Abstract
In this paper, I conduct a synchronic investigation of the Old Persian adverb vasai̯. In some cases, this adverb functions as a degree intensifier whereas in others it appears to quantify over an argument NP. By drawing on analyses of adverbs like French beaucoup, English completely and German größtenteils, I will argue that a unified semantic analysis can be applied to all attestations of vasai̯. I will argue that in all attestations, vasai̯ indicates a high position on a scale. What differs in the respective passages is the nature of the scale. It can be an intensity scale specified by the predicate or a volume scale specified by an argument of the predicate. The latter case yields an interpretation that can be paraphrased by using an adnominal quantifier like much. In addition to the semantic analysis, I will argue that, contrary to the assumption made by several scholars, vasai̯ is always to be interpreted as an adverb and does not function as an uninflected noun or adjective.
Acknowledgments
I have presented preliminary results of my research for this article in two colloquia at the University of Cologne. I would like to thank my friends and colleagues for their helpful comments. In particular, I would like to thank Sylvia Hutter for her advice on the Babylonian data and for providing the glosses of all Babylonian examples in this article. In addition, I would like to thank two anonymous reviewers for their fruitful comments and suggestions, and Leonard del Federico for proofreading my article. Of course, all mistakes are my own.
Abbreviations
Languages
- Goth.
-
Gothic
- OHG
-
Old High German
- ON
-
Old Norse
- PIE
-
Proto-Indo-European
Glosses
- 1
-
1st person
- 2
-
2nd person
- 3
-
3rd person
- abl
-
ablative
- acc
-
accusative
- adv
-
adverb
- aor
-
aorist
- c
-
common gender
- caus
-
causative
- dat
-
dative
- dem
-
demonstrative pronoun
- du
-
dual
- dur
-
durative
- f
-
feminine
- gen
-
genitive
- imp
-
imperative
- inf
-
infinitive
- inj
-
injunctive
- ins
-
instrumental
- loc
-
locative
- lp
-
local particle
- m
-
masculine
- mid
-
middle
- n
-
neuter
- neg
-
negation
- nom
-
nominative
- opt
-
optative
- perf
-
perfect
- pl
-
plural
- pn
-
proper name
- ppp
-
perfect passive participle
- prs
-
present
- prt
-
particle
- pst
-
past
- ptcp
-
participle
- quot
-
quotative
- rel
-
relative pronoun
- sbjv
-
subjunctive
- sg
-
singular
- vadj
-
verbal adjective
- voc
-
vocative
References
Abeillé, Anne, Jenny Doetjes, Arie Molendijk & Henriëtte de Swart. 2004. Adverbs and quantification. In Francis Corblin & Henriëtte de Swart (eds.), Handbook of French semantics, 185–209. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Search in Google Scholar
Authier, J.-Marc. 2016. Degree quantifiers, bare quantifiers and intensifiers in the midfield: A new look at quantification at a distance. Glossa 1(1). 1–34. https://doi.org/10.5334/gjgl.45.Search in Google Scholar
Bae, Chul-Hyun. 2001. Comparative studies of king Darius’s Bisitun inscription. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University PhD thesis.Search in Google Scholar
Bartholomae, Christian. 1904. Altiranisches Wörterbuch. Strassburg: Verlag von Karl J. Trübner.Search in Google Scholar
Bartholomae, Christian. 1925. Zur Kenntnis der mitteliranischen Mundarten: VI. Heidelberg: Carl Winter’s Universitätsbuchhandlung.Search in Google Scholar
Bavant, Marc J. J. 2014. Résultatif, diathèse et possession en basque, vieux perse et élamite. Utrecht: LOT.Search in Google Scholar
Benson, Melissa. 2020 [n.d.]. Violence in the Behistun monument: Construction and cohesion of Achaemenid imperial rule under Darius I (522–519 BCE). London: University College London PhD thesis.Search in Google Scholar
