaido H. J Biol Chem. 1994;269:3905–3909.10.1016/S0021-9258(17)41716-9Search in Google Scholar

32. Naumann D, Schultz C, Sabich A, Kkasrowsky M, Labishinsi H. J Mol Struct. 1989;214:213–246.10.1016/0022-2860(89)80015-8Search in Google Scholar

33. Pitha J, Jones N. Can J Chem. 1966;44:3031–3050.10.1139/v66-445Search in Google Scholar

34. Selle C, Pohle W, Fritzshe H. J Mol Struct. 1999;480-481:401–405.10.1016/S0022-2860(98)00772-8Search in Google Scholar

35. Levin W, Lewis EN. Anal Chem. 1990;62. 1101A-1111A.10.1021/ac00220a001Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Received: 2016-7-27
Revised: 2016-10-26
Accepted: 2016-11-30
Published Online: 2017-1-19
Published in Print: 2017-1-1

© 2017 by Walter De Gruyter GmbH

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Editorial: The importance of advanced oxidation processes in degrading persistent pollutants
  2. An overview on heterogeneous Fenton and photoFenton reactions using zerovalent iron materials
  3. Photooxidative Degradation of Pesticides in Water; Response Surface Modeling Approach
  4. The treatment of aniline in aqueous solutions by gamma irradiation
  5. Microwave regeneration of biological activated carbon
  6. Molecular iodine/aqueous NH4OAc: a green reaction system for direct oxidative synthesis of nitriles from amines
  7. Catalytic Degradation of Safranin T in Aqueous Medium Using Non-conventional Processes
  8. Oxidation of 1, 2-dichlorobenzene on a commercial V2O5-WO3/nano-TiO2 catalyst: Effect of HCl addition
  9. Current conduction mechanisms in thermal nitride and dry gate oxide grown on 4H-silicon carbide (SiC)
  10. Effect of light and oxygen on repetitive bacterial inactivation on uniform, adhesive, robust and stable Cu-polyester surfaces
  11. Wet oxidation of an industrial high concentration pharmaceutical wastewater using hydrogen peroxide as an oxidant
  12. Oxidation characteristics of heavy crude oil in ignition process
  13. Comparative studies on the performance of porous Ti/Sno2-Sb2O3/Pbo2 enhanced by CNT and Bi Co-doped electrodes for methyl orange oxidation
  14. Application of photocatalytic paint for destruction of benzo[a]pyrene. Impact of air humidity
  15. Spray-drying synthesis and characterization of Li4Ti5O12 anode material for lithium ion batteries
  16. Kinetics analysis of photocatalytic degradation of Acid Orange 7 by Co/N/Er3+: Y3Al5O12/TiO2 films
  17. Reaction characteristics of oxygen generation from plate-like potassium superoxide within a confined space
  18. Electrochemical reduction of CO2 on a Cu2O/polyaniline /stainless steel based electrode
  19. Role of oxygen-containing functional surface groups of activated carbons on the elimination of 2-hydroxybenzothiazole from waters in A hybrid heterogeneous ozonation system
  20. The degradation efficiency and mechanism of meclofenamic acid in aqueous solution by UV irradiation
  21. Effect of electrode oxide film in micro arc oxidation on water treatment
  22. Photocurrent response and photocatalytic activity of Nd-doped TiO2 thin films prepared by sol-gel method
  23. Mathematical model involving chemical reaction and mass transfer for the ozonation of dimethyl phthalate in water in a bubble column reactor
  24. Elimination of organic micro-contaminants in municipal wastewater by a combined immobilized biomass reactor and solar photo-Fenton tertiary treatment
  25. Degradation of catechol on BiOCl: charge transfer complex formation and photoactivity
  26. Photocatalytic degradation of phenol on strontium titanate supported on HZSM-5
  27. Selective Fenton-like catalytic oxidation of acid orange II on inorganic heterogeneous molecular imprinted catalysts
  28. Decoloration of azo dye methyl orange by a novel electro-Fenton internal circulation batch reactor
Downloaded on 26.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/jaots-2016-0178/html
Scroll to top button