Exemplification and ad hoc categorization: The genre-construction in French

References

Aarts, Bas, David Denison, Evelien Keizer & Gergana Popova (eds.). 2004. Fuzzy grammar. A reader. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Aijmer, Karin. 2002. English discourse particles: Evidence from a corpus. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.10.1075/scl.10Search in Google Scholar

Barsalou, Lawrence W. 1983. Ad hoc categories. Memory & Cognition 11. 211–227.10.3758/BF03196968Search in Google Scholar

Barsalou, Lawrence W. 2010. Ad hoc categories. In Patrick C. Hogan (ed.), The Cambridge encyclopedia of the language sciences, 86–87. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Beaulieu-Masson, Anne, Mélanie Charpentier, Lisanne Lanciault & Xiaoyan Liu. 2007. Comme en français québécois. Communication, lettres et sciences du langage 1. 27–41.Search in Google Scholar

Brems, Lieselotte. 2011. Layering of size and type noun constructions in English. Berlin/Boston: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110252927Search in Google Scholar

Brems, Lieselotte & Kristin Davidse. 2010. The grammaticalisation of nominal type noun constructions with kind/sort of : Chronology and paths of change. English Studies 91(2). 180–202.10.1080/00138380903355023Search in Google Scholar

Brown, Penelope & Stephen C. Levinson. 1978. Universals in language usage: Politeness phenomena. In Esther N. Goody (ed.), Question and politeness, 56–311. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Brown, Penelope & Stephen C. Levinson. 1987. Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511813085Search in Google Scholar

Channell, Joanna. 1994. Vague language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Chauveau-Thoumelin, Pierre. 2016. De l’exemplification à la catégorisation approximative : étude de la construction [[X]_SNgenre [Y]_SN]. In Franck Neveu, Gabriel Bergounioux, Marie-Hélène Côté, Jean-Michel Fournier, Linda Hriba & Sophie Prévost (eds.), Actes du 5^e Congrès Mondial de Linguistique Française. Tours. https://www.linguistiquefrancaise.org/articles/shsconf/pdf/2016/05/shsconf_cmlf2016_12005.pdf, last accessed 23 February 2018).10.1051/shsconf/20162712005Search in Google Scholar

Chauveau-Thoumelin, Pierre. In preparation. Approche constructionnelle des enclosures genre et espèce en synchronie et en diachronie. Université Lille 3 dissertation.Search in Google Scholar

Chauveau-Thoumelin, Pierre & Dany Amiot. In press. Évolution linguistique : Pression externe et fonctionnement interne de la langue. In Peter Blumenthal & Denis Vigier (eds.), Études diachroniques du français et perspectives sociétales, 65–91. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Search in Google Scholar

Croft, William & D. Alan Cruse. 2004. Cognitive linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511803864Search in Google Scholar

Danon-Boileau, Laurent & Mary-Annick Morel. 1997. Question, point de vue, genre, style: Les noms prépositionnels en français contemporain. Faits de langues 9. 192–200.10.3406/flang.1997.1155Search in Google Scholar

Davidse, Kristin, Lieselotte Brems, Peter Willemse, Émeline Doyen, Jessica Kiermeer & Elfi Thoelen. 2013. A comparative study of the grammaticalized uses of English sort (of) and French genre (de) in teenage forum data. In Emanuele Miola (ed.), Languages go web. Standard and non-standard languages on the internet, 41–66. Alessandria: Edizioni dell’Orso.Search in Google Scholar

Davidse, Kristin & Émeline Doyen. 2009. Using teenage versus adult forum data for the study of language change: Is the grammaticalization of French genre as advanced as that of English sort and kind? In Stef Slembrouck, Miriam Taverniers & Micke Van Herreweghe (eds.), From will to well: Studies in linguistics offered to Anne-Marie Simon-Vandenbergen, 135–145. Gent: Academia Press.Search in Google Scholar

Denison, David. 2002. History of the sort of construction family. Second International Conference on Construction Grammar (ICCG2). Helsinki.Search in Google Scholar

Denison, David. 2005. The grammaticalisations of sort of, kind of and type of in English. New Reflections on Grammaticalization. University of Santiago de Compostela.Search in Google Scholar

Denison, David. 2011. The construction of SKT. Second Vigo-Newcastle-Santiago-Leuven International Workshop on the Structure of the Noun Phrase in English (NP2). Newcastle upon Tyne.Search in Google Scholar

DHLF=Rey, Alain (ed.). 2012. Dictionnaire historique de la langue française. 3 volumes. Paris: Dictionnaires Le Robert.Search in Google Scholar