Benveniste, Emile. 1945. Etudes Iraniennes. Transactions of the Philological Society 44. 39–78. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-968x.1945.tb00210.x.Search in Google Scholar
Benvenuto, Maria C. 2012. Self-discipline and the exercise of power: Linguistic evidence in the royal Achaemenid inscriptions (DNb and XPl). In Gian P. Basello & Adriano V. Rossi (eds.), Dariosh studies II: Persepolis and its settlements. Territorial system and ideology in the Achaemenid state, 67–90. Napoli: Università degli studi di Napoli “L’Orientale”.Search in Google Scholar
Benvenuto, Maria C. & Flavia Pompeo. 2019. Some remarks on the accusative in Old Persian. Vicino Oriente 23. 81–93. https://doi.org/10.53131/vo2724-587x2019_6.Search in Google Scholar
Benvenuto, Maria C. & Flavia Pompeo. 2020. Towards a morphosyntax of Old Persian cases: The genitive. Hamburg: Baar.Search in Google Scholar
Benvenuto, Maria C. & Flavia Pompeo. 2022. La lingua degli antichi Persiani. Milano: EDITORE ULRICO HOEPLI MILANO.Search in Google Scholar
Berman, Stephen R. 1987. Situation-based semantics for adverbs of quantification. University of Massachusetts Occasional Papers in Linguistics 13. 47–68.Search in Google Scholar
Bolinger, Dwight. 1972. Degree words. The Hague & Paris: Mouton.10.1515/9783110877786Search in Google Scholar
Bosque, Ignacio & Pascual J. Masullo. 1998. On verbal quantification in Spanish. In Olga Fullana & Francesc Roca (eds.), Studies on the syntax of Central Romance languages: Proceedings of the III symposium on the syntax of Central Romance languages, 9–63. Girona: Universitat de Girona.Search in Google Scholar
Brandenstein, Wilhelm & Manfred Mayrhofer. 1964. Handbuch des Altpersischen. Wiesbaden: Otto Harrassowitz.Search in Google Scholar
Brereton, Joel P. & Stephanie W. Jamison. 2020. The Rigveda: A guide. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Brugmann, Karl. 1892. Grundriss der vergleichenden Grammatik der indogermanischen Sprachen: Zweiter Band. Wortbildungslehre (Stammbildungs- und Flexionslehre). Strassburg: Karl J. Trübner.10.1515/9783112381281Search in Google Scholar
Brust, Manfred. 2018. Historische Laut- und Formenlehre des Altpersischen: Mit einem etymologischen Glossar. Innsbruck: Institut für Sprachen und Literaturen der Universität Innsbruck.Search in Google Scholar
Casaretto, Antje. 2020. On secondary predicates in Vedic Sanskrit: Syntax and semantics. International Journal of Diachronic Linguistics and Linguistic Reconstruction 17. 1–63.Search in Google Scholar
Caudal, Patrick & David Nicolas. 2005. Types of degrees and types of event structures. In Claudia Maienborn & Angelika Wöllstein (eds.), Event arguments: Foundations and applications, 277–299. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer Verlag.10.1515/9783110913798.277Search in Google Scholar
Cheung, Johnny. 2007. Etymological dictionary of the Iranian verb. Leiden & Boston: Brill.Search in Google Scholar
Coenen, Pascal. 2020–2021 [2022]. The functions of the Old Persian particle =ci. Die Sprache 54. 13–94. https://doi.org/10.13173/spr.54.1.013.Search in Google Scholar
Dabir-Moghaddam, Mohammad. 2018. Non-canonical subject construction in endangered Iranian languages: Further investigation into the debates on the genesis of ergativity. In Saloumeh Gholami (ed.), Endangered Iranian languages, 9–40. Wiesbaden: Reichert.Search in Google Scholar
Dandamaev, Muchammad A. 1963. Краткие сообщения Института народов Азии, vol. 61, 175–187. http://kronk.spb.ru/library/ksina.htm.Search in Google Scholar
Doetjes, Jenny S. 1997. Quantifiers and selection: On the distribution of quantifying expressions in French, Dutch and English. The Hague: Holland Academic Graphics.Search in Google Scholar
