Ad hoc categorization in Russian and multifunctional general extenders

References

Arcodia, Giorgio Francesco, Grandi Nicola & Wälchli Bernhard. 2010. Coordination in compounding. In Sergio Scalise & Irene Vogel (eds.), Cross-Disciplinary Issues in Compounding, 177–198. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/cilt.311.15arcSearch in Google Scholar

Barsalou, Lawrence W. 1983. Ad hoc categories. Memory and Cognition 11. 211–277.10.3758/BF03196968Search in Google Scholar

Belikov, Vladimir N. 1990. Produktivnaja model’ povtora v russkom jazyke (variant dlja obsuždenija) [A productive model of reduplication in Russian (data for discussion)]. Russian Linguistics 14(1). 81–86.Search in Google Scholar

Benigni, Valentina. 2014. Strategie di approssimazione lessicale in russo e in italiano. In Olga Inkova, Marina Di Filippo & François Esvan (eds.), L’archittetura del testo. Studi contrastivi slavo-romanzi, 203–224. Alessandria: Edizioni dell’Orso.Search in Google Scholar

Benigni, Valentina. 2015. Le liste paradigmatiche in russo: Forme e funzioni. Studi Slavistici 12. 209–237.Search in Google Scholar

Benigni, Valentina. 2016a. Le marche di lista in russo. Segnali riformulativi, estensivi, generalizzanti… i vse takoe. In Valentina Benigni, Lucyna Gebert & Julija Nikolaeva (eds.), Le lingue slave tra struttura e uso, 17–43. Firenze: Firenze University Press.10.36253/978-88-6453-328-5.02Search in Google Scholar

Benigni, Valentina. 2016b. Roba da matti! La resa dei nomi vaghi nella traduzione dall’italiano al russo. In Olga Inkova & Andrea Trovesi (eds), Langues slaves en contraste / Slavjanskie jazyki in comparatione / Lingue slave a confronto, 307–342. Bergamo: Bergamo University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Benigni, Valentina & Francesca Masini. 2009. Compounds in Russian. Lingue e Linguaggio 2. 171–194.Search in Google Scholar

Blakemore, Diane. 1993. The relevance of reformulations. Language and Literature 2. 101–120.10.1177/096394709300200202Search in Google Scholar

Bonvino, Elisabetta, Francesca Masini & Paola Pietrandrea. 2009. List constructions: A semantic network. Paper presented at the 3rd International AFLiCo Conference – Grammars in Construction(s), Paris, 27–29 May.Search in Google Scholar

Brown, Penelope & Stephen C Levinson. 1987. Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511813085Search in Google Scholar

Carroll, Ruth. 2008. Historical English phraseology and the extender tag. Selim: Journal of the Spanish Society for Mediaeval English Language and Literature 15. 7–37.Search in Google Scholar

Channell, Joanna. 1994. Vague Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Cheshire, Jenny. 2007. Discourse variation, grammaticalisation and stuff like that. Journal of Sociolinguistics 11(2). 155–193.10.1111/j.1467-9841.2007.00317.xSearch in Google Scholar

Croft, William & Alan D Cruse. 2004. Cognitive Linguistic. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511803864Search in Google Scholar

Cruse, Alan D. 1986. Lexical Semantics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Daniel, Michael & Edith Moravcsik. 2005. The associative plural. In Martin Haspelmath, Matthew S. Dryer, David Gil & Bernard Comrie (eds.), The World Atlas of Language Structures (WALS), 150–153. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Dines, Elizabeth R. 1980. Variation in discourse – ‘and stuff like that’. Language in Society 9. 13–31.10.1017/S0047404500007764Search in Google Scholar

Dubois, Sylvie. 1992. Extension particles, etc. Language Variation and Change 4(2). 179–203.10.1017/S0954394500000740Search in Google Scholar

Fillmore, Charles J. 1985. Frames and the semantics of understanding. Quaderni di Semantica 12. 222–254.Search in Google Scholar

Gerdes, Kim & Sylvain Kahane. 2009. Speaking in Piles. Paradigmatic Annotation of a French Spoken Corpus. In Michaela Mahlberg, Victorina González-Díaz & Catherine Smith (eds.), Proceedings of the Corpus Linguistics Conference conference (CL2009). Liverpool: University of Liverpool. http://ucrel.lancs.ac.uk/publications/cl2009/ (accessed 5 May 2017).Search in Google Scholar

Halliday, Michael A. K. & Ruqaiya Hasan. 1976. Cohesion in English. London: Longman.Search in Google Scholar

Janko, Tat’jana Evgen’evna. 2008. Intonacionnye strategii russkoj reči v sopostavitel’nom aspekte [Russian speech intonation strategies in comparative aspect]. Moskva: Jazyki slavjanskich kul’tur.Search in Google Scholar

Jefferson, Gail. 1990. List-construction as a task and a resource. In George Psathas (ed.), Interaction Competence, 63–92. Washington D.C.: University Press of America.Search in Google Scholar

Kahane, Sylvain & Paola Pietrandrea. 2012. La typologie des entassements en français. In Actes du 3ème congrès mondial de linguistique française (CMLF), 1809–1828. http://www.linguistiquefrancaise.org/articles/shsconf/pdf/2012/01/shsconf_cmlf12_000238.pdf (accessed 5 May 2017).10.1051/shsconf/20120100238Search in Google Scholar

