Home Selective Fenton-like catalytic oxidation of acid orange II on inorganic heterogeneous molecular imprinted catalysts
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Selective Fenton-like catalytic oxidation of acid orange II on inorganic heterogeneous molecular imprinted catalysts

  • Yanqun Song , Jiaobo Shang , Chuan Rong , Yinghui Wang , Yuanyuan Zhang EMAIL logo , Kefu Yu EMAIL logo and Liyuan Chen
Published/Copyright: February 11, 2017
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

In order to realize the selective oxidation of Fenton-like reaction, an inorganic molecularly imprinted Fe/Al/SiO2 composite (IMIPF) was synthesized by sol-gel method using acid orange II as template. As a comparison, the Fe/Al/SiO2 composite without molecular imprinting was referred to as INIPF. The adsorption performance and Fenton-like catalytic selectivity were also studied with sodium dodecyl benzene sulfonate as the coexistence interference. Adsorption results in single systems and binary systems proved that IMIPF owned special molecular recognition and priority adsorption ability of the target pollutant. In addition, both IMIPF and INIPF exhibited high catalytic activity toward the degradation of acid orange II in single systems. Benefited from the preferential adsorption and Fenton-like activity, IMIPF could achieve the goal of selective removal of target pollutants at low concentration in the presence of other pollutants at high concentration in binary systems. Moreover, IMIPF possessed a wide applicable pH range and good reusability.

Funding statement: This research was supported by Nature Science Foundations of China (51668005, 21267002, 21367003, 41473118, and 41273139), the China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (No. 2016M592607, 2016M590846), the National Key Basic Research Program of China (No. 2013CB956102), Nature Foundations of Guangxi Province (2015GXNSFBB139009, 2014GXNSFAA118296, 2014GXNSFBA118217, 2013GXNSFEA053001) and the BaGui Scholars Program Foundation (2014).

References

1. Zheng X, Liu J. Desalination. 2006;190:277–286.10.1016/j.desal.2005.09.008Search in Google Scholar

2. Lotito AM, Fratino U, Bergna G, Iaconi CD. Chem Eng J. 2012;195-196:261–269.10.1016/j.cej.2012.05.006Search in Google Scholar

3. Bes-Piá A, Mendoza-Roca J, Alcaina-Miranda M, Iborra-Clar A, Iborra-Clar M. Desalination. 2003;157:73–80.10.1016/S0011-9164(03)00385-0Search in Google Scholar

4. Jia Z, Zhang W, Wang W, Habibi D, Zhang L. Appl Catal B. 2016;192:46–56.10.1016/j.apcatb.2016.03.048Search in Google Scholar

5. Jia Z, Zhang W, Wang W, Habibi D, Zhang L. J Taiwan Inst Chem Eng. 2016;60:267–274.10.1016/j.jtice.2015.10.012Search in Google Scholar

6. Soula L, Gonçalves I, Santos W, Franco D, Silva L. J Adv Oxid Technol. 2014;17:1–9.Search in Google Scholar

7. Miao J, Jia Z, Lu H, Habibi D, Zhang L. J Taiwan Inst Chem Eng. 2014;45:1636–1641.10.1016/j.jtice.2013.11.007Search in Google Scholar

8. Savun B, Neis U, Ince N, Yenigün O. J Adv Oxid Technol. 2012;15:374–379.Search in Google Scholar

9. Blanco J, Torrades F, De La Varga M, García-Montaño J. Desalination. 2012;286:394–399.10.1016/j.desal.2011.11.055Search in Google Scholar

10. Escalona I, Fortuny A, Stüber F, Bengoa C, Fabregat A, Font J. Desalination. 2014;345:77–84.10.1016/j.desal.2014.04.024Search in Google Scholar

11. Bach A, Shemer H, Semiat R. Desalination. 2010;264:188–192.10.1016/j.desal.2010.04.011Search in Google Scholar

12. Eskelinen K, Särkkä H, Kurniawan TA, Sillanpää MET. Desalination. 2010;255:179–187.10.1016/j.desal.2009.12.024Search in Google Scholar

13. Lee JC, Kim MS, Kim CK, Chung CH, Cho SM, Han GY,et al. Korean J Chem Eng. 2003;5:862–868.10.1007/BF02697289Search in Google Scholar

14. Shih Y, Binh NT, Chen CW, Chen CF, Dong C. Chemosphere. 2016;150:294–303.10.1016/j.chemosphere.2016.01.112Search in Google Scholar PubMed

15. Oturan M, Aaron J. Crit Rev Environ Sci Technol. 2016;44:2577–2641.10.1080/10643389.2013.829765Search in Google Scholar

