Lexical systems with systematic gaps: verbs of falling

References

Akita, Kim. 2017. The typology of manner expressions: A preliminary look. In Iraide Ibarretxe-Antuñano (ed.), Motion and space across languages: Theory and applications, 39–60. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/hcp.59.03akiSearch in Google Scholar

Aurnague, Michel & Dejan Stosic (eds.). 2019. The semantics of dynamic space in French. Descriptive, experimental and formal studies on motion expression. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/hcp.66Search in Google Scholar

Bagirokova, Irina & Daria Ryzhova. 2020. Glagoly padenija i osobennosti ix argumentnoj struktury v adygskix jazykax [Verbs of falling and their argument structure in Circassian languages]. Acta Linguistica Petropolitana. Transactions of the Institute for Linguistic Studies, Russian Academy of Sciences 16(1). 723–756.10.30842/alp2306573716122Search in Google Scholar

Beavers, John, Beth Levin & Shiao Wei Tham. 2010. The typology of motion expressions revisited. Journal of Linguistics 46(2). 331–377. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0022226709990272.Search in Google Scholar

Berlin, Brent & Paul Kay. 1969. Basic color terms: Their universality and evolution. Berkeley & Los Angeles: University of California Press.Search in Google Scholar

Bohnemeyer, Jürgen, Nicholas J. Enfield, James Essegbey, Iraide Ibarretxe-Antuñano, Sotaro Kita, Friederike Lüpke & Felix K. Ameka. 2007. Principles of event segmentation in language: The case of motion events. Language 83(3). 495–532. https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2007.0116.Search in Google Scholar

Cardini, Filippo-Enrico. 2008. Manner of motion saliency: An inquiry into Italian. Cognitive Linguistics 19(4). 533–569. https://doi.org/10.1515/COGL.2008.021.Search in Google Scholar

Choi, Soonja & Melissa Bowerman. 1991. Learning to express motion events in English and Korean: The influence of language-specific lexicalization patterns. Cognition 41(1). 83–121. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(91)90033-Z.Search in Google Scholar

Croft, William. 2003. Typology and universals, 2nd edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Croft, William, Jóhanna Barðdal, Willem Hollmann, Violeta Sotirova & Chiaki Taoka. 2010. Revising Talmy’s typological classification of complex event constructions. In Hans C. Boas (ed.), Contrastive studies in construction grammar, 201–236. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/cal.10.09croSearch in Google Scholar

Fenson, Larry, Philip S. Dale, Steven Reznick, Elizabeth Bates, Donna J. Thal, Stephen J. Pethick, Michael Tomasello, Carolyn B. Mervis & Joan Stiles. 1994. Variability in early communicative development. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development 59(5). 1–185. https://doi.org/10.2307/1166093.Search in Google Scholar

Filipović, Luna. 2007. Talking about motion: A crosslinguistic investigation of lexicalization patterns. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/slcs.91Search in Google Scholar

Fillmore, Charles J. 1976. Frame semantics and the nature of language. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 280(1). 20–32. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.1976.tb25467.x.Search in Google Scholar

Fillmore, Charles J. & Beryl T. Sue Atkins. 2000. Describing polysemy: The case of “crawl”. In Yael Ravin & Claudia Leacock (eds.), Polysemy: Theoretical and computational approaches, 91–110. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780198238423.003.0005Search in Google Scholar

Fortis, Jean-Michel & Alice Vittrant. 2016. Path-expressing constructions: Toward a typology. STUF – Language Typology and Universals 69(3). 341–374. https://doi.org/10.1515/stuf-2016-0015.Search in Google Scholar

François, Alexandre. 2008. Semantic maps and the typology of colexification: Intertwining polysemous networks across languages. In Martine Vanhove (ed.), From polysemy to semantic change: Towards a typology of lexical semantic associations, 163–215. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/slcs.106.09fraSearch in Google Scholar

Georgakopoulos, Thanasis & Stéphane Polis. 2018. The semantic map model: State of the art and future avenues for linguistic research. Language and Linguistics Compass 12(2). 1–33. https://doi.org/10.1111/lnc3.12270.Search in Google Scholar

Goldberg, Adele E. 1992. Argument structure constructions. Berkeley: University of California.Search in Google Scholar