Kubrjakova, Elena Samojlovna. 2004. Jazyk i znanie. Na puti polučenija znanij o jazyke. Časti reči s kognitivnoj točki zrenija. Rol’ jazyka v poznanii mira [Language and knowledge. On getting knowledge about language. Parts of speech from a cognitive point of view. The role of language in the world cognition]. Moskva: Jazyki slavjanskoj kul’tury.Search in Google Scholar

Laptevа, Ol’ga Alekseevna. 1983. Tipa ili vrode [Tipa or vrode]. Voprosy jazykoznanija 1. 39–51.Search in Google Scholar

Mauri, Caterina. 2017. Building and Interpreting Ad Hoc Categories: A Linguistic Analysis. In Joanna Blochowiak, Cristina Grisot, Stephanie Durrleman & Christopher Laenzlinger (eds.), Formal Models in the Study of Language, 297–326. Berlin: Springer.10.1007/978-3-319-48832-5_16Search in Google Scholar

Mauri, Caterina & Andrea Sansò. This issue,Search in Google Scholar

Mihatsch, Wiltrud. 2007. The construction of vagueness: Sort of expressions in Romance languages. In Günter Radden, Klaus-Michael Köpke, Thomas Berg & Peter Siemund (eds.), Aspects of meaning constructiong meaning: From concepts to utterance, 225–245. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/z.136.15mihSearch in Google Scholar

Mihatsch, Wiltrud. 2009. Nouns are THINGS. Evidence for a grammatical metaphor?. In Klaus-Uwe Panther, Linda L. Thornburg & Barcelona Antonio (eds.), Metonymy and Metaphor in Grammar, 75–97. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/hcp.25.06mihSearch in Google Scholar

Overstreet, Maryann. 1999. Whales, Candlelight, and Stuff Like That: General Extenders in English Discourse. New York: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780195125740.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Overstreet, Maryann. 2005. And stuff und so: Investigating Pragmatic Expressions in English and German. Journal of Pragmatics 37. 1845–1864.10.1016/j.pragma.2005.02.015Search in Google Scholar

Pacsai, Imre. 2013. Vostočnye èlementy russkoj narodnoj reči (leksika i derivacija) [The eastern elements in the Russian folk speech (lexis and derivation)]. Folia linguistica rossica 9. 43–56.Search in Google Scholar

Plotnikova, Anna Michajlovna. 2012. Parnye sočetanija v sovremennom russkom jazyke i ich kreativnyj potencial [Pair combinations in modern Russian and their creative potential]. Ural’skij filologičeskij vestnik 2. 183–187.Search in Google Scholar

Podlesskaya, Vera Isaakovna. 2013. Nečetkaja nominacija v russkoj razgovornoj reči: Opyt korpusnogo issledovanija [Vague reference in Russian: Evidence from spoken corpora]. Kompjuternaja lingvistika i intellektualnye technologii 12(19). 619–632.Search in Google Scholar

Rozhanskiy, Fedor Ivanovich. 2015. Two semantic patterns of reduplication. Iconicity revisited. In Daniela Rossi (ed.), The Why and How of Total Reduplication: Current Issues and New Perspectives [Special issue]. Studies in Language 39(4). 992–1018.10.1075/sl.39.4.02rozSearch in Google Scholar

Sannikov, Vladimir Zinov’evič. 2008. Russkij sintaksis v semantiko-pragmatičeskom prostranstve [Russian Syntax in the Semantic-Pragmatic Space]. Moskva: Jazyki slavjanskich kul’tur.Search in Google Scholar

Savchenko, Dar’ja Sergeevna. 2015. On possible functions of X_ind vrode/tipa/napodobie ‘like’ Y in Russian colloquial speech. Kommunikativnye issledovanija 4(6). 100–108.Search in Google Scholar

Schmid, Hans-Jörg. 2000. English abstract nouns as conceptual shells: From corpus to cognition. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110808704Search in Google Scholar

Simone, Raffaele. 2012. On Discourse Operations. In José Jesús De Bustos Tovar, Rafael Cano-Aguilar, Elena Méndez García De Paredes & Araceli López Serena (eds.), Sintaxis y análisis del discurso hablado en español. Homenaje a Antonio Narbona, 942–962. Sevilla: Universidad de Sevilla.Search in Google Scholar

Traugott, Elizabeth C. 2010. (Inter)subjectivity and (inter)subjectification: A reassessment. In Kristin Davidse, Lieven Vandelanotte & Hubert Cuyckens (eds.), Subjectification, Intersubjectification and Grammaticalization, 29–74. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110226102.1.29Search in Google Scholar

Vande Kopple, William J. 1985. Some exploratory discourse on metadiscourse. College Composition and Communication 36(1). 82–93.10.2307/357609Search in Google Scholar

Voinov, Vitaly. 2012. Rhyming reduplication in Russian paired words. Russian Linguistics 36. 175–191.10.1007/s11185-012-9091-5Search in Google Scholar

Wälchli, Bernhard. 2005. Co-compounds and Natural Coordination. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199276219.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Zielińska, Dorota. 2015. Corpus-Driven Analysis of Code Glosses in Non-Native Students’ Written Discourse. In Wojciech Malec & Marietta Rusinek (eds.), Within Language, Beyond Theories (Volume III). Discourse Analysis, Pragmatics and Corpus-based Studies, 58–77. Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Search in Google Scholar