16. Bokare A, Choi WY. J Hazard Mater. 2014;275:121–135.10.1016/j.jhazmat.2014.04.054Search in Google Scholar PubMed

17. Yuan S, Mao X, Akram A. Environ Sci Technol. 2012;46:3398–3405.10.1021/es204546uSearch in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

18. Bouasla C, Samar MEH, Ismail F. Desalination. 2010;254:35–41.10.1016/j.desal.2009.12.017Search in Google Scholar

19. Kušić H, Koprivanac N, Selanec I. Chemosphere. 2006;65:65–73.10.1016/j.chemosphere.2006.02.053Search in Google Scholar PubMed

20. Anastasiou N, Monou M, Mantzavinos D, Kassinos D. Desalination. 2009;248:836–842.10.1016/j.desal.2008.11.006Search in Google Scholar

21. Wang N, Zheng T, Zhang G, Wang P. Chem Eng. 2016;4:762–787.Search in Google Scholar

22. Chen J, Lin H, Luo Z, He YS, Li GP. Desalination. 2011;277:265–273.10.1016/j.desal.2011.04.040Search in Google Scholar

23. Patra S, Roy E, Madhuri R, Sharma PK. Anal Chim Acta. 2016;918:77–88.10.1016/j.aca.2016.02.046Search in Google Scholar PubMed

24. Liu X, Zhu Q, Chen H, Zhou L, Dang X, Huang J. J Chromatogr B. 2014;951-952:32–37.10.1016/j.jchromb.2014.01.010Search in Google Scholar

25. Yu C, Mosbach K. J Chromatogr A. 2000;888:63–72.10.1016/S0021-9673(00)00556-2Search in Google Scholar

26. Qin F, Xie C, Yu Z, Kong L, Ye M, Zou H. J Sep Sci. 2006;29:1332–1343.10.1002/jssc.200600030Search in Google Scholar PubMed

27. Yang X, Wang R, Wang W, Yan H, Qiu M, Song Y. J Chromatogr B. 2014;945-946:127–134.10.1016/j.jchromb.2013.11.040Search in Google Scholar PubMed

28. Wei H, Tsai Y, Wu J, Chen H. J Chromatogr B. 2006;836:57–62.10.1016/j.jchromb.2006.03.047Search in Google Scholar PubMed

29. Deng F, Liu Y, Luo X, Wu S, Luo S, Au C,et al. J Hazard Mater. 2014;278:108–115.10.1016/j.jhazmat.2014.05.088Search in Google Scholar PubMed

30. Deng F, Liu Y, Li K, Tu X, Luo S, Yang L,et al. J Mol Catal A Chem. 2013;366:222–227.10.1016/j.molcata.2012.09.027Search in Google Scholar

31. Tan L, Haung C, Peng R, Tang Y, Li W. Biosens Bioelectron. 2014;61:506–511.10.1016/j.bios.2014.06.004Search in Google Scholar PubMed

32. Shen X, Zhu L, Huang C, Tang H, Yu Z, Deng F. J Mater Chem. 2009;19:4843–4851.10.1039/b900196dSearch in Google Scholar

33. Hu Y, Li J, Hu Y, Li G. Talanta. 2010;82:464–470.10.1016/j.talanta.2010.04.057Search in Google Scholar PubMed

34. Glavicic M, Semiatin S. Acta Mater. 2006;54:5337–5347.10.1016/j.actamat.2006.04.020Search in Google Scholar

35. Bougrab H, Inal K, Leoni M. Mater Sci Eng A. 2005;400-401:142–145.10.1016/j.msea.2005.02.079Search in Google Scholar

36. Groma I, Tüzes D, Ispánovity P. Scr Mater. 2013;68:755–758.10.1016/j.scriptamat.2013.01.002Search in Google Scholar

37. Zhao NN, He C, Liu J, Gong H, An T, Xu H,et al. J Solid State Chem. 2014;219:67–73.10.1016/j.jssc.2014.06.039Search in Google Scholar

38. Teleki A, Akhtar MK, Pratsinis SE. J Mater Chem. 2008;18:3509–3616.10.1039/b811648mSearch in Google Scholar

39. Warzywoda J, Dixon A, Thompson R, Jr AS. Zeolites. 1996;16:125–137.10.1016/0144-2449(95)00101-8Search in Google Scholar

40. Huang M, Wu C, Jiang Y, Yan M. J Alloys Compd. 2015;644:124–130.10.1016/j.jallcom.2015.04.201Search in Google Scholar

