Categorization via exemplification: evidence from Italian

References

Aijmer, Karin. 1991. I think – An English modal particle. In Toril Swan & Olaf Jansen Westvik (eds.), Modality in Germanic languages: Historical and comparative perspectives, 1–47. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110889932.1Search in Google Scholar

Barotto, Alessandra. 2016. Exemplification and Categorization: The case of Japanese. University of Bergamo dissertation.Search in Google Scholar

Barotto, Alessandra & Caterina Mauri. 2016. Constructing lists for constructing categories. Paper presented at the 50th Società Linguistica Italiana Conference, University of Milano-Bicocca, 22-24 September.Search in Google Scholar

Barsalou, Lawrence W. 1983. Ad hoc categories. Memory and Cognition 11(3). 211–227.10.3758/BF03196968Search in Google Scholar

Barsalou, Lawrence W. 2010. Ad hoc categories. In Patrick C. Hogan (ed.), The Cambridge encyclopedia of the language sciences, 87–88. New York: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Bazzanella, Carla. 1995. I segnali discorsivi. In Lorenzo Renzi, Giampaolo Salvi & Anna Cardinaletti (eds.), Grande Grammatica italiana di consultazione. III Tipi di frase, deissi, formazione delle parole, 225–257. Bologna: Il Mulino.Search in Google Scholar

Blakemore, Diane. 1993. The relevance of reformulations. Language Literature 2. 101–120.10.1177/096394709300200202Search in Google Scholar

Caffi, Claudia. 2007. Mitigation. Amsterdam: Elsevier.10.1016/B0-08-044854-2/00392-8Search in Google Scholar

Channell, Joanna. 1994. Vague Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Croft, William & Alan D. Cruse. 2004. Cognitive Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511803864Search in Google Scholar

Fiorentini, Ilaria & Andrea Sansò. 2017. Reformulation markers and their functions: Two case studies from Italian. Journal of Pragmatics 120. 54–72.10.1016/j.pragma.2017.08.010Search in Google Scholar

Givón, Talmy. 1983. Topic continuity in discourse: A quantitative cross-language study. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/tsl.3Search in Google Scholar

Hyland, Ken. 2007. Applying a gloss: Exemplifying and reformulating in academia discourse. Applied Linguistics 28(2). 266–285.10.1093/applin/amm011Search in Google Scholar

König, Ekkehard & Peter Siemund. 2007. Speech act distinctions in grammar. In Timothy Shopen (ed.), Language typology and linguistic description, 2nd edn., 276–324 Cambridge: CUP.10.1017/CBO9780511619427.005Search in Google Scholar

Longacre, Robert E. 1983. The grammar of discourse. New York, NY: Plenum Press.Search in Google Scholar

Lyons, John. 1977. Semantics, vol. 1. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Lyons, John. 1995. Linguistic semantics: An introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511810213Search in Google Scholar

Manzotti, Emilio. 1998. L’esempio. Natura, definizioni, problemi. Cuadernos de Filología Italiana 5. 99–123.Search in Google Scholar

Masini, Francesca & Paola Pietrandrea. 2010. Magari. Cognitive Linguistics 21. 75–121.10.1515/cogl.2010.003Search in Google Scholar

Mauri, Caterina. 2017. Building and interpreting ad hoc categories: a linguistic analysis. In Joanna Blochowiak, Cristina Grisot, Stephanie Durrleman & Cristopher Laenzlinger (eds.), Formal models in the study of language, 297–326. Cham: Springer.10.1007/978-3-319-48832-5_16Search in Google Scholar

Mauri, Caterina & Sansò Andrea. 2018. Strategie linguistiche per la costruzione on-line di categorie: Un quadro tipologico. In Sandro Caruana & Joseph M. Brincat (eds.), Tipologia e ‘dintorni’. Il metodo tipologico alla intersezione di piani d’analisi. Atti del XLIX Convegno della Società di Linguistica Italiana, 209–232. Roma: Bulzoni.Search in Google Scholar

Overstreet, Maryann. 1999. Whales, candlelight, and stuff like that: General extenders in English discourse. New York: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780195125740.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Rosch, Eleanor. 1973. Natural Categories. Cognitive Psychology 4. 328–350.10.1016/0010-0285(73)90017-0Search in Google Scholar

Rosch, Eleanor. 1975. Cognitive representations of semantic categories. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 104(3). 192–233.10.1037/0096-3445.104.3.192Search in Google Scholar

Rosch, Eleanor. 1978. Principles of Categorization. In Rosch Eleanor & Barbara B. Lloyd (eds.), Cognition and categorization, 27–48. Hillsdale, N. J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.10.4324/9781032633275-4Search in Google Scholar

Schneider, Stefan. 2007a. Reduced parenthetical clauses as mitigators. A corpus study of spoken French, Italian and Spanish. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Benjamins.10.1075/scl.27Search in Google Scholar

Schneider, Stefan. 2007b. Reduced parenthetical clauses in Romance languages. In Nicole Dehé & Yordanka Kavalova (eds.), Parentheticals, 237–258. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Benjamins.10.1075/la.106.13schSearch in Google Scholar

Taylor, John R. 1995. Linguistic categorization. Prototypes in linguistic theory. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Search in Google Scholar

Voghera, Miriam. 2013. Tipi di tipo nel parlato e nello scritto. In Immacolata, Tempesta & Massimo, Vedovelli (eds.), Di Linguistica e di Sociolinguistica, Studi offerti a Norbert Dittmar, 185–195. Roma: Bulzoni.Search in Google Scholar

Voghera, Miriam, Claudio Iacobini, Renata Savy, Francesco Cutugno, Aurelio De Rosa & Iolanda Alfano. 2014. VoLIP: a searchable Italian spoken corpus, in Complex Visibles Out There. In Ludmila Veselovská & Markéta Janebová (eds.), Proceedings of the Olomouc Linguistics Colloquium: Language Use and Linguistic Structure, 628–640. Olomouc: Palacký University.Search in Google Scholar

Wittgenstein, Ludwig. 1953. Philosophical investigations. Oxford: Blackwell, and New York: Macmillan.Search in Google Scholar

Corpora

Coris Corpus http://corpora.dslo.unibo.it/TCORIS/Search in Google Scholar

Lip Corpus http://badip.uni-graz.atSearch in Google Scholar

Nunc Corpus http://www.corpora.unito.it/it/cqpmode/Search in Google Scholar