Home Philosophy Kant’s Conception of Value – Realistic Enough?
Chapter
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Kant’s Conception of Value – Realistic Enough?

  • Gerhard Schönrich
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill
Kant’s Theory of Value
This chapter is in the book Kant’s Theory of Value

Abstract

Whether Kant’s conception of value is to be reconstructed realistically or anti-realistically is determined by the question of how the grounding of value and normativity in the “rational nature” of human beings (GMS, AA 04: 428.07-11) is to be understood. Are values dependent on pro-attitudes or do they exist in a robust sense as metaphysically independent entities, and what does the answer to this question mean for the fundamental value of the rational nature? Both outright realism in its varieties and outright anti-realism fail to overcome insurmountable difficulties. Kant’s fitting attitude account that can solve the dilemma is a moderate anti-realism that embraces a central realist insight. Pro-attitudes need not simply fit the object of the attitude. They must meet an inherent correctness condition if they are to be indicative of value. A fact or property is valuable if it could be valued by an agent in a correct pro-setting. Yet does this not simply replace the metaphysical value fact of realism with an equally queer normative fact of correctness? This fact would be strange only if it had to be judged from a standpoint outside the normative considerations, we have engaged in with the grounding question. Our rational nature turns out to be a reflexive value-fact.

Abstract

Whether Kant’s conception of value is to be reconstructed realistically or anti-realistically is determined by the question of how the grounding of value and normativity in the “rational nature” of human beings (GMS, AA 04: 428.07-11) is to be understood. Are values dependent on pro-attitudes or do they exist in a robust sense as metaphysically independent entities, and what does the answer to this question mean for the fundamental value of the rational nature? Both outright realism in its varieties and outright anti-realism fail to overcome insurmountable difficulties. Kant’s fitting attitude account that can solve the dilemma is a moderate anti-realism that embraces a central realist insight. Pro-attitudes need not simply fit the object of the attitude. They must meet an inherent correctness condition if they are to be indicative of value. A fact or property is valuable if it could be valued by an agent in a correct pro-setting. Yet does this not simply replace the metaphysical value fact of realism with an equally queer normative fact of correctness? This fact would be strange only if it had to be judged from a standpoint outside the normative considerations, we have engaged in with the grounding question. Our rational nature turns out to be a reflexive value-fact.

Downloaded on 5.11.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/9783110796056-003/html
Scroll to top button