Doetjes, Jenny. 2004. Degree quantifiers. In Francis Corblin & Henriëtte de Swart (eds.), Handbook of French semantics, 83–98. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Search in Google Scholar
Doetjes, Jenny. 2007. Adverbs and quantification: Degrees versus frequency. Lingua 117. 685–720. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2006.04.003.Search in Google Scholar
Doniger O’Flaherty, Wendy. 1981. The Rig Veda: An anthology. One hundred and eight hymns, selected, translated and annotated. Harmondsworth, New York, Ringwood, Markham & Auckland: Penguin Books.Search in Google Scholar
Dowty, David. 1991. Thematic proto-roles and argument selection. Language 67(3). 547–619. https://doi.org/10.2307/415037.Search in Google Scholar
Durkin-Meisterernst, Desmond. 2004. Dictionary of Manichaean texts: Vol. III. Texts from Central Asia and China. Part 1. Dictionary of Manichaean Middle Persian and Parthian. Turnhout, Belgium: Brepols.Search in Google Scholar
Emmerick, Ronald E. 2009 [2012]. Khotanese and Tumshuqese. In Gernot Windfuhr (ed.), The Iranian languages, 377–415. London & New York: Routledge Taylor & Francis Group.Search in Google Scholar
Filippone, Ela. 2005. I dimostrativi in anticopersiano. In Michele Bernardini & Natalia L. Tornesello (eds.), Scritti in onore di Giovanni M. D’Erme, vol. 2, 383–426. Napoli: Università degli studi di Napoli “L’Orientale”, Dipartimento di Studi Asiatici.Search in Google Scholar
Filippone, Ela. 2012. DPd/DPe and the political discourse of King Darius. In Gian P. Basello & Adriano V. Rossi (eds.), Dariosh studies II: Persepolis and its settlements. Territorial system and ideology in the Achaemenid state, 101–119. Napoli: Università degli studi di Napoli “L’Orientale”, Dipartimento di Studi Asiatici.Search in Google Scholar
Filippone, Ela. 2016. Goat-skins, horses and camels: How did Darius’ army cross the Tigris? In Céline Redard (ed.), Des contrées avestiques à Mahabad, via Bisotun: Études offertes en hommage à Pierre Lecoq, 25–60. Paris: Recherches et Publications.Search in Google Scholar
Filippone, Ela. 2019 [2020]. The orders of the King: Reported directive quotations in the Achaemenid Royal inscriptions. In Sabir Badalkhan, Gian P. Basello & Matteo de Chiara (eds.), Iranian studies in honour of Adriano V. Rossi, vol. 2, 291–323. Napoli: UniorPress.Search in Google Scholar
Fleischhauer, Jens. 2016. Degree gradation of verbs. Düsseldorf: dup.Search in Google Scholar
Foy, Willy. 1898. Beiträge zur erklärung der altpersischen keilinschriften. Zeitschrift für vergleichende Sprachforschung auf dem Gebiete der Indogermanischen Sprachen 35(1). 1–78.Search in Google Scholar
Fuhrmann, Manfred. 1995. Die Reden gegen Verres: In C. Verrem, vol. 2. Zürich: Artemis & Winkler.Search in Google Scholar
García-Ramón, José Luís. 1998. Indogermanisch *gu̯hen- ‘(wiederholt) schlagen’, ‘töten’. In Jay Jasanoff, H. Craig Melchert & Lisi Oliver (eds.), Mír Curad: Studies in honor of Calvert Watkins, 139–154. Innsbruck: Institut für Sprachwissenschaft der Universität Innsbruck.Search in Google Scholar
Geldner, Karl F. 1951–1957. Der Rig-Veda: Aus dem Sanskrit ins Deutsche übersetzt und mit einem laufenden Kommentar versehen, vol. 4. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Grassmann, Hermann. 1873. Wörterbuch zum Rig-Veda. Leipzig: F. A. Brockhaus.Search in Google Scholar
Gray, Louis H. 1900. Indo-Iranian studies. The American Journal of Philology 21(1). 1–22. https://doi.org/10.2307/287841.Search in Google Scholar
Greenfield, Jonas C. & Bezalel Porten. 1982. The Bisitun inscription of Darius the Great: Aramaic version. London: Lund Humphries.Search in Google Scholar
Hale, Mark R. 1987. Studies in the comparative syntax of the oldest Indo-Iranian languages. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University PhD thesis.Search in Google Scholar