Goldberg, Adele E. & Laura Suttle. 2010. Construction grammar. WIREs Cognitive Science 1(4). 468–477. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcs.22.Search in Google Scholar

Goschler, Juliana & Anatol Stefanowitsch (eds.). 2013. Variation and change in the encoding of motion events. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/hcp.41Search in Google Scholar

Haspelmath, Martin. 2003. The geometry of grammatical meaning: Semantic maps and cross-linguistic comparison. In Michael Tomasello (ed.), The new psychology of language: Cognitive and functional approaches to language structure, vol. 2, 211–242. Mahwah, NJ & London: Lawrence Erlbaum.Search in Google Scholar

Haspelmath, Martin. 2010. Comparative concepts and descriptive categories in crosslinguistic studies. Language 86(3). 663–687. https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2010.0021.Search in Google Scholar

Haspelmath, Martin. 2018. How comparative concepts and descriptive linguistic categories are different. In Daniël van Olmen, Tanja Mortelmans & Frank Brisard (eds.), Aspects of linguistic variation, 83–113. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.10.1515/9783110607963-004Search in Google Scholar

Kadyrova, Olga. 2020. Glagoly padenija v turetskom jazyke [Turkish verbs of falling]. Acta Linguistica Petropolitana. Transactions of the Institute for Linguistic Studies, Russian Academy of Sciences 16(1). 545–578.10.30842/alp2306573716117Search in Google Scholar

Karamshoev, Dodxudo. 1988. Šugnansko-russkij slovar’ [Shughni-Russian dictionary], vol. 1. Moscow: Nauka.Search in Google Scholar

Kashkin, Egot. 2017. Komi jazyk i leksičeskaja tipologija: Glagoly padenija [Komi language and lexical typology: The verbs of falling]. In Rimma P. Popova, Galina V. Punegova, Valentina M. Ludykova & Elena V. Ostapova (eds.), Permistika-16: Dialekty i istorija permskix jazykov vo vzaimodejstvii s drugimi jazykami: Sbornik naučnyx statej, 86–94. Syktyvkar: Publishing house of the Pitirim Sorokin Syktyvkar State University.Search in Google Scholar

Kazkenova, Aimgul. 2020. Glagoly padenija v kazaxskom jazyke [Verbs of falling in Kazakh language]. Acta Linguistica Petropolitana. Transactions of the Institute for Linguistic Studies, Russian Academy of Sciences 16(1). 523–544.10.30842/alp2306573716116Search in Google Scholar

Khokhlova, Ludmila. 2020. Semantičeskoe pole padenija v trex rodstvennyx novoindijskix jazykax: xindi-urdu, pandžabi i gudžarati [Semantic domain of falling in three related Indo-Aryan languages: Hindi-Urdu, Punjabi, and Gujarati]. Acta Linguistica Petropolitana. Transactions of the Institute for Linguistic Studies, Russian Academy of Sciences 16(1). 638–676.10.30842/alp2306573716120Search in Google Scholar

Kholkina, Liliya & Qiang Si. 2020. Glagoly padenija v sovremennom kitajskom jazyke [Verbs of falling in modern Chinese]. Acta Linguistica Petropolitana. Transactions of the Institute for Linguistic Studies, Russian Academy of Sciences 16(1). 898–942.10.30842/alp2306573716128Search in Google Scholar

Kopecka, Anetta & Marine Vuillermet. 2021. Source-goal (a)symmetries across languages. Studies in Language 45(1). 2–35. https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.00018.kop.Search in Google Scholar

Koptjevskaja-Tamm, Maria, Dagmar Divjak & Ekaterina V. Rakhilina. 2010. Aquamotion verbs in Slavic and Germanic: A case study in lexical typology. In Victoria Hasko & Renee Perelmutter (eds.), New approaches to Slavic verbs of motion, 315–341. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/slcs.115.18kopSearch in Google Scholar

Kuleshova, Maria. 2016. Glagoly padenija v slovenskom jazyke: leksiko-tipologičeskij aspect [Slovene verbs of falling from a lexical typological perspective]. Filološke studije 14(2). 188–201.Search in Google Scholar

Kyuseva, Maria, Elena Parina & Daria Ryzhova. 2022. Methodology at work: Semantic fields “sharp” and “blunt.”. In Ekaterina V. Rakhilina, Tatiana I. Reznikova & Daria A. Ryzhova (eds.), The typology of physical qualities, 29–56. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/tsl.133.02kyuSearch in Google Scholar