41. Xu Z, Song C, Hu Y, Li G. Talanta. 2011;85:97–103.10.1016/j.talanta.2011.03.041Search in Google Scholar PubMed

42. Liu R, Li X, Li Y, Jin P, Qin W, Qi J. Biosens Bioelectron. 2009;25:629–634.10.1016/j.bios.2009.01.039Search in Google Scholar PubMed

43. Say R, Erdem M, Ersöz A, Türk H, Denizli A. Appl Catal A. 2005;286:221–225.10.1016/j.apcata.2005.03.015Search in Google Scholar

44. Zhang Y, Adams RD, Silva L. Int J Adhes Adhes. 2014;50:85–92.10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2014.01.022Search in Google Scholar

45. Lee Y, Lee W. J Hazard Mater. 2010;178:187–193.10.1016/j.jhazmat.2010.01.062Search in Google Scholar

46. Panizza M, Cerisola G. Water Res. 2009;43:339–344.10.1016/j.watres.2008.10.028Search in Google Scholar

47. Hermosilla D, Cortijo M, Huang C. Sci Total Environ. 2009;407:3473–3481.10.1016/j.scitotenv.2009.02.009Search in Google Scholar

48. Deng J, Jiang J, Zhang Y, Lin X, Du C, Xiong Y. Appl Catal B. 2008;84:468–473.10.1016/j.apcatb.2008.04.029Search in Google Scholar

49. Sabhi S, Kiwi J. Water Res. 2001;35:1994–2002.10.1016/S0043-1354(00)00460-7Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2016-8-15
Revised: 2016-10-4
Accepted: 2016-10-24
Published Online: 2017-2-11
Published in Print: 2017-1-1

© 2017 by Walter De Gruyter GmbH

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Editorial: The importance of advanced oxidation processes in degrading persistent pollutants
  2. An overview on heterogeneous Fenton and photoFenton reactions using zerovalent iron materials
  3. Photooxidative Degradation of Pesticides in Water; Response Surface Modeling Approach
  4. The treatment of aniline in aqueous solutions by gamma irradiation
  5. Microwave regeneration of biological activated carbon
  6. Molecular iodine/aqueous NH4OAc: a green reaction system for direct oxidative synthesis of nitriles from amines
  7. Catalytic Degradation of Safranin T in Aqueous Medium Using Non-conventional Processes
  8. Oxidation of 1, 2-dichlorobenzene on a commercial V2O5-WO3/nano-TiO2 catalyst: Effect of HCl addition
  9. Current conduction mechanisms in thermal nitride and dry gate oxide grown on 4H-silicon carbide (SiC)
  10. Effect of light and oxygen on repetitive bacterial inactivation on uniform, adhesive, robust and stable Cu-polyester surfaces
  11. Wet oxidation of an industrial high concentration pharmaceutical wastewater using hydrogen peroxide as an oxidant
  12. Oxidation characteristics of heavy crude oil in ignition process
  13. Comparative studies on the performance of porous Ti/Sno2-Sb2O3/Pbo2 enhanced by CNT and Bi Co-doped electrodes for methyl orange oxidation
  14. Application of photocatalytic paint for destruction of benzo[a]pyrene. Impact of air humidity
  15. Spray-drying synthesis and characterization of Li4Ti5O12 anode material for lithium ion batteries
  16. Kinetics analysis of photocatalytic degradation of Acid Orange 7 by Co/N/Er3+: Y3Al5O12/TiO2 films
  17. Reaction characteristics of oxygen generation from plate-like potassium superoxide within a confined space
  18. Electrochemical reduction of CO2 on a Cu2O/polyaniline /stainless steel based electrode
  19. Role of oxygen-containing functional surface groups of activated carbons on the elimination of 2-hydroxybenzothiazole from waters in A hybrid heterogeneous ozonation system
  20. The degradation efficiency and mechanism of meclofenamic acid in aqueous solution by UV irradiation
  21. Effect of electrode oxide film in micro arc oxidation on water treatment
  22. Photocurrent response and photocatalytic activity of Nd-doped TiO2 thin films prepared by sol-gel method
  23. Mathematical model involving chemical reaction and mass transfer for the ozonation of dimethyl phthalate in water in a bubble column reactor
  24. Elimination of organic micro-contaminants in municipal wastewater by a combined immobilized biomass reactor and solar photo-Fenton tertiary treatment
  25. Degradation of catechol on BiOCl: charge transfer complex formation and photoactivity
  26. Photocatalytic degradation of phenol on strontium titanate supported on HZSM-5
  27. Selective Fenton-like catalytic oxidation of acid orange II on inorganic heterogeneous molecular imprinted catalysts
  28. Decoloration of azo dye methyl orange by a novel electro-Fenton internal circulation batch reactor
Downloaded on 26.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/jaots-2016-0195/html
Scroll to top button