Hale, Mark. 1988. Old Persian word order. Indo-Iranian Journal 31(1). 27–40. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00159812.Search in Google Scholar
Hale, Mark. 2017–2018. The syntax of Indo-Iranian. In Jared Klein, Brian Joseph & Matthias Fritz (eds.), Handbook of comparative and historical Indo-European linguistics, vol. 3, 1924–1942. Berlin & Boston: De Gruyter Mouton.10.1515/9783110542431-033Search in Google Scholar
Harmatta, János. 1979. Darius’ expedition against the Sakā Tigraxaudā. In János Harmatta (ed.), Studies in the sources on the history of pre-Islamic Central Asia, 19–28. Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó.Search in Google Scholar
Herrenschmidt, Clarisse. 1989. Le paragraphe 70 de l’inscription de Bisotun. In Gilbert Lazard, Charles-Henri de Fouchécour & Philippe Gignoux (eds.), Études irano-aryennes offertes à Gilbert Lazard, 193–208. Paris: Association pour l’avancement des études iraniennes.Search in Google Scholar
Herzfeld, Ernst. 1938. Altpersische Inschriften. Berlin: Verlag von Dietrich Reimer; Andrews & Steiner.Search in Google Scholar
Hinterwimmer, Stefan. 2008. Q-adverbs as selective binders: The quantificational variability of free relatives and definite DPs. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110199208Search in Google Scholar
Hinz, Walther. 1939. Zur iranischen Altertumskunde. Zeitschrift der Deutschen Morgenländischen Gesellschaft 93 (n.F. 18)(3/4). 363–380.Search in Google Scholar
Hinz, Walther. 1969. Altiranische Funde und Forschungen. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter & Co.10.1515/9783110823462Search in Google Scholar
Hinz, Walther. 1972. Die Zusätze zur Darius-Inschrift von Behistan. Archaeologische Mitteilungen aus Iran 5 (neue Folge). 243–251.Search in Google Scholar
Hinz, Walther & Heidemarie Koch. 1987. Elamisches Wörterbuch (in 2 Teilen). Berlin: Verlag von Dietrich Reimer in Berlin.Search in Google Scholar
Hoekstra, Jarich. 2013. Another quantificational variability effect: The indefinite pronoun neemen ‘no one’ as a floating quantifier and as a negative adverb in Fering-Öömrang (North Frisian). Lingua 134. 194–209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2013.07.006.Search in Google Scholar
Hoffmann, Karl. 1952 [1956]. Zum prädikativen adverb. Münchener Studien zur Sprachwissenschaft 1. 42–53.Search in Google Scholar
Hoffmann, Karl. 1976. Präteritaler Optativ im Altiranischen. In Johanna Narten (ed.), Aufsätze zur Indoiranistik: Band 2, 605–619. Wiesbaden: Dr. Ludwig Reichert Verlag.Search in Google Scholar
Humbach, Helmut & Pallan R. Ichaporia. 1998. Zamyād Yasht: Yasht 19 of the Younger Avesta. Text, translation, commentary. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz Verlag.Search in Google Scholar
Hyland, John O. 2014. The casualty figures in Darius’ Bisitun inscription. Journal of Ancient Near Eastern History 1(2). 173–199. https://doi.org/10.1515/janeh-2013-0001.Search in Google Scholar
Jamison, Stephanie W. & Joel P. Brereton. 2014. The Rigveda: The earliest religious poetry of India, vol. 3. Oxford & New York: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Johnson, Edwin L. 1917. Historical grammar of the Ancient Persian language. New York, Cincinnati & Chicago: American Book Company.Search in Google Scholar
Jügel, Thomas. 2017–2018. The syntax of Iranian. In Jared Klein, Brian Joseph & Matthias Fritz (eds.), Handbook of comparative and historical Indo-European linguistics, vol. 3, 549–566. Berlin & Boston: De Gruyter Mouton.10.1515/9783110261288-035Search in Google Scholar
Kennedy, Christopher. 2012. The composition of incremental change. In Violeta Demonte & Louise McNally (eds.), Telicity, change, and state: A cross-categorial view of event structure, 103–121. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199693498.003.0004Search in Google Scholar