Lamarre, Christine & Toshio Ohori. 2007. Typological studies of the linguistic expression of motion events, Volume 1: Perspectives from East and Southeast Asia. University of Tokio. Research report.Search in Google Scholar

Lander, Yury, Timur Maisak & Ekaterina Rakhilina. 2012. Verbs of aquamotion: Semantic domains and lexical systems. In Mila Vulchanova & Emile van der Zee (eds.), Motion encoding in language and space, 67–83. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199661213.003.0004Search in Google Scholar

Lauwers, Peter & Dominique Willems. 2011. Coercion: Definition and challenges, current approaches, and new trends. Linguistics 49(6). 1219–1235. https://doi.org/10.1515/ling.2011.034.Search in Google Scholar

de Leon, Lourdes. 2001. Finding the richest path: The role of language and cognition in the acquisition of verticality in Tzotzil (Mayan). In Melissa Bowerman & Stephen C. Levinson (eds.), Language acquisition and conceptual development, 544–565. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511620669.020Search in Google Scholar

Levin, Beth & Malka Rappaport Hovav. 1992. The lexical semantics of verbs of motion: The perspective from unaccusativity. In Iggy M. Roca (ed.), Thematic structure: Its role in grammar, 247–269. Berlin: Foris.10.1515/9783110872613.247Search in Google Scholar

Levinson, Stephen C., Gunter Senft & Asifa Majid. 2007. Emotion categories in language and thought. In Asifa Majid (ed.), Field manual, vol. 10, 46–52. Nijmegen: Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics.Search in Google Scholar

Maisak, Timur A. & Ekaterina V. Rakhilina (eds.). 2007. Glagoly dviženija v vode: leksičeskaja tipologija [The typology of Aquamotion verbs]. Moscow: Indrik.Search in Google Scholar

Majid, Asifa. 2015. Comparing lexicons cross-linguistically. In John R. Taylor (ed.), The Oxford handbook of the word, 364–379. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199641604.013.020Search in Google Scholar

Majid, Asifa & Melissa Bowerman (eds.). 2007. Cutting and breaking events: A crosslinguistic perspective. [Special issue]. Cognitive Linguistics 18(2).10.1515/COG.2007.005Search in Google Scholar

Majid, Asifa, Fiona Jordan & Michael Dunn. 2015. Semantic systems in closely related languages. Language Sciences 49. 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2014.11.002.Search in Google Scholar

Makino, Seiichi & Michio Tsutsui. 1994. A dictionary of basic Japanese grammar. Tokyo: The Japan Times.Search in Google Scholar

Malt, Barbara C., Silvia Gennari, Mutsumi Imai, Eef Ameel, Naoaki Tsuda & Asifa Majid. 2008. Talking about walking: Biomechanics and the language of locomotion. Psychological Science 19(3). 232–240. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02074.x.Search in Google Scholar

Margetts, Anna, Katharina Haude, Nikolaus P. Himmelmann, Dagmar Jung, Sonja Riesberg, Stefan Schnell, Frank Seifart, Harriet Sheppard & Claudia Wegener. 2022. Cross-linguistic patterns in the lexicalisation of bring and take. Studies in Language 46(4). 934–993. https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.19088.mar.Search in Google Scholar

Matsumoto, Yo. 2018. Motion event descriptions in Japanese from typological perspectives. In Prashant Pardeshi & Taro Kageyama (eds.), Handbook of Japanese contrastive linguistics, 273–290. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.10.1515/9781614514077-010Search in Google Scholar

Nasledskova, Polina L. & Ivan V. Netkachev. 2020. K opisaniju semantičeskogo polja padenija v rutul’skom jazyke [Towards a description of the semantic field ‘falling’ in Rutul]. Acta Linguistica Petropolitana. Transactions of the Institute for Linguistic Studies, Russian Academy of Sciences 16(1). 801–818.10.30842/alp2306573716125Search in Google Scholar

Panina, Anna S. 2020. Glagoly padenija v japonskom jazyke: prjamye i perenosnye značenija [Verbs of falling in Japanese. Physical senses and semantic shifts]. Acta Linguistica Petropolitana. Transactions of the Institute for Linguistic Studies, Russian Academy of Sciences 16(1). 968–996.Search in Google Scholar

