Home Laryngealized vowels in Yánesha’: a phonetic description and subsegmental analysis
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Laryngealized vowels in Yánesha’: a phonetic description and subsegmental analysis

  • Allegra Robertson Molinaro EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: January 30, 2025
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill
Folia Linguistica
From the journal Folia Linguistica

Abstract

This paper addresses the phonetic and phonological status of laryngeals in Yánesha’(Arawakan), showing that they are features associated with vowels, rather than following consonants or free-standing segments. Based on phonetic findings, I propose that [+spread glottis] and [+constricted glottis] are contrastive features associated with the rightmost subsegments of aspirated and glottalized vowels, respectively, within a Q-Theoretic framework. This analysis is supported by distributional and durational patterns and interactions between weight and stress, as quantified in the phonetics description. Yánesha’s laryngealized vowels are subsequently considered in light of areal trends, and an analytical extension to closely related Chamicuro is proposed. This paper contributes to our empirical understanding of a typologically rare segment type in an understudied language.


Corresponding author: Allegra Robertson Molinaro, Linguistics Department, UC Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, USA, E-mail:

References

Adelaar, Willem F. H. 2007. The Quechua impact in Amuesha, an Arawak language of the Peruvian Amazon. In Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald & Robert M. W. Dixon (eds.), Grammars in contact: A cross-linguistic typology, 290–312. Oxford: Oxford Academic. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199207831.003.0012.Search in Google Scholar

Akinlabi, Akinbiyi & Mark Liberman. 2001. Tonal complexes and tonal alignment. North East Linguistic Society 31. 1–20.10.1075/la.36.04akiSearch in Google Scholar

Attinasi, John Joseph. 1973. Lak t’an: A grammar of the Chol (Mayan) word. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago dissertation.Search in Google Scholar

Bates, Douglas, Martin Mächler, Ben Bolker & Steve Walker. 2015. Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software 67(1). 1–48. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v067.i01.Search in Google Scholar

Bautista, Espíritu, Richard Chase Smith & W. Martinez. 2008. Yompor Santo – A Yanesha Ancestor. Lima: Instituto del Bien Comun. Available at: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M6BLVnxrwx8.Search in Google Scholar

Boersma, Paul. 2001. Praat, a system for doing phonetics by computer. Glot International 5(9). 341–345.Search in Google Scholar

Browman, Catherine P. & Louis Goldstein. 1989. Articulatory gestures as phonological units. Phonology 6(2). 201–251. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0952675700001019.Search in Google Scholar

Browman, Catherine P. & Louis Goldstein. 1990. Tiers in articulatory phonology, with some implications for casual speech. Papers in laboratory phonology I: Between the grammar and physics of speech, 341–376.10.1017/CBO9780511627736.019Search in Google Scholar

Browman, Catherine P. & Louis Goldstein. 1992. Articulatory phonology: An overview. Phonetica 49(3-4). 155–180. https://doi.org/10.1159/000261913.Search in Google Scholar

Coon, Jessica. 2010. Complementation in Chol (Mayan): A theory of split ergativity. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology dissertation.Search in Google Scholar

Coon, Jessica. 2016. Mayan morphosyntax. Language and Linguistics Compass 10(10). 515–550. https://doi.org/10.1111/lnc3.12149.Search in Google Scholar

Czarnecki, Przemysław. 2013. The phonology of quantity in Icelandic and Norwegian. Poznán: Adam Mickiewicz University dissertation.Search in Google Scholar

Duff-Tripp, Martha. 1997. Gramática del idioma Yanesha’ (Amuesha). Lima: Instituto Lingüístico de Verano.Search in Google Scholar

Duff-Tripp, Martha. 1998. Diccionario Yánesha’ (Amuesha)–Castellano. Lima: Instituto Lingüístico de Verano.Search in Google Scholar

Fast, Peter W. 1953. Amuesha (Arawak) phonemes. International Journal of American Linguistics 19(3). 191–194. https://doi.org/10.1086/464218.Search in Google Scholar

Fry, Dennis B. 1955. Duration and intensity as physical correlates of linguistic stress. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 27(4). 765–768. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.1908022.Search in Google Scholar

Fry, Dennis B. 1958. Experiments in the perception of stress. Language and Speech 1(2). 126–152. https://doi.org/10.1177/002383095800100207.Search in Google Scholar

