Abstract
The aim of this paper is to examine the role of exemplification in categorization processes, that is, how examples can be used in discourse to communicate conceptual categories. Based on data from present-day Japanese and a corpus-driven methodology, it will be shown that exemplifying constructions can be used 1) to refine already explicit categories by contextualizing and actualizing the reference, and 2) to create categories ex novo by triggering associative inferences and abstractive processes. Accordingly, a detailed analysis of the linguistic properties of the examples will be provided in order to identify recurring encoding patterns and correlations with the functions described above. Furthermore, it will be argued that, although any conceptual category can be lexicalized by means of a category label, there exist some interesting correlations between the coding of the examples and the labelling of the category. Finally, we will conclude by showing that the linguistic analysis of exemplification can provide useful insights regarding the modalities in which the human brain categorizes.
Acknowledgements
The research here presented was developed within the SIR project “LEAdhoC: Linguistic expression of ad hoc categories”, coordinated by Caterina Mauri (University of Bologna; prot. RBSI14IIG0). I would like to thank Caterina Mauri, Andrea Sansò, Mira Ariel, Simone Mattiola, and the two anonymous reviewers for their precious comments that allowed me to improve the concepts discussed in the present paper. I would also like to thank Kazumi Taniguchi and Giorgio Francesco Arcodia for helping me with the translation and interpretation of Japanese data. The usual disclaimers apply.
References
Banno, Eri, Yutaka Ohno, Yoko Sakane & Chikako Shinagawa. 1999. An integrated course in elementary Japanese. Tokyo: The Japan Times.Search in Google Scholar
Barotto, Alessandra. 2016. Exemplification and categorization: the case of Japanese. Bergamo: University of Bergamo dissertation.Search in Google Scholar
Barsalou, Lawrence W. 1982. Context-independent and context-dependent information in concepts. Memory & Cognition 10. 82–93.10.3758/BF03197629Search in Google Scholar
Barsalou, Lawrence W. 1983. Ad hoc categories. Memory & Cognition 11(3). 211–227.10.3758/BF03196968Search in Google Scholar
Barsalou, Lawrence W. 2010. Ad hoc categories. In Patrick C. Hogan (ed.), The Cambridge encyclopedia of the language sciences, 87–88. New York: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Chino, Naoko. 2001. All About Particles: A Handbook of Japanese Function Words. Tokyo: Kodansha.Search in Google Scholar
Cristofaro, Sonia. 2007. Deconstructing categories: Finiteness in a functional-typological perspective. In Irina Nikolaeva (ed.), Finiteness: Theoretical and empirical foundations, 91–114. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780199213733.003.0004Search in Google Scholar
Croft, William & Alan D. Cruse. 2004. Cognitive Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511803864Search in Google Scholar
Cruse, Alan D. 1986. Lexical semantics. Cambridge, England: University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Givón, Talmy. 2001a. Syntax. An introduction (2◦ edition), volume I. Amsterdam; Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Search in Google Scholar
Givón, Talmy. 2001b. Syntax. An introduction (2◦ edition), volume II. Amsterdam; Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/z.syn2Search in Google Scholar
Glucksberg, Sam. 2001. Understanding Figurative Language. Oxford: Oxford Univerity Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195111095.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Goldhahn, Dirk, Thomas Eckart & Uwe Quasthoff. 2012. Building large monolingual dictionaries at the Leipzig Corpora Collection: From 100 to 200 Languages. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC’12). 759–765.Search in Google Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin. 1995. The converb as a cross-linguistically valid category. In Martin Haspelmath & Ekkehard König (eds.), Converbs in cross-linguistic perspective, 1–55. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110884463Search in Google Scholar
Kaiser, Stefan, Yasuko Ichikawa, Noriko Kobayashi & Hilofumi Yamamoto. 2001. Japanese: A Comprehensive Grammar. New York: Routledge Grammars.Search in Google Scholar
Kuhn, Thomas. 1970. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, 2nd edn Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Search in Google Scholar
Lang, Ewald. 1984. The semantics of coordination. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/slcs.9Search in Google Scholar
Langacker, Ronald W. 1987. Foundations of Cognitive Grammar. Vol. 1: Theoretical Prerequisites. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Langacker, Ronald W. 1991a. Concept, Image, and Symbol. The Cognitive Basis of Grammar. Berlin & New York: De Gruyter Mouton.Search in Google Scholar