Rakhilina, Ekaterina V., Jean-Marie Merle & Irina Kor Chahine (eds.). 2017. Verba sonandi: Étude de la représentation linguistique des cris d’animaux. Aix-en-Provence: Presses Universitaires de Provence.Search in Google Scholar

Rakhilina, Ekaterina V. & Shaxlo S. Nekushoeva. 2020. Sistema glagolov dviženija vniz v šugnanskom jazyke [Falling verbs in Shughni]. Acta Linguistica Petropolitana. Transactions of the Institute for Linguistic Studies, Russian Academy of Sciences 16(1). 580–608.Search in Google Scholar

Rakhilina, Ekaterina V. & Tatiana I. Reznikova. 2016. A Frame-based methodology for lexical typology. In Päivi Juvonen & Maria Koptjevskaja-Tamm (eds.), The lexical typology of semantic shifts, 95–129. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.10.1515/9783110377675-004Search in Google Scholar

Rakhilina, Ekaterina V., Tatiana I. Reznikova & Daria A. Ryzhova (eds.). 2022a. The typology of physical qualities. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/tsl.133Search in Google Scholar

Rakhilina, Ekaterina V., Daria A. Ryzhova & Yulia G. Badryzlova. 2022b. Lexical typology and semantic maps: Perspectives and challenges. Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft 41(1). 231–262. https://doi.org/10.1515/zfs-2021-2046.Search in Google Scholar

Rappaport Hovav, Malka & Beth Levin. 2010. Reflections on manner/result complementarity. In Malka Rappaport Hovav, Edit Doron & Ivy Sichel (eds.), Lexical semantics, syntax, and event structure, 21–38. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199544325.003.0002Search in Google Scholar

Reznikova, Tatiana I. 2022. Glagoly prjatanija: tipologija sistem [Verbs of hiding: A typology of systems]. Voprosy jazykoznanija 4. 66–94. https://doi.org/10.31857/0373-658x.2022.4.66-94.Search in Google Scholar

Reznikova, Tatiana I. & Solmaz R. Merdanova. 2020. Kak jazyku obojtis’ bez glagolov padenija: semantičeskoe pole nekontrolirujemogo peremeščenija vniz v agul’skom jazyke [Doing without verbs of falling: The semantic domain of uncontrolled downward motion in Aghul]. Acta Linguistica Petropolitana. Transactions of the Institute for Linguistic Studies, Russian Academy of Sciences 16(1). 757–785.10.30842/alp2306573716123Search in Google Scholar

Ryzhova, Daria A., Ekaterina V. Rakhilina & Lilya S. Kholkina. 2019. Approaching perceptual qualities: The case of HEAVY. In Laura Speed, Carolyn O’Meara, Lila San Roque & Asifa Majid (eds.), Perception metaphors, 185–207. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/celcr.19.10ryzSearch in Google Scholar

Rzymski, Christoph, Tiago Tresoldi, Simon J. Greenhill, Mei-Shin Wu, Nathanael E. Schweikhard, Maria Koptjevskaja-Tamm, Volker Gast, Timotheus A. Bodt, Abbie Hantgan, Gereon A. Kaiping, Sophie Chang, Yunfan Lai, Natalia Morozova, Heini Arjava, Nataliia Hübler, Ezequiel Koile, Steve Pepper, Mariann Proos, Briana Van Epps, Ingrid Blanco, Carolin Hundt, Sergei Monakhov, Kristina Pianykh, Sallona Ramesh, Russell D. Gray, Robert Forkel & Johann-Mattis List. 2019. The database of cross-linguistic colexifications, reproducible analysis of cross-linguistic polysemies. Scientific Data 7. 13. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-019-0341-x.Search in Google Scholar

Schaefer, Ronald P. & Richard Gaines. 1997. Toward a typology of directional motion for African languages. Studies in African Linguistics 26(2). 193–220. https://doi.org/10.32473/sal.v26i2.107393.Search in Google Scholar

Sherstyuk, Alina & Tatiana Reznikova. 2022. Semantic continuity in a cross-Linguistic perspective: Evidence from Slavic verbs of pulling and pushing. Jezikoslovni Zapiski 28(1). 55–67. https://doi.org/10.3986/JZ.28.1.03.Search in Google Scholar