Gafos, Adamantios I. 2002. A grammar of gestural coordination. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 20(2). 269–337. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1014942312445.10.1023/A:1014942312445Search in Google Scholar

Garvin, Karee, Myriam Lapierre & Sharon Inkelas. 2018. A Q-Theoretic approach to distinctive subsegmental timing. Linguistic Society of America 3(1). 9–1. https://doi.org/10.3765/plsa.v3i1.4330.Search in Google Scholar

Garvin, Karee, Myriam Lapierre, Martha Schwarz & Sharon Inkelas. 2020. Modeling vowel quantity scales in Q-theory. Proceedings of the 2019 Annual Meeting on Phonology 8. 1–12. https://doi.org/10.3765/amp.v8i0.4685.Search in Google Scholar

Gordon, Matthew. 1998. The phonetics and phonology of non-modal vowels: A cross-linguistic perspective. Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society 24. 93–105. https://doi.org/10.3765/bls.v24i1.1246.Search in Google Scholar

Gordon, Matthew. 1999. Syllable weight: Phonetics, phonology, typology. Los Angeles: University of California, Los Angeles dissertation.Search in Google Scholar

Gordon, Matthew & Peter Ladefoged. 2001. Phonation types: A cross-linguistic overview. Journal of Phonetics 29(4). 383–406. https://doi.org/10.1006/jpho.2001.0147.Search in Google Scholar

Harrison, Philip. 2013. Making accurate formant measurements: An empirical investigation of the influence of the measurement tool, analysis settings and speaker on formant measurements. Heslington: University of York dissertation.Search in Google Scholar

Hofling, Charles A. 2000. Itzaj maya grammar. Salt Lake City: University of Utah Press.Search in Google Scholar

Holmer, Nils M. 1949. Guajiro (Arawak). International Journal of American Linguistics 15. 45–56. https://doi.org/10.1086/464022.Search in Google Scholar

Hunter, John D. 2007. Matplotlib: A 2D graphics environment. Computing in Science and Engineering 9(3). 90–95. https://doi.org/10.1109/mcse.2007.55.Search in Google Scholar

Hyman, Larry M. 2007. Universals of tone rules: 30 years later. Typological Studies in Word and Sentence Prosody 1. 1–34. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110207569.1.Search in Google Scholar

Inkelas, Sharon & Stephanie S. Shih. 2014. Unstable surface correspondence as the source of local conspiracies. North East Linguistic Society 44(1). 191–204.Search in Google Scholar

Inkelas, Sharon & Stephanie S. Shih. 2016. Re-representing phonology: Consequences of Q-Theory. North East Linguistic Society 46. 161–174.Search in Google Scholar

Inkelas, Sharon & Stephanie S. Shih. 2017. Looking into segments. Proceedings of the 2016 Annual Meeting on Phonology 4. 1–18. https://doi.org/10.3765/amp.v4i0.3996.Search in Google Scholar

Instituto Nacional de Estadística e Informática (INEI). 2017. Perú: Censos Nacionales de Población y Vivienda.Search in Google Scholar

Kim, Yuni. 2008. Topics in the phonology and morphology of San Francisco del Mar Huave. Berkeley: University of California, Berkeley dissertation.Search in Google Scholar

Kuznetsova, Alexandra, Per B. Brockhoff & Rune H. B. Christensen. 2017. lmerTest package: Tests in linear mixed effects models. Journal of Statistical Software 82(13). 1–26. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v082.i13.Search in Google Scholar

Ladefoged, Peter. 1971. Preliminaries to linguistic phonetics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Search in Google Scholar

Ladefoged, Peter & Ian Maddieson. 1996. The sounds of the world’s languages. Cambridge, UK: Blackwell Publishers.Search in Google Scholar

Lois, Ximena, Kirill Shklovsky, Pedro Mateo Pedro & Jessica Coon. 2011. Roots and patterns in Yucatecan languages. Formal approaches to Mayan linguistics. Cambridge, MIT: Working Papers in Linguistics.Search in Google Scholar

Macaulay, Monica & Joseph C. Salmons. 1995. The phonology of glottalization in Mixtec. International Journal of American Linguistics 61(1). 38–61. https://doi.org/10.1086/466244.Search in Google Scholar