Kennedy, Christopher & Louise McNally. 2005. Scale structure, degree modification, and the semantics of gradable predicates. Language 81(2). 345–381. https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2005.0071.Search in Google Scholar
Kent, Roland G. 1915. Studies in the Old Persian inscriptions. Journal of the American Oriental Society 35. 321–352. https://doi.org/10.2307/592657.Search in Google Scholar
Kent, Roland G. 1943. Old Persian texts. Journal of Near Eastern Studies 2(2). 105–114. https://doi.org/10.1086/370665.Search in Google Scholar
Kent, Roland G. 1944. Old Persian texts: V. Darius’ Behistan inscription, column V. A correction. Journal of Near Eastern Studies 3(4). 232–233. https://doi.org/10.1086/370722.Search in Google Scholar
Kent, Roland G. 1946. The accusative in Old Persian mām kāma. Journal of the American Oriental Society 66(1). 44–49. https://doi.org/10.2307/595497.Search in Google Scholar
Kent, Roland G. 1952. Cameron’s new readings of the Old Persian at Behistan. Journal of the American Oriental Society 72(1). 9–20. https://doi.org/10.2307/595322.Search in Google Scholar
Kent, Roland G. 1953. Old Persian: Grammar. Texts. Lexicon. New Haven, Connecticut: American Oriental Society.Search in Google Scholar
Keydana, Götz, Wolfgang Hock & Paul Widmer. 2021. Comparison and gradation in Indo-European: Introduction and overview. In Götz Keydana, Wolfgang Hock & Paul Widmer (eds.), Comparison and gradation in Indo-European, 1–33. Berlin & Boston: De Gruyter Mouton.10.1515/9783110641325Search in Google Scholar
Lajara, Ignasi-Xavier A. 2000. Sobre el relativo del antiguo persa. In Bernhard Forssman & Robert Plath (eds.), Indoarisch, Iranisch und die Indogermanistik: Arbeitstagung der Indogermanischen Gesellschaft vom 2. bis 5. Oktober 1997 in Erlangen, 1–13. Wiesbaden: Reichert Verlag Wiesbaden.Search in Google Scholar
Lecoq, Pierre. 1997. Les inscriptions de la Perse achéménide: Traduit du vieux perse, de l’elamite, du babylonien et de l’araméen. Paris: Gallimard.Search in Google Scholar
Lewis, David. 1975. Adverbs of quantification. In Edward L. Keenan (ed.), Formal semantics of natural language: Papers from a colloquium sponsored by the King’s College Research Centre, Cambridge, 3–15. Cambridge, London, New York & Melbourne: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Lincoln, Bruce. 2012. Happiness for mankind: Achaemenian religion and the imperial project. Leuven, Paris & Walpole, MA: Peeters.Search in Google Scholar
Lincoln, Bruce. 2015 [2020]. Representing the Lie in Achaemenian Persia. In Philippe Swennen (ed.), Démons iraniens: Actes du colloque international organisé à l’Université de Liège les 5 et 6 février 2009 à l’occasion des 65 ans de Jean Kellens, 135–144. Liége: Presses universitaires de Liège.10.4000/books.pulg.9549Search in Google Scholar
Meillet, Antoine. 1915. Grammaire du vieux perse. Paris: Librairie Orientale et Américaine.Search in Google Scholar
Meillet, Antoine & Emile Benveniste. 1931. Grammaire du vieux-perse: Deuxième édition entièrement corrigée et augmentée par E. Benveniste. Paris: Librairie ancienne honoré champion, éditeur Édouard Champion.Search in Google Scholar
Milizia, Paolo. 2021. Old Iranian. In Götz Keydana, Wolfgang Hock & Paul Widmer (eds.), Comparison and gradation in Indo-European, 417–475. Berlin & Boston: De Gruyter Mouton.10.1515/9783110641325-015Search in Google Scholar
Mittwoch, Anita. 2005. Unspecified arguments in episodic and habitual sentences. In Nomi Erteschik-Shir & Tova R. Rapoport (eds.), The syntax of aspect: Deriving thematic and aspectual interpretation, 237–254. Oxford & New York: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199280445.003.0011Search in Google Scholar