Slobin, Dan I. 2004. The many ways to search for a frog: Linguistic typology and the expression of motion events. In Sven Strömqvist & Ludo Verhoeven (eds.), Relating events in narrative, Vol. 2: Typological and contextual perspectives, 219–257. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Search in Google Scholar

Slobin, Dan I., Iraide Ibarretxe-Antuñano, Anetta Kopecka & Asifa Majid. 2014. Manners of human gait: A crosslinguistic event-naming study. Cognitive Linguistics 25(4). 701–741. https://doi.org/10.1515/cog-2014-0061.Search in Google Scholar

Stosic, Dejan. 2019. Manner as a cluster concept: What does lexical coding of manner of motion tell us about manner? In Michel Aurnague & Dejan Stosic (eds.), The semantics of dynamic space in French: Descriptive, experimental and formal studies on motion expression, 141–178. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/hcp.66.04stoSearch in Google Scholar

Stosic, Dejan. 2020. Defining the concept of manner: An attempt to order Chaos. Testi e Linguaggi 14. 127–150. https://doi.org/10.14273/unisa-3440.Search in Google Scholar

Talmy, Leonard. 1972. Semantic structures in English and Atsugewi. Berkeley: University of California dissertation.Search in Google Scholar

Talmy, Leonard. 1974. Semantics and syntax of motion. In John Kimball (ed.), Syntax and semantics, vol. 4, 181–238. New York: Academic Press.10.1163/9789004368828_008Search in Google Scholar

Talmy, Leonard. 1985. Lexicalization patterns: Semantic structure in lexical forms. In Timothy Shoepen (ed.), Language typology and lexical description, Vol. 3: Grammatical categories and the lexicon, 36–149. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Talmy, Leonard. 1991. Path to realization: A typology of event conflation. In Laurel A. Sutton, Christopher Johnson & Ruth Shields (eds.), Proceedings of the seventeenth annual meeting of Berkeley Linguistics Society, 480–519. Berkeley: Berkeley Linguistics Society.10.3765/bls.v17i0.1620Search in Google Scholar

Talmy, Leonard. 2000. Toward a cognitive semantics, Vol. 2: Typology and process in concept structuring. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/6848.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Talmy, Leonard. 2005. A windowing to conceptual structure and language. Part 1: Lexicalisation and typology. Written interview by Talmy on his work conducted by Iraide Ibarretxe Antuñano. Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics 3(1). 325–347. https://doi.org/10.1075/arcl.3.17iba.Search in Google Scholar

Talmy, Leonard. 2017. Past, present and future of motion research. In Iraide Ibarretxe-Antuñano (ed.), Motion and space across languages: Theory and applications, 1–12. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/hcp.59.01talSearch in Google Scholar

Tomasello, Michael. 1992. First verbs: A case study of early grammatical development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511527678Search in Google Scholar

Tomasello, Michael. 2003. Constructing a language: A usage-based theory of language acquisition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Viimaranta, Johanna & Ekaterina Protassova. 2020. Glagoly padenija v finskom jazyke [The Finnish verbs of falling]. Acta Linguistica Petropolitana. Transactions of the Institute for Linguistic Studies, Russian Academy of Sciences 16(1). 389–434.10.30842/alp2306573716112Search in Google Scholar

Vyrenkova, Anastasia S., Ekaterina V. Rakhilina & Boris V. Orekhov. 2022. A new approach to “old” studies. In Ekaterina V. Rakhilina, Tatiana I. Reznikova & Daria A. Ryzhova (eds.), The typology of physical qualities, 189–214. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/tsl.133.07vyrSearch in Google Scholar

Zlatev, Jordan, Johan Blomberg, Simon Devylder, Viswanatha Naidu & Joost van de Weijer. 2021. Motion event descriptions in Swedish, French, Thai and Telugu: A study in post-Talmian motion event typology. Acta Linguistica Hafniensia 53(1). 58–90. https://doi.org/10.1080/03740463.2020.1865692.Search in Google Scholar

Zlatev, Jordan & Peerapat Yangklang. 2004. A third way to travel: The place of Thai in motion-event typology. In Sven Strömqvist & Ludo Verhoeven (eds.), Relating events in narrative, Vol. 2: Typological and contextual perspectives, 159–190. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Search in Google Scholar