Maddieson, Ian & Sandra Ferrari Disner. 1984. Patterns of sounds. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511753459Search in Google Scholar

Michael, Lev, Tammy Stark, Emily Clem & Will Chang (compilers). 2015. South American phonological inventory Database v2.1.0. Survey of California and Other Indian Languages Digital Resource. Berkeley: University of California.Search in Google Scholar

Michael, Lev. 2020. Comparative Arawakan lexical dataset. UC Berkeley, unpublished database.Search in Google Scholar

Miller, Brett. 2012. Sonority and the larynx. In Steve Parker (ed.), The sonority controversy, 257–288. Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter Mouton.10.1515/9783110261523.257Search in Google Scholar

Moran, Steven & Daniel McCloy (eds.). 2019. Phoible 2.0. Jena: Max Planck Institute for the Science of Human History.Search in Google Scholar

Parker, Stephen G. 1991. Estudios sobre la fonología del Chamicuro. Lima: Instituto Lingüístico de Verano.Search in Google Scholar

Parker, Stephen G. 1994. Laryngeal codas in Chamicuro. International Journal of American Linguistics 60(3). 261–271. https://doi.org/10.1086/466233.Search in Google Scholar

Payne, David L. 1991. A classification of Maipuran (Arawakan) languages based on shared lexical retention. Handbook of Amazonian Languages 3. 355–499.Search in Google Scholar

Ryan, Kevin M. 2011. Gradient syllable weight and weight universals in quantitative metrics. Phonology 28(3). 413–454. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0952675711000212.Search in Google Scholar

Schwarz, Martha, Myriam Lapierre, Karee Garvin & Sharon Inkelas. 2019. Recent advances in Q-Theory: Segment strength. Linguistic Society of America 51. 1–14. https://doi.org/10.3765/plsa.v4i1.4550.Search in Google Scholar

Silva, Wilson. 2016. The Status of the Laryngeals 'ʔ' and 'h' in Desano. The phonetics and phonology of laryngeal features in Native American languages, 285–307. Leiden: Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004303218_012.Search in Google Scholar

Silverman, Daniel. 2003. On the rarity of pre-aspirated stops. Journal of Linguistics 39(3). 575–598. https://doi.org/10.1017/s002222670300210x.Search in Google Scholar

Stenzel, Kristine. 2007. The semantics of serial verb constructions in two Eastern Tukanoan languages: Kotiria (Wanano) and Waikhana (Piratapuyo). Semantics of Under-Represented Languages of the Americas 4. 275–290.Search in Google Scholar

Steriade, Donca. 1993. Closure, release, and nasal contours. In Marie K. Huffman & Rena A. Krakow (eds.), Phonetics and phonology, nasals, nasalization, and the Velum, vol. 5, 401–470. Cambridge, MA: Elsevier.10.1016/B978-0-12-360380-7.50018-1Search in Google Scholar

Steriade, Donca. 1994. Complex onsets as single segments: The Mazateco pattern. Perspectives in Phonology. 203–291.Search in Google Scholar

Stevens, Mary & John Hajek. 2004. How pervasive is preaspiration? Investigating sonorant devoicing in Sienese Italian. 10th Australian International Conference on Speech Science & Technology, 334–339.Search in Google Scholar

Waskom, Michael L. 2021. Seaborn: Statistical data visualization. Journal of Open Source Software 6(60). 1–4. https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.03021.Search in Google Scholar

Wise, Mary Ruth. 1958. Diverse points of articulation of allophones in Amuesha (Arawak). Le Maître Phonetíque 36. 15–21.Search in Google Scholar

Wise, Mary Ruth. 1976. Apuntes sobre la influencia inca entre los amuesha: factor que oscurece la clasificación de su idioma. Revista del Museo Nacional 42. 355–366.Search in Google Scholar

Wise, Mary Ruth. 2018. From here to there and back again: Fieldwork in the Andean foothills. In Hannah Sarvasy & Diana Forker (eds.), Word hunters. Field linguists on fieldwork, 157–169. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: John Benjamins Publishing Company.10.1075/slcs.194.11wisSearch in Google Scholar

Received: 2022-10-26
Accepted: 2024-12-12
Published Online: 2025-01-30

© 2025 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 16.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/flin-2025-2002/html
Scroll to top button