Müller, Friedrich. 1892. Kleine Mittheilungen. Wiener Zeitschrift für die Kunde des Morgenlandes 6. 351–358.Search in Google Scholar
Müller, Friedrich. 1893. Beiträge zur Erklärung der altpersischen Keilinschriften. Wiener Zeitschrift für die Kunde des Morgenlandes 7. 252–259.Search in Google Scholar
Obenauer, Hans-Georg. 1983. Une quantification non canonique: la « quantification à distance ». Langue Française 58. 66–88. https://doi.org/10.3406/lfr.1983.6415.Search in Google Scholar
Obenauer, Hans-Georg. 1984. On the identification of empty categories. The Linguistic Review 4. 153–202. https://doi.org/10.1515/tlir.1985.4.2.153.Search in Google Scholar
Parian, Saber A. 2017. A new edition of the Elamite version of the Behistun inscription (I). Cuneiform Digital Library Bulletin 2017(3). 1–14.Search in Google Scholar
Patejuk, Agnieszka & Adam Przepiórkowski. 2021. Predicative adverbs: Evidence from Polish. Linguistic Inquiry 52(4). 835–851.Search in Google Scholar
Pompeo, Flavia. 2012. Some syntactic and semantic remarks on XPl 30-31. In Gian, P. & Adriano, V. (eds.), Dariosh studies II: Persepolis and its settlements. Territorial system and ideology in the Achaemenid state, 155–181. Napoli: Università degli studi di Napoli “L’Orientale”.Search in Google Scholar
Pompeo, Flavia. 2018. Tracce di grammaticalizzazione nel persiano antico: lo strano caso di mām kāma. In Luca Alfieri, Maria C. Benvenuto, Claudia A. Ciancaglini, Alessandro de Angelis, Paolo Milizia & Flavia Pompeo (eds.), Linguistica, filologia e storia culturale: In ricordo di Palmira Cipriano, 237–257. Roma: Editrice “Il Calamo”.Search in Google Scholar
Pompeo, Flavia. 2019 [2020]. Il persiano antico tra conservazione e innovazione: considerazioni sulle costruzioni impersonali nelle iscrizioni achemenidi. In Sabir Badalkhan, Gian P. Basello & Matteo de Chiara (eds.), Iranian studies in honour of Adriano V. Rossi, vol. 2, 721–740. Napoli: UniorPress.Search in Google Scholar
Puskás, Genoveva. 2017. Discontinous quantifiers, primarily in French. In Martin Everaert & Henk C. van Riemsdijk (eds.), The Wiley Blackwell companion to syntax, 2nd edn., 1307–1335. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons Inc.10.1002/9781118358733.wbsyncom019Search in Google Scholar
Rappaport Hovav, Malka. 2008. Lexicalized meaning and the internal temporal structure of events. In Susan Rothstein (ed.), Theoretical and crosslinguistic approaches to the semantics of aspect, 13–42. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.10.1075/la.110.03hovSearch in Google Scholar
Rappaport Hovav, Malka & Beth Levin. 2010. Reflections on manner/result complementarity. In Malka Rappaport Hovav, Edit Doron & Ivy Sichel (eds.), Lexical semantics, syntax, and event structure, 21–38. Oxford & New York: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199544325.003.0002Search in Google Scholar
Rossi, Adriano V. 2000. L’iscrizione originaria di Bisotun: DB elam. A+L. In Simonetta Graziani (ed.), Studi sul vicino oriente antico dedicati alla memoria di Luigi Cagni, vol. IV, 2065–2107. Napoli: Instituto Universitatiro Orientali di Napoli.Search in Google Scholar
Rossi, Adriano V. 2021a. Tense and aspect in Old Persian. In Markus Witte & Brinthanan Puvaneswaran (eds.), Tempus und Aspekt in den alten Sprachen, 261–288. Kamen: Hartmut Spenner.Search in Google Scholar
Rossi, Adriano V. 2021b. The inscriptions of the Achaemenids. In Bruno Jacobs & Robert Rollinger (eds.), A companion to the Achaemenid Persian Empire, vol. 2, 75–85. Hoboken: Wiley Blackwell.10.1002/9781119071860.ch6Search in Google Scholar
Schmitt, Rüdiger. 1980. Zur babylonischen Version der Bīsutūn-Inschrift. Archiv für Orientforschung 27. 106–126.Search in Google Scholar
Schmitt, Rüdiger. 1986. Ein kleiner Beitrag “Von Großkönigs Gnaden”. Zeitschrift für Papyrologie und Epigraphik 65. 79–83.Search in Google Scholar
Schmitt, Rüdiger. 1990. Epigraphisch-exegetische Noten zu Dareios’ Bīsutūn-Inschriften. Wien: Verlag der Österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften.Search in Google Scholar
Schmitt, Rüdiger. 1991. The Bisitun inscriptions of Darius the Great: Old Persian text. London: School of Oriental and African Studies.Search in Google Scholar
Schmitt, Rüdiger. 1995. Zur Enklise im Altpersischen. In Heinrich Hettrich, Wolfgang Hock, Peter-Arnold Mumm & Norbert Oettinger (eds.), Verba et structurae: Festschrift für Klaus Strunk zum 65. Geburtstag, 285–301. Innsbruck: Institut für Sprachwissenschaft der Universität Innsbruck.Search in Google Scholar
Schmitt, Rüdiger. 1996. Epigraphisch-exegetische Probleme der altpersischen Texte “DNb” und “XPl”: Teil I. Bulletin of the Asia Institute 10. 15–23.Search in Google Scholar
Schmitt, Rüdiger. 1998. Neue Lesungen des Bīsutūn-Textes. In Vasilij I. Abaev (ed.), Studia Iranica et Alanica: Festschrift for Prof. Vasilij Ivanovič Abaev on the occasion of his 95th birthday, 447–464. Rome: Istituto italiano per l’Africa e l’Oriente.Search in Google Scholar
Schmitt, Rüdiger. 1999. Beiträge zu altpersischen Inschriften. Wiesbaden: Reichert Verlag Wiesbaden.Search in Google Scholar
Schmitt, Rüdiger. 2000. The Old Persian inscriptions of Naqsh-i Rustam and Persepolis. London: School of Oriental and African Studies.Search in Google Scholar
Schmitt, Rüdiger. 2009. Die altpersischen Inschriften der Achaimeniden: Editio minor mit deutscher Übersetzung. Wiesbaden: Reichert Verlag Wiesbaden.Search in Google Scholar
Schmitt, Rüdiger. 2014. Wörterbuch der altpersischen Königsinschriften. Wiesbaden: Reichert Verlag Wiesbaden.10.29091/9783954906437Search in Google Scholar
Schmitt, Rüdiger. 2016. Stilistik der altpersischen Inschriften: Versuch einer Annäherung. Wien: Verlag der Österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften.10.1553/0x0033ea80Search in Google Scholar
Schweiger, Günter. 1998. Kritische Neuedition der achaemenidischen Keilinschriften (in zwei Bänden): Band 1. Textband. Transkribierter Text und Übersetzung. Taimering: Schweiger VWT-Verlag.Search in Google Scholar
Shahbazi, Alireza Shapour. 1982. Darius in Scythia and Scythians in Persepolis. Archaeologische Mitteilungen aus Iran 15. 189–235.Search in Google Scholar
Skjærvø, Prods O. 1999. Avestan quotations in Old Persian?: Literary sources of the Old Persian inscriptions. In Shaul Shaked & Amnon Netzer (eds.), Irano-Judaica IV: Studies relating to Jewish contacts with Persian culture throughout the ages, 1–64. Jerusalem: Ben-Zvi Institute.Search in Google Scholar
Skjærvø, Prods O. 2009 [2012]. Old Iranian. In Gernot Windfuhr (ed.), The Iranian languages, 43–195. London & New York: Routledge Taylor & Francis Group.Search in Google Scholar
Skjærvø, Prods O. 2009. Reflexes of Iranian oral traditions in Manichean literature. In Desmond Durkin-Meisterernst, Christiane Reck & Dieter Weber (eds.), Literarische Stoffe und ihre Gestaltung in mitteliranischer Zeit: Kolloquium anlässlich des 70. Geburtstages von Werner Sundermann, 269–286. Wiesbaden: Dr. Ludwig Reichert Verlag.Search in Google Scholar
Skjærvø, Prods O. 2011. Review of “Schmitt, Rüdiger: Die altpersischen Inschriften der Achaimeniden. Editio minor mit deutscher Übersetzung. Wiesbaden: Reichert 2009”. Orientalistische Literaturzeitung 106. 4–5.Search in Google Scholar
Skjærvø, Prods O. 2017–2018a. The documentation of Iranian. In Jared Klein, Brian Joseph & Matthias Fritz (eds.), Handbook of comparative and historical Indo-European linguistics, vol. 3, 471–481. Berlin & Boston: De Gruyter Mouton.10.1515/9783110261288-032Search in Google Scholar