Dines, Elizabeth R. 1980. Variation in discourse — “and stuff like that. Language in Society. Cambridge University Press 9(1). 13–31.10.1017/S0047404500007764Search in Google Scholar

Dostie, Gaétane. 1995. Comme, genre et style postposés en français du Québec : Une étude sémantique. Lingvisticæ Investigationes 19(2). 247–263.10.1075/li.19.2.03dosSearch in Google Scholar

Doyen, Émeline & Kristin Davidse. 2009. Using e-data for the study of language change: A comparative study of the grammaticalized uses of French genre in teenage and adult forum data. In Iñaki Alegria, Igor Leturia & Serge Sharoff (eds.), Proceedings of the fifth web as corpus workshop (WAC5), 17–25. San Sebastián: Elhuyar Fundazioa.Search in Google Scholar

Égré, Paul & Nathan Klinedinst (eds.). 2011. Vagueness and language use. London: Palgrave McMillan.10.1057/9780230299313Search in Google Scholar

Fleischman, Suzanne. 1998. Des jumeaux du discours. La Linguistique 34(2). 31–47.Search in Google Scholar

Fleischman, Suzanne & Marina Yaguello. 2004. Discourse markers across languages. In Carol Lynn Moder & Aida Martinovic-Zic (eds.), Discourse across languages and cultures, 129–147. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.10.1075/slcs.68.08fleSearch in Google Scholar

Francis, Gill. 1986. Anaphoric nouns (Discourse Analysis Monographs 11). Birmingham: English Language Research, Department of English, University of Birmingham.Search in Google Scholar

Franco, António. 1998. ‘uma espécie (de)’ nem sempre é uma espécie. Marcadores de gradação variável e os dicionários. In Maria Teresa Fuentes Morán & Reinhold Werner (eds.), Lexicografías iberorrománicas: Problemas, propuestas y proyectos, 81–95. Frankfurt:Vervuert-Iberoamericana.Search in Google Scholar

Fuchs, Catherine & Pierre Le Goffic. 2005. La polysémie de comme. In Olivier Soutet (ed.), La polysémie, 267–292. Paris: Presses de l’Université Paris-Sorbonne.Search in Google Scholar

Goldberg, Adele. 1995. Constructions: A construction grammar approach to argument structure. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Search in Google Scholar

Goldberg, Adele. 2006. Constructions at work: The nature of generalization in language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199268511.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Grice, H. Paul. 1975. Logic and conversation. In Peter Cole & Jerry L. Morgan (eds.), Speech acts, 41–58. New York/London: Academic Press.10.1163/9789004368811_003Search in Google Scholar

Hoffmann, Thomas & Graeme Trousdale (eds.). 2013. The Oxford Handbook of Construction Grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195396683.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Ivanič, Roz. 1991. Nouns in search of a context: A study of nouns with both open- and closed-system characteristics. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching 29(2). 93–114.10.1515/iral.1991.29.2.93Search in Google Scholar

Jefferson, Gail. 1990. List construction as a task and resource. In George Psathas (ed.), Interaction competence, 63–92. Washington: IIECA/University Press of America.Search in Google Scholar

Keizer, Evelien. 2007. The English Noun Phrase. The nature of linguistic categorization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511627699Search in Google Scholar

Kleiber, Georges. 1987. Mais à quoi sert donc le mot chose? Langue française 73. 109–128.10.3406/lfr.1987.6431Search in Google Scholar

Masini, Francesca. 2016. Binominal constructions in italian of the N1-di-N2 type: Towards a typology of light noun constructions. Language Sciences 53. 99–113.10.1016/j.langsci.2015.05.010Search in Google Scholar

Mauri, Caterina. 2017. Building and interpreting ad hoc categories: A linguistic analysis. In Joanna Blochowiak, Cristina Grisot, Stephanie Durrleman & Christopher Laenzlinger (eds.), Formal models in the study of language, 297–326. Berlin: Springer.10.1007/978-3-319-48832-5_16Search in Google Scholar

Mihatsch, Wiltrud. 2006. Machin, truc, chose : La naissance de marqueurs pragmatiques. In Martina Drescher & Barbara Frank-Job (eds.), Les marqueurs discursifs dans les langues romanes, 153–172. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Search in Google Scholar

Mihatsch, Wiltrud. 2007. The construction of vagueness. “sort of” expressions in romance languages. In Günter Radden, Klaus-Michael Köpcke, Thomas Berg & Peter Siemund (eds.), Aspects of meaning construction, 225–245. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.10.1075/z.136.15mihSearch in Google Scholar