Langacker, Ronald W. 1991b. Foundations of Cognitive Grammar, Vol. 2: Descriptive Application. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Lehmann, Christian. 1988. Towards a typology of clause linkage. In John Haiman & Sandra A. Thompson (eds.), Clause combining in grammar and discourse, 181–226. Amsterdam: Benjamins.10.1075/tsl.18.09lehSearch in Google Scholar
Manzotti, Emilio. 1998. L'esempio. Natura, definizioni, problemi. Cuadernos de Filología Italiana 5. 99–123.Search in Google Scholar
Mauri, Caterina. 2014. What do connectives and plurals have in common? The linguistic expression of ad hoc categories. In Joanna Blochowiak, Stèphanie Durrlemann-Tame, Cristina Grisot & Christopher C. Laenzlinger (eds.), Linguistic papers dedicated to Jacques Moeschler, 1–21. Genève: University of Geneva Publication.Search in Google Scholar
Mauri, Caterina. 2017. Building and interpreting ad hoc categories: A linguistic analysis. In Joanna Blochowiak, Stèphanie Durrlemann-Tame, Cristina Grisot & Christopher C. Laenzlinger (eds.), Formal models in the study of language, 297–326. Berlin: Springer.10.1007/978-3-319-48832-5_16Search in Google Scholar
Maynard, Senko. 1990. An Introduction to Japanese Grammar and Communication Strategies. Tokyo: Japan Times.Search in Google Scholar
Medin, Douglas L. & Marguerite M. Shaffer. 1978. Context theory of classification learning. Psychological Review 85. 207–238.10.1037/0033-295X.85.3.207Search in Google Scholar
Overstreet, Maryann. 1999. Whales, Candlelight, and Stuff Like That: General Extenders in English Discourse. New York: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780195125740.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Perelman, Chaim & Lucie Olbrechts-Tyteca. 1969. The new rhetoric: A treatise on argumentation. Translated by J. Wilkinson and P. Weaver. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.Search in Google Scholar
Recanati, François. 2004. Literal Meaning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511615382Search in Google Scholar
Rosch, Eleanor. 1973. Natural Categories. Cognitive Psychology 4. 328–350.10.1016/0010-0285(73)90017-0Search in Google Scholar
Rosch, Eleanor. 1975. Cognitive Representations of Semantic Categories. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 104(3). 192–233.10.1037/0096-3445.104.3.192Search in Google Scholar
Rosch, Eleanor, Carolyn B. Mervis, Wayne D. Gray, David M. Johnson & Penny Boyes-Bream. 1976. Basic objects in natural categories. Cognitive Psychology 1. 491–502.10.1037/e666602011-017Search in Google Scholar
Smith, Linda B. & Larissa K. Samuelson. 1997. Perceiving and remembering: Category stability, variability and development. In Koen Lamberts & David Shanks (eds.), Knowledge, concepts and categories, 161–195. Hove: Psychology Press.10.7551/mitpress/4071.003.0009Search in Google Scholar
Soga, Matsuo. 1983. Tense and aspect in Modern Colloquial Japanese. Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press.10.59962/9780774854719Search in Google Scholar
Tognini-Bonelli, Elena. 2001. Corpus Linguistics at Work. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/scl.6Search in Google Scholar
Wilson, Deirdre & Robyn Carston. 2007. A unitary approach to lexical pragmatics: Relevance, inference and ad hoc concepts. In Noel Burton-Roberts (ed.), Pragmatics, 230–259. London: Palgrave.10.1057/978-1-349-73908-0_12Search in Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, Ludwig. 1953 [1978]. Philosophical Investigations. Translated by G.E.M. Anscombe. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Search in Google Scholar
© 2018 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Linguistic strategies for ad hoc categorization: theoretical assessment and cross-linguistic variation
- The role of exemplification in the construction of categories: the case of Japanese
- Categorization via exemplification: evidence from Italian
- Ad hoc categorization in Russian and multifunctional general extenders
- Alternative Relations and Higher-Level Categories
- From ad hoc category to ad hoc categorization: The proceduralization of Argentinian Spanish tipo
- Exemplification and ad hoc categorization: The genre-construction in French
- Collective suffixes and ad hoc categories: from Latin -ālia to Italian -aglia
- The encoding of ad hoc categories in Sanskrit: A synchronic and diachronic analysis of “compounds” with ādi-
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Linguistic strategies for ad hoc categorization: theoretical assessment and cross-linguistic variation
- The role of exemplification in the construction of categories: the case of Japanese
- Categorization via exemplification: evidence from Italian
- Ad hoc categorization in Russian and multifunctional general extenders
- Alternative Relations and Higher-Level Categories
- From ad hoc category to ad hoc categorization: The proceduralization of Argentinian Spanish tipo
- Exemplification and ad hoc categorization: The genre-construction in French
- Collective suffixes and ad hoc categories: from Latin -ālia to Italian -aglia
- The encoding of ad hoc categories in Sanskrit: A synchronic and diachronic analysis of “compounds” with ādi-