Startseite Fold Bifurcation Caused by Pollution Emission in an OLG Economy
Artikel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert Erfordert eine Authentifizierung

Fold Bifurcation Caused by Pollution Emission in an OLG Economy

  • Dong Cao EMAIL logo , Lin Wang und Shouyang Wang
Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 17. September 2017
Veröffentlichen auch Sie bei De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to investigate the macroeconomic effect of pollution emission in an overlapping generation system. This is done through constructing an endogenous economy which generates pollution and environment deterioration. It shows how different level of pollution emission could cause complexity such as fold bifurcation in this system. In addition, numerical simulations are provided to show the emergency of complexity.


Supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (71303181), the Science Foundation of Ministry of Education of China (11YJC790004), China Postdoctoral Science Foundation Funded Project (2014M550864), and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities of China (K50511060001). This work is also supported by China Scholarship Council (201406965014) while the first author was visiting George Mason University and Research Funds for Research Base of Modern Service Industry in Hunan Province (16jdmszd01)


References

[1] Cao D, Wang L, Wang Y. Endogenous fluctuations induced by nonlinear pollution accumulation in an OLG economy and the bifurcation control. Economic Modelling, 2011 28(6): 2528–2531.10.1016/j.econmod.2011.07.016Suche in Google Scholar

[2] Hofer C, Cantor D E, Dai J. The competitive determinants of a firm’s environmental management activities: Evidence from US manufacturing industries. Journal of Operations Management, 2012, 30(1–2): 69–84.10.1016/j.jom.2011.06.002Suche in Google Scholar

[3] Gutierrez M J. Dynamic inefficiency in an overlapping generation economy with pollution and health costs. Journal of Pubilic Economic Theory, 2008, 10(4): 563–594.10.1111/j.1467-9779.2008.00377.xSuche in Google Scholar

[4] Pindyck R S. Uncertainty in environmental economics. Rreview of environmental economics and policy, 2007, 1(1): 45–65.10.1093/reep/rem002Suche in Google Scholar

[5] Xepapadeas A. Environmental policy design and dynamic nonpoint-source pollution. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 1992, 23(1): 22–39.10.1016/0095-0696(92)90039-YSuche in Google Scholar

[6] Xepapadeas A. Economic growth and the environment. Ed. by Mler K G and Vincent J R. Handbook of Environmental Economics, Elsevier, North Holland, Edition 1, Volume 3, Chapter 23, 2005: 1219–1271.10.1016/S1574-0099(05)03023-8Suche in Google Scholar

[7] Zivin J S G, Kotchen M J, Mansur E T. Spatial and temporal heterogeneity of marginal emissions: Implications for electric cars and other electricity-shifting policies. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 2014, 107(part A): 248–268.10.3386/w18462Suche in Google Scholar

[8] Coondoo D, Dinda S. Causality between income and emission: A country group-specific econometric analysis. Ecological Economics, 2002, 40(3): 351–367.10.1016/S0921-8009(01)00280-4Suche in Google Scholar

[9] Kaufmann R K, Davidsdottir B, Garnham S, et al. The determinants of atmospheric SO2 concentrations: Reconsidering the environmental Kuznets curve. Ecological Economics, 1998, 25(2): 209–220.10.1016/S0921-8009(97)00181-XSuche in Google Scholar

[10] De Bruyn S M, Van den Bergh J C J M, Opschoor J B. Economic growth and emissions: Reconsidering the empirical basis of environmental Kuznets curves, Ecological Economics, 1998, 25(2): 161–175.10.1016/S0921-8009(97)00178-XSuche in Google Scholar

[11] Saltari E, Travaglini G. Pollution control under emission constraints: Switching between regimes. Energy Economics, 2016, 53: 212–219.10.1016/j.eneco.2014.07.010Suche in Google Scholar

[12] Arrow K, Bolin B, Costanza R, et al. Economic growth, carrying capacity, and the environment. Ecological Applications, 1996, 6(1): 13–15.10.2307/2269539Suche in Google Scholar

[13] Crepin A S, Lindahl T. Grazing games: Sharing common property resources with complex dynamics. Environmental and Resource Economics, 2009, 44(1): 29–46.10.1007/s10640-008-9258-0Suche in Google Scholar

[14] Le Kama A D A. Sustainable growth, renewable resources and pollution. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 2001, 25(12): 1911–1918.10.1016/S0165-1889(00)00007-5Suche in Google Scholar

[15] Wirl F. Sustainable growth, renewable resources and pollution: Thresholds and cycles. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 2004, 28(6): 1149–1157.10.1016/S0165-1889(03)00077-0Suche in Google Scholar

[16] Seegmuller T, Verchère A. Pollution as a source of endogenous fluctuations and periodic welfare inequality in OLG economies. Economics Letters, 2004, 84(3): 363–369.10.1016/j.econlet.2004.03.006Suche in Google Scholar

[17] Schumachera I, Zou B. Pollution perception: A challenge for intergenerational equity. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 2008, 55(3): 296–309.10.1016/j.jeem.2007.12.001Suche in Google Scholar

[18] Fanti L, Gori L. Public health spending, old-age productivity and economic growth: Chaotic cycles under perfect foresight. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 2011, 78(1–2): 137–151.10.1016/j.jebo.2010.12.014Suche in Google Scholar

[19] Rosser Jr J B. Post Keynesian perspectives and complex ecologic-economic dynamics. Metroeconomica, 2011, 62(1): 96–121.10.1111/j.1467-999X.2010.04094.xSuche in Google Scholar

Received: 2016-9-21
Accepted: 2017-2-7
Published Online: 2017-9-17

© 2017 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Heruntergeladen am 27.10.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.21078/JSSI-2017-302-08/html
Button zum nach oben scrollen