Mihatsch, Wiltrud. 2009. L’approximation entre sens et signification: Un tour d’horizon. In Dominique Verbeken (ed.), Entre sens et signification. constitution du sens: Points de vue sur l’articulation sémantique-pragmatique, 125–143. Paris: L’Harmattan.Search in Google Scholar

Mihatsch, Wiltrud. 2010. The diachrony of rounders and adaptors: Approximation and unidirectional change. In Gunther Kaltenböck, Wiltrud Mihatsch & Stefan Schneider (eds.), New approaches to hedging, 93–122. Bingley: Emerald.10.1163/9789004253247Search in Google Scholar

Mihatsch, Wiltrud. 2016. Type-noun binominals in four romance languages. Languages Sciences 53. 136–159.10.1016/j.langsci.2015.05.009Search in Google Scholar

Noailly, Michèle. 2006. Quoi de neuf côté prépositions ? Modèles linguistiques 27-1(53). 75–90.10.4000/ml.521Search in Google Scholar

Overstreet, Maryann E. 1995. The form and function of general extenders in English interactive discourse. University of Hawai’i dissertation.Search in Google Scholar

Overstreet, Maryann E. & George Yule. 1997. On being inexplicit and stuff in contemporary American English. Journal of English Linguistics 25(3). 250–258.10.1177/007542429702500307Search in Google Scholar

Peirce, Charles Sanders. 1902. Vague. In James M. Baldwin (ed.), Dictionary of philosophy and psychology, 748. New York: MacMillan.Search in Google Scholar

PR=Rey-Debove, Josette & Alain Rey (eds.). 2018. Le Petit Robert. Dictionnaire alphabétique et analogique de la langue française. Paris: Dictionnaires Le Robert.Search in Google Scholar

Rosch, Eleanor. 1973. Natural categories. Cognitive Psychology 4. 328–350.10.1016/0010-0285(73)90017-0Search in Google Scholar

Rosch, Eleanor. 1975. Cognitive representations of semantic categories. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 104. 192–233.10.1037/0096-3445.104.3.192Search in Google Scholar

Rosch, Eleanor, Caroline B. Mervis, Wayne D. Gray, David M. Johnson & Penny Boyes-Braem. 1976. Basic objects in natural categories. Cognitive Psychology 8. 382–439.10.1037/e666602011-017Search in Google Scholar

Rosier, Laurence. 2000. Les petits “rapporteurs” de discours. In Paulo De Carvalho & Laurence Labrune (eds.), Grammaticalisation 1. (dé)motivation et contrainte, 209–229. Rennes: Presses Universitaires de Rennes.Search in Google Scholar

Rosier, Laurence. 2002. Genre: Le nuancier de sa grammaticalisation. Travaux de linguistique 44. 79–88.10.3917/tl.044.0079Search in Google Scholar

Rosier, Laurence. 2005. La polysémie des mots genre, style, type. In Olivier Soutet (ed.), La polysémie, 231–243. Paris: Presses de l’Université Paris-Sorbonne.Search in Google Scholar

Schmid, Hans-Jörg. 1997. Constant and ephemeral hypostatization: Thing, problem and other “shell nouns”. In Proceedings of the 16^th international congress of linguists.Search in Google Scholar

Schmid, Hans-Jörg. 2000. English abstract nouns as conceptual shells. From corpus to cognition. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110808704Search in Google Scholar

Selting, Margret. 2007. Lists as embedded structures and the prosody of list construction as an interactional resource. Journal of Pragmatics 39. 483–526.10.1016/j.pragma.2006.07.008Search in Google Scholar

Smith, Linda B. & Larissa K. Samuelson. 1997. Perceiving and remembering: Category stability, variability and development. In Koen Lamberts & David Shanks (eds.), Knowledge, concepts and categories, 161–195. Hove: Psychology Press.10.7551/mitpress/4071.003.0009Search in Google Scholar

Vendler, Zeno. 1968. Adjectives and nominalizations. The Hague/Paris: Mouton.Search in Google Scholar

Voghera, Miriam. 2013. A case study on the relationship between grammatical change and synchronic variation: Emergence of tipo_[−N] in Italian. In Anna Giacalone Ramat, Caterina Mauri & Piera Molinelli (eds.), Synchrony and diachrony. A dynamic interface, 283–311. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.10.1075/slcs.133.12vogSearch in Google Scholar

Yaguello, Marina. 1998. Genre, une particule d’un genre nouveau. In Petits faits de langue, 18–24. Paris: Le Seuil.Search in Google Scholar