Skjærvø, Prods O. 2017–2018b. The morphology of Iranian. In Jared Klein, Brian Joseph & Matthias Fritz (eds.), Handbook of comparative and historical Indo-European linguistics, vol. 3, 503–549. Berlin & Boston: De Gruyter Mouton.10.1515/9783110261288-034Search in Google Scholar
Söderlund, Jonathan. 2020. “Han tog riket för sig själv”: Den falske Smerdis uppror. Uppsala: Uppsala Universitet BA thesis.Search in Google Scholar
Steve, Marie-Joseph. 1987. Nouveaux mélanges épigraphiques. Inscriptions royales de Suse et de la Susiane. Nice: Editions. Serre.Search in Google Scholar
Szemerényi, Oswald John Louis. 1991. Iranica V. Nos. 59–70. In Patrick Considine & James T. Hooker (eds.), Oswald Szemerényi: Scripta minora. Selected essays in Indo-European, Greek, and Latin. Volume IV: Indo-European languages other than Latin and Greek, 1923–2004. Innsbruck: Institut für Sprachwissenschaft an der Universität Innsbruck.Search in Google Scholar
Tenny, Carol L. 1987. Grammaticalizing aspect and affectedness. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Massachusetts Institute of Technology PhD thesis.Search in Google Scholar
Tenny, Carol L. 1994. Aspectual roles and the syntax-semantics interface. Dordrecht, Boston, London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.10.1007/978-94-011-1150-8Search in Google Scholar
Tenny, Carol L. 2000. Core events and adverbial modification. In Carol Tenny & James Pustejovsky (eds.), Events as grammatical objects: The converging perspectives of lexical semantics and syntax, 285–334. Stanford, California: CSLI Publications.Search in Google Scholar
Tuplin, Christopher. 2005. Darius’ accession in (the) media. In Piotr Bienkowski, Christopher Mee & Elizabeth Slater (eds.), Writing and ancient near eastern society: Papers in honour of Alan R. Millard, 217–244. New York & London: T&T Clark.Search in Google Scholar
Vallat, François. 1977. Corpus des inscriptions royales en elamite achemenide. Paris: Université de la Sorbonne PhD thesis.Search in Google Scholar
Vallat, François. 2010. Les principales inscriptions achéménides de Suse. In Jean Perrot (ed.), Le palais de Darius à Suse: Une résidence royale sur la route de Persépolis à Babylone, 300–317. Paris: PUPS.Search in Google Scholar
van Nooten, Barend A. & Gary B. Holland. 1994. Rig Veda: A metrically restored text with an introduction and notes. Cambridge, Massachusetts & London, England: Harvard University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Vogelsang, Willem. 1986. Four short notes on the Bisutun text and monument. Iranica Antiqua 21. 121–140. https://doi.org/10.2143/ia.21.0.2014072.Search in Google Scholar
Voigtlander, Elizabeth N. 1978. The Bisitun inscription of Darius the Great: Babylonian version. London: Lund Humphries.Search in Google Scholar
Weissbach, Franz H. 1911. Die Keilinschriften der Achämeniden. Leipzig: J. C. Hinrichs’sche Buchhandlung.Search in Google Scholar
Weissbach, Franz H. 1940. Die fünfte Kolumne der großen Bīsutūn-Inschrift. Zeitschrift für Assyrologie und vorderasiatische Archäologie 46. 53–82. https://doi.org/10.1515/zava.1940.46.1.53.Search in Google Scholar
Yonge, Charles D. 1903. The orations of Marcus Tullius Cicero: Vol. I. Orations for Quintius, Sextus Roscius, Quintus Roscius, against Quintus, Cæcilius, and against Verres. London: George Bell & Sons.Search in Google Scholar
Zobel, Sarah. 2021. Quantificational variability effects with German größtenteils and implicit agents. In Patrick Grosz, Luisa Martí, Hazel Paerson, Yasutada Sudo & Sarah Zobel (eds.), Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung 25, 939–956. London: University College London and Queen Mary University of London.Search in Google Scholar
